Hunger is a gatekeeper of pain in the brain

Ponomarenko, Alexey; Korotkova, Tatiana

doi:10.1038/d41586-018-04759-0

NEWS AND VIEWS
23 April 2018

Hunger is a gatekeeper of pain in the brain

A neuronal population has now been found that regulates two competing needs — hunger and pain. Urgent pain overrides hunger, but appetite-inducing neuronal activity dampens long-term pain responses to enable feeding.

Alexey Ponomarenko⁰ &
Tatiana Korotkova¹

Alexey Ponomarenko
1. lexey Ponomarenko is at the Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf 40225, Germany.
View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Tatiana Korotkova
1. Tatiana Korotkova is at the Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research, Cologne 50931, Germany.
View author publications

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Access through your institution

Buy or subscribe

The body’s basic needs include a timely supply of nutrients and the avoidance of tissue damage, which are signalled in the brain by hunger and pain, respectively. But these needs cannot be fulfilled simultaneously, because their resolution involves mutually exclusive behaviours. How does the brain prioritize the more urgent need? Writing in Cell, Alhadeff et al.¹ report that the brain’s priorities are set depending on the type of pain involved. Hunger-mediating neurons suppress long-term inflammatory pain, but acute pain, which signals an immediate threat, dampens the activity of these neurons and thus deprioritizes feeding.

Access options

Access through your institution

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Nature 556, 445-446 (2018)

doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-04759-0

References

Alhadeff, A. L. et al. Cell 173, 140–152 (2018).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Aponte, Y., Atasoy, D. & Sternson, S. M. Nature Neurosci. 14, 351–355 (2011).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Gropp, E. et al. Nature Neurosci. 8, 1289–1291 (2005).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Luquet, S., Perez, F. A., Hnasko, T. S. & Palmiter, R. D. Science 310, 683–685 (2005).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Betley, J. N., Cao, Z. F. H., Ritola, K. D. & Sternson, S. M. Cell 155, 1337–1350 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Steculorum, S. M. et al. Cell 165, 125–138 (2016).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Campos, C. A., Bowen, A. J., Roman, C. W. & Palmiter, R. D. Nature 555, 617-622 (2018).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Carter, M. E., Soden, M. E., Zweifel, L. S. & Palmiter, R. D. Nature 503, 111–114 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Krashes, M. J., Shah, B. P., Koda, S. & Lowell, B. B. Cell Metab. 18, 588–595 (2013).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Lin, Y.-C., Kuo, T.-W. & Knight, Z. A. Cell 160, 829–841 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Sternson, S. M. & Eiselt, A.-K. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 79, 401–423 (2017).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Saper, C. B. & Loewy, A. D. Brain Res. 197, 291–317(1980).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Jennings, J. H. et al. Cell 160, 516–527 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Nieh, E. H. et al. Cell 160, 528–541 (2015).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Carus-Cadavieco, M. et al. Nature 542, 232–236 (2017).
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar