Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Infections

Efficacy and safety of micafungin for the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection during neutropenia in children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of micafungin for the prevention of invasive fungal infection (IFI) during the neutropenic phase of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (allo-HSCT) in children and adolescents. This was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. Micafungin was administered i.v. at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day (max 50 mg) from the beginning of conditioning until neutrophil engraftment. Treatment success was defined as the absence of proven, probable, possible or suspected IFI through to 4 weeks after therapy. From April 2010 to December 2011, 155 patients were enrolled from 11 institutions in Korea, and 147 patients were analyzed. Of the 147 patients, 121 (82.3%) completed the protocol without premature interruption. Of the 132 patients in whom micafungin efficacy could be evaluated, treatment success was achieved in 119 patients (90.2%). There was no proven fungal infection in any patient. The number of patients with probable, possible and suspected IFI was two, two and nine, respectively. Thirty-five patients (23.8%) experienced 109 adverse events (AEs) possibly related to micafungin. No patients experienced grade IV AEs. Two patients (1.4%) discontinued micafungin administration due to adverse effects. None of the deaths were related to the study drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marr KA, Carter RA, Crippa F, Wald A, Corey L . Epidemiology and outcome of mould infections in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 2002; 34: 909–917.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kume H, Yamazaki T, Abe M, Tanuma H, Okudaira M, Okayasu I . [Epidemiology of visceral mycoses in patients with leukemia and MDS—Analysis of the data in annual of pathological autopsy cases in Japan in 1989, 1993, 1997 and 2001]. Nihon Ishinkin Gakkai Zasshi 2006; 47: 15–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Denning DW . Echinocandin antifungal drugs. Lancet 2003; 362: 1142–1151.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yanada M, Kiyoi H, Murata M, Suzuki M, Iwai M, Yokozawa T et al. Micafungin, a novel antifungal agent, as empirical therapy in acute leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia. Intern Med 2006; 45: 259–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kuse ER, Chetchotisakd P, da Cunha CA, Ruhnke M, Barrios C, Raghunadharao D et al. Micafungin versus liposomal amphotericin B for candidaemia and invasive candidosis: a phase III randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2007; 369: 1519–1527.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van Burik JA, Ratanatharathorn V, Stepan DE, Miller CB, Lipton JH, Vesole DH et al. Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 39: 1407–1416.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashino S, Morita L, Takahata M, Onozawa M, Nakagawa M, Kawamura T et al. Administration of micafungin as prophylactic antifungal therapy in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol 2008; 87: 91–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kusuki S, Hashii Y, Yoshida H, Takizawa S, Sato E, Tokimasa S et al. Antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin in patients treated for childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2009; 53: 605–609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, Stevens DA, Edwards JE, Calandra T et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis 2008; 46: 1813–1821.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1981; 30: 239–245.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Maertens J, Theunissen K, Verhoef G, Verschakelen J, Lagrou K, Verbeken E et al. Galactomannan and computed tomography-based preemptive antifungal therapy in neutropenic patients at high risk for invasive fungal infection: a prospective feasibility study. Clin Infect Dis 2005; 41: 1242–1250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garey KW, Rege M, Pai MP, Mingo DE, Suda KJ, Turpin RS et al. Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin Infect Dis 2006; 43: 25–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hachem R, Hanna H, Kontoyiannis D, Jiang Y, Raad I . The changing epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: Candida glabrata and Candida krusei as the leading causes of candidemia in hematologic malignancy. Cancer 2008; 112: 2493–2499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kolve H, Ahlke E, Fegeler W, Ritter J, Jurgens H, Groll AH . Safety, tolerance and outcome of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B in paediatric patients with cancer or undergoing haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Antimicrob Chemother 2009; 64: 383–387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roden MM, Nelson LD, Knudsen TA, Jarosinski PF, Starling JM, Shiflett SE et al. Triad of acute infusion-related reactions associated with liposomal amphotericin B: analysis of clinical and epidemiological characteristics. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36: 1213–1220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Walsh TJ, Finberg RW, Arndt C, Hiemenz J, Schwartz C, Bodensteiner D et al. Liposomal amphotericin B for empirical therapy in patients with persistent fever and neutropenia. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 764–771.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Huang X, Chen H, Han M, Zou P, Wu D, Lai Y et al. Multicenter, randomized, open-label study comparing the efficacy and safety of micafungin versus itraconazole for prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 1509–1516.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Seibel NL, Schwartz C, Arrieta A, Flynn P, Shad A, Albano E et al. Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Micafungin (FK463) in febrile neutropenic pediatric patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2005; 49: 3317–3324.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sawada A, Sakata N, Higuchi B, Takeshita Y, Ishihara T, Sakata A et al. [Comparison of micafungin and fosfluconazole as prophylaxis for invasive fungal infection during neutropenia in children undergoing chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation]. Rinsho Ketsueki 2009; 50: 1692–1699.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hiramatsu Y, Maeda Y, Fujii N, Saito T, Nawa Y, Hara M et al. Use of micafungin versus fluconazole for antifungal prophylaxis in neutropenic patients receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol 2008; 88: 588–595.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Grigull L, Kuehlke O, Beilken A, Sander A, Linderkamp C, Schmid H et al. Intravenous and oral sequential itraconazole antifungal prophylaxis in paediatric stem cell transplantation recipients: a pilot study for evaluation of safety and efficacy. Pediatr Transplant 2007; 11: 261–266.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McCoy D, Depestel DD, Carver PL . Primary antifungal prophylaxis in adult hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: current therapeutic concepts. Pharmacotherapy 2009; 29: 1306–1325.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Joseph JM, Jain R, Danziger LH . Micafungin: a new echinocandin antifungal. Pharmacotherapy 2007; 27: 53–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was coordinated by the Clinical Research Coordination Center, National Cancer Center, Korea, using the web-based clinical research management platform (Velos).

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

HJP designed the study, collected the data, performed analysis and reviewed the manuscript; MP performed the analysis and wrote the paper; JJS designed the study and reviewed the manuscript; MH collected the data and performed the analysis; BHN performed the anlaysis; KNK, HJI, JWL, N-GC, BC, H-KK, KHY, HHK, HJK, HYS, HSA, YTL, HK, CJL, JOH contributed to data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J J Seo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, H., Park, M., Han, M. et al. Efficacy and safety of micafungin for the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection during neutropenia in children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 49, 1212–1216 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2014.136

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2014.136

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links