Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Passive narcosis for anesthesia induction in cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus)

Abstract

Cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus) are widely used as animal models for infectious disease and immunological research. They emulate many aspects of human disease pathogenesis, and the introduction of cotton rat-specific immunological reagents, cell lines and sequencing of relevant genes have all helped to increase the popularity of this disease model. However, the use of cotton rats is problematic owing to their propensity for aggressive responses when handled, which can lead to escape, increased stress to the animals, and bites to staff. When cotton rats are co-housed, which is recommended under current social housing guidelines, these risks are increased. Here, we describe a method of isoflurane anesthesia induction in the home cage that reduces the risk of animal escape, minimizes stress during induction, and provides additional safety for staff. The method uses inexpensive materials that are widely available and can be easily disinfected. Our method also eliminates the need for expensive and cumbersome machines traditionally used with anesthetic chambers, and uses a minimal amount of inhalant anesthetic, saving resources and protecting staff from inhalation of leaked gas.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Image of typical filter-top isolation cages, each containing a single housing structure and a pair of cotton rats, were used for the experiment.
Figure 2
Figure 3: Image of 2-3 cotton balls inserted into the bottom of each tube just below the level of the holes shown in Figure 2.
Figure 4: Image of 2-3 mL of isoflurane slowly added via syringe or disposable pipette to each tube to prevent spillage and allow absorption into the cotton balls.
Figure 5: The cover from the isolation cage is quickly removed and the housing structure then covered with the anesthesia box being careful to ensure that both cotton rats (if co-housed) are captured inside the structure.
Figure 6: Once both animals are sternally recumbent, the anesthesia box is removed and set onto its lid to prevent anesthetic gas leakage.

References

  1. Jorquera, P.A., Anderson, L. & Tripp, R.A. Understanding respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) vaccine development and aspects of disease pathogenesis. Expert Rev. Vaccines 15, 173–187 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kolappaswamy, K. Susceptibility of Sigmodon hispidus. Lab Anim. (NY) 44, 199 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Grieves, J.L., Yin, Z., Durbin, R.K. & Durbin, J.E. Acute and chronic airway disease after human respiratory syncytial virus infection in cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus). Comp. Med. 65, 315–326 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Boukhvalova, M.S. & Blanco, J.C. The cotton rat Sigmodon hispidus model of respiratory syncytial virus infection. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 372, 347–358 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Prince, G.A., Jenson, A.B., Horswood, R.L., Camargo, E. & Chanock, R.M. The pathogenesis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in cotton rats. Am. J. Pathol. 93, 771–791 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dreizin, R.S., Vyshnevetskaia, L.O., Bagdamian, E.E., Iankevich, O.D. & Tarasova, L.B. Experimental RS virus infection of cotton rats. A viral and immunofluorescent study. Vopr. Virusol. 16, 670–676 (1971).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Green, M.G., Huey, D. & Niewiesk, S. The cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) as an animal model for respiratory tract infections with human pathogens. Lab Anim. (NY) 42, 170–176 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Niewiesk, S. & Prince, G. Diversifying animal models: the use of hispid cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus) in infectious diseases. Lab. Anim. 36, 357–372 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Blanco, J.C. et al. The cotton rat: an underutilized animal model for human infectious diseases can now be exploited using specific reagents to cytokines, chemokines, and interferons. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 24, 21–28 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Silverman, J. Use of the home cage as an anesthesia induction chamber. Lab Anim. (NY) 44, 257 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis, J.N., Caro, A., Spears, S. & Sharp, J. Response to protocol review scenario: chamber is preferred. Lab Anim. (NY) 44, 257 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gallaugher, L. & Goodchild, L. Response to protocol review scenario: consider the logistics. Lab Anim. (NY) 44, 258 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Na, J.J. & Rush, H.G. Response to protocol review scenario: a valid concern. Lab Anim. (NY) 44, 258 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cuddington, B., Verschoor, M. & Mossman, K. Handling of the cotton rat in studies for the pre-clinical evaluation of oncolytic viruses. J. Vis. Exp. 93, e52232 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chaoul, M. et al. Does occupational exposure to anesthetic gases lead to increase of pro-inflammatory cytokines? Inflamm. Res. 64, 939–942 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith, J.C. & Bolon, B. Comparison of three commercially available activated charcoal canisters for passive scavenging of waste isoflurane during conventional rodent anesthesia. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 42, 10–15 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith, J.C. & Bolon, B. Atmospheric waste isoflurane concentrations using conventional equipment and rat anesthesia protocols. Contemp. Top. Lab. Anim. Sci. 41, 10–17 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ayers, J.D., Rota, P.A., Collins, M.L. & Drew, C.P. Alternatives to retroorbital blood collection in hispid cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus). J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 51, 239–245 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project described was supported by Artificial Cell Technologies, New Haven, CT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph A. Tripp.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Video 1

Video depicting passive narcosis procedure for cotton rats (MP4 26319 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hanson, J., Anderson, L., Williams, C. et al. Passive narcosis for anesthesia induction in cotton rats (Sigmodon hispidus). Lab Anim 45, 333–337 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/laban.1084

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing