Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:

Risks and benefits of ovarian shielding in female patients undergoing TBI: a decision analysis

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

References

  1. Courbiere B, Prebet T, Mozziconacci MJ, Metzler-Guillemain C, Saias-Magnan J, Gamerre M . Tumor cell contamination in ovarian tissue cryopreserved before gonadotoxic treatment: should we systematically exclude ovarian autograft in a cancer survivor? Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45: 1247–1248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Oktay K, Cil AP, Bang H . Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2006; 86: 70–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP . Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod BioMed Online 2005; 11: 300–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2008; 90: S241–S246.

  5. Nagashima T, Muroi K, Kawano-Yamamoto C, Miyoshi T, Ohmine K, Toshima M et al. Autologous gamete cryopreservation before hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Med Sci Monit 2005; 11: CR91–CR94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Socie G, Salooja N, Cohen A, Rovelli A, Carreras E, Locasciulli A et al. Nonmalignant late effects after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood 2003; 101: 3373–3385.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakagawa K, Kanda Y, Yamashita H, Nakagawa S, Sasano N, Ohtomo K et al. Ovarian shielding allows ovarian recovery and normal birth in female hematopoietic SCT recipients undergoing TBI. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008; 42: 697–699.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Okuda S, Sato M, Terasako K, Kako S, Oshima K, Kanda Y . Should busulfan-containing regimen be avoided for young female patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation? Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43: 261–262.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Scott BL, Sandmaier BM, Storer B, Maris MB, Sorror ML, Maloney DG et al. Myeloablative vs nonmyeloablative allogeneic transplantation for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myelogenous leukemia with multilineage dysplasia: a retrospective analysis. Leukemia 2006; 20: 128–135.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogawa H, Ikegame K, Kawakami M, Takahashi S, Sakamaki H, Karasuno T et al. Impact of cytogenetics on outcome of stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a large-scale retrospective analysis of data from the Japan Society for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation. Int J Hematol 2004; 79: 495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kanda, Y., Sakamoto, K., Ashizawa, M. et al. Risks and benefits of ovarian shielding in female patients undergoing TBI: a decision analysis. Bone Marrow Transplant 46, 1145–1147 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2010.240

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2010.240

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links