Sir,
We thank Mr Ahfat1 for the comments offered in response to our report of a series of patients with transient retinal artery occlusion (TRAO) occurring during phacoemulsification cataract surgery.2
Ocular compression devices were not used in any of the patients described in our series. However, we agree that consideration of potential mechanisms that may logically underlie TRAO is important to identify preventative strategies. Conceptually, any peri-operative manoeuvre that elevates intraocular pressure (IOP) above ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) may produce retinal arterial hypoperfusion. This may be ‘absolute’ if the induced IOP elevation exceeds systolic OPP, or ‘relative’ if IOP exceeds diastolic OPP—for the duration throughout which the stimulus is applied.
Excessive ocular compression, high infusion pressures, or over-hydration of corneal wounds may all contribute to the risk of TRAO. IOP may exceed 85 mm Hg during nuclear fragment removal depending on flow rates and infusion parameters.3, 4 Newer-generation phacoemulsification technologies can maintain a target IOP5 and protect OPP.4 This may reduce the risk of TRAO when compared with phacoemulsification platforms that utilise gravity fluidics or fixed pressure irrigation systems.
Patient factors must be considered when evaluating candidate risk factors for TRAO. High diastolic systemic arterial pressures may be protective, maintaining OPP throughout the cardiac cycle despite peri-operative elevations in IOP. Conversely, carotid artery stenosis is associated with reduced ipsilateral OPP6 and may risk TRAO in the context of relatively minor fluctuations in IOP.
TRAO may have a permanent impact on post-operative visual function despite technically uncomplicated phacoemulsification cataract surgery.2 We encourage the clinicians to exclude TRAO in all patients presenting with unexplained post-operative visual loss. Improved detection and reporting of TRAO may enable a prospective case-finding study in which candidate patient risk factors and intra-operative manoeuvres may be identified. In the absence of such a study, associations may be suggested, but cannot be proven.
References
Ahfat F . Transient retinal artery occlusion during phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 2015. e-pub ahead of print 16 January 2015 doi:10.1038/eye.2014.322.
Yusuf IH, Fung TH, Wasik M, Patel CK . Transient retinal artery occlusion during phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Eye (Lond) 2014; 28 (11): 1375–1379.
Vasavada V, Raj SM, Praveen MR, Vasavada AR, Henderson BA, Asnani PK . Real-time dynamic intraocular pressure fluctuations during microcoaxial phacoemulsification using different aspiration flow rates and their impact on early postoperative outcomes: a randomized clinical trial. J Refract Surg 2014; 30 (8): 534–540.
Zhao Y, Li X, Tao A, Wang J, Lu F . Intraocular pressure and calculated diastolic ocular perfusion pressure during three simulated steps of phacoemulsification in vivo. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50 (6): 2927–2931.
Sharif-Kashani P, Fanney D, Injev V . Comparison of occlusion break responses and vacuum rise times of phacoemulsification systems. BMC Ophthalmol 2014; 14: 96.
Cohn EJ Jr ., Sandager GP, Benjamin ME, Lilly MP, Hanna DJ, Flinn WR . Assessment of ocular perfusion after carotid endarterectomy with color-flow duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29 (4): 665–671.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yusuf, I., Fung, T., Wasik, M. et al. Reply: Transient retinal artery occlusion during phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Eye 29, 591–592 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.323
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2014.323