Abstract
Purpose To determine whether the mydriatic efficacy of spray application of tropicamide 1% is comparable to drop instillation of tropicamide 1%, and to compare the ocular discomfort caused by these methods.
Methods Thirty-four healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to one of two groups, and received either a single drop of tropicamide 1% eye drops or a single puff of tropicamide 1% spray into open eyes. Pupil diameters were measured from anterior segment images taken using a Topcon Imagenet system at baseline and at the fifth, tenth and fifteenth minute after drug administration. Ocular discomfort experienced with each method was also compared.
Results Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed that a statistically significant increase in pupil diameter was achieved with both application methods over time (p < 0.0001), and that there were no statistically significant differences in pupil diameter between the two groups at each time point (p = 0.409). The mean ocular discomfort score for tropicamide 1% spray was 1.45 ± 0.56, and for tropicamide 1% eye drops was 2.71 ± 0.67. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001).
Conclusions The mydriatic efficacy of tropicamide 1% spray is similar to that of conventional tropicamide 1% eye drops, and spray application causes less ocular discomfort.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Ueno N, Refojo MF, Abelson MB . Pharmacokinetics. In: Albert DM, Jakobiec FA, editors. Principles and practice of ophthalmology: basic sciences. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1994:916–29.
Bartlett JD, Wesson MD, Swiatocha J, Woolley T . Efficacy of a pediatric cycloplegic administration as a spray. J Am Optom Assoc 1993;64:617–21.
Ismail EE, Rouse MW, De Land PN . A comparison of drop instillation and spray application of 1% cyclopentolate hydrochloride. Optom Vis Sci 1994;71:235–41.
Benavides JO, Satchell ER, Frantz KA . Efficacy of a mydriatic spray in the pediatric population. Optom Vis Sci 1997;74:160–3.
Doe EA, Campagna JA . Pilocarpine spray: an alternative delivery method. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 1998;14:1–4.
Mishima S . Clinical pharmacokinetics of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1981;21:504–9.
File RR, Patton TF . Topically applied pilocarpine. Arch Ophthalmol 1980;98:112–8.
European pharmacopoeia. 3rd ed. Strasbourg: European Department for the Quality of Medicines, 1997:1767–8.
Mullen W, Shepherd W, Labovitz J . Ophthalmic preservatives and vehicles. Surv Ophthalmol 1973;17:469–76.
Burstein NL . Corneal cytotoxicity of topically applied drugs, vehicles and preservatives. Surv Ophthalmol 1980;25:15–20.
Olson RJ, White GL . Preservatives in ophthalmic topical medications: a significant cause of disease. Cornea 1990;9:363–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akman, A., Aydin, P. Comparison of mydriatic efficacy of spray application and drop instillation of tropicamide 1%. Eye 13, 653–655 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1999.177
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1999.177