Original Research Article | Published:

Clinical validity of phenotype-driven analysis software PhenoVar as a diagnostic aid for clinical geneticists in the interpretation of whole-exome sequencing data

Genet Med | Download Citation




We sought to determine the diagnostic yield of whole-exome sequencing (WES) combined with phenotype-driven analysis of variants in patients with suspected genetic disorders.


WES was performed on a cohort of 51 patients presenting dysmorphisms with or without neurodevelopmental disorders of undetermined etiology. For each patient, a clinical geneticist reviewed the phenotypes and used the phenotype-driven analysis software PhenoVar (http://phenovar.med.usherbrooke.ca/) to analyze WES variants. The prioritized list of potential diagnoses returned was reviewed by the clinical geneticist, who selected candidate variants to be confirmed by segregation analysis. Conventional analysis of the individual variants was performed in parallel. The resulting candidate variants were subsequently reviewed by the same geneticist, to identify any additional potential diagnoses.


A molecular diagnosis was identified in 35% of the patients using the conventional analysis, and 17 of these 18 diagnoses were independently identified using PhenoVar. The only diagnosis initially missed by PhenoVar was rescued when the optional “minimal phenotypic cutoff” filter was omitted. PhenoVar reduced by half the number of potential diagnoses per patient compared with the conventional analysis.


Phenotype-driven software prioritizes WES variants, provides an efficient diagnostic aid to clinical geneticists and laboratories, and should be incorporated in clinical practice.

  • Subscribe to Genetics in Medicine for full access:



Additional access options:

Already a subscriber?  Log in  now or  Register  for online access.


  1. 1.

    & . Global burden of genetic disease and the role of genetic screening. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2015;20:354–363.

  2. 2.

    et al. The utility of the traditional medical genetics diagnostic evaluation in the context of next-generation sequencing for undiagnosed genetic disorders. Genet Med 2014;16:176–182.

  3. 3.

    et al. The genetic basis of Mendelian phenotypes: discoveries, challenges, and opportunities. Am J Hum Genet 2015;97:199–215.

  4. 4.

    et al. Effectiveness of exome and genome sequencing guided by acuity of illness for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders. Sci Transl Med 2014;6:265ra168.

  5. 5.

    et al. Genetic diagnosis of developmental disorders in the DDD study: a scalable analysis of genome-wide research data. Lancet 2015;385:1305–1314.

  6. 6.

    et al. Molecular findings among patients referred for clinical whole-exome sequencing. JAMA 2014;312:1870.

  7. 7.

    et al. Clinical application of whole-exome sequencing across clinical indications. Genet Med 2015;18:1–9.

  8. 8.

    et al. PhenoVar: a phenotype-driven approach in clinical genomics for the diagnosis of polymalformative syndromes. BMC Med Genomics 2014;7:22.

  9. 9.

    et al. Improved exome prioritization of disease genes through cross-species phenotype comparison. Genome Res 2014;24:340–348.

  10. 10.

    & . Phenotype-driven strategies for exome prioritization of human Mendelian disease genes. Genome Med 2015;7:81.

  11. 11.

    et al. Phevor combines multiple biomedical ontologies for accurate identification of disease-causing alleles in single individuals and small nuclear families. Am J Hum Genet 2014;94:599–610.

  12. 12.

    , & . Phenolyzer: phenotype-based prioritization of candidate genes for human diseases. Nat Methods 2015;12:841–843.

  13. 13.

    et al. Clinical diagnostics in human genetics with semantic similarity searches in ontologies. Am J Hum Genet 2009;85:457–464.

  14. 14.

    et al. Diagnosis of late-onset Pompe disease and other muscle disorders by next-generation sequencing. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2016;11:8.

  15. 15.

    , & . Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 2014;30:2114–2120.

  16. 16.

    et al. A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data. Brief Bioinform 2014;15:256–278.

  17. 17.

    et al. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet 2011;43:491–498.

  18. 18.

    et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118 ; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 2012;6:80–92.

  19. 19.

    et al. ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:D862–D868.

  20. 20.

    et al. Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans. Nature 2016;536:285–291.

  21. 21.

    & . BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 2010;26:841–842.

  22. 22.

    et al. Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence. Genome Res 2005;15:901–913.

  23. 23.

    & . Predicting deleterious amino acid substitutions. Genome Res 2001;11:863–874.

  24. 24.

    et al. A method and server for predicting damaging missense mutations. Nat Methods 2010;7:248–249.

  25. 25.

    , , & . MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods 2014;11:361–362.

  26. 26.

    et al. The phenotypic spectrum of Schaaf-Yang syndrome: 18 new affected individuals from 14 families. Genet Med 2017;19:45–52.

  27. 27.

    et al. Truncating mutations of MAGEL2 cause Prader-Willi phenotypes and autism. Nat Genet 2013;45:1405–1408.

  28. 28.

    et al. Extreme growth failure is a common presentation of ligase IV deficiency. Hum Mutat 2014;35:76–85.

  29. 29.

    et al. Diagnostic odyssey in severe neurodevelopmental disorders: toward clinical whole-exome sequencing as a first-line diagnostic test. Clin Genet 2016;89:700–707.

  30. 30.

    et al. A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories. Genet Med 2017;19:575–582.

  31. 31.

    et al. PhenomeCentral: a portal for phenotypic and genotypic matchmaking of patients with rare genetic diseases. Hum Mutat 2015;36:931–940.

Download references


The study was supported by institutional funds of the Université de Sherbrooke, La Fondation du Grand Défi Pierre Lavoie, and La Fondation des Étoiles. We are thankful to Génome Québec and Fulgent for the exome sequencing. Moreover, we thank Marie Edmont and Laura Dempsey-Nunez for the genetic counseling. We are also grateful to the patients and their families for their participation in this study.

Author information


  1. Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

    • Fanny Thuriot
    • , Caroline Buote
    • , Elaine Gravel
    • , Sébastien Chénier
    • , Valérie Désilets
    • , Bruno Maranda
    • , Paula J Waters
    •  & Sébastien Lévesque
  2. Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

    • Pierre-Etienne Jacques
  3. Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada

    • Pierre-Etienne Jacques


  1. Search for Fanny Thuriot in:

  2. Search for Caroline Buote in:

  3. Search for Elaine Gravel in:

  4. Search for Sébastien Chénier in:

  5. Search for Valérie Désilets in:

  6. Search for Bruno Maranda in:

  7. Search for Paula J Waters in:

  8. Search for Pierre-Etienne Jacques in:

  9. Search for Sébastien Lévesque in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien Lévesque.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history






Rights and permissions

To obtain permission to re-use content from this article visit RightsLink.

Supplementary material is linked to the online version of the paper at http://www.nature.com/gim