Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Maternal Nutrition, Infants and Children

Folic acid supplementation during pregnancy may protect against depression 21 months after pregnancy, an effect modified by MTHFR C677T genotype



As low folate status has been implicated in depression, high folate intake, in the form of supplements, during pregnancy might offer protection against depression during pregnancy and postpartum.


We examined the association between change in self-reported depressive symptoms (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale) at different timepoints during and following pregnancy and self-reported folic acid supplementation during pregnancy in a prospective cohort of 6809 pregnant women. We also tested whether there was a main effect of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T genotype (which influences folate metabolism and intracellular levels of folate metabolites and homocysteine) on change in depression scores, and carried out our analysis of folic acid supplementation and depression stratifying by genotype.


We found no strong evidence that folic acid supplementation reduced the risk of depression during pregnancy and up to 8 months after pregnancy. However, we did find evidence to suggest that folic acid supplements during pregnancy protected against depression 21 months postpartum, and that this effect was more pronounced in those with the MTHFR C677T TT genotype (change in depression score from 8 months to 21 months postpartum among TT individuals was 0.66 (95% CI=0.31–1.01) among those not taking supplements, compared with −1.02 (95% CI=−2.22–0.18) among those taking supplements at 18 weeks pregnancy, Pdifference=0.01).


Low folate is unlikely to be an important risk factor for depression during pregnancy and for postpartum depression, but may be a risk factor for depression outside of pregnancy, especially among women with the MTHFR C677T TT genotype.


Several studies have shown that low folate levels are associated with depression in the general population (Bjelland et al., 2003; Paul et al., 2004; Lewis et al., 2006; Morris et al., 2006) and some clinical trials also show that folate may have a therapeutic effect on depression, either alone or in combination with antidepressants (Taylor et al., 2004). A number of biological mechanisms have been postulated to explain how folate may affect central nervous system pathways that regulate mood. These include folate participation in serotonin metabolic pathways, decreasing homocysteine levels, which seems to have an excitotoxic effect on brain receptors, and DNA methylation—a process essential for gene regulation (Paul et al., 2004).

During pregnancy, the demand for folate is increased. Without adequate supplementation, concentrations of maternal serum folate decrease gradually from the fifth month of pregnancy onwards, and remain low for several months after childbirth, something which is further accentuated with shorter inter-pregnancy intervals (Smits and Essed, 2001). A short inter-pregnancy interval, which allows less time for restoration of folate levels between pregnancies, has been shown to be strongly associated with postpartum depression in a small observational study (Gurel and Gurel, 2000). Thus, if low folate levels contribute to causing depression, the increased likelihood of lower folate levels during the maternal perinatal period could explain the common occurrence of depression at this period. However, there is a paucity of studies of this association at this critical period. We found only three studies examining the association between folate levels and postpartum depression with contrasting results. Two of these studies were extremely small; Rouillon et al. (1992) (n=25) found no relationship between measured folate levels on the third day after delivery and postpartum depression, whereas, Abou-Saleh et al. (1999) (n=5) found strong evidence (P<0.01) of an association between low folate levels and depression 7 days after delivery. To our knowledge, there has been only one study investigating the relationship between dietary folate intake during pregnancy and postnatal depression in a population-based sample. This prospective cohort study of 865 pregnant women found no evidence of an association; however, the number of women classified as depressed was relatively small (14%) considering that a threshold of 9 or more on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) was used, and folic acid supplementation was not included in the analysis (Miyake et al., 2006). Cho et al. (2008) investigated whether intake of prenatal multivitamins containing folic acid was associated with decreased rates of depression among 1277 pregnant women. The overall prevalence of depression was 9.4% among those taking multivitamins and 6.9% among those not taking multivitamins, but the study did not show strong evidence of an effect (P=0.11).

The enzyme methyltetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) metabolises folate and, in doing so, produces a methyl donor for the synthesis of methionine from homocysteine, and the precursor of S-adenosyl-L-methionine. A common polymorphism (C677T) in the MTHFR gene, which is associated with MTHFR activity and circulating homocysteine levels, has been identified. TT homozygotes have higher homocysteine compared with CC homozygotes (Frosst et al., 1995), although these differences in levels by genotype are diminished with folic acid supplementation (Yang et al., 2008). If low folate levels are an important factor in postpartum depression, the MTHFR C677T genotype should be associated with increased rates of depression, and the protective effect of supplementation should be greatest among those with MTHFR C677T TT genotype.

As increasing folate intake before conception and for the first 3 months of pregnancy reduces the risk of neural tube defects (MRC Vitamin Study Research Group, 1991), women planning or in the early stages of pregnancy are advised to take folic acid supplements until the end of the first trimester. Many women continue to take large amounts of folic acid throughout pregnancy, but the implications of this, including a potential beneficial effect on preventing pregnancy or postnatal depression, have not been adequately studied.

We examined the association between folic acid supplementation in pregnancy and MTHFR C677T genotype, and changes in depression score assessed by the EPDS between 18 and 32 weeks antenatally, between 32 pregnancy weeks and 8 weeks postpartum, between 8 weeks and 8 months postpartum, and between 8 and 21 months postpartum in a large prospective study, in order to test the hypothesis that high folate intake during pregnancy protects against depression.

Participants and methods

The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents And Children (ALSPAC) is a population-based prospective study investigating factors that affect the health and development of children and their parents. The study methods are described in detail elsewhere ( and Golding et al., 2001). In brief, pregnant women living in Bristol, England who had an expected date of delivery between April 1991 and December 1992 were eligible. Of the 14 541 pregnancies enroled in the study, 14 273 were singleton pregnancies and 335 pregnancies were excluded because these were second or third pregnancies of mothers already in the study. Of the 13 928 remaining women, 13 299 had offspring surviving to 12 months. Extensive data have been collected from the mothers from pregnancy onwards by questionnaire, abstraction from medical notes, record linkage, and by attendance at research clinics. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the ALSPAC Law and Ethics Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees.

Measurement of folate intake

Information on use of folic acid supplements was collected from mothers (by self-report) at 18 weeks gestation based on whether these had ever been taken during pregnancy and at 32 weeks gestation based on whether these had been taken within the last 3 months. This questionnaire also included an open-ended question on supplement use; in some cases, women did not report taking folic acid when asked specifically but later recording either taking folic acid alone or folic acid with iron as free text. All these women were included in the group taking folic acid.

Measurement of depressive symptoms

Women completed the EPDS by questionnaire at 18 and 32 weeks of pregnancy and at 8 weeks, 8 months and 21 months postpartum. This questionnaire has 10 questions each with a maximum score of 3 points, with a higher score indicating a greater level of depression. Rather than using an arbitrary cut-off point for cases of depression, something which is highly contentious, we used a continuous EPDS score, which also improved the statistical power to detect an association. Our interest was in the change in EPDS score between successive assessments because we wanted to capture the effects of folic acid supplementation on depression score rather than the effect of depressive symptoms on taking folic acid supplements. In addition, we wanted to study the effect of folic acid supplementation during specific periods; hence, using differences allows us to adjust for the starting scores in each period. Thus, we calculated the difference in EPDS scores between 18 and 32 weeks of pregnancy, between 32 weeks pregnancy and 8 weeks postpartum, between 8 weeks and 8 months postpartum, and between 8 and 21 months postpartum. Negative differences were equivalent to a decrease in depressive symptoms and positive differences in EPDS scores indicated greater levels of depressive symptoms.

Measurement of confounders

There are many potential confounders for the association between folic acid supplementation and depression score, and there is likely to be some bias and measurement error when assessing these confounders. However, potential confounders between folic acid intake and depression score are unlikely to be associated with MTHFR C677T genotype (we tested this assumption by looking at the association between genotype and several maternal characteristics, obtained by questionnaire completed by the mother during pregnancy). Thus, although we show results adjusted for a minimal set of confounders (mother's age, pre-pregnancy BMI, educational level and parity), rather than trying to adjust for all potential confounders in our analysis, and further reducing our dataset due to missingness, we used the association with genotype as a way of confirming that any associations with folate status were real. The MTHFR C677T genotype has been found to be associated with folate levels and to explain around 53% of the genetic variance in homocysteine levels (Bathum et al., 2007) with the difference in homocysteine levels between the CC and TT genotypes being approximately equal to the difference between those taking and not taking folic acid supplements. In addition, we determined whether any effect of folic acid supplementation was more pronounced among TT homozygotes, as a way of determining whether the effect was biological or simply due to confounding. The difference in serum folate and homocysteine concentrations by genotype is known to decrease as intake of folic acid increases; this is because the largest change in levels occurs in the MTHFR C677T TT genotype (Yang et al., 2008).

Laboratory methods

DNA was extracted using the salting out procedure (Miller et al., 1988). Genotyping was undertaken by KBioscience Ltd (, who use their own form of competitive allele-specific PCR system (KASPar) and Taqman, for SNP analysis.

Statistical methods

We tested for associations between potential confounders during pregnancy and genotype using analysis of variance for continuous variables and χ2 for categorical variables. Although the EPDS scores were negatively skewed, the differences in scores were symmetric and the distribution normal; hence, we used paired t-tests to determine whether differences in depression scores between the different time points were associated with folic acid supplementation and MTHFR C677T genotype. We used linear regression for multivariate analyses to adjust for confounders. We also carried out analyses between depression and folic acid supplementation with stratification by MTHFR C677T genotype. Finally, we looked for interactions between genotype and supplement intake using linear regression models with an interaction term; in this analysis, the TT genotype was compared with the CC and CT genotype combined. Assumptions of Hardy–Weinberg Equilibrium were formally tested using a likelihood ratio test. All data were analysed using Stata 8.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA).


Information on folic acid supplementation at either 18 weeks or 32 weeks of pregnancy was available for 12 718 (95.6%) of eligible women. The MTHFR C677T was successfully genotyped in 7587 (59.7%) of these women (the genotyping call rate for this particular polymorphism was 96.8%). Of these 7587 women, 284 (3.7%) who were either of unknown or non-white ethnicity were excluded from analysis. A further 494 (6.8%) women did not complete the Edinburgh postnatal depression score at 18 weeks of pregnancy and so were excluded. This analysis is based on the remaining 6809 women.

At 18 weeks gestation, only 9.36% of women reported having taken folate supplements during their pregnancy, this figure had increased to 27.8% by 32 weeks gestation. The distribution of depression scores and changes in scores among mothers during and following pregnancy in ALSPAC has previously been reported (18), and are shown for this sample in Table 1 (defined using a EPDS cut-off >12). Despite being based on a smaller sample of the main cohort, our results correspond very well with those of Evans et al. (2001). Our mean scores based on the EPDS during and after pregnancy and mean changes in scores between time points are also shown in Table 1. We found that scores decreased after pregnancy, suggesting lower levels of depressive symptomatology and were at their lowest 8 months postpartum, but increased slightly again by 21 months postpartum.

Table 1 Mean Edinburgh postnatal depression scores and changes in scores at different time points during and after pregnancy

In Table 2, we have shown the distribution of several potential confounding factors by genotype, which illustrates that the association between MTHFR genotypes is unlikely to be confounded by maternal age, parity, inter-pregnancy interval, alcohol intake during pregnancy, smoking, social class, educational level and folic acid supplementation.

Table 2 Distribution of potential confounding factors by MTHFR C677T genotype

The results of the analysis of folic acid intake and depression are shown in Table 3. Reported folic acid supplementation at 18 and 32 weeks of pregnancy and MTHFR C677T genotype were not associated with changes in depression score, as measured by the EPDS between 18 and 32 weeks of pregnancy, 32 weeks of pregnancy and 8 weeks postpartum, or between 8 weeks and 8 months postpartum. However, women taking folic acid supplementation at 32 weeks of pregnancy experienced on average a smaller increase in depression score between 8 months and 21 months postpartum than those not taking supplements. We analysed the above with adjustment for key confounders of mother's age, BMI, parity and educational level; this adjustment did not notably change our results.

Table 3 Analysis of folic acid supplement use, MTHFR C677T genotype and change in Edinburgh postnatal depression

In addition, the MTHFR C677T CT and TT genotypes were associated with greater increases in EPDS score between 8 month and 21 months post pregnancy than the CC genotype. In the analysis stratified by genotype, we found that the biggest effect of folic acid supplementation on change in depression score was seen among TT homozygotes (P-interaction=0.02, Table 4). Among this genotype group, women who were taking folic acid supplements were less depressed (according to EPDS score) at 21 months postpartum than at 8 months postpartum, which is contrary to all other genotypes and to women who did not report taking folic acid at 32 weeks of pregnancy. We also stratified by genotype and looked at the association between folic acid supplementation and change in depression score at other time points, but found no association (data not shown).

Table 4 Change in depression score between 8 months and 21 months postpartum stratified by MTHFR C677T genotype


To our knowledge, this is the first longitudinal study of folic acid supplementation use and perinatal depression ever carried out. We had repeated measures of depression score covering pregnancy and up to 21 months postpartum, and this allowed us to test for changes in depression score, which may be associated with folic acid supplementation. In addition, we were able to look at the association between the MTHFR C677T polymorphism and postnatal depression, which, as far as we are aware, has so far not been reported in previous studies. We hypothesised that folic acid supplementation use during pregnancy may protect against increases in depressive symptoms. We found no strong evidence that folic acid supplementation in pregnancy, which could increase circulating folate levels and decrease homocysteine levels substantially, was associated with changes in depression score during pregnancy or up to 8 months postpartum. However, we did find evidence to suggest that folic acid supplementation in pregnancy may protect against an increase in depressive symptoms between 8 and 21 months postpartum. This association was most pronounced among those with the MTHFR C677T TT genotype. Folic acid supplementation has been shown to have the biggest impact on circulating folate and homocysteine levels in those with the MTHFR C677T TT genotype; in accordance with this, we found that the folic acid supplementation had the most beneficial impact on EPDS scores at 21 months postpartum among women with the TT genotype.

Observational studies are subject to confounding, measurement error and bias. Confounding is particularly likely to be a problem in observational studies of folate intake as supplement use and higher dietary intake are associated with a number of measures of social position, which have also been associated with risk of depression. However, associations between genetic variants and disease are not generally subject to the problem of confounding, as a genetic variant, which affects the metabolism of a nutrient, is unlikely to be associated with other dietary and lifestyle factors, which are typically associated with dietary folate intake (Davey Smith and Ebrahim, 2003, 2004; Lewis et al., 2006). Furthermore, unlike measurement of dietary intake (Lewis et al., 2006b), measurement of genotype has a very low error rate and is not generally subject to bias. Thus, associations between polymorphisms, which affect the biologically effective level of a particular exposure, and disease can be used to make inferences about the given exposure and disease.

Some potential limitations need to be borne in mind. We did not conduct psychiatric interviews to assess depression but relied on the EPDS (Cox et al., 1987), a self-reported questionnaire that has shown excellent validity in measuring depressive symptoms during pregnancy and post-natal depression in the United Kingdom and elsewhere (Eberhard-Gran et al., 2001). We used a continuous measure of depression rather than using a cut-off for defining depressive disorder, this gave us more power to look at associations and also helps avoid the problem of setting an arbitrary and debatable cut-off point for caseness. We looked for changes in this score between time points in order to take account of prevalent depressive mood, this gave us an indicator of changes in the severity of depressive symptoms along a continuous measure. However, it is very difficult to quantify the clinical relevance of such changes at a population level. Once we excluded all women with missing data, we were left with a much smaller subset of the original ALSPAC study, however, our scores corresponded very well with those reported previously in a much large sample, (Evans et al., 2001) suggesting that the women included in this analysis were representative of the women who took part in the study. We did not have information on the dose of folic acid taken by women in the study, nor information on how long the folic acid was taken, similarly, many women reported taking multivitamins during pregnancy, but as we did not have any data on whether these contained folic acid (at the time of recruitment, it was not clear that folic acid was beneficial during pregnancy), we did not include women taking multivitamins (unless they specifically reported taking folic acid) in our exposed group. However, even if these multivitamins did contain folic acid this would usually be at a lower dose than a folic acid-only supplement, and excluding these women from the folic acid group would attenuate our results towards the null, and so makes our estimates of effect more conservative.

The association between folic acid supplementation at 32 weeks of pregnancy and change in depression score between 8 months and 21 months of pregnancy could be a chance finding given the large number of statistical tests performed in this analysis. However, our finding of an association between change in EPDS score and the MTHFR C677T genotype, and a greater effect of supplementation among those with the MTHFR C677T genotype suggests that this association may be true rather than due to multiple testing.

How could folic acid supplementation at 32 weeks of pregnancy affect changes in depression score between 8 and 21 months postpartum and not changes in depression score during pregnancy and up to 8 months after pregnancy? Twenty-one months postpartum is a time at which depression can no longer be classified as postnatal and is unlikely to be related to reproductive factors or changes in folate levels during or immediately after pregnancy. Postpartum depression does not seem to be different from other types of depression except for the timing at which it occurs. Many of the symptoms and risk factors that appear to be associated with depression during and following pregnancy are the same as those that are related to depression in general (Halbreich, 2005). However, low folate levels and high homocysteine levels have been suggested to increase infertility and miscarriages (Nelen et al., 2000; George et al., 2002). Therefore, perhaps the fact that all of the women in this study had a pregnancy, which went to term, meant that they also had a sufficiently high folate level so as not to influence depressive symptomatology. While nutrient intakes of the women in this study were similar to the reported nutrient intakes for all women aged 16–64 in the 1987 dietary and nutritional survey of British adults the intake of folate was much higher (Rogers and Emmett, 1998). The mean folate intake in this study was 250 μg/day while the mean intake among women in dietary and nutritional survey of British adults was just 213 μg/day (a difference of 27). In other studies, it has been observed that homocysteine concentrations are lower in pregnant women than in non-pregnant controls, and that this difference is independent of folic acid supplementation (Bonnette et al., 1998; Walker et al., 1999). This may be a physiological response to pregnancy, but may also protect against depression while pregnant and immediately afterwards. Of note is that depression scores among the women included in this study were lower postnatally than antenatally, and that the prevalence of depression (defined by an EPDS score 13) was lower than in women aged 26 in a population-based cohort study (Gale and Martyn, 2004). Depression during pregnancy may therefore be related to reasons other than a lack of folate, which may be a risk factor outside the perinatal period as suggested by previous studies (Bjelland et al., 2003; Morris et al., 2006).

It is not clear whether taking supplements at 32 weeks of pregnancy could lead to large increases in available folate at 21 months postpartum, as there is little data on folate levels several months after supplementation. One study based on a single administration of folic acid in just one subject suggested that the half-life of folate in body pools may be around 100 days (Krumdieck et al., 1998). However, it is possible that women who were taking folic acid supplements at 32 weeks of pregnancy continued to take these supplements after pregnancy. It is possible that these results have arisen by chance in this population and so further studies are required, preferably using a clinical diagnosis of depression to determine whether taking folic acid supplements can affect long-term depression risk and if this risk is moderated by the MTHFR genotype.


  1. Abou-Saleh MT, Ghubash R, Karim L, Krymski M, Anderson DN (1999). The role of pterins and related factors in the biology of early postpartum depression. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 9, 295–300.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bathum L, Petersen I, Christiansen L, Konieczna A, Sørensen TI, Kyvik KO (2007). Genetic and environmental influences on plasma homocysteine: results from a Danish twin study. Clin Chem 53, 971–979.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bjelland I, Tell GS, Vollset SE, Refsum H, Ueland PM (2003). Folate, vitamin B12, homocysteine, and the MTHFR 677C-&gt;T polymorphism in anxiety and depression: the Hordaland Homocysteine Study. Arch Gen Psychiatry 40, 618–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonnette RE, Caudill MA, Boddie AM, Hutson AD, Kauwell GP, Bailey LB (1998). Plasma homocyst(e)ine concentrations in pregnant and nonpregnant women with controlled folate intake. Obstet Gynecol 92, 167–170.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho Y, Han J, Choi J, Ahn H, Ryu H, Kim M et al (2008). Prenatal multivitamins containing folic acid do not decrease prevalence of depression among pregnant women. J Obstet Gynaecol 28, 482–484.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R (1987). Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br J Psychiatry 150, 782–786.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S (2003). ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determinants of disease? Int J Epidemiol 32, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davey Smith G, Ebrahim S (2004). Mendelian randomization: prospects, potentials, and limitations. Int J Epidemiol 33, 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A, Tambs K, Opjordsmoen S, Samuelsen SO (2001). Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 104, 243–249.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Evans J, Heron J, Francomb H, Oke S, Golding J (2001). Cohort study of depressed mood during pregnancy and after childbirth. Brit Med J 323, 257–260.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frosst P, Blom HJ, Milos R, Goyette P, Sheppard GA, Mathews RG et al (1995). A candidate genetic risk factor for vascular disease: a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Nat Genet 10, 111–113.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gale CR, Martyn CN (2004). Birthweight and later risk of depression in a national birth cohort. Brit J Psychiatry 184, 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. George L, Mills JL, Johansson AL, Nordmark A, Olander B, Granath F et al. (2002). Plasma folate levels and risk of spontaneous abortion 288, 1867–1873.

  14. Golding J, Pembrey M, Jones R (2001). ALSPAC-the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. I. Study methodology. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 15, 74–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gurel S, Gurel H (2000). The evaluation of determinants of early postpartum low mood: the importance of parity and inter-pregnancy interval. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 91, 21–24.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Halbreich U (2005). Postpartum disorders: multiple interacting underlying mechanisms and risk factors. J Affect Disord 88, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krumdieck CL, Fukushima K, Fukushima T, Shiota T, Butterworth CE (1998). A long-term study of the excretion of folate and pterins in a human subject after ingestion of 14C folic acid, with observation on the effect of diphenylhydantoin administration. Am J Clin Nutr 31, 88–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewis SJ, Lawlor DA, Davey Smith G, Araya R, Timpson N, Day INM et al. (2006). An association between the thermolabile variant of MTHFR and depression; new evidence from the British Women's Heart and Health Study plus a meta-analysis of existing data. Mol Psychiatry 11, 352–356.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis SJ, Harbord RM, Harris R, Smith GD (2006b). Meta-analyses of observational and genetic association studies of folate intakes or levels and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 98, 1607–1622.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller SA, Dykes DD, Polesky HF (1988). A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells. Nucleic Acids Res 16, 1215.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Miyake Y, Sasaki S, Tanaka K, Yokoyama T, Ohya Y, Fukushima W et al. (2006). Dietary folate and vitamins B(12), B(6), and B(2) intake and the risk of postpartum depression in Japan: The Osaka Maternal and Child Health Study. J Affect Disord 96, 133–138.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Morris MS, Fava M, Jacques PF, Selhub J, Rosenberg IH (2006). Depression and folate status in the US population. Psychother Psychosom 72, 80–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group (1991). Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council vitamin study. Lancet 338, 131–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelen WL, Blom HJ, Steegers EA, den Heijer M, Thomas CM, Eskes TK (2000). Homocysteine and folate levels as risk factors for recurrent early pregnancy loss. Obstet Gynecol 95, 519–524.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Paul RTP, McDonnell AP, Kelly CB (2004). Folic Acid: neurochemistry, metabolism and relationship to depression. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp 19, 477–488.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rogers I, Emmett P (1998). Diet during pregnancy in a population of pregnant women in South West England. ALSPAC Study Team. Avon Longitudinal Study of Pregnancy and Childhood. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 246–250.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rouillon F, Thalassinos M, Miller HD, Lemperiere T (1992). Folates and post partum depression. J Affect Disord 25, 235–241.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Smits LJ, Essed GG (2001). Short interpregnancy intervals and unfavourable pregnancy outcome: role of folate depletion. Lancet 358, 2074–2077.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Taylor MJ, Carney SM, Goodwin GM, Geddes JR (2004). Folate for depressive disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Psychopharmacol 18, 251–256.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Walker MC, Smith GN, Perkins SL, Keely EJ, Garner PR (1999). Changes in homocysteine levels during normal pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180, 660–664.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang Q-H, Botto LD, Gallagher M, Friedman JM, Sanders CL, Koontz D et al. (2008). Prevalence and effects of gene-gene and gene-nutrient interactions on serum folate and serum total homocysteine concentrations in the United States: findings from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey DNA bank. Am J Clin Nutr 88, 232–246.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses. The UK Medical Research Council, the Wellcome Trust and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. This publication is the work of the authors and Sarah Lewis will serve as a guarantor for the contents of this paper.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to S J Lewis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, S., Araya, R., Leary, S. et al. Folic acid supplementation during pregnancy may protect against depression 21 months after pregnancy, an effect modified by MTHFR C677T genotype. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 97–103 (2012).

Download citation


  • postpartum depression
  • folate
  • polymorphism
  • folic acid

Further reading


Quick links