Sir,
The theoretical risk of prion transmission has led to the widespread use of disposable prism tonometers.1 This has led to the marketing of products such as TONOSAFE (Haag-Streit UK), who state in their product information that ‘disposable prisms are convenient, effective method of reducing the risk of cross infection between patients and eliminating the need to clean and disinfect prisms.’2 The actual prisms have been shown to enable accurate pressure measurement and to be sterile.3, 4 The potential risk of transmission of microbial contamination of the holder for disposable applanation prisms has yet to be reported (see Figure 1).
Case report
In the light of this, an audit of handwashing was performed during a general ophthalmology checkup. This involved plating of ophthalmologist's fingers, after handwashing, following the interaction with patients. The sterile holder (TONOSAFE) was also plated after use with each successive patient (n=10). The next day, the process was repeated, but the holder was disinfected with alcohol wipes between patients (as was standard in the traditional Goldmann tonometer).
Normal skin flora was grown on doctor's blood agar plates. This included Staphyloccocus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus. These organisms were shown to be present on the plates of the holder even after the first patient (see Figure 2). We believe that they had transferred from patient to holder through the doctor's hands. Alcohol wiping of holder removed all organisms.
Comment
Disposable tonometers have been advocated as a better replacement for Goldmann tonometers as they ‘eliminate the need to clean and disinfect prisms.’2 This audit has shown that bacteria can be transferred to the holder and are transferred between patients through the clinicians' hands (despite handwashing). The transmission of S. aureus (including MRSA) presents a potential risk for infection control, particularly in the elderly population.5 Although this is unlikely to be of pathological significance, these results contradicts the manufacturer's claims regarding their product.
We believe that even the disposable holders should be cleaned with alcohol wipes between patients to reduce this risk. The original reason for introducing disposable prisms was to eliminate transfer. These results indicate that this risk has not been averted.
References
Amin SZ, Smith L, Luthert PJ, Cheetham ME, Buckley RJ . Minimising the risk of prion transmission by contact tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87 (11): 1360–1362.
http://www.haagstreituk.com/products/index.html?cat_branch=tonosafe_disposable_prisms/.
Salvi SM, Sivakumar S, Sidiki SS . Use of disposable prism tonometry in routine clinical practice. Eye 2005; 19 (7): 743–746.
Cillino S, Casuccio A, Giammanco GM, Mammina C, Morreale D, Di Pace F et al. Tonometers and infectious risk: myth or reality? Efficacy of different disinfection regimens on tonometer tips. Eye 2007; 21 (4): 541–546.
Kuramoto-Chikamatsu A, Honda T, Matsumoto T, Shiohara M, Kawakami Y, Yamauchi K et al. Transmission via the face is one route of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus cross-infection within a hospital. Am J Infect Control 2007; 35 (2): 126–130.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The abstract has been accepted as a poster for Royal College of Ophthalmologists Congress in Liverpool 2008.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lockington, D., Mukherjee, S. & Mansfield, D. Bacterial contamination of the disposable prism holder during routine tonometry for intraocular pressure. Eye 23, 1474–1475 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.163
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2008.163