Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

A call to reduce the carbon costs of forest harvest

Economic modelling of the global carbon cost of harvesting wood from forests shows a much higher annual cost than that estimated by other models, highlighting a major opportunity for reducing emissions by limiting wood harvests.
  1. William R. Moomaw

    1. William R. Moomaw is in the Fletcher School, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA, and Woodwell Climate Research Center, Falmouth, USA.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

  2. Beverly E. Law

    1. Beverly E. Law is in the Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA, and Conservation Biology Institute, Corvallis, USA.

    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed  Google Scholar

Forests accumulate and store vast amounts of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and protect biodiversity1, giving them a defining role in controlling the global average temperature. By contrast, human activity typically increases carbon emissions to the atmosphere and diminishes species populations and diversity. Nowhere is this distinction more obvious than in the harvesting of wood from forests, but the carbon cost of this practice has been overlooked — until now. Writing in Nature, Peng et al.2 report the true carbon cost of wood harvests, which have reduced more carbon storage in vegetation and soils than any other practice except agriculture3,4.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 620, 44-45 (2023)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-02238-9

Updates & Corrections

  • Clarification 04 August 2023: This News & Views article originally understated the IPCC’s stance on the importance of forest-ecosystem protection in reducing greenhouse-gas emissions. The authors’ affiliations have also been updated.

References

  1. Law, B. E. et al. Commun. Earth Environ. 2, 254 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Peng, L., Searchinger, T. D., Zionts, J. & Waite, R. Nature 620, 110–115 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Erb, K.-H. et al. Nature 553, 73–76 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Marques, A. et al. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3, 628–637 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hudiburg, T. W. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 095005 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mackey, B. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 054028 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mildrexler, D. J. et al. Front. For. Glob. Change 3, 594274 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Law, B. E. et al. Land 11, 721 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Birdsey, R. A. et al. Front. For. Glob. Change 5, 1074508 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lutz, J. A. et al. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 849–864 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. REN21. Renewables 2022 Global Status Report (REN21 Secretariat, 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sterman, J. D. et al. Environ. Res. Lett. 13, 015007 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Field, C. B. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Searchinger, T. D. et al. Science 326, 527–528 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Giles-Hansen, K. & Wei, X. Environ. Res. Lett. 17, 044049 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moomaw, W. R. et al. Front. For. Glob. Change 2, 27 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parmesan, C. et al. in Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Pörtner, H.-O. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Subjects

Latest on:

Nature Careers

Jobs

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing

Search

Advanced search

Quick links