Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Allografting

Cryopreservation of allogeneic PBSC from related and unrelated donors is associated with delayed platelet engraftment but has no impact on survival

Abstract

Cryopreservation of PBSC for allo-SCT offers potential advantages; however, its impact on engraftment and outcomes remains unclear. A total of 76 allo-SCT performed using cryopreserved PBSC from HLA identical related (n=57) and unrelated donors (n=19) were compared with 123 fresh PBSC allo-SCT. Median neutrophil engraftment was on day 12 for both cryopreserved and fresh PBSC; in multivariate analysis, there was a slight but significant delay in neutrophil engraftment after the median date (hazard ratio (HR)=1.44, P=0.003). Platelet engraftment was significantly delayed in cryopreserved PBSC recipients (median time 19 vs 14 days). In multivariate analysis cryopreservation (HR=1.85, P<0.001), earlier date of transplant and lower CD34+ cell dose were associated with delayed platelet engraftment. Two-year OS and relapse and 1-year TRM rates did not differ significantly. Acute GVHD incidence was comparable, and extensive chronic GVHD at 1 year was higher in cryopreserved PBSC recipients (40.3 vs 28.3%), but not significantly so (P=0.13). Cryopreservation of related and unrelated donor allogeneic PBSC is safe and effective where its benefits outweigh the risks of delayed platelet engraftment; its impact on chronic GVHD incidence requires further assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Frey NV, Lazarus HM, Goldstein SC . Has allogeneic stem cell cryopreservation been given the 'cold shoulder'? An analysis of the pros and cons of using frozen versus fresh stem cell products in allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 38: 399–405.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lasky LC, Van Buren N, Weisdorf DJ, Filipovich A, McGlave P, Kersey JH et al. Successful allogeneic cryopreserved marrow transplantation. Transfusion 1989; 29: 182–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eckardt JR, Roodman GD, Boldt DH, Clark GM, Alvarez R, Page C et al. Comparison of engraftment and acute GVHD in patients undergoing cryopreserved or fresh allogeneic BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 1993; 11: 125–131.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stockschläder M, Krüger W, Kroschke G, Zeller W, Hoffknecht M, Löliger C et al. Use of cryopreserved bone marrow in allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 569–572.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stockschläder M, Hassan HT, Krog C, Krüger W, Löliger C, Horstman M et al. Long-term follow-up of leukaemia patients after related cryopreserved allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Br J Haematol 1997; 96: 382–386.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shinkoda Y, Ijichi O, Tanabe T, Ishikawa S, Kamitamari A, Nishikawa T et al. Identical reconstitution after bone marrow transplantation in twins who received fresh and cryopreserved grafts harvested at the same time from their older brother. Clin Transplant 2004; 18: 743–747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim DH, Jamal N, Saragosa R, Loach D, Wright J, Gupta V et al. Similar outcomes of cryopreserved allogeneic peripheral stem cell transplants (PBSCT) compared to fresh allografts. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 1233–1243.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lioznov M, Dellbrügger C, Sputtek A, Fehse B, Kröger N, Zander AR . Transportation and cryopreservation may impair haematopoietic stem cell function and engraftment of allogeneic PBSCs, but not BM. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008; 42: 121–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stockschläder M, Krüger W, Tom Dieck A, Horstmann M, Altnöder M, Löliger C et al. Use of cryopreserved bone marrow in unrelated allogeneic transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17: 197–199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Przepiorka D, Anderlini P, Ippoliti C, Khouri I, Fietz T, Thall P et al. Allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation in advanced hematologic cancers. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 19: 455–460.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ringdén O, Labopin M, Bacigalupo A, Arcese W, Schaefer UW, Willemze R et al. Transplantation of peripheral blood stem cells as compared with bone marrow from HLA-identical siblings in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 4655–4664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zaucha JM, Gooley T, Bensinger WI, Heimfeld S, Chauncey TR, Zaucha R et al. CD34 cell dose in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cell grafts affects engraftment kinetics and development of extensive chronic graft-versus-host disease after human leukocyte antigen-identical sibling transplantation. Blood 2001; 98: 3221–3227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feugier P, Bensoussan D, Girard F, Alla F, Schuhmacher A, Latger-Cannard V et al. Hematologic recovery after autologous PBPC transplantation: importance of the number of postthaw CD34+ cells. Transfusion 2003; 43: 878–884.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weaver CH, Hazelton B, Birch R, Palmer P, Allen C, Schwartzberg L et al. An analysis of engraftment kinetics as a function of the CD34 content of peripheral blood progenitor cell collections in 692 patients after the administration of myeloablative chemotherapy. Blood 1995; 86: 3961–3969.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Storb R, Deeg HJ, Pepe M, Appelbaum F, Anasetti C, Beatty P et al. Methotrexate and cyclosporine versus cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease in patients given HLA-identical marrow grafts for leukemia: long-term follow-up of a controlled trial. Blood 1989; 73: 1729–1734.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Janice Ward for assistance with the data collection.

Author contributions: PM contributed to the study design, collected and analysed the data and wrote the manuscript; SN contributed to the study design and collected the data; DH contributed to the study design, performed cryopreservation and collected the data; CC designed the study and critically reviewed the manuscript; RM designed the study and critically reviewed the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R Malladi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Medd, P., Nagra, S., Hollyman, D. et al. Cryopreservation of allogeneic PBSC from related and unrelated donors is associated with delayed platelet engraftment but has no impact on survival. Bone Marrow Transplant 48, 243–248 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.118

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.118

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links