Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review
  • Published:

Cadmium exposure and risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort and case–control studies among general and occupational populations

Abstract

The association between cadmium exposure and risk of lung cancer is still unclear. We quantitatively reviewed the observational studies that investigated the association between cadmium exposure and lung cancer risk in both general and occupational populations published through April 2015. The final data set is comprised of three cohort studies in the general population totaling 22,551 participants (354 events) with a mean follow-up of 15 years, five occupational cohort studies including 4205 individuals (180 events) with an average follow-up of 31 years, and three occupational case–control studies including 4740 cases and 6268 controls. Comparing the highest to the lowest category of cadmium exposure, the weighted relative risk and 95% confidence interval of lung cancer in the general population was 1.42 (95% CI (0.91, 2.23)); the weighted risk estimates (95% CIs) of lung cancer in three occupational cohort studies and three case–control studies were 0.68 (95% CI (0.33, 1.41)) and 1.61 (95% CI (0.94, 2.75)), respectively. No linear association was found. When comparing participants exposed to cadmium with non-exposed based on available data, the association became statistically significant. According to findings from this meta-analysis, the possibility that cadmium exposure may increase risk of lung cancer cannot be completely ruled out in either general or occupational population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D . Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A . Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 2014; 64: 9–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beveridge R, Pintos J, Parent MÉ, Asselin J, Siemiatycki J . Lung cancer risk associated with occupational exposure to nickel, chromium VI, and cadmium in two population-based case-control studies in Montreal. Am J Ind Med 2010; 53: 476–485.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. Beryllium, cadmium, mercury, and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry: IARC, 1993.

  5. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Potential for human exposure. In: Toxicological Profile for Cadmium. 2011, 277–331.

  6. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Cadmium and Cadmium Compounds. 2011.

  7. Sorahan T, Lister A, Gilthorpe MS, Harrington JM . Mortality of copper cadmium alloy workers with special reference to lung cancer and non-malignant diseases of the respiratory system, 1946-92. Occup Environ Med 1995; 52: 804–812.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sorahan T, Esmen N . Lung cancer mortality in UK nickel-cadmium battery workers, 1947–2000. Occup Environ Med 2004; 61: 108–116.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Park RM, Stayner LT, Petersen MR, Finley-Couch M, Hornung R, Rice C . Cadmium and lung cancer mortality accounting for simultaneous arsenic exposure. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69: 303–309.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin J-C, Imbernon E, Goldberg M, Chevalier A, Bonenfant S . Occupational risk factors for lung cancer in the French electricity and gas industry a case-control survey nested in a cohort of active employees. Am J Epidemiol 2000; 151: 902–912.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mannetje A, Bencko V, Brennan P, Zaridze D, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Rudnai P et al. Occupational exposure to metal compounds and lung cancer. Results from a multi-center case–control study in Central/Eastern Europe and UK. Cancer Causes Control 2011; 22: 1669–1680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones S, Atkin P, Holroyd C, Lutman E, Batlle JV, Wakeford R et al. Lung cancer mortality at a UK tin smelter. Occup Med 2007; 57: 238–245.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Järup L, Bellander T, Hogstedt C, Spång G . Mortality and cancer incidence in Swedish battery workers exposed to cadmium and nickel. Occup Environ Med 1998; 55: 755–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Silvera SAN, Rohan TE . Trace elements and cancer risk: a review of the epidemiologic evidence. Cancer Causes Control 2007; 18: 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Verougstraete V, Lison D, Hotz P . Cadmium, lung and prostate cancer: a systematic review of recent epidemiological data. J Toxicol Environ Health Part B Crit Rev 2003; 6: 227–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nawrot TS, Martens DS, Hara A, Plusquin M, Vangronsveld J, Roels HA et al. Association of total cancer and lung cancer with environmental exposure to cadmium: the meta-analytical evidence. Cancer Causes Control 2015; 26: 1281–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Qian L, Nishijo M, Nakagawa H, Morikawa Y, Sakurai M, Nakamura K et al. Relationship between urinary cadmium and mortality in habitants of a cadmium-polluted area: a 22-year follow-up study in Japan. Chin Med J 2011; 124: 3504–3509.

    Google Scholar 

  18. García-Esquinas E, Pollan M, Tellez-Plaza M, Francesconi KA, Goessler W, Guallar E et al. Cadmium exposure and cancer mortality in a prospective cohort: the Strong Heart Study. Environ Health Perspect 2014; 122: 363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Adams SV, Passarelli MN, Newcomb PA . Cadmium exposure and cancer mortality in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cohort. Occup Environ Med 2012; 69: 153–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins J, Rothstein HR . Meta-regression. In: Introduction to Meta-analysis 2009, 187–203.

  21. Kazantzis G, Lam T-H, Sullivan KR . Mortality of cadmium-exposed workers: a five-year update. Scand J Work Environ Health 1988; 14: 220–223.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nawrot T, Plusquin M, Hogervorst J, Roels HA, Celis H, Thijs L et al. Environmental exposure to cadmium and risk of cancer: a prospective population-based study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7: 119–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Stayner L, Steenland K, Dosemeci M, Hertz-Picciotto I . Attenuation of exposure-response curves in occupational cohort studies at high exposure levels. Scand J Work Environ Health 2003; 29: 317–324.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Soerjomataram I, Oomen D, Lemmens V, Oenema A, Benetou V, Trichopoulou A et al. Increased consumption of fruit and vegetables and future cancer incidence in selected European countries. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 2563–2580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Source of funding: Drs. Xun and He were partially supported by grants from the NIH (R01HL081572, R01ES021735 and R03CA139261). The funding sources had no involvement in the study design; the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; the writing of the report; and the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ka He.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, C., Xun, P., Nishijo, M. et al. Cadmium exposure and risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis of cohort and case–control studies among general and occupational populations. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 26, 437–444 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.6

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links