Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Feline leukemia virus integrase and capsid packaging functions do not change the insertion profile of standard Moloney retroviral vectors

Subjects

Abstract

Adverse events linked to perturbations of cellular genes by vector insertion reported in gene therapy trials and animal models have prompted attempts to better understand the mechanisms directing viral vector integration. The integration profiles of vectors based on MLV, ASLV, SIV and HIV have all been shown to be non-random, and novel vectors with a safer integration pattern have been sought. Recently, we developed a producer cell line called CatPac that packages standard MoMLV vectors with feline leukemia virus (FeLV) gag, pol and env gene products. We now report the integration profile of this vector, asking if the FeLV integrase and capsid proteins could modify the MoMLV integration profile, potentially resulting in a less genotoxic pattern. We transduced rhesus macaque CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells with CatPac or standard MoMLV vectors, and determined their integration profile by LAM-PCR. We obtained 184 and 175 unique integration sites (ISs) respectively for CatPac and standard MoMLV vectors, and these were compared with 10 000 in silico-generated random IS. The integration profile for CatPac vector was similar to MoMLV and equally non-random, with a propensity for integration near transcription start sites and in highly dense gene regions. We found an IS for CatPac vector localized 715 nucleotides upstream of LMO-2, the gene involved in the acute lymphoblastic leukemia developed by X-SCID patients treated by gene therapy using MoMLV vectors. In conclusion, we found that replacement of MoMLV env, gag and pol gene products with FeLV did not alter the basic integration profile. Thus, there appears to be no safety advantage for this packaging system. However, considering the stability and efficacy of CatPac vectors, further development is warranted, using potentially safer vector backbones, for instance those with a SIN configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li Z, Dullmann J, Schiedlmeier B, Schmidt M, von Kalle C, Meyer J et al. Murine leukemia induced by retroviral gene marking. Science 2002; 296: 497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Seggewiss R, Pittaluga S, Adler RL, Guenaga FJ, Ferguson C, Pilz IH et al. Acute myeloid leukemia is associated with retroviral gene transfer to hematopoietic progenitor cells in a rhesus macaque. Blood 2006; 107: 3865–3867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Garrigue A, Wang GP, Soulier J, Lim A, Morillon E et al. Insertional oncogenesis in 4 patients after retrovirus-mediated gene therapy of SCID-X1. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 3132–3142.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Hacein-Bey-Abina S, Von Kalle C, Schmidt M, McCormack MP, Wulffraat N, Leboulch P et al. LMO2-associated clonal T cell proliferation in two patients after gene therapy for SCID-X1. Science 2003; 302: 415–419.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Howe SJ, Mansour MR, Schwarzwaelder K, Bartholomae C, Hubank M, Kempski H et al. Insertional mutagenesis combined with acquired somatic mutations causes leukemogenesis following gene therapy of SCID-X1 patients. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 3143–3150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Doty RT, Sabo KM, Chen J, Miller AD, Abkowitz JL . An all feline retroviral packaging system for transduction of human cells. Hum Gene Ther (in press).

  7. Donahue RE, Kirby MR, Metzger ME, Agricola BA, Sellers SE, Cullis HM . Peripheral blood CD34+ cells differ from bone marrow CD34+ cells in Thy-1 expression and cell cycle status in nonhuman primates mobilized or not mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and/or stem cell factor. Blood 1996; 87: 1644–1653.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Larochelle A, Choi U, Shou Y, Naumann N, Loktionova NA, Clevenger JR et al. In vivo selection of hematopoietic progenitor cells and temozolomide dose intensification in rhesus macaques through lentiviral transduction with a drug resistance gene. J Clin Invest 2009; 119: 1952–1963.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim YJ, Kim YS, Larochelle A, Renaud G, Wolfsberg TG, Adler R et al. Sustained high-level polyclonal hematopoietic marking and transgene expression 4 4 years after autologous transplantation of rhesus macaques with SIV lentiviral vector-transduced CD34+ cells. Blood 2009; 113: 5434–5443.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hematti P, Hong BK, Ferguson C, Adler R, Hanawa H, Sellers S et al. Distinct genomic integration of MLV and SIV vectors in primate hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. PLoS Biol 2004; 2: e423.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Wu X, Li Y, Crise B, Burgess SM . Transcription start regions in the human genome are favored targets for MLV integration. Science 2003; 300: 1749–1751.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mitchell RS, Beitzel BF, Schroder AR, Shinn P, Chen H, Berry CC et al. Retroviral DNA integration: ASLV, HIV, and MLV show distinct target site preferences. PLoS Biol 2004; 2: E234.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Crise B, Li Y, Yuan C, Morcock DR, Whitby D, Munroe DJ et al. Simian immunodeficiency virus integration preference is similar to that of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J Virol 2005; 79: 12199–12204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Schroder AR, Shinn P, Chen H, Berry C, Ecker JR, Bushman F . HIV-1 integration in the human genome favors active genes and local hotspots. Cell 2002; 110: 521–529.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nienhuis AW, Dunbar CE, Sorrentino BP . Genotoxicity of retroviral integration in hematopoietic cells. Mol Ther 2006; 13: 1031–1049.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregory TK, Wald D, Chen Y, Vermaat JM, Xiong Y, Tse W . Molecular prognostic markers for adult acute myeloid leukemia with normal cytogenetics. J Hematol Oncol 2009; 2: 23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Metais JY, Dunbar CE . The MDS1-EVI1 gene complex as a retrovirus integration site: impact on behavior of hematopoietic cells and implications for gene therapy. Mol Ther 2008; 16: 439–449.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aiuti A, Cassani B, Andolfi G, Mirolo M, Biasco L, Recchia A et al. Multilineage hematopoietic reconstitution without clonal selection in ADA-SCID patients treated with stem cell gene therapy. J Clin Invest 2007; 117: 2233–2240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cassani B, Montini E, Maruggi G, Ambrosi A, Mirolo M, Selleri S et al. Integration of retroviral vectors induces minor changes in the transcriptional activity of T cells from ADA-SCID patients treated with gene therapy. Blood 2009; 114: 3546–3556.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ott MG, Schmidt M, Schwarzwaelder K, Stein S, Siler U, Koehl U et al. Correction of X-linked chronic granulomatous disease by gene therapy, augmented by insertional activation of MDS1-EVI1, PRDM16 or SETBP1. Nat Med 2006; 12: 401–409.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Suzuki T, Shen H, Akagi K, Morse HC, Malley JD, Naiman DQ et al. New genes involved in cancer identified by retroviral tagging. Nat Genet 2002; 32: 166–174.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Shibagaki Y, Chow SA . Central core domain of retroviral integrase is responsible for target site selection. J Biol Chem 1997; 272: 8361–8369.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Harper AL, Sudol M, Katzman M . An amino acid in the central catalytic domain of three retroviral integrases that affects target site selection in nonviral DNA. J Virol 2003; 77: 3838–3845.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Barr SD, Ciuffi A, Leipzig J, Shinn P, Ecker JR, Bushman FD . HIV integration site selection: targeting in macrophages and the effects of different routes of viral entry. Mol Ther 2006; 14: 218–225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lucas ML, Seidel NE, Porada CD, Quigley JG, Anderson SM, Malech HL et al. Improved transduction of human sheep repopulating cells by retrovirus vectors pseudotyped with feline leukemia virus type C or RD114 envelopes. Blood 2005; 106: 51–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewinski MK, Bushman FD . Retroviral DNA integration—mechanism and consequences. Adv Genet 2005; 55: 147–181.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lewinski MK, Yamashita M, Emerman M, Ciuffi A, Marshall H, Crawford G et al. Retroviral DNA integration: viral and cellular determinants of target-site selection. PLoS Pathog 2006; 2: e60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Busschots K, Vercammen J, Emiliani S, Benarous R, Engelborghs Y, Christ F et al. The interaction of LEDGF/p75 with integrase is lentivirus-specific and promotes DNA binding. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 17841–17847.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fujino Y, Ohno K, Tsujimoto H . Molecular pathogenesis of feline leukemia virus-induced malignancies: insertional mutagenesis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2008; 123: 138–143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Johnson C, Lobelle-Rich PA, Puetter A, Levy LS . Substitution of feline leukemia virus long terminal repeat sequences into murine leukemia virus alters the pattern of insertional activation and identifies new common insertion sites. J Virol 2005; 79: 57–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Jean-Yves Métais would like to dedicate this paper to his grandmother Marie Pradier born Sautereau. This research was supported in part by the Intramural Research Programs of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute and the National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health. Raymond T Doty and Janis L Abkowitz are the inventors on a patent filed for the CatPac producer cell line, which may have potential for commercial use (patent application serial number 61/058,148). On request CatPac packaging cells will be supplied to academic investigators.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C E Dunbar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on Gene Therapy website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Métais, JY., Topp, S., Doty, R. et al. Feline leukemia virus integrase and capsid packaging functions do not change the insertion profile of standard Moloney retroviral vectors. Gene Ther 17, 799–804 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2010.24

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/gt.2010.24

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links