Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The consciousness wars: can scientists ever agree on how the mind works?

Cartoon illustration of scientists exploring a brain-shaped maze.

Illustration: David Parkins

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 625, 438-440 (2024)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-024-00107-7

Updates & Corrections

  • Correction 25 January 2024: The graphic in this feature incorrectly stated that integrated information theory predicts that any complex system could in principle be conscious. In fact, the system needs to have the right kind of information structure, and an AI would not meet this criterion.

References

  1. Fleming, S. M. et al. Preprint at PsyArXiv https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/zsr78 (2023).

  2. Crick, F. & Koch, C. Semin. Neurosci. 2, 263–275 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chalmers, D. J. J. Conscious. Stud. 2, 200–219 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cogitate Consortium. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.23.546249 (2023).

Download references

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Quick links