Ethical research — the long and bumpy road from shirked to shared

From all too scarce, to professionalized, the ethics of research is now everybody’s business, argues Sarah Franklin in the sixth essay in a series on how the past 150 years have shaped science, marking Nature’s anniversary.
Sarah Franklin is chair of sociology and director of the Reproductive Sociology Research Group at the University of Cambridge, UK.

Search for this author in:

Illustration by Señor Salme

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Nature 574, 627-630 (2019)

doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-03270-4


  1. 1.

    Galton, F. Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into its Laws and Consequences (Macmillan, 1869).

  2. 2.

    Keller, E. F. in FutureNatural: Nature, Science, Culture (eds Robertson, G. et al.) 107–121 (Routledge, 1996).

  3. 3.

    Pauly, P. J. Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology (Oxford Univ. Press, 1987).

  4. 4.

    Wilmut, I., Campbell, K. & Tudge, C. The Second Creation: The Age of Biological Control by the Scientists who Cloned Dolly (Headline, 2000).

  5. 5.

    Bashford, A. & Levine, P. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of the History of Eugenics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2010).

  6. 6.

    Duster, T. Backdoor to Eugenics (Routledge, 1990).

  7. 7.

    Ryan, K. J. et al. The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research (US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1978).

  8. 8.

    Reich, W. T. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Bioethics Vol. 1 (The Free Press, 1978).

  9. 9.

    Harris, J. The Value of Life: An Introduction to Medical Ethics (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1985).

  10. 10.

    Leyser, O. The Culture of Scientific Research in the UK (Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2014).

Download references

Nature Briefing

An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.