Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Haploidentical, G-CSF-primed, unmanipulated bone marrow transplantation for patients with high-risk hematological malignancies: an update

Abstract

Ninety-seven patients affected by high-risk hematological malignancies underwent G-CSF primed, unmanipulated bone marrow (BM) transplantation from a related, haploidentical donor. All patients were prepared with an identical conditioning regimen including Thiotepa, Busilvex, Fludarabine (TBF) and antithymocyte globulin given at myeloablative (MAC=68) or reduced (reduced intensity conditioning (RIC)=29) dose intensity and received the same GvHD prophylaxis consisting of the combination of methotrexate, cyclosporine, mycofenolate-mofetil and basiliximab. Patients were transplanted in 1st or 2nd CR (early phase: n=60) or in >2nd CR or active disease (advanced phase: n=37). With a median time of 21 days (range 12–38 days), the cumulative incidence (CI) of neutrophil engraftment was 94±3%. The 100-day CI of III–IV grade acute GvHD and the 2-year CI of extensive chronic GvHD were 9±3% and 12±4%, respectively. Overall, at a median follow-up of 2.2 years (range 0.3–5.6), 44 out of 97 (45%) patients are alive in CR. The 5-year probability of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for patients in early and advanced phase was 53±7 vs 24±8% (P=0.006) and 48±7 vs 22±8% (P=0.01), respectively. By comparing MAC with RIC patient groups, the transplant-related mortality was equivalent (36±6 vs 28±9%) while the relapse risk was lower for the MAC patients (22±6 vs 45±11%), who showed higher OS (48±7 vs 29±10%) and DFS (43±7 vs 26±10%). However, all these differences did not reach a statistical significance. In multivariate analysis, diagnosis and recipient age were significant factors for OS and DFS. In conclusion, this analysis confirms, on a longer follow-up and higher number of patients, our previous encouraging results obtained by using MAC and RIC TBF regimen as conditioning for G-CSF primed, unmanipulated BM transplantation from related, haploidentical donor in patients with high-risk hematological malignancies, lacking an HLA-identical sibling or unrelated donor and in need to be urgently transplanted.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huang XJ, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Chen H, Han W et al. Haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation without in vitro T-cell depletion for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 38: 291–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Xu LP, Liu KY, Liu DH, Han W, Chen H, Chen YH et al. A novel protocol for haploidentical hematopoietic SCT without in vitro T-cell depletion in the treatment of severe acquired aplastic anemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 1507–1512.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chang YJ, Huang XJ . Haploidentical bone marrow transplantation without T-cell depletion. Semin Oncol 2012; 39: 653–663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Solomon SR, Sizemore CA, Sanacore M, Zhang X, Brown S, Holland HK et al. Haploidentical transplantation using T cell replete peripheral blood stem cells and myeloablative conditioning in patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies who lack conventional donors is well tolerated and produces excellent relapse-free survival: results of a prospective phase II trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 1859–1866.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bashey A, Zhang X, Sizemore CA, Manion K, Brown S, Holland HK et al. T-cell-replete HLA-haploidentical hematopoietic transplantation for hematologic malignancies using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide results in outcomes equivalent to those of contemporaneous HLA-matched related and unrelated donor transplantation. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 1310–1316.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Di Bartolomeo P, Santarone S, De Angelis G, Picardi A, Cudillo L, Cerretti R et al. Haploidentical, unmanipulated, G-CSF-primed bone marrow transplantation for patients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. Blood 2013; 12: 849–857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Raiola AM, Dominietto A, Ghiso A, Di Grazia C, Lamparelli T, Gualandi F et al. Unmanipulated haploidentical bone marrow transplantation and posttransplantation cyclophosphamide for hematologic malignancies after myeloablative conditioning. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2013; 19: 117–122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Laughlin MJ, Eapen M, Rubinstein P, Wagner JE, Zhang MJ, Champlin RE et al. Outcome after transplantation of cord blood or bone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with acute leukaemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2265–2275.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rocha V, Labopin M, Sanz G, Arcese W, Schwerdtfeger R, Bosi A et al. Transplants of umbilical cord blood orbone marrow from unrelated donors in adults with acute leukaemia. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2276–2285.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta V, Tallman MS, Weisdorf DJ . Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for adults with acute Myeloid leukaemia: myths, controversies and unknowns. Blood 2011; 117: 2307–2318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weisdorf D . Which donor or graft source should you choose for the strongest GVL? Is there really any difference. Best Practice and Research. Clin Haematol 2013; 26: 293–296.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ballen KK, Spitzer TR . The great debate: haploidentical or cord blood transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 323–329.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ballen KK, Koreth J, Chen YB, Dey BR, Spitzer TR . Selection of optimal alternative graft source: mismatched unrelated donor, umbilical cord blood, or haploidentical transplant. Blood 2012; 113: 1972–1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brunstein CG, Fuchs EJ, Carter SL, Karanes C, Costa LJ, Wu J et al. Alternative donor transplantation after reduced intensity conditioning: results of parallel phase 2 trials using partially HLA-mismatched related bone marrow or unrelated double umbilical cord blood grafts. Blood 2011; 118: 282–288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aversa F, Tabilio A, Velardi A, Cunningham I, Terenzi A, Falzetti F et al. Treatment of high-risk acute leukemia with T-cell-depleted stem cells from related donors with one fully mismatched HLA haplotype. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1186–1193.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Aversa F, Terenzi A, Tabilio A, Falzetti F, Carotti A, Ballanti S et al. Full haplotype-mismatched hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation: a phase II study in patients with acute leukemia at high risk of relapse. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 3447–3454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu DP, Dong L, Wu T, Huang XJ, Zhang MJ, Han W et al. Conditioning including antithymocyte globulin followed by unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical blood and marrow transplantation can achieve comparable outcomes with HLA-identical sibling transplantation. Blood 2006; 107: 3065–3073.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang XJ, Liu DH, Liu KY, Xu LP, Chen H, Han W et al. Treatment of acute leukemia with unmanipulated HLA-mismatched/haploidentical blood and bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 257–265.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Luznik L, O’Donnell PV, Symons HJ, Chen AR, Leffell MS, Zahurak M et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, post-transplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008; 14: 641–650.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Ciurea SO, Mulanovich V, Saliba RM, Bayraktar UD, Jiang Y, Bassett R et al. Improved early outcomes using a T cell replete graft compared with T cell depleted haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 1835–1844.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Martelli MF, Di Ianni M, Ruggeri L, Pierini A, Falzetti F, Carotti A et al. ‘Designed’ grafts for HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation. Blood 2014; 123: 967–973.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen BJ, Cui X, Liu C, Chao NJ . Prevention of graft-versus-host disease while preserving graft-versus-leukemia effect after selective depletion of host-reactive T cells by photodynamic cell purging process. Blood 2002; 99: 3083–3088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Federmann B, Bornhauser M, Meisner C, Kordelas L, Beelen DW, Stuhler G et al. Haploidentical allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adults using CD3/CD19 depletion and reduced intensity conditioning: a phase II study. Haematologica 2012; 97: 1523–1531.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Schuster FR, Meisel R, Führer M, Reuther S, Hauer J, Tischer J et al. Anti-leukaemic activity of a novel haploidentical-transplantation approach employing unmanipulated bone marrow followed by CD6-depleted peripheral blood stem cells in children with refractory/relapsed acute leukaemia. Br J Haematol 2013; 162: 802–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Daniele N, Scerpa MC, Caniglia M, Bernardo ME, Rossi C, Ciammetti C et al. Transplantation in the onco-hematology field: focus on the manipulation of αβ and γδ T cells. Pathol Res Pract 2012; 208: 67–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lu SY, Liu KY, Liu DH, Xu LP, Huang XJ . High frequencies of CD62L+ naive regulatory T cells in allografts are associated with a low risk of acute graft-versus-host disease following unmanipulated allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Exp Immunol 2011; 165: 264–277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bertaina A, Merli P, Rutella S, Pagliara D, Bernardo ME, Masetti R et al. HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation after removal of αβ+ T and B-cells in children with non-malignant disorders. Blood 2014; 124: 822–826.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ji SQ, Chen HR, Yan HM, Wang HX, Liu J, Zhu PY et al. Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (basiliximab) for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematological malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 36: 349–354.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Luznik L, O’Donnell PV, Fuchs EJ . Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for tolerance induction in HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation. Semin Oncol 2012; 39: 683–693.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sanz J, Boluda JC, Martín C, González M, Ferrá C, Serrano D et al. Single-unit umbilical cord blood transplantation from unrelated donors in patients with hematological malignancy using busulfan, thiotepa, fludarabine and ATG as myeloablative conditioning regimen. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 1287–1293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974; 18: 295–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J et al. 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 825–828.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shulman HM, Kleiner D, Lee SJ, Morton T, Pavletic SZ, Farmer E et al. Histopathologic diagnosis of chronic graft-versus-host disease: National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Project on Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: II. Pathology Working Group Report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 31–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Gooley TA, Leisenring W, Crowley J, Storer BE . Estimation of failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks: new representations of old estimators. Stat Med 1999; 18: 695–706.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gray RJ . A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 1988; 16: 1141–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaplan EL, Meier P . Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1999; 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mantel N . Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 1966; 50: 163–170.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cox DR . Regression models and life-tables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 1972; 34: 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Maffongelli G, Tatarelli P, De Angelis G, Cerretti R, Picardi A, Cudillo L et al. A matched-pair analysis of infections and related mortality in haploidentical vs HLA identical transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014; 49: S84.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Vago L, Perna SK, Zanussi M, Mazzi B, Barlassina C, Stanghellini MT et al. Loss of mismatched HLA in leukemia after stem-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 478–488.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Vago L, Toffalori C, Ciceri F, Fleischhauer K . Genomic loss of mismatched human leukocyte antigen and leukemia immune escape from haploidentical graft-versus-leukemia. Semin Oncol 2012; 39: 707–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Zeidan AM, Forde PM, Symons H, Chen A, Smith BD, Pratz K et al. HLA-haploidentical donor lymphocyte infusions for patients with relapsed hematologic malignancies after related HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2014; 20: 314–318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by grants from the Agenzia Regionale del Lazio per i Trapianti e le Patologie Connesse and from the “Matteo Fabrizio” Onlus-Association.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W Arcese.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

This article was published as part of a supplement, supported by WIS-CSP Foundation, in collaboration with Gilead, Milteny Biotec, Gamida cell, Adienne Pharma and Biotech, Medac hematology, Kiadis Pharma and Almog Diagnostic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arcese, W., Picardi, A., Santarone, S. et al. Haploidentical, G-CSF-primed, unmanipulated bone marrow transplantation for patients with high-risk hematological malignancies: an update. Bone Marrow Transplant 50 (Suppl 2), S24–S30 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2015.91

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2015.91

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links