Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

Exposure science will not increase protection of workers from asbestos-caused diseases: NIOSH fails to provide needed public health action and leadership

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  • Dement JM ., Harris Jr RL ., Symons MJ ., and Shy CM . Exposures and mortality among chrysotile asbestos workers. Part II: mortality. Am J Ind Med 1983: 4 (3): 421–433.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dement JM . Carcinogenicity of chrysotile asbestos: a case control study of textile workers. Cell Biol Toxicol 1991: 7 (1): 59–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RC . A worn-out welcome — renewed call for a global ban on asbestos. Environ Health Persp 2010: 118 (7): A289–A303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill BH . The environment and disease: association or causation — President's address. Proc R Soc Med 1965: 58: 295–299.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Howard J ., and Middendorf P . Exposure science can increase protection of workers and their families from exposure to asbestos and inform on the effects of other elongate mineral particles. J Exp Sci Environ Epi 2010, 485–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ILO (International Labour Organization). ILO adopts new measures on occupational safety and health, the employment relationship, asbestos. International Labour Organization 2006.

  • LaDou J ., Castleman B ., Frank A ., Gochfeld M ., Greenberg M ., and Huff J ., et al. The case for a global ban on asbestos. Environ Health Persp 2010: 118 (7): 897–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaDou J . The asbestos cancer epidemic. Environ Health Perspect 2004: 112 (3): 285–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIOSH. 2010, Asbestos fibers and other elongate mineral particles: state of the science and roadmap for research (draft 4, January 2010) http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/asbestos.

  • NIOSH. Revised recommended asbestos standard. US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Center for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 1976.

  • NTP RoC. Asbestos CAS No. 1332-21-4, 111-21-111-24. 11th Report on Carcinogens, National Toxicology Program. Research Triangle Park, NC, 2004.

  • Stayner L ., Smith R ., Bailer J ., Gilbert S ., Steenland K ., and Dement J ., et al. Exposure-response analysis of risk of respiratory disease associated with occupational exposure to chrysotile asbestos. Occ Env Med 1997: 54: 646–652.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Straif K ., Benbrahim-Tallaa L ., Bean R ., Grosse Y ., Secretan B ., and El Ghissassi F ., et al. A review of human carcinogens-part C, metals, arsenic, dusts, and fibres. Lancet Oncol 2009: 10: 453–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (World Health Organization). Elimination of Asbestos Related Diseases. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.

Download references

Acknowledgements

For disclosure purposes, the authors report their professional titles as follows: Richard A. Lemen, PhD, Assistant Surgeon General, USPHS (ret.), Deputy Director and Acting Director. NIOSH (ret.); Henry Anderson, MD, Chief Medical Officer, Wisconsin Division of Public Health; John C. Bailar III, MD, PhD, Professor Emeritus, University of Chicago, Scholar in Residence, The National Academies; Eula Bingham, PhD, Former Assistant Secretary, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Professor of Environmental Health, University of Cincinnati; Barry Castleman, ScD, Environmental Consultant, Baltimore, MD; Arthur L. Frank, MD, PhD, Drexel University School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA; James Huff PhD, Associate Director for Chemical Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Joseph LaDou MD, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco; James Melius, MD, DrPH, NYS Laborers Health and Safety Fund; Celeste Monforton, DrPH, MPH, Immediate-past Chair Occupational Health and Safety Section, American Public Health Association, Anthony Robhins, MD, Former Director, NIOSH, Professor of Public Health, Tufts University School of Medicine, and Co-Editor, Journal of Public Health Policy; Daniel Thau Teitelbaum, MD, Adjunet Professor, Occupational and Environmental Health Colorado School of Public Health; Laura S. Welch, MD, Professorial Lecturer, George Washington University, School of Public Health and Health Services.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lemen, R., Anderson, H., Bailar, J. et al. Exposure science will not increase protection of workers from asbestos-caused diseases: NIOSH fails to provide needed public health action and leadership. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 21, 114–115 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2010.53

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2010.53

Search

Quick links