Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Efficacy and safety of a newly developed polylactic acid microsphere as an injectable bulking agent for penile augmentation: 18-months follow-up


Polylactic acid (PLA) fillers are widely used for cosmetic volume augmentation. But, no study has evaluated the use of PLA filler in penile augmentation (PA No. 4). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a newly developed PLA filler for PA during a 18-month follow-up period. A total of 23 healthy adult men were prospectively enrolled between June and November 2012. Penile girth was measured at proximal-, mid- and distal-shaft at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 18 months following injection. Subjects’ satisfaction was assessed with visual analogue scale (VAS). Adverse events (AEs) were also reported. Mean injected volume was 20 ml. The circumference of proximal-, mid-, and distal-shaft increased by a mean of 2.2±0.2, 2.7±1.0 and 2.7±1.0 cm at 3 months, respectively (each P<0.001). No significant differences were noted in girth circumference between 3 and 18 months post-injection (each P>0.05). VAS score increased from 51.6±14.7 at baseline to 64.8±19.3 and 74.3±14.6 at 3 and 6 months, respectively (each P<0.05). Six cases of mild, transient treatment-emergent AEs were reported in 5 subjects. Serious AEs were not reported. In conclusion, penile injection of a newly developed PLA filler led to significant penile augmentative effects for up to 18 months and was well tolerated without serious AEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4


  1. Vardi Y, Gruenwald I . The status of penile enhancement procedures. Curr Opin Urol 2009; 19: 601–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg DJ . Breakthroughs in US dermal fillers for facial soft-tissue augmentation. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2009; 11: 240–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Glogau RG . Fillers: from the past to the future. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2012; 31: 78–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Funt D, Pavicic T . Dermal fillers in aesthetics: an overview of adverse events and treatment approaches. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2013; 6: 295–316.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Luebberding S, Alexiades-Armenakas M . Facial volume augmentation in 2014: overview of different filler options. J Drugs Dermatol 2013; 12: 1339–1344.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lowe NJ . Optimizing poly-L-lactic acid use. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2008; 10: 43–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ezzat WH, Keller GS . The use of poly-L-lactic acid filler in facial aesthetics. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27: 503–509.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SH, Ko K, Choo MS, Lee WK, Jeong HC, Cho ST et al. The effect and safety of polylactic acid and adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction cell as an injectable bulking agent in urologic field: a 24-week follow-up study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2015; 103: 440–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kontis TC . Contemporary review of injectable facial fillers. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15: 58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones DH . Semipermanent and permanent injectable fillers. Dermatol Clin 2009; 27: 433–444.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang DY, Lee WK, Kim SC . Tolerability and efficacy of newly developed penile injection of cross-linked dextran and polymethylmethacrylate mixture on penile enhancement: 6 months follow-up. Int J Impot Res 2013; 25: 99–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Buck DW 2nd, Alam M, Kim JY . Injectable fillers for facial rejuvenation: a review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith KC . Reversible vs. nonreversible fillers in facial aesthetics: concerns and considerations. Dermatol Online J 2008; 14: 3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gogolewski S, Jovanovic M, Perren SM, Dillon JG, Hughes MK . Tissue response and in vivo degradation of selected polyhydroxyacids: polylactides (PLA), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHB/VA). J Biomed Mater Res 1993; 27: 1135–1148.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwak TI, Oh M, Kim JJ, Moon, du G . The effects of penile girth enhancement using injectable hyaluronic acid gel, a filler. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 3407–3413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim JJ, Kwak TI, Jeon BG, Cheon J, Moon DG . Effects of glans penis augmentation using hyaluronic acid gel for premature ejaculation. Int J Impot Res 2004; 16: 547–551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kang DH, Chung JH, Kim YJ, Lee HN, Cho SH, Chang TH et al. Efficacy and safety of penile girth enhancement by autologous fat injection for patients with thin penises. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36: 813–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Panfilov DE . Augmentative phalloplasty. Aesth Plast Surg 2006; 30: 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yacobi Y, Tsivian A, Grinberg R, Kessler O . Short-term results of incremental penile girth enhancement using liquid injectable silicone: Words of praise for a change. Asian J Androl 2007; 9: 408–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vardi Y, Harshai Y, Gil T, Gruenwald I . A critical analysis of penile enhancement procedures for patients with normal penile size: surgical techniques, success, and complications. Eur Urol 2008; 54: 1042–1050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Casavantes L, Lemperle G, Morales P . Penile girth enhancement with polymethylmethacrylate-based soft tissue fillers. J Sex Med 2016; 13: 1414–1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Monheit GD, Coleman KM . Hyaluronic acid fillers. Dermatol Ther 2006; 19: 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim JE, Sykes JM . Hyaluronic acid fillers: history and overview. Facial Plast Surg 2011; 27: 523–528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hyun MY, Lee Y, No YA, Yoo KH, Kim MN, Hong CK et al. Efficacy and safety of injection with poly-L-lactic acid compared with hyaluronic acid for correction of nasolabial fold: a randomized, evaluator-blinded, comparative study. Clin Exp Dermatol 2015; 40: 129–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kim JH, Lee HJ, Song YS . Treatment of bladder dysfunction using stem cell or tissue engineering technique. Korean J Urol 2014; 55: 228–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. No YA, Seok J, Hyun MY, Kwon TR, Oh CT, Choi EJ et al. Long-term (24-month) safety evaluation of poly-DL-lactic acid filler injection for the nasolabial fold: a multicenter, open, randomized, evaluator-blind, active-controlled design. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135: 1074e–1075ee.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rotunda AM, Narins RS . Poly-L-lactic acid: a new dimension in soft tissue augmentation. Dermatol Ther 2006; 19: 151–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moon DG, Kwak TI, Kim JJ . Glans penis augmentation using hyaluronic acid gel as an injectable filler. World J Mens Health 2015; 33: 50–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Narins RS . Minimizing adverse events associated with poly-L-lactic acid injection. Dermatol Surg 2008; 34 (Suppl 1): S100–S104.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors were investigators on a clinical trial sponsored by REGEN Biotech, Inc., Seoul, Republic of Korea.


This trial was registered in WHO ICTRP (KCT0001827).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to W K Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, D., Ko, K., Lee, S. et al. Efficacy and safety of a newly developed polylactic acid microsphere as an injectable bulking agent for penile augmentation: 18-months follow-up. Int J Impot Res 29, 136–141 (2017).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


Quick links