Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Changing work stressors and coping resources influence blood pressure and hypertension incidence in a large OHSPIW cohort

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 31, pages 313–319 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Psychosocial work environments may adversely influence blood pressure, but the benefits of altering these factors and introducing coping resources is unclear. We examined whether changing work stressors and coping resources affect the risk of hypertension and elevated BP. A total of 13,145 workers from the Occupational Health Study of Petroleum Industry Workers were included in this study. A baseline evaluation of work-related stress and coping resources was followed up in all participants after 12 years. The changes in task stressors and coping resources were measured using the Occupation Stress Inventory-Revised Edition, and changes in job control and organizational stressors were evaluated using the Instrument for Stress-Related Job Analysis (v. 6.0). Elevated hypertension incidence and BP were associated with increased task and organizational stressors, together with decreased job control and reduced coping resources. Gender-specific differences were observed in the factors influencing BP. The main risk factor was decreased self-care in males (3.11 mm Hg) and increased responsibility in females (2.84 mm Hg). The present study demonstrated that promoting such factors at the task-, individual-, and organizational level may help improve cardiovascular health.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 2224–2260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J . Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005; 365: 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Babu GR, Jotheeswaran AT, Mahapatra T, Mahapatra S, Kumar AS, Detels R et al. Is hypertension associated with job strain? A meta-analysis of observational studies. Postgrad Med J 2014; 90: 402–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cuffee Y, Ogedegbe C, Williams NJ, Ogedegbe G, Schoenthaler A . Psychosocial risk factors for hypertension: an update of the literature. Curr Hypertens Rep 2014; 16: 483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gilbert-Ouimet M, Trudel X, Brisson C, Milot A, Vezina M . Adverse effects of psychosocial work factors on blood pressure: systematic review of studies on demand-control-support and effort-reward imbalance models. Scand J Work Environ Health 2014; 40: 109–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenthal T, Alter A . Occupational stress and hypertension. J Am Soc Hypertens 2012; 6: 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karasek RA . Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Administr Sci Quart 1979; 24: 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Siegrist J . Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol 1996; 1: 27–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fauvel JP, M'Pio I, Quelin P, Rigaud JP, Laville M, Ducher M . Neither perceived job stress nor individual cardiovascular reactivity predict high blood pressure. Hypertension 2003; 42: 1112–1116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman A, Mandryk JA, Frommer MS, Edye BV, Ferguson DA . Chronic perceived work stress and blood pressure among Australian government employees. Scand J Work Environ Health 1990; 16: 258–269.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Trudel X, Brisson C, Milot A, Masse B, Vezina M . Adverse psychosocial work factors, blood pressure and hypertension incidence: repeated exposure in a 5-year prospective cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2016; 70: 402–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Guimont C, Brisson C, Dagenais GR, Milot A, Vezina M, Masse B et al. Effects of job strain on blood pressure: a prospective study of male and female white-collar workers. Am J Public Health 2006; 96: 1436–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schnall PL, Schwartz JE, Landsbergis PA, Warren K, Pickering TG . A longitudinal study of job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: results from a three-year follow-up. Psychosom Med 1998; 60: 697–706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Markovitz JH, Matthews KA, Whooley M, Lewis CE, Greenlund KJ . Increases in job strain are associated with incident hypertension in the CARDIA Study. Ann Behav Med 2004; 28: 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert-Ouimet M, Brisson C, Vezina M, Milot A, Blanchette C . Repeated exposure to effort-reward imbalance, increased blood pressure, and hypertension incidence among white-collar workers: effort-reward imbalance and blood pressure. J Psychosom Res 2012; 72: 26–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lamy S, De Gaudemaris R, Lepage B, Sobaszek A, Caroly S, Kelly-Irving M et al. Psychosocial and organizational work factors and incidence of arterial hypertension among female healthcare workers: results of the Organisation des Soins et Sante des Soignants cohort. J Hypertens 2014; 32: 1229–1236.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Modrek S, Cullen MR . Health consequences of the ‘Great Recession’ on the employed: evidence from an industrial cohort in aluminum manufacturing. Soc Sci Med 2013; 92: 105–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Radi S, Lang T, Lauwers-Cances V, Diene E, Chatellier G, Larabi L et al. Job constraints and arterial hypertension: different effects in men and women: the IHPAF II case control study. Occup Environ Med 2005; 62: 711–717.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Smith P, Beaton D . Measuring change in psychosocial working conditions: methodological issues to consider when data are collected at baseline and one follow-up time point. Occup Environ Med 2008; 65: 288–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobson NS, Truax P . Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59: 12–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Osipow SH . Occupational Stress Inventory Revised Edition (OSI-R). Psychol Assess Resources Inc: Columbus, USA, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Semmer NK, Zapf D, Dunckel H. Instrument zur Stressbezogenen Tätigkeits analyse ISTA. In: Dunckel (Hrsg.). H (ed).Handbuch Psychologischer Arbeitsanalyseverfahren. Hochschulverlag: Zürich, Switzerland, 1999, pp 179–204.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frohlich ED . Recommendations for blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometry. Ann Intern Med 1988; 109: 612.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. O'Brien E, Coats A, Owens P, Petrie J, Padfield PL, Littler WA et al. Use and interpretation of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: recommendations of the British hypertension society. Br Med J 2000; 320: 1128–1134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Li J, Lan YJ, Wang ZM, Wang MZ, Wang MZ, Liu GQ . The test of occupational stress inventory revised edition. Chin J Ind Hyg Occup Dis 2001; 19: 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wu H, Zhao Y, Wang JN, Wang L . Factors associated with occupational stress among Chinese doctors: a cross-sectional survey. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2010; 83: 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang X, Wang L, Ge C, Hu B, Chi T . Factors associated with occupational strain among Chinese teachers: a cross-sectional study. Public Health 2011; 125: 106–113.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yulong L, Jiwen L, Chen Z, Fang Y . Assessment on reliability and validity of instrument for stress-related job analysis 6.0. Chin J Ind Hyg Occup Dis 2007; 25: 730–734.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Frese M . Stress at work and psychosomatic complaints: a causal interpretation. J Appl Psychol 1985; 70: 314–328.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Clougherty JE, Eisen EA, Slade MD, Kawachi I, Cullen MR . Gender and sex differences in job status and hypertension. Occup Environ Med 2010; 68: 16–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Backe EM, Seidler A, Latza U, Rossnagel K, Schumann B . The role of psychosocial stress at work for the development of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2012; 85: 67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Steptoe A, Willemsen G . The influence of low job control on ambulatory blood pressure and perceived stress over the working day in men and women from the Whitehall II cohort. J Hypertens 2004; 22: 915–920.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Landsbergis PA, Dobson M, Koutsouras G, Schnall P . Job strain and ambulatory blood pressure: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Am J Public Health 2013; 103: e61–e71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Trudel X, Brisson C, Milot A, Masse B, Vezina M . Psychosocial work environment and ambulatory blood pressure: independent and combined effect of demand-control and effort-reward imbalance models. Occup Environ Med 2013; 70: 815–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Smith PM, Mustard CA, Lu H, Glazier RH . Comparing the risk associated with psychosocial work conditions and health behaviours on incident hypertension over a nine-year period in Ontario, Canada. Can J Public Health 2013; 104: e82–e86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Niedhammer I, Sultan-Taieb H, Chastang JF, Vermeylen G, Parent-Thirion A . Exposure to psychosocial work factors in 31 European countries. Occup Med (Lond) 2012; 62: 196–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Arcury TA, O'Hara H, Grzywacz JG, Isom S, Chen H, Quandt SA . Work safety climate, musculoskeletal discomfort, working while injured, and depression among migrant farmworkers in North Carolina. Am J Public Health 2012; 102: S272–S278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schutte AE, Ware LJ, Huisman HW, Fourie CM, Greeff M, Khumalo T et al. Psychological distress and the development of hypertension over 5 years in black South Africans. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2015; 17: 126–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bosworth HB, Dubard CA, Ruppenkamp J, Trygstad T, Hewson DL, Jackson GL . Evaluation of a self-management implementation intervention to improve hypertension control among patients in Medicaid. Transl Behav Med 2011; 1: 191–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Huttunen-Lenz M, Song F, Poland F . Are psychoeducational smoking cessation interventions for coronary heart disease patients effective? Meta-analysis of interventions. Br J Health Psychol 2010; 15: 749–777.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hinderliter AL, Sherwood A, Craighead LW, Lin PH, Watkins L, Babyak MA et al. The long-term effects of lifestyle change on blood pressure: one-year follow-up of the ENCORE study. Am J Hypertens 2014; 27: 734–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Bowen KS, Birmingham W, Uchino BN, Carlisle M, Smith TW, Light KC . Specific dimensions of perceived support and ambulatory blood pressure: which support functions appear most beneficial and for whom? Int J Psychophysiol 2013; 88: 317–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hardy ST, Loehr LR, Butler KR, Chakladar S, Chang PP, Folsom AR et al. Reducing the blood pressure-related burden of cardiovascular disease: impact of achievable improvements in blood pressure prevention and control. J Am Heart Assoc 2015; 4: e002276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dajun Zhang and his staff at the Central Hospital of Kelamayi City for carrying out the measurement of BP. This work was supported by research projects funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number 81260424, 81460489 and 81260425).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Y Lian and J Liu: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, China

    Y Lian, C Qi & J Xiao

  2. Division of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi, China

    Y Lian, N Tao, R Han, Y Jiang, S Guan, H Ge, L Ning & J Liu

Authors
  1. Y Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C Qi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R Han
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Y Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. H Ge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. L Ning
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. J Xiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. J Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y Lian.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Journal of Human Hypertension website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lian, Y., Qi, C., Tao, N. et al. Changing work stressors and coping resources influence blood pressure and hypertension incidence in a large OHSPIW cohort. J Hum Hypertens 31, 313–319 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2016.79

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2016.79

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links