Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical nutrition, enteral and parenteral nutrition

Compliance with preoperative oral nutritional supplements in patients at nutritional risk─only a question of will?

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Preoperative nutrition has been shown to reduce morbidity after major gastrointestinal (GI) surgery in selected patients at risk. In a randomized trial performed recently (NCT00512213), almost half of the patients, however, did not consume the recommended dose of nutritional intervention. The present study aimed to identify the risk factors for noncompliance.

Subjects/Methods:

Demographic (n=5) and nutritional (n=21) parameters for this retrospective analysis were obtained from a prospectively maintained database. The outcome of interest was compliance with the allocated intervention (ingestion of 11/15 preoperative oral nutritional supplement units). Uni- and multivariate analyses of potential risk factors for noncompliance were performed.

Results:

The final analysis included 141 patients with complete data sets for the purpose of the study. Fifty-nine patients (42%) were considered noncompliant. Univariate analysis identified low C-reactive protein levels (P=0.015), decreased recent food intake (P=0.032) and, as a trend, low hemoglobin (P=0.065) and low pre-albumin (P=0.056) levels as risk factors for decreased compliance. However, none of them was retained as an independent risk factor after multivariate analysis. Interestingly, 17 potential explanatory parameters, such as upper GI cancer, weight loss, reduced appetite or co-morbidities, did not show any significant correlation with reduced intake of nutritional supplements.

Conclusions:

Reduced compliance with preoperative nutritional interventions remains a major issue because the expected benefit depends on the actual intake. Seemingly, obvious reasons could not be retained as valid explanations. Compliance seems thus to be primarily a question of will and information; the importance of nutritional supplementation needs to be emphasized by specific patients’ education.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fang S, Long J, Tan R, Mai H, Lu W, Yan F et al. A multicentre assessment of malnutrition, nutritional risk, and application of nutritional support among hospitalized patients in Guangzhou hospitals. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2013; 22: 54–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weimann A, Breitenstein S, Breuer JP, Gabor SE, Holland-Cunz S, Kemen M et al. Clinical nutrition in surgery: Guidelines of the German Society for Nutritional Medicine. Chirurg 2014; 85: 320–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Marik PE, Flemmer M . Immunonutrition in the surgical patient. Minerva Anestesiol 2012; 78: 336–342.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cerantola Y, Hubner M, Grass F, Demartines N, Schafer M . Immunonutrition in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2011; 98: 37–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mauskopf JA, Candrilli SD, Chevrou-Severac H, Ochoa JB . Immunonutrition for patients undergoing elective surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: impact on hospital costs. World J Surg Oncol 2012; 10: 136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Y, Gu Y, Guo T, Li Y, Cai H . Perioperative immunonutrition for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Surg Oncol 2012; 21: e87–e95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hubner M, Cerantola Y, Grass F, Bertrand PC, Schafer M, Demartines N . Preoperative immunonutrition in patients at nutritional risk: results of a double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 2012; 66: 850–855.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M . ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 2003; 22: 415–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McClave SA, Martindale RG, Vanek VW, McCarthy M, Roberts P, Taylor B et al. Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.). JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2009; 33: 277–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de Groot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM . How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr 2006; 25: 224–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, Fearon K, Weimann A, Bozzetti F . ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: surgery. Clin Nutr 2009; 28: 378–386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Vermorel M, Ritz P, Tappy L, Laville M, Martin A . Apports nutritionnels conseillés de la population française. In: TEC and DCO, editor 2001, p 17–36.

  14. Hiesmayr M, Schindler K, Pernicka E, Schuh C, Schoeniger-Hekele A, Bauer P et al. Decreased food intake is a risk factor for mortality in hospitalised patients: the Nutrition Day survey 2006. Clin Nutr 2009; 28: 484–491.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stratton RJ, Elia M . Encouraging appropriate, evidence-based use of oral nutritional supplements. Proc Nutr Soc 2010; 69: 477–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mariette C, Alves A, Benoist S, Bretagnol F, Mabrut JY, Slim K . Perioperative care in digestive surgery. Guidelines for the French society of digestive surgery (SFCD). Ann Chir 2005; 130: 108–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ravasco P, Monteiro-Grillo I, Camilo M . Individualized nutrition intervention is of major benefit to colorectal cancer patients: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of nutritional therapy. Am J Clin Nutr 2012; 96: 1346–1353.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Elia M, Stratton RJ . An analytic appraisal of nutrition screening tools supported by original data with particular reference to age. Nutrition 2012; 28: 477–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chang YL, Tsai YF, Wu YC, Hsieh MJ . Factors Relating to Quality of Life After Esophagectomy for Cancer Patients in Taiwan. Cancer Nurs 2014; 37: 4–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Scarpa M, Valente S, Alfieri R, Cagol M, Diamantis G, Ancona E et al. Systematic review of health-related quality of life after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 4660–4674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ryan AM, Healy LA, Power DG, Rowley SP, Reynolds JV . Short-term nutritional implications of total gastrectomy for malignancy, and the impact of parenteral nutritional support. Clin Nutr 2007; 26: 718–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bozzetti F . Nutritional support in patients with oesophageal cancer. Support Care Cancer 2010; 18: S41–S50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fearon KC, Jenkins JT, Carli F, Lassen K . Patient optimization for gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Br J Surg 2013; 100: 15–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ionescu D, Tibrea C, Puia C . Pre-operative hypoalbuminemia in colorectal cancer patients undergoing elective surgery - a major risk factor for postoperative outcome. Chirurgia (Bucur) 2013; 108: 822–828.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Uppal S, Al-Niaimi A, Rice LW, Rose SL, Kushner DM, Spencer RJ et al. Preoperative hypoalbuminemia is an independent predictor of poor perioperative outcomes in women undergoing open surgery for gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 131: 416–422.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bozzetti F, Gianotti L, Braga M, Di Carlo V, Mariani L . Postoperative complications in gastrointestinal cancer patients: the joint role of the nutritional status and the nutritional support. Clin Nutr 2007; 26: 698–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Valenzuela-Landaeta K, Rojas P, Basfi-fer K . [Nutritional assessment for cancer patient]. Nutr Hosp 2012; 27: 516–523.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Seo KW, Yoon KY . Nutritional assessment and perioperative nutritional support in gastric cancer patients. Korean J Gastroenterol 2013; 61: 186–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ranzani OT, Zampieri FG, Forte DN, Azevedo LC, Park M . C-reactive protein/albumin ratio predicts 90-day mortality of septic patients. PLoS One 2013; 8: e59321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was presented at the Annual Swiss Surgical Meeting during 12–14 June, 2013, in Bern, Switzerland.

Author Contributions

Study conception and design: M Hübner, F Grass, P Coti Bertrand and N Demartines. Acquisition of data: P Coti Bertrand, M Hübner, F. Grass and Y Cerantola. Analysis and interpretation of data: P. Ballabeni, M Hübner, F. Grass, P Coti Bertrand, M Schäfer and N Demartines. Drafting of manuscript: F Grass, M Hübner, M Schäfer, P Coti Bertrand, N Demartines and Y Cerantola. Critical revision of manuscript: all authors

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N Demartines.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grass, F., Bertrand, P., Schäfer, M. et al. Compliance with preoperative oral nutritional supplements in patients at nutritional risk─only a question of will?. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 525–529 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.285

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2014.285

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links