Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED), a rare and heterogeneous hereditary disorder, is characterized by deficient development of multiple ectodermal structures including hair, sweat glands and teeth. If caused by mutations in the genes EDA, EDA1R or EDARADD, phenotypes are often very similar as the result of a common signaling pathway. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affecting any gene product in this pathway may cause inter- and intrafamilial variability. In a cohort of 124 HED patients, genotyping was attempted by Sanger sequencing of EDA, EDA1R, EDARADD, TRAF6 and EDA2R and by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Pathogenic mutations were detected in 101 subjects with HED, affecting EDA, EDA1R and EDARADD in 88%, 9% and 3% of the cases, respectively, and including 23 novel mutations. MLPA revealed exon copy-number variations in five unrelated HED families (two deletions and three duplications). In four of them, the genomic breakpoints could be localized. The EDA1R variant rs3827760 (p.Val370Ala), known to lessen HED-related symptoms, was found only in a single individual of Asian origin, but in none of the 123 European patients. Another SNP, rs1385699 (p.Arg57Lys) in EDA2R, however, appeared to have some impact on the hair phenotype of European subjects with EDA mutations.
Ectodermal dysplasia (ED) is a large and heterogeneous group of congenital disorders affecting the normal development of ectoderm-derived structures such as hair, nails, teeth and eccrine glands.1, 2 Hypohidrotic ED (HED), the most common form of ED, is characterized by a triad of hypotrichosis, missing teeth and hypo- or anhidrosis, which can lead to life-threatening hyperthermia.3 Furthermore, many patients with HED display some distinctive craniofacial characteristics including frontal bossing, sparse eyebrows, periorbital wrinkling and hyperpigmentation, prominent lips, protruding ears and peg-shaped teeth,4, 5 which may result in psychosocial problems.6, 7 Owing to the deficient development of eccrine glands, such as sebaceous, salivary, lacrimal, meibomian and submucous glands, many patients suffer from a very dry and eczematous skin, atrophic rhinitis, dry eyes and recurrent infections of the upper respiratory tract.4, 8, 9, 10, 11 Affected females frequently report a reduced ability to breast-feed, referable to the malformation of mammary glands.12 Breast development may be completely missing uni- or bilaterally.13, 14
The highly conserved ectodysplasin A signaling pathway has a crucial role in the embryonic development of ectodermal structures. It starts with binding of ectodysplasin A1 (EDA1; encoded by the gene EDA on the X chromosome, MIM *300451) to its receptor EDA1R (alternatively termed EDAR; encoded by EDA1R on chromosome 2, MIM *604095), which leads to recruitment of the EDAR-associated death domain adapter protein (EDARADD; encoded by EDARADD on chromosome 1, MIM *606603). EDARADD interacts with a complex consisting of tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (encoded by TRAF6 on chromosome 11, MIM *602355), transforming growth factor-beta-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) and TAK1-binding protein 2. This results in activation of the inhibitor of nuclear factor kappa-B kinase (IKK) complex, comprising the IKK subunit alpha (IKK1), the IKK subunit beta (IKK2) and the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cell (NF-κB) essential modulator (encoded by NEMO on the X chromosome, MIM *300248). The active IKK complex induces phosphorylation of the I-κB complex (inhibitors of NF-κB alpha/beta) and its proteasomal degradation, which enables translocation of the transcription factor NF-κB into the nucleus and transcription of several target genes. One of them is WNT10A (MIM *606268), mutations of which cause a partially overlapping phenotype of ED.15 The second isoform of ectodysplasin A, EDA2, binds to the ectodysplasin A2 receptor (EDA2R, previously termed XEDAR; encoded by EDA2R on Xq12, MIM *300276), that is assumed to lead to NF-κB activation similar to the ‘classical’ EDA1 pathway, although the exact role of EDA2R is not well understood.16, 17, 18
X-linked HED (MIM #305100), the most frequent subtype of HED, is caused by variations in EDA.19 More than 200 different mutations have been published.20 Most autosomal recessive (MIM #24900 and #614941) and autosomal dominant forms of HED (MIM #129490 and #614940) are due to mutations in EDA1R,21 with more than 40 different mutations published, or in EDARADD,22 with seven mutations known so far.14, 20 Single mutations in EDA2R and TRAF6 have also been reported to cause HED.23, 24 Previous investigations of potential genotype–phenotype correlations revealed intra- and interfamilial variabilities, not solely explicable by the patients’ mutations.25 The single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs3827760 (c.1109T>C; p.Val370Ala) in EDA1R, a gain-of-function allele with a high frequency in the East Asian and Native American population, has been associated with increased hair thickness and shovel-shaped incisors26, 27 and was found to attenuate the severity of X-linked HED-related symptoms in a family of Asian origin.28 The SNP rs1385699 (c.170G>A; p.Arg57Lys) in EDA2R with a high frequency in the European population (~70%), in contrast, has been associated with androgenetic alopecia.29 The locally diverging allele frequencies of the closely related genes EDA1R and EDA2R may be the result of positive selection of certain phenotypes.30, 31 This study aimed at detecting disease-causing mutations and phenotypically relevant polymorphisms of candidate genes in a large cohort of European HED patients, including genomic characterization of rare copy-number variations.
Subjects and methods
DNA samples from 68 male and 56 female patients with clinically evident HED (age range, 1–72 years) were investigated. All adults gave written informed consent to the use of their DNA for molecular analysis of HED-related genes and further genetic research; in the case of minors, parental consent was obtained.
Standard mutation analysis
Specific primers covering the exons and intron–exon boundaries of EDA, EDA1R, EDARADD, TRAF6 and EDA2R were designed using the online design and analysis tools ExonPrimer (https://ihg.gsf.de/ihg/ExonPrimer.html) and the In silico PCR tool from UCSC (https://genome.ucsc.edu/; specific primer sequences and thermal cycling conditions available upon request). Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples using a commercial kit (QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and analyzed by Sanger sequencing of individual genes. The Sequencher 4.8 software (Gene Codes Corporation, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; https://www.genecodes.com) was used for analysis of the electropherograms. All detected variants were assessed with the mutation prediction tools Mutation Taster (Charité, Berlin, Germany; Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK; http://www.mutationtaster.org) and NNSplice (Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project, Berkeley, CA, USA; http://www.fruitfly.org/seq_tools/splice.html).
Detection of exon copy-number aberrations by MLPA
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was performed with the commercial kit SALSA MLPA P183 EDA-EDAR-EDARADD probemix and SALSA MLPA EK1 reagent kit-Cy5 (MRC-Holland, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Fragment sizes were determined by capillary electrophoresis using a Beckman CEQ-8800 sequencer. Relative exon copy-numbers were calculated after normalization of the peak height value against the mean peak height value of a control group (at least two individuals of the same sex known to have normal gene dosage).
Primer arrangement and long-range PCR in special cases
Detection of genomic breakpoints in patients with exon duplications required long-range PCR (LongAmp Taq DNA Polymerase, New England Biolabs GmbH, Frankfurt am Main, Germany), as the largest intronic region with a putative breakpoint had a size of more than 340 000 base pairs (bps). Assuming that the duplicated exons were in direct tandem orientation, we designed a series of forward primers binding within the intronic region after the last duplicated exon and a series of reverse primers binding to the intronic region preceding the first duplicated exon. In order to narrow down candidate regions of deletion breakpoints, we designed and combined a series of primer pairs binding upstream and downstream of the deleted exons (specific primer sequences and thermal cycling conditions available upon request). For exact determination of the breakpoints within the fragments obtained, PCR products were sequenced as described above.
Pathogenic mutations in EDA, EDA1R or EDARADD were detected in 101 patients, including 23 novel (Table 1) and 24 known (Table 2) disease-causing mutations. Most of them were found in EDA (n=42), distributed over the regions encoding the intracellular domain, the furin cleavage site, the collagen-like domain and the tumor necrosis factor homology domain. Four novel mutations in EDA1R affected the extracellular and the death domain of the respective protein and one in EDARADD affected the region encoding the death domain. All variants absent from the Exome Aggregation Consortium control cohort have been included in the Leiden Open Variation Database (http://databases.lovd.nl/shared/variants?search_owned_by_=%3D%22Sigrun%20Wohlfart%22).
Genomic rearrangements affecting EDA
In all cases, where no disease-causing mutation could be identified in EDA, EDA1R or EDARADD by Sanger sequencing, MLPA analysis was performed to detect potential exon copy-number variations. This method revealed a hemizygous deletion of EDA exon 2 in one individual and hemizygous deletion of EDA exons 4–6 in another. Furthermore, three cases of hemizygous exon duplication within EDA, two affecting exon 2 and one affecting exons 3–8, became evident (Figure 1).
In order to confirm the results of this MLPA analysis with a non-quantitative method and for better understanding of the disease-causing recombination events, breakpoint mapping of the genomic rearrangements was performed. The recombination sites could be defined exactly in both cases of exon deletions and in the two cases with single-exon duplications, but not for the multiple-exon duplication. On the basis of our DNA-sequencing results, the deletion of exon 2 was designated as c.397−?_502+?del (p.Met133AlafsX112), with a fragment of 91 bp, which may originate either from intron 1 or intron 2 because of their sequence homology at this position (Figure 2a). The two breakpoints are located within long interspersed nuclear elements, namely L1PA2 (intron 1) and L1PA3 (intron 2). The breakpoint region in case of the deletion of exons 4–6, c.527-3066_793+1017del-ins8 (p.Lys177ValfsX17), additionally contains a small insertion of 8 bp (Figure 2b). One of the breakpoints lies closely to a microsatellite element consisting of a simple repeat of (CTCA)n (intron 3). The two cases of exon 2 duplication leading to the same change of the amino-acid sequence (p.Gly168AspfsX10) were shown to be independent, as different breakpoints in the intronic regions were found. The first duplication, with one of the breakpoints situated within a region of low complexity because of its high frequency of adenine repeats (intron 1), was named c.397-5858_502+3441dup (Figure 2c). The second one, named c.397-6070_502+3112dup (Figure 2d), has its breakpoints within the in long interspersed nuclear elements L2a (intron 2) and L1PA3 (intron 1).
Screening for the EDA1R variant rs3827760 (p.Val370Ala) and possible relevance of additional polymorphisms
The EDA1R variant rs3827760 was detected only in one of 124 individuals with clinically diagnosed HED. The hair phenotype (amount and color) of this male patient of Turkish (Asian) origin was rather normal for a Turkish boy.
We assessed various other SNPs that might be associated with phenotypic differences between HED patients (variants of intronic regions with no predicted influence on splicing excluded). In EDA, the known polymorphism rs140642493 (c.458G>A; p.Arg153His) possibly affecting the furin cleavage site of the respective protein was detected only in a single individual. Many of our patients carried the EDA1R variants rs260632 (c.750C>T) and rs12623957 (c.1056C>T), which seem to be irrelevant for the disease phenotype because they do not change the amino-acid sequence. Two polymorphisms of EDARADD, rs966365 (c.27G>A; p.Met9Ile) and rs604070 (c.369C>T), were found in our cohort, the latter of which without impact on the respective amino-acid sequence. Two more interesting polymorphisms, rs1385699 (c.170G>A; p.Arg57Lys) and rs1385698 (c.385A>G; p.Thr129Ala) of EDA2R, were detected in 86% and 100% of our male HED patients, respectively. Two patients without EDA2R rs1385699 had more and thicker hair than most other male subjects with HED.
HED is a rare congenital disorder with high clinical variability. In this genetic study on a large cohort of HED patients, we detected 47 different disease-causing mutations, 23 of which have not yet been reported and therefore widen the mutational spectrum of HED. Their distribution among EDA, EDA1R and EDARADD (88%, 9% and 3%, respectively) coincides with published data.20 Most of the mutations are situated in evolutionarily conserved and functionally relevant domains. In conclusion, the intra- and intergenic distributions of these variants confirm the mutational hotspots known from the literature.
Most of our HED patients had missense, nonsense or splice site mutations, small deletions or duplications, except for five families with rare genomic rearrangements, namely exon deletions and duplications in EDA. To date, few cases of such exon deletions and only one case of exon duplication in EDA have been reported.13 Genomic breakpoint mapping allowed us to confirm results of the MLPA analysis (a technique with an immanent risk of false-positive or -negative results) and to search for a common origin of variants in subjects with similar MLPA readouts. To our knowledge, this is the first report on breakpoints in EDA associated with exon duplication, whereas breakpoint characterization of an exon deletion in EDA has been published for a single individual.43 At least one of the two breakpoints of each exon duplication or deletion was found within or very close to repetitive elements like in long interspersed nuclear elements or microsatellites. Such elements make up more than one-third of the mammalian genome and are known to be frequently responsible for genomic rearrangements due to deficient replication.44, 45 Interestingly, neither our two cases of exon 2 duplication nor the case of exon 2 deletion and another one reported in the literature had any breakpoints in common, which excludes the possibility of a common ancestor. Independent recombination events with repetitive sequence motifs as driving forces seem to be responsible for these exon copy-number aberrations. In case of the large duplication of exons 3–8, however, we failed to localize the genomic breakpoints exactly, although various primer combinations were tried. Not all duplications are in direct tandem orientation; they may also arise as an inversion or extragenic copy, which makes breakpoint mapping much more difficult. We suspect exon copy-number aberrations to be an underestimated cause of HED and recommend the routine performance of MLPA analysis in all laboratories offering molecular diagnosis of this disorder.
Although HED patients often have a quite similar appearance, deviations in the degree of severity are observed. Some genotype–phenotype correlations have been evident with respect to the number and function of sweat glands,41 cutaneous signs and certain hair findings,25 and also to the number of teeth.36 Nevertheless, intrafamilial differences exist, which may be because of additional genetic factors, as already reported for the variant rs3827760 of EDA1R that seems to attenuate HED-related symptoms. In our cohort, HED patients with the EDA2R polymorphism rs1385699 appeared to have less and thinner hair compared with carriers of the wild-type allele, suggesting this variant to be an intensifier of HED-related hair issues. Nevertheless, further studies with larger numbers of participants are required to clarify whether there is a distinct association between the variant and phenotypes of hair and possibly other ectodermal structures. Furthermore, we suppose that more such gain-of-function alleles exist and that systematic mapping of all polymorphisms in genes relevant to ectodermal development will allow for clearer genotype–phenotype correlations.
Despite routine performance of MLPA analysis and screening for mutations in more than the usually investigated genes of the signaling pathway, we were unable to detect disease-causing mutations in a significant portion of our HED patients. Next-generation sequencing may offer better chances to establish a molecular diagnosis in such cases and may allow the detection of yet unknown variants in genes not considered so far.
Both a correct molecular diagnosis and more profound knowledge about genotype–phenotype correlations are required for valid assessments of the efficacy of a drug currently under investigation for use in newborn infants with HED (www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01775462 and NCT01992289).
Pinheiro, M. & Freire-Maia, N. Ectodermal dysplasias: a clinical classification and a causal review. Am. J. Med. Genet. 53, 153–162 (1994).
Priolo, M. & Lagana, C. Ectodermal dysplasias: a new clinical-genetic classification. J. Med. Genet. 38, 579–585 (2001).
Blüschke, G., Nüsken, K. D. & Schneider, H. Prevalence and prevention of severe complications of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia in infancy. Early Hum. Dev. 86, 397–399 (2010).
Clarke, A., Phillips, D. I., Brown, R. & Harper, P. S. Clinical aspects of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Arch. Dis. Child 62, 989–996 (1987).
Cluzeau, C., Hadj-Rabia, S., Jambou, M., Mansour, S., Guigue, P., Masmoudi, S. et al. Only four genes (EDA1, EDAR, EDARADD, and WNT10A) account for 90% of hypohidrotic/anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia cases. Hum. Mutat. 32, 70–72 (2011).
Tanner, B. A. Psychological aspects of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Birth Defects Orig. Artic. Ser. 24, 263–275 (1988).
Hummel, P. & Guddack, S. Psychosocial stress and adaptive functioning in children and adolescents suffering from hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Pediatr. Dermatol. 14, 180–185 (1997).
Nordgarden, H., Johannessen, S., Storhaug, K. & Jensen, J. L. Salivary gland involvement in hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Oral Dis. 4, 152–154 (1998).
Kaercher, T. Ocular symptoms and signs in patients with ectodermal dysplasia syndromes. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 242, 495–500 (2004).
Al-Jassim, A. H. & Swift, A. C. Persistent nasal crusting due to hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. J. Laryngol. Otol. 110, 379–382 (1996).
Dietz, J., Kaercher, T., Schneider, A. T., Zimmermann, T., Huttner, K., Johnson, R. et al. Early respiratory and ocular involvement in X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Eur. J. Pediatr. 172, 1023–1031 (2013).
Lindfors, P. H., Voutilainen, M. & Mikkola, M. L. Ectodysplasin/NF-kappaB signaling in embryonic mammary gland development. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia 18, 165–169 (2013).
Al Marzouqi, F., Michot, C., Dos Santos, S., Bonnefont, J. P., Bodemer, C. & Hadj-Rabia, S. Bilateral amastia in a female with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Br. J. Dermatol. 171, 671–673 (2014).
Wohlfart, S., Söder, S., Smahi, A. & Schneider, H. A novel missense mutation in the gene EDARADD associated with an unusual phenotype of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 170, 249–253 (2016).
Adaimy, L., Chouery, E., Megarbane, H., Mroueh, S., Delague, V., Nicolas, E. et al. Mutation in WNT10A is associated with an autosomal recessive ectodermal dysplasia: the odonto-onycho-dermal dysplasia. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 821–828 (2007).
Bayes, M., Hartung, A. J., Ezer, S., Pispa, J., Thesleff, I., Srivastava, A. K. et al. The anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia gene (EDA) undergoes alternative splicing and encodes ectodysplasin-A with deletion mutations in collagenous repeats. Hum. Mol. Genet. 7, 1661–1669 (1998).
Yan, M., Wang, L. C., Hymowitz, S. G., Schilbach, S., Lee, J., Goddard, A. et al. Two-amino acid molecular switch in an epithelial morphogen that regulates binding to two distinct receptors. Science 290, 523–527 (2000).
Verhelst, K., Gardam, S., Borghi, A., Kreike, M., Carpentier, I. & Beyaert, R. XEDAR activates the non-canonical NF-kappaB pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 465, 275–280 (2015).
Kere, J., Srivastava, A. K., Montonen, O., Zonana, J., Thomas, N., Ferguson, B. et al. X-linked anhidrotic (hypohidrotic) ectodermal dysplasia is caused by mutation in a novel transmembrane protein. Nat. Genet. 13, 409–416 (1996).
Trzeciak, W. H. & Koczorowski, R. Molecular basis of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: an update. J. Appl. Genet. 57, 51–61 (2016).
Monreal, A. W., Ferguson, B. M., Headon, D. J., Street, S. L., Overbeek, P. A. & Zonana, J. Mutations in the human homologue of mouse dl cause autosomal recessive and dominant hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Nat. Genet. 22, 366–369 (1999).
Headon, D. J., Emmal, S. A., Ferguson, B. M., Tucker, A. S., Justice, M. J., Sharpe, P. T. et al. Gene defect in ectodermal dysplasia implicates a death domain adapter in development. Nature 414, 913–916 (2001).
Wisniewski, S. A. & Trzeciak, W. H. A new mutation resulting in the truncation of the TRAF6-interacting domain of XEDAR: a possible novel cause of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. J. Med. Genet. 49, 499–501 (2012).
Wisniewski, S. A. & Trzeciak, W. H. A rare heterozygous TRAF6 variant is associated with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Br. J. Dermatol. 166, 1353–1356 (2012).
Burger, K., Schneider, A. T., Wohlfart, S., Kiesewetter, F., Huttner, K., Johnson, R. et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in boys with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 164a, 2424–2432 (2014).
Mou, C., Thomason, H. A., Willan, P. M., Clowes, C., Harris, W. E., Drew, C. F. et al. Enhanced ectodysplasin-A receptor (EDAR) signaling alters multiple fiber characteristics to produce the East Asian hair form. Hum. Mutat. 29, 1405–1411 (2008).
Kimura, R., Yamaguchi, T., Takeda, M., Kondo, O., Toma, T., Haneji, K. et al. A common variation in EDAR is a genetic determinant of shovel-shaped incisors. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 85, 528–535 (2009).
Cluzeau, C., Hadj-Rabia, S., Bal, E., Clauss, F., Munnich, A., Bodemer, C. et al. The EDAR370A allele attenuates the severity of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia caused by EDA gene mutation. Br. J. Dermatol. 166, 678–681 (2012).
Prodi, D. A., Pirastu, N., Maninchedda, G., Sassu, A., Picciau, A., Palmas, M. A. et al. EDA2R is associated with androgenetic alopecia. J. Invest. Dermatol. 128, 2268–2270 (2008).
Hillmer, A. M., Freudenberg, J., Myles, S., Herms, S., Tang, K., Hughes, D. A. et al. Recent positive selection of a human androgen receptor/ectodysplasin A2 receptor haplotype and its relationship to male pattern baldness. Hum. Genet. 126, 255–264 (2009).
Casto, A. M., Li, J. Z., Absher, D., Myers, R., Ramachandran, S. & Feldman, M. W. Characterization of X-linked SNP genotypic variation in globally distributed human populations. Genome Biol. 11, R10 (2010).
Monreal, A. W., Zonana, J. & Ferguson, B. Identification of a new splice form of the EDA1 gene permits detection of nearly all X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia mutations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 380–389 (1998).
Schneider, P., Street, S. L., Gaide, O., Hertig, S., Tardivel, A., Tschopp, J. et al. Mutations leading to X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia affect three major functional domains in the tumor necrosis factor family member Ectodysplasin-A. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 18819–18827 (2001).
RamaDevi, A. R., Reddy, E. C., Ranjan, S. & Bashyam, M. D. Molecular genetic analysis of patients from India with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia reveals novel mutations in the EDA and EDAR genes. Br. J. Dermatol. 158, 163–167 (2008).
van der Hout, A. H., Oudesluijs, G. G., Venema, A., Verheij, J. B. G. M., Mol, B. G. J., Rump, P. et al. Mutation screening of the Ectodysplasin-A receptor gene EDAR in hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 16, 673–679 (2008).
Zhang, J., Han, D., Song, S., Wang, Y., Zhao, H., Pan, S. et al. Correlation between the phenotypes and genotypes of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia and non-syndromic hypodontia caused by ectodysplasin-A mutations. Eur. J. Med. Genet. 54, e377–e382 (2011).
François, C. Dysplasie Ectodermique Hypohidrotique Liee a l’ x: Phenotypes Osseux et Dentaire Chez l’homme et la Souris Tabby 95 (Thèse de doctorat, Univ. Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, 2008).
Schneider, H. & Mühle, C. X-chromosomal insertions at a recurrent site causing ectodermal dysplasia. Eur. J. Dermatol. 19, 178–179 (2009).
Gunadi, Miura, K., Ohta, M., Sugano, A., Lee, M. J., Sato, Y. et al. Two novel mutations in the ED1 gene in Japanese families with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Pediatr. Res. 65, 453–457 (2009).
Salas-Alanis, J. C., Wozniak, E., Mein, C. A., Duran Mckinster, C. C., Ocampo-Candiani, J., Kelsell, D. P. et al. Mutations in EDA and EDAR genes in a large Mexican Hispanic cohort with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Ann. Dermatol. 27, 474–477 (2015).
Schneider, H., Hammersen, J., Preisler-Adams, S., Huttner, K., Rascher, W. & Bohring, A. Sweating ability and genotype in individuals with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. J. Med. Genet. 48, 426–432 (2011).
Arte, S., Parmanen, S., Pirinen, S., Alaluusua, S. & Nieminen, P. Candidate gene analysis of tooth agenesis identifies novel mutations in six genes and suggests significant role for WNT and EDA signaling and allele combinations. PLoS ONE 8, e73705 (2013).
Hayashi, R., Farooq, M., Fujikawa, H., Fujimoto, A., Hashimoto, T., Ito, M. et al. Case of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia caused by a large deletion mutation in the EDA gene. J. Dermatol. 40, 281–283 (2013).
Britten, R. J. & Kohne, D. E. Repeated sequences in DNA. Hundreds of thousands of copies of DNA sequences have been incorporated into the genomes of higher organisms. Science 161, 529–540 (1968).
Argueso, J. L., Westmoreland, J., Mieczkowski, P. A., Gawel, M., Petes, T. D. & Resnick, M. A. Double-strand breaks associated with repetitive DNA can reshape the genome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11845–11850 (2008).
We thank all patients and their families for participation in the study and Ida Allabauer for expert technical assistance. This work was funded partially by a grant from the German-Swiss-Austrian ectodermal dysplasia patient support group (to HS).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wohlfart, S., Hammersen, J. & Schneider, H. Mutational spectrum in 101 patients with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia and breakpoint mapping in independent cases of rare genomic rearrangements. J Hum Genet 61, 891–897 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2016.75
This article is cited by
No evidence for preferential X-chromosome inactivation as the main cause of divergent phenotypes in sisters with X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (2021)
Natural history of X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: a 5-year follow-up study
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (2020)
EDA, EDAR, EDARADD and WNT10A allelic variants in patients with ectodermal derivative impairment in the Spanish population
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (2019)