Abstract
Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of two carbomer 940 eye gels in the treatment of dry eyes: Lacrinorm (also called GelTears), a recently introduced eye gel, and Viscotears (also called Vidisic or Lacrigel), used as a reference gel. The main difference between the two gels is in the preservative, respectively benzalkonium chloride and cetrimide.
Methods A double-masked, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted in 16 centres in four European countries. A total of 179 patients suffering from aqueous-deficient dry eye were enrolled, of whom 92 were randomised to treatment with Lacrinorm and 87 to the reference gel. Gel was instilled four times a day for a period of 30 days.
Results After 30 days of treatment, subjective symptoms (the combined scores of foreign body sensation, ocular dryness, burning or pain, and photophobia) had improved by 50% in the Lacrinorm group and by 45% in the reference gel group, and objective test results (break-up time, fluorescein test, Schirmer test, Lissamine Green test) by 35-36% in the Lacrinorm group and 25-45% in the reference group. The improvements were significant in both treatment groups (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between the treatment groups. Subjective local tolerability upon instillation on day 30 was rated ‘good’ or ‘very good’ by 91% of patients in both treatment groups. Adverse events were reported for 21 patients in the Lacrinorm group and 17 in the reference group, the most frequent being discomfort, blurred vision, hyperaemia, burning and itching. The frequency and descriptions of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions Over the period of study, Lacrinorm eye gel was as effective and safe as Viscotears/Lacrigel in the treatment of dry eye.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Lemp MA . Dry eye syndromes: treatment and clinical trials. In: Sullivan DA, editor. Lacrimal gland, tear film, and dry eye syndromes. New York: Plenum Press, 1994:553–9.
Ünlü N, Ludwig A, van Ooteghem M, Hincal AA . Formulation of Carbopol 940 ophthalmic vehicles, and in vitro evaluation of the influence of simulated lacrimal fluid on their physico-chemical properties. Pharmazie 1991;46:784–8.
Marquardt R, Christ T . Untersuchungen zur Verweildauer von Tränenersatzmitteln. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1986;189:254–7.
Edsman K, Carlfors J, Harju K . Rheological evaluation and ocular contact time of some carbomer gels for ophthalmic use. J Pharm 1996;137:233–41.
Ünlü N, Ludwig A, van Ooteghem M, Hincal AA . A comparative rheological study on carbopol viscous solutions and the evaluation of their suitability as the ophthalmic vehicles and artificial tears. Pharm Acta Helv 1992;67:5–10.
Bron AJ, Tiffany JM . Pseudoplastic materials as tear substitutes: an exercise in design. In: van Bijsterveld OP, Lemp SA, Spinelli D, editors. International symposium on the lacrimal system 6, Singapore 1990. Milan: Kugler and Ghedini, 1991:27–33.
Leibowitz HM, Chang RK, Mandell AI . Gel tears: a new medication for the treatment of dry eyes. Ophthalmology 1984;91:1199–204.
Lepri A, Salvatori E, Gloria EM, Bartalena L, Marcocci C, Bruno-Bossio G, et al. A new artificial tear gel preparation in the treatment of mild Graves ophthalmopathy. In: van Bijsterveld OP, Lemp MA, Spinelli D, editors. International symposium on the lacrimal system 6, Singapore 1990. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini, 1991:51–5.
Troiano P, Calabrese A, Aschero M, Miglior M . The possibility to stabilize the tearfilm; comparison between tear substitutes. In: van Bijsterveld OP, Lemp MA, Spinelli D, editors. International symposium on the lacrimal system 6, Singapore 1990. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini, 1991:97–101.
Laroche L, Arrata M, Brasseur G, et al. Traitement de la sécheresse oculaire par gel lacrymal: étude multicentrique randomisée. J Fr Ophtalmol 1991;14:321–6.
Marner K, Moller PM, Dillon M, Rask-Pedersen E . Viscous carbomer eye drops in patients with dry eyes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1996;74:249–52.
Brodwall J, Alme G, Gedde-Dahl S, Smith J, Lilliedahl NP, Kunz PA, Sunderraj P . A comparative study of polyacrylic acid (Viscotears) liquid gel versus polyvinylalcohol in the treatment of dry eyes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997;75:457–61.
Sullivan LJ, McCurrach F, Lee S, Taylor HR, Rolando M, Marechal-Courtois C, et al. Efficacy and safety of 0.3% carbomer gel compared to placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe dry eye syndrome. Ophthalmology 1997;104:1402–8.
Gambaro S, Bellusi M, Formenti F, Lore V, Spinelli D . The use of a carbopolmannitol gel combination in the treatment of dry eye. In: van Bijsterveld OP, Lemp MA, Spinelli D, editors. International symposium on the lacrimal system 6, Singapore 1990. Amsterdam: Kugler & Ghedini, 1991:103–13.
Lemp MA . Report of National Eye Institute/Industry workshop on clinical trials in dry eye. CLAO J 1995;21:221–32.
van Bijsterveld OP . Diagnostic tests in the sicca syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;82:10–4.
SAS/STAT User's Guide, version 6, 4th ed. Cary: SAS Institute, 1990.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bron, A., Daubas, P., Siou-Mermet, R. et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two eye gels in the treatment of dry eyes: Lacrinorm and Viscotears. Eye 12, 839–847 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.215
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1998.215