Abstract
Abstract: Biotinidase deficiency is an autosomal recessively inherited disorder of biotin recycling that is associated with neurologic and cutaneous consequences if untreated. Fortunately, the clinical features of the disorder can be ameliorated or prevented by administering pharmacological doses of the vitamin biotin. Newborn screening and confirmatory diagnosis of biotinidase deficiency encompasses both enzymatic and molecular testing approaches. These guidelines were developed to define and standardize laboratory procedures for enzymatic biotinidase testing, to delineate situations for which follow-up molecular testing is warranted, and to characterize variables that can influence test performance and interpretation of results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Biotinidase deficiency, also known as late-onset multiple carboxylase deficiency, is an autosomal recessively inherited disorder of biotin recycling associated with secondary alterations in amino acid, carbohydrate, and fatty acid metabolism.1 The disorder is caused by absent or markedly deficient activity of biotinidase, a cytosolic enzyme that liberates free biotin from biocytin during the normal proteolytic turnover of holocarboxylases and other biotinylated proteins.2 Biotinidase may also play a role in the biotinylation of specific proteins, such as histones.3 The diagnosis of biotinidase deficiency is based on demonstration of deficient enzyme activity in serum or plasma.4 Patients with profound biotinidase deficiency have <10% mean normal serum activity, whereas patients with the partial biotinidase deficiency variant have 10–30% of mean normal serum activity and are largely asymptomatic. Confirmation of biotinidase deficiency by DNA analysis, by either allele-targeted methods or full gene sequencing, may be useful in some cases. Biotinidase testing may be part of a larger workup in a child who exhibits clinical features suggestive of the disease but more frequently is performed on asymptomatic infants after abnormal newborn screening results. Because all newborn screening programs in the United States and many other countries worldwide include biotinidase deficiency in their panel of screened conditions, there is an increased need to define and standardize laboratory approaches for enzymatic biotinidase testing, to delineate situations for which follow-up molecular testing is warranted, and to characterize variables that can influence test performance and interpretation of results. These guidelines describe best laboratory practices for biotinidase deficiency testing, including preanalytical considerations, test selection and performance, results interpretation, and appropriate follow-up testing.
BACKGROUND
Biochemical and molecular characteristics of biotinidase
Biotinidase (E.C. 3.5.1.12) is a 70–80 kD glycoprotein that is ubiquitously expressed and detectable in multiple sample types including serum, leukocytes, fibroblasts, and liver.5 The enzyme functions in the recycling of biotin, a water-soluble cofactor necessary for the function of four carboxylases: propionyl-CoA carboxylase (E.C. 6.4.1.3), 3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase (E.C. 6.4.1.4), pyruvate carboxylase (E.C. 6.4.1.1), and acetyl-CoA carboxylase (E.C. 6.4.1.2).6 An inherited disorder of biotin recycling or utilization, from a deficiency of biotinidase (OMIM 253260) or holocarboxylase synthetase (E.C. 6.3.4.10; OMIM 253270), leads to secondary disruptions in the activities of the aforementioned carboxylases which, in turn, cause impairments in the metabolic pathways of amino acids, carbohydrates, and lipids.
Biotinidase is a monomeric enzyme encoded by a single gene (BTD) located on chromosome 3p257 and comprised 543 amino acid residues including 41 amino acids of a potential signal peptide.8 The gene spans at least 23 kb of genomic DNA and consists of four exons and three introns,9 reflecting a simple structural organization that facilitates gene sequencing for the genotyping of patients. Two putative translation initiation codons exist, one in exon 1 and the other in exon 2, with the second containing the N-terminal methionine of the mature enzyme and also containing features of housekeeping genes.9 The sequences upstream of exons 1 and 2 contain promoter elements consistent with the ubiquitous expression of biotinidase. The presence of an intron between the two possible initiation codons could allow for alternative splicing, raising the possibility of tissue-specific expression of different BTD transcripts. In support of this idea, a consensus sequence for the liver-specific transcription factor HNF-5 is present at nucleotide position -352, although the physiologic significance of this is unknown.
More than 100 disease-causing mutations in the BTD gene have been reported to date.10 Four common mutations cause profound biotinidase deficiency.11 Among children ascertained because of clinical symptoms, the two most commonly reported mutations are a seven-base deletion/three-base insertion (c.98-104del7ins3 [G98d7i3]) in exon 2, occurring in at least one allele in ∼50% of patients, and R538C in exon 4, occurring at least once in 30% of children.12,13 Both of these mutations result in a complete absence of biotinidase protein. Other relatively common mutations discovered by newborn screening are Q456H, associated with profound deficiency,14 and D444H, a mild mutation that reduces enzymatic activity by ∼50%.15 D444H in trans with a severe BTD mutation is associated with partial biotinidase deficiency, whereas in cis with A171T (i.e., as the double mutant A171T:D444H), results in a profound biotinidase deficiency allele.16 A compilation of disease-causing BTD mutations has been reported.10
Initially, most symptomatic children with biotinidase deficiency were found to have 3% of mean serum biotinidase activity of normal individuals.17 Three standard deviations above this mean, corresponding to 10% of mean normal activity, was taken as the threshold below which individuals were considered to have profound biotinidase deficiency. After newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency was introduced, babies were identified with ∼25% of mean normal activity.18 Ultimately, it was determined that essentially all these children had the D444H mutation as one of their alleles, with the resultant aberrant enzyme contributing ∼50% of normal activity.15 This mutation, together with a mutation for profound deficiency on the other allele, results in between 10 and 30% of mean normal biotinidase activity.19 These children are considered to have partial biotinidase deficiency. Because biotinidase deficiency is not due to a continuous spectrum of residual activity but rather a biphasic distribution of activity, the terms profound biotinidase deficiency and partial biotinidase are useful functional descriptions.
Clinical description of disease
The initial clinical presentation and ultimate expression of profound biotinidase deficiency are quite variable, even within the same family.20 Symptoms in untreated patients usually appear between 2 and 5 months of age but may not be evident until several years of age.21 Abnormalities involving the central nervous system are frequently the first features to occur. More than 70% of clinically ascertained children exhibit seizures, hypotonia, skin rash, or alopecia at some time before diagnosis and treatment.22 About half of the children have ataxia, developmental delay, conjunctivitis, and visual problems, including optic atrophy.23 More than three quarters of symptomatic children develop hearing loss.24 The hearing loss, visual abnormalities, and degrees of developmental delay do not seem to be reversible once they occur, even after initiation of biotin therapy. Affected individuals may have features ranging from multiple mild episodes of seizures and ataxia, to severe metabolic compromise, which can result in coma or death.20 Some children with profound biotinidase deficiency developed symptoms only later in childhood or during adolescence.25,26 They exhibited motor limb weakness, spastic paresis, and eye problems, such as loss of visual acuity and scotomata, rather than the more characteristic symptoms observed in young untreated children with the disorder. There are several reports of adults with profound biotinidase deficiency who were ascertained because they had children with profound biotinidase deficiency identified by newborn screening. These adults were asymptomatic although they had never been treated with biotin.27–29 Several of these parents had extensive evaluations, including rigorous dietary histories, but they failed to demonstrate any clinical or biochemical features. None of these adults had null mutations, but all had enzymatic activities in the profoundly deficient range with some residual activity. The explanation as to why they have remained asymptomatic is not known.
Biochemically, untreated individuals may exhibit metabolic ketoacidosis, lactic acidosis, and/or hyperammonemia.17 Other metabolic abnormalities are more variable and may include elevated excretion of 3-hydroxyisovaleric, lactic and 3-hydroxypropionic acids, and 3-methylcrotonylglycine by urine organic acid analysis, as well as mildly elevated 3-hydroxyisovalerylcarnitine (C5–OH) by plasma acylcarnitine analysis.30 These metabolic abnormalities are variable, and affected children, whether symptomatic or asymptomatic, do not always exhibit ketoacidosis or organic aciduria.17
Biotin supplementation seems to prevent the development of symptoms in presymptomatic children with profound biotinidase deficiency31,32 Furthermore, all symptomatic children with profound deficiency who have been treated with pharmacological doses of biotin (5–20 mg daily) have shown clinical improvement.20 Seizures and ataxia resolve within hours to days, and the cutaneous manifestations usually resolve within weeks. Depending on the severity and frequency of episodes of metabolic and neurologic compromise, many children with developmental delay rapidly achieve new milestones or regain those that were lost. Children with biotinidase deficiency who have failed to comply with their biotin therapy, either unintentionally or deliberately, developed symptoms within several weeks to months. These cases illustrate the importance of early diagnosis and initiation of lifelong treatment.
Partial biotinidase deficiency, defined as 10–30% of mean normal serum activity, initially was considered a variant without clinical consequences. Later, several reports described children with partial biotinidase deficiency who developed symptoms when under stress, such as an infection or starvation.19 The symptoms resolved with biotin therapy.
Newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency
Methods for the semiquantitative determination of biotinidase activity on dried blood spots were developed in 198433 and first used that same year in a pilot newborn screening program in Virginia. Biotinidase deficiency meets many of the criteria for inclusion in state newborn screening programs: there is an inexpensive and reliable screening test, the disorder is associated with high morbidity and mortality if untreated, an easy and effective treatment exists, and the population incidence is comparable with that of other disorders screened.34 Currently, all newborn screening programs in the United States and more than 30 other countries screen their newborns for biotinidase deficiency.35,36 The screening method used by almost all programs is based on a colorimetric assay of biotinidase activity in dried blood spots,33 although states have individually established their own screening cutoffs and rescreening or follow-up protocols. Some states report qualitative screening results as either positive or negative, whereas others report quantitative enzyme activities with a screening cutoff value.
Because biotinidase deficiency screening is performed by direct enzyme assay, results are not influenced by dietary protein intake as is the case for phenylketonuria or other amino acidopathies. Approximately 50% of false-positive results (i.e., low estimates of enzyme activity) are due to prematurity and most others to mishandling of samples and possibly their exposure to excessive heat and/or humidity.37,38 The effect of transfusion on biotinidase screening has not been established. Because red blood cells do not express biotinidase activity, it may be helpful to determine whether the patient was transfused with whole blood or packed red blood cells. However, variable, but possibly significant, quantities of plasma/serum are retained in the preparations of packed red blood cells, and the “circulating life” of biotinidase in these preparations is unknown. One approach for determining the child's actual enzyme status after transfusion is to measure biotinidase activities in the parents. If both parents are clearly in the normal range, then it is unlikely that the child has profound or partial deficiency. Mutation analysis may also be used to resolve the issue. It is also possible to provide the infant with biotin supplementation for several months before repeating the confirmatory testing, because this treatment does not affect performance of the biotinidase assay. In general, the parental enzymatic results are reassuring.
Many of the clinical issues and frequently asked questions about biotinidase deficiency have been addressed recently in an article by one of the authors.39
Conditions identified by enzymatic biotinidase testing
The enzymatic determination of biotinidase activity identifies individuals with profound biotinidase deficiency (<10% mean normal serum activity) and those with partial biotinidase deficiency (10–30% of mean normal serum activity).19 Heterozygous individuals may also be identified by this test as having ∼50% of mean normal activity, although there may be significant overlap among the various groups. At least some of the variability arises from clinical status, assay interferents, and sample handling artifacts (see later). Before a diagnostic category can definitively be assigned, the laboratory must establish ranges from known affected individuals and obligate heterozygotes. In addition, all preanalytical and analytical variables must be carefully controlled before a measured decrease in activity can be attributed to an inherited defect in biotinidase.
Prevalence
Based on newborn screening outcome data from 2007 to 2008, the incidence of profound biotinidase deficiency in the United States is estimated at ∼1 of 80,000 births and that of partial biotinidase deficiency between 1 of 31,000 and 1 of 40,000 (available at: http://www2.uthscsa.edu/nnsis/), although frequencies may vary within and between states by local population. Earlier studies have indicated similar findings, with the overall incidence of biotinidase deficiency estimated at ∼1 in 60,000 newborns worldwide, equally divided between profound and partial biotinidase deficiency.35 The majority of reported patients who were ascertained clinically have been of European descent.36 The disease incidence varies between countries, with incidences in Brazil as high as 1 in 9,00040 and possibly higher incidences in countries with a high degree of consanguinity, such as Turkey and Saudi Arabia.41–43
Mode of inheritance
Biotinidase deficiency is inherited as an autosomal recessive trait.4
PREANALYTICAL REQUIREMENTS
Sample types
Biotinidase activity is reliably measured in serum and plasma; activity can less readily be determined in fibroblasts and leukocytes and other tissue extracts.44 Biotinidase activity can also be measured in cultured amniocytes,45 although in practice this is seldom performed because of the treatability of the disorder. Plasma or serum samples may not be suitable for individuals who have undergone transfusion; in such cases, determining the carrier status of the parents may be an alternate strategy (see “Newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency”). Samples collected postmortem are not suitable for enzyme assay; in such cases, the diagnosis may be established by molecular testing or by enzymatically determining the carrier status of the parents. Molecular studies for BTD mutations are performed on DNA isolated from leukocytes, fibroblasts, or dried blood spots.
Sample volumes
Specific requirements of sample type, collection volumes, and conditions of sample shipping and handling must be established by the laboratory and made available to referring physicians on request. As a general guideline, 1–2 mL of serum or plasma is required for biotinidase testing. Approximately 2–3 mL of whole blood should be collected by venipuncture in a red-top or green-top (sodium or lithium heparin) tube, and the cells separated from serum/plasma by centrifugation within 1 hour of sample collection. Samples should be immediately frozen at −80°C, and should remain frozen at this temperature until the time of testing. When testing is being performed after an abnormal newborn screening result, blood should also be collected from the parents and sent together with the patient's sample whenever possible to aid in the interpretation of results. Similarly, a sample obtained from an unrelated control is useful for distinguishing true biotinidase deficiency from decreased activity because of sample handling artifacts. DNA testing typically requires 1–2 mL whole blood collected in a lavender-top (EDTA) tube.
Conditions of sample shipping, handling, and storage
Blood spots collected for newborn screening must be dried completely before shipping to the laboratory, because humidity or wet samples result in significant loss of enzyme activity. Serum or plasma samples for diagnostic assays must be frozen at −80°C and shipped to the laboratory on dry ice. Long-term storage of samples at −20°C has been shown to lead to loss of enzyme activity and artifactually low values46 (Wolf, unpublished data). As noted earlier, the use of parental and/or unrelated controls is recommended whenever possible, although this may not be operationally feasible in all settings. Samples for DNA testing should be shipped to the laboratory at room temperature as soon as possible but are stable for several days from the time of collection.
METHOD VALIDATION
Calibration and quantitation
The most widespread method for the diagnosis of biotinidase deficiency is based on enzymatic assay using the artificial substrate of biocytin, biotin-4-amidobenzoic acid.4,33,47 This substrate and all other reagents used in the assay are commercially available but must be individually prepared and validated by each laboratory before being put into use. Validation of assay performance should be established by assessing inter- and intraday variability, analytical measurement range, and effects of interference. In particular, sulfa drugs are known to interfere and can lead to falsely elevated estimates of activity if not properly controlled (see later). Performance characteristics should be verified on a regular basis as specified by the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments.
Reference ranges
Biotinidase activity reference ranges for normal, affected, and obligate carrier individuals have been published and are summarized in Table 1. Before clinical enzymatic testing is implemented, a laboratory should determine the mean biotinidase activity of a cohort of normal individuals (e.g., 20–50) and of multiple individuals with profound biotinidase deficiency, partial biotinidase deficiency, and heterozygotes for profound deficiency. These results should be used to establish the laboratory's reference ranges for each group. Because full-term newborns have 50–70% of mean normal adult biotinidase activity,48 a separate reference range should ideally also be established for this age group. The laboratory should periodically verify and update their reference ranges as additional newborns samples are tested and children with the deficiency are identified.
Testing personnel
Appropriate training and ongoing competency requirements for laboratory personnel performing biotinidase deficiency testing must be established and documented. Testing personnel must satisfy CLIA requirements for high-complexity testing and have, at a minimum, an associate degree in a laboratory science or medical laboratory technology from an accredited institution. Stricter requirements apply in some states.
TESTING FOR BIOTINIDASE DEFICIENCY
Sample preparation
For enzymatic testing, serum or plasma samples should be thawed immediately before analysis with no other sample preparation steps required. Information pertaining to the collection, analysis, interpretation, and quality control of molecular studies is given by the American College of Medical Genetics Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories, Part G (Molecular Genetics), available at: http://www.acmg.net/AM./Template.cfm?Section=Laboratory_Standards_and_Guidelines&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=3735.
Analytical methods
The most widespread method for the diagnosis of biotinidase deficiency is based on enzymatic assay using the artificial substrate biotin-4-amidobenzoic acid.4,33,47 In a typical assay, serum is incubated with a substrate buffer at 37°C for 30 minutes and the reaction stopped with trichloroacetic acid. During the reaction, biotinidase in patient serum acts to liberate free p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) from the artificial substrate. The released PABA is diazotized with sodium nitrite and the excess nitrite removed by the addition of ammonium sulfamate. Finally, the diazotized PABA reacts with N-1-naphthyl-ethylene-diamine dihydrochloride to yield a mauve-colored product, which is measured spectrophotometrically at 546 nm. The net absorbance is directly proportional to the amount of PABA released, which, in turn, is directly proportional to biotinidase activity in the sample. This method also forms the basis for newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency33 and had been adapted for use with microtiter plates.49
Biotinidase activity can also be measured using a fluorescent technique with biotinyl-6-aminoquinoline as an artificial substrate.50 This substrate is more expensive than that for the colorimetric method but has also been adapted to newborn screening and the testing of dried blood spots.51 There are other methods for determining biotinidase activity, such as measuring the release of biotin from biocytin,52,53 using other fluorescent biotinylated derivatives54and radioisotopic biotinylated analogs,44,55 but they are more expensive, require more time, are difficult to perform, and often are not readily adaptable to enzymatic determinations using dried blood spots.51,56
Analysis of urine organic acids by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry or plasma acylcarnitines by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry sometimes may reveal characteristic abnormalities in patients with biotinidase deficiency. However, this approach is never appropriate as the sole testing modality in individuals suspected of having the disorder because many biotinidase deficient patients will have normal results by analyte testing and, therefore, be missed. Conversely, metabolic abnormalities that may be compatible with biotinidase deficiency, including elevations of 3-hydroxyisovalerate, 3-methylcrotonylglycine, and 3-hydroxyisovalerylcarnitine, can also be a characteristic of other conditions and disease states and, if not confirmed by enzyme assay, can lead to an incorrect diagnosis of biotinidase deficiency. Therefore, if biotinidase deficiency is excluded by enzyme testing, other conditions must be considered.
Because of the simple organization of the BTD gene, follow-up molecular testing by either targeted mutation analysis57 or complete sequencing is possible.58 Molecular testing is particularly useful for differentiating individuals with profound biotinidase deficiency from those who have partial deficiency and those with partial deficiency from those who are heterozygous for profound deficiency, because almost all children with partial deficiency have the D444H mutation.15 Common mutations, including D444H, can be readily determined by targeted analysis using DNA extracted from a dried blood spot. If results are not conclusive after performing this testing, complete sequencing and, when necessary, deletion/duplication analysis, is also clinically available.
Quality control
A positive (abnormal) and normal control should be included with each set of patient samples. The positive control, representing decreased biotinidase activity, may be prepared by heat inactivating a large pool of normal serum at 60°C for 1 hour. Both sets of controls should be stored as aliquots at −80°C and thoroughly evaluated before being used in clinical testing. Tolerance limits for acceptance or rejection of quality control (QC) performance should be established, and procedures should be developed for instances where QC criteria are not met. A QC designee should perform an ongoing (at least monthly) compilation, review, and sign off of control values.
For diagnostic evaluations, all samples should be tested for the presence of interfering substances, such as sulfa drugs, which may cause false-negative results.59 This is readily performed by running a substrate-free blank for each patient sample tested (i.e., by testing the serum/plasma for positive color development in the absence of substrate). This control is typically not performed for newborn screening assays and, fortunately, sulfa drugs are contraindicated during pregnancy and in neonates.
Proficiency testing
An ongoing proficiency testing (PT) program for biotinidase testing must be implemented and documented. An external PT program for biotinidase deficiency newborn screening is offered through the Newborn Screening Quality Assurance Program of the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention.60 No external PT programs for diagnostic testing are currently available. A number of approaches given by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute may be taken, including split sample analysis with a reference or other laboratory and storing aliquots of samples from affected individuals (at −80°C) and rerunning these samples periodically.61
TEST INTERPRETATION AND REPORTING
Interpretation
For tests initiated because of abnormal newborn screening, biotinidase activity <10% of mean normal activity is indicative of profound deficiency, and activity between 10 and 30% of mean normal activity is indicative of partial deficiency. Laboratories should apply these guidelines by comparing a child's activity with the mean normal biotinidase activity established in their laboratory (see “Reference ranges”). Decreased enzymatic activity can also be due to prematurity or liver dysfunction,62,63 although, if all preanalytical variables are properly controlled, this typically does not lead to misdiagnosis of biotinidase deficiency. Biotinidase activity in newborns usually increases during the first days to weeks of life, and those with activities between 50 and 70% of mean normal activity do not usually require retesting at a later date. The most common cause of decreased enzymatic activity is sample mishandling. Therefore, a definitive diagnosis of biotinidase deficiency based on low enzyme activity cannot be made unless these variables are properly controlled. The optimal approach is to determine enzyme activities on samples from an unrelated individual (normal control) and both parents (if available). These samples should be collected simultaneously and sent with the patient's sample for testing. The authors are aware of multiple instances where children were diagnosed with profound biotinidase deficiency by reputable laboratories but did not have appropriate unrelated or parental control samples for comparison. Several of these children were treated for extended periods with biotin before repeat enzyme testing, initiated as part of a later family study or because clinical symptoms failed to improve, revealed normal biotinidase activities. These examples emphasize the importance of obtaining appropriate control samples to avoid misdiagnosis of enzyme deficiency. If there is any question of interpretation, gene sequencing can be used to confirm or exclude the diagnosis (targeted mutation analysis will not identify all the possible mutations).
Biotinidase activity in the range of 10–30% of mean normal activity is suggestive of partial biotinidase deficiency. Typically, when testing the parents, one has ∼50% of mean normal activity, indicative of being a carrier for a profound deficiency allele, and the other parent has activity that is ∼75% of mean normal activity, indicative of being a carrier for the D444H mutation. It is not uncommon that one or both parents have activities that are not clearly interpretable, such as clearly in the normal range. These cases can be resolved by mutation analysis. Occasionally, a parent has enzymatic activity in the heterozygous range and is ultimately found to be homozygous for the D444H allele by mutation analysis or a parent will be found to have partial biotinidase deficiency.
Intermediate biotinidase activity (i.e., 50% of normal) could be compatible with either heterozygosity for profound biotinidase deficiency or homozygosity for a variant allele, most often D444H. Again, evaluation of biotinidase activity in the parents is useful in distinguishing between these possibilities but still may require mutation analysis, possibly targeted analysis for the D444H mutation, to definitively determine their status. When interpreting results for possible carrier or variant status, the laboratories must have sufficient experience with the enzymatic ranges of these genotypic groups and must have proper controls in place.
For patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of biotinidase deficiency, the disorder is excluded by enzyme activity >10% of normal. Enzyme activity <10% of normal is consistent with profound deficiency, providing that the proper controls were in place to exclude sample mishandling as the source of decreased activity.57,64 Confirmation by molecular testing is often useful but may not be necessary in all cases.
Mutation analysis for biotinidase deficiency is readily available. The BTD gene is composed of four exons, permitting rapid sequencing of the entire complementary DNA and intron-exon junctions.8 Mutation analysis is not suitable for newborn screening but is useful for confirmatory testing to help differentiate between individuals with profound and partial biotinidase deficiency, and individuals who are carriers for profound deficiency and those homozygous for a partial deficiency allele. It is also useful for family studies and prenatal diagnosis. Optimal sample preparation, handling, and shipping together with the inclusion of appropriate control samples often makes molecular analysis unnecessary and can eliminate the expense of repeated confirmational testing.40,61
There is still little known about phenotype/genotype correlations. There is one report of such a relationship between genotype and hearing loss.65 In addition, it has been proposed that children with some residual enzyme activity may have a milder clinical course than those with no measurable biotinidase activity and may have a lower requirement for biotin supplementation for treatment.32 However, it is important that all children with profound biotinidase deficiency be treated with adequate biotin therapy.66
Reporting
Patient reports must contain appropriate patient and specimen information as given by the American College of Medical Genetics Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories, Sections 2.4, 2.41 and 2.42 (http://www.acmg.net/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Laboratory_Standards_and_Guidelines&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm&ContentID=3136) and as specified by CLIA. Written reports should contain biotinidase activity, units of measure, and an appropriate reference range, together with an interpretation (see “Interpretation”). Recommendations for follow-up, including referral to a metabolic specialist, should also be included when appropriate.
References
Wolf B, Disorders of biotin metabolism. In: Scriver CR, Beaudet AL, Sly WS, Valle D (eds) The metabolic and molecular bases of inherited disease. New York, NY, McGraw-Hill, 2001; 3935–3962.
Wolf B, Heard GS, McVoy JS, Raetz HM . Biotinidase deficiency: the possible role of biotinidase in the processing of dietary protein-bound biotin. J Inherited Metab Dis 1984; 7( suppl 2): 121–122.
Hymes J, Wolf B . Biotinidase and its role in biotin metabolism. Clin Chim Acta 1996; 255: 1–11.
Wolf B, Grier RE, Allen RJ, Goodman SI, Kien CL . Biotinidase deficiency: the enzymatic defect in late-onset multiple carboxylase deficiency. Clin Chim Acta 1983; 131: 273–281.
Pispa J . Animal biotinidase. Ann Med Exp Biol Fenn 1965; 43( suppl 5): 1–39.
Wolf B, Feldman GL . The biotin-dependent carboxylase deficiencies. Am J Hum Genet 1982; 34: 699–716.
Cole H, Weremowicz H, Morton CC, Wolf B . Localization of serum biotinidase (BTD) to human chromosome 3 in band p25. Genomics 1994; 22: 662–663.
Cole H, Reynolds TR, Buck GB, et al. Human serum biotinidase. cDNA cloning, sequence, and characterization. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 6566–6570.
Knight HC, Reynolds TR, Meyers GA, Pomponio RJ, Buck GA, Wolf B . Structure of the human biotinidase gene. Mamm Genome 1998; 9: 327–330.
Hymes J, Stanley CM, Wolf B . Mutations in BTD causing biotinidase deficiency. Hum Mutat 2001; 200: 375–381.
Norrgard KJ, Pomponio RJ, Hymes J, et al. Mutations causing profound biotinidase deficiency in children ascertained by newborn screening in the United States occur at different frequencies than in symptomatic children. Pediatr Res 1999; 46: 20–27.
Pomponio RJ, Reynolds TR, Cole H, Buck GA, Wolf B . Mutational hotspot in the human biotinidase gene as a cause of biotinidase deficiency. Nat Genet 1995; 11: 96–98.
Pomponio RJ, Norrgard KJ, Hymes J, et al. Arg538 to Cys mutation in a CpG dinucleotide of the human biotinidase gene is the second most common cause of biotinidase deficiency in symptomatic children with biotinidase deficiency. Hum Genet 1997; 99: 506–512.
Norrgard KJ, Pomponio RJ, Swango KL, et al. Mutation (Q456H) is the most common cause of profound biotinidase deficiency in children ascertained by newborn screening in the United States. Biochem Mol Med 1997; 61: 22–27.
Swango KL, Demirkol M, Huner G, et al. Partial biotinidase deficiency is usually due to the D444H mutation in the biotinidase gene. Hum Genet 1998; 102: 571–575.
Norrgard KJ, Pomponio Swango KL, et al. Double mutation (A171T and D444H) is a common cause of profound biotinidase deficiency in children ascertained by newborn screening in United States. Mutations in brief no. 128. Online. Hum Mutat 1998; 11: 410.
Wolf B, Grier RE, Secor McVoy JR, Heard GS . Biotinidase deficiency: a novel vitamin recycling defect. J Inherited Metab Dis 1985; 8( suppl 1): 53–58.
Wolf B, Heard GS, Jefferson LG, et al. Neonatal screening for biotinidase deficiency: an update. J Inher Metab Dis 1986; 9( suppl 2): 303–306.
McVoy JR, Levy HL, Lawler M, et al. Partial biotinidase deficiency: clinical and biochemical features. J Pediatr 1990; 116: 78–83.
Wolf B, Grier RE, Allen RJ, et al. Phenotypic variation in biotinidase deficiency. J Pediatr 1983; 103: 233–237.
Wolf B, Heard GS, Weissbecker KA, McVoy JR, Grier RE, Leshner RT . Biotinidase deficiency: initial clinical features and rapid diagnosis. Ann Neurol 1985; 18: 614–617.
Salbert BA, Pellock JM, Wolf B . Characterization of seizures associated with biotinidase deficiency. Neurology 1993; 43: 1351–1354.
Salbert BA, Astruc J, Wolf B . Ophthalmological findings in biotinidase deficiency. Ophthalmologica 1993; 206: 177–181.
Wolf B, Spencer R, Gleason AT . Hearing loss in common in symptomatic children with profound biotinidase deficiency. J Pediatr 2002; 140: 242–246.
Ramaekers VT, Suormala TM, Brab M, Duran R, Heimann G, Baumgartner ER . A biotinidase Km variant causing late onset bilateral optic neuropathy. Arch Dis Child 1992; 67: 115–119.
Wolf B, Pomponio RJ, Norrgard KJ, et al. Delayed-onset profound biotinidase deficiency. J Pediatr 1998; 132: 362–365.
Secor McVoy JR, Shapiro SM, Leshner RT, et al. Asymptomatic adult with profound biotinidase deficiency. Am J Hum Genet 1991; 49: 105.
Wolf B, Norrgard K, Pomponio RJ, et al. Profound biotinidase deficiency in two asymptomatic adults. Am J Med Genet 1997; 73: 5–9.
Baykal T, Gokcay G, Gokdemir Y, et al. Asymptomatic adults and older siblings with biotinidase deficiency ascertained by family studies of index cases. J Inherit Metab Dis 2005; 28: 903–912.
Chalmers RA, Roe CR, Stacey TE, Hoppel CL . Urinary excretion of l-carnitine and acylcarnitine by patients with disorders of organic acid metabolism: evidence for secondary insufficiency of l-carnitine. Pediatr Res 1984; 18: 1325–1328.
Schubiger G, Caflisch U, Baumgartner R, Suormala T, Bachmann C . Biotinidase deficiency: clinical course and biochemical findings. J Inherit Metab Dis 1984; 7: 129–130.
Moslinger D, Stockler-Ipsiroglu S, Scheibenreiter S, et al. Clinical and neuropsychological outcome in 33 patients with biotinidase deficiency ascertained by nationwide newborn screening and family studies in Austria. Eur J Pediatr 2001; 160: 277–282.
Heard GS, Secor McVoy JR, Wolf B . A screening method for biotinidase deficiency in newborns. Clin Chem 1984; 30: 125–127.
Wolf B, Heard GS, Jefferson LG, Proud VK, Nance WE, Weissbecker KA . Clinical findings in four children with biotinidase deficiency detected through a statewide neonatal screening program. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 16–19.
Wolf B . Worldwide survey of neonatal screening for biotinidase deficiency. J Inherited Metab Dis 1991; 14: 923–927.
Wolf B, Heard GS . Screening for biotinidase deficiency in newborns: worldwide experience. Pediatrics 1990; 85: 512–517.
Thibodeau DL, Andrews W, Meyer J, Mitchell P, Wolf B . Comparison of the effects of season and prematurity on the newborn screening tests for galactosemia and biotinidase deficiency. Screening 1993; 2: 19–27.
Suormala T, Wick H, Baumgartner ER . Low biotinidase activity in plasma of some preterm infants: possible source of false-positive screening results. Eur J Pediatr 1988; 147: 478–480.
Wolf B . Clinical issues and frequent questions about biotinidase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab 2010; 100: 6–13.
Neto EC, Schulte JJ, Rubim R, et al. Newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency in Brazil: biochemical and molecular characterizations. Braz J Med Biol Res 2004; 37: 295–299.
Pomponio RJ, Ozand PI, Al Essa M, Wolf B . Novel mutations in children with profound biotinidase deficiency from Saudi Arabia. J Inherit Metab Dis 2000; 23: 185–187.
Pomponio RJ, Coskun T, Demirkol M, et al. Novel mutations cause biotinidase deficiency in Turkish children. J Inherit Metab Dis 2000; 23: 120–128.
Popelka G, The acoustic reflex in normal and pathological ears. In: Popelka G (ed) Hearing assessment with the acoustic reflex. New York, Grune and Stratton, 1981; 5–21.
Wolf B, Secor McVoy J . A sensitive radioassay for biotinidase activity: deficient activity in tissues of serum biotinidase-deficient individuals. Clin Chim Acta 1983; 135: 275–281.
Secor McVoy JR, Heard GS, Wolf B . Potential for prenatal diagnosis of biotinidase deficiency. Prenat Diagn 1984; 4: 317–318.
Wolf B, Hymes J, Heard GS . Biotinidase. Methods Enzymol 1990; 184: 103–111.
Koivusalo M, Pispa J . Biotinidase activity in animal tissue. Acta Physiol Scand 1963; 58: 13–19.
Heard GS, Wolf B, Jefferson LG, et al. Neonatal screening for biotinidase deficiency: results of a 1-year pilot study. J Pediatr 1986; 108: 40–46.
Pettit DA, Amador PS, Wolf B . The quantitation of biotinidase activity in dried blood spots using microtiter transfer plates: identification of biotinidase-deficient and heterozygous individuals. Anal Biochem 1989; 179: 371–374.
Wastell H, Dale G, Bartlett K . A sensitive fluorimetric rate assay for biotinidase using a new derivative of biotin, biotinyl-6-aminoquinoline. Anal Biochem 1984; 140: 69–73.
Broda E, Baumgartner ER, Scholl S, Stopsack M, Horn A, Rhode H . Biotinidase determination in serum and dried blood spots—high sensitivity fluorometric ultramicro-assay. Clin Chim Acta 2001; 314: 175–185.
Weiner DL, Grier RE, Wolf B . A bioassay for determining biotinidase activity and for discriminating biocytin from biotin using holocarboxylase synthetase-deficient cultured fibroblasts. J Inherited Metab Dis 1985; 8: 101–102.
Kumasaka K, Muratsugu M, Fukui T, Kimura M, Takagi Y, Hashizume N . A new quantitative analytical method of serum biotinidase activity using biocytin as asubstrate and its clinical significance in Japan. Clin Chim Acta 2001; 306: 71–77.
Forman DT, Bankson DD, Highsmith WE Jr, Neonatal screening for biotinidase deficiency. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1992; 22: 144–154.
Livaniou E, Kakabakos SE, Evangelatos SA, Evangelatos GP, Ithakissios DS . Determination of serum biotinidase activity with radioiodinated biotinylamide analogs. Methods Enzymol 1997; 279: 442–451.
Yamaguchi A, Fukushi M, Arai O, et al. A simple method for quantitation of biotinidase activity in dried blood spot and its application to screening for biotinidase deficiency. Tohoku J Exp Med 1987; 152: 339–346.
Dobrowolski SF, Angeletti J, Banas RA, Naylor EW . Real time PCR assays to detect common mutations in the biotinidase gene and application of mutational analysis to newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency. Mol Genet Metab 2003; 78: 100–107.
Pomponio RJ, Hymes J, Reynolds TR, et al. Mutations in the human biotinidase gene that cause profound biotinidase deficiency in symptomatic children: molecular, biochemical, and clinical analysis. Pediatr Res 1997; 42: 840–848.
Bratton AC, Marshall EK . A new coupling component for sulfanilamide determination. J Biol Chem 1939; 128: 537–550.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/labstandards/nsqap.htm. Accessed June 1, 2010.
Wolf B . Biotinidase deficiency: new directions and potential concerns. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2003; 5: 321–328.
Grier RE, Heard GS, Watkins P, Wolf B . Low biotinidase activities in the sera of patients with impaired liver function: evidence that the liver is the source of serum biotinidase. Clin Chim Acta 1990; 186: 397–400.
Pabuccuoglu A, Aydogdu S, Bas M . Serum biotinidase activity in children with chronic liver disease and its clinical implications. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2002; 34: 59–62.
Hoffman TL, Simon EM, Ficicioglu C . Biotinidase deficiency: the importance of adequate follow-up for inconclusive newborn screening results. Eur J Pediatr 2005; 164: 298–301.
Sivri HS, Genc GA, Tokatli A, et al. Hearing loss in biotinidase deficiency: genotype-phenotype correlation. J Pediatr 2007; 150: 439–442.
Wolf B . Children with profound biotinidase deficiency should be treated with biotin regardless of their residual enzyme activity. Eur J Pediatr 2002; 161: 167–168.
Wolf B, Hymes J, Hart PS . Biochemical and immunological characterization of serum biotinidase in profound biotinidase deficiency. Am J Hum Genet 1992; 50: 126–136.
Wolf B, Hymes J, Hart PS . Biochemical and immunologic characterization of serum biotinidase in partial biotinidase deficiency. Pediatr Res 1992; 31: 261–265.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported in part by the Safra Research Fund (B.W.). The authors thank Drs. Jerry Feldman, Maria Descartes, and Robert Steiner for their constructive comments and suggestions. The revised document was reviewed and endorsed by the Biochemical Genetics Working Group of the ACMG Quality Assurance Committee.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Additional information
Disclosure: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer: These standards and guidelines are designed primarily as an educational resource for clinical laboratory geneticists to help them provide quality laboratory genetic services. Adherence to these standards and guidelines does not necessarily ensure a successful medical outcome. These standards and guidelines should not be considered inclusive of all proper procedures and tests or exclusive of other procedures and tests that are reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. In determining the propriety of any specific procedure or test, the clinical laboratory geneticists should apply their own professional judgment to the specific clinical circumstance presented by the individual patient or specimen. It may be prudent, however, to document in the laboratory record the rationale for any significant deviation from these standards and guidelines.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cowan, T., Blitzer, M., Wolf, B. et al. Technical standards and guidelines for the diagnosis of biotinidase deficiency. Genet Med 12, 464–470 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e4cc0f
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181e4cc0f
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Cochlear Implantation in Biotinidase Enzyme Deficiency
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery (2022)
-
Developmental and behavioral outcomes of preschool-aged children with biotinidase deficiency identified by newborn screening
European Journal of Pediatrics (2021)
-
Genotypic and phenotypic correlations of biotinidase deficiency in the Chinese population
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases (2019)
-
Clinical utility gene card for: Biotinidase deficiency—update 2015
European Journal of Human Genetics (2016)
-
Detection of biotinidase gene mutations in Turkish patients ascertained by newborn and family screening
European Journal of Pediatrics (2015)