Abstract
Background:
Activation of the PI3K/mTOR and Hedgehog (Hh) signalling pathways occurs frequently in biliary tract cancer (BTC). Crosstalk between these pathways occurs in other gastrointestinal cancers. The respective signalling inhibitors rapamycin and vismodegib may inhibit BTC synergistically and suppress cancer stem cells (CSCs).
Methods:
Gene expression profiling for p70S6k and Gli1 was performed with BTC cell lines. Tumour and pathway inhibitory effects of rapamycin and vismodegib were investigated in BTC preclinical models and CSCs.
Results:
Rapamycin and vismodegib synergistically reduced BTC cell viability and proliferation. This drug combination arrested BTC Mz-ChA-1 cells in the G1 phase but had no significant effect on the cell cycle of BTC Sk-ChA-1 cells. Combined treatment inhibited the proliferation of CSCs and ALDH-positive cells. Nanog and Oct-4 expression in CSCs was decreased by the combination treatment. Western blotting results showed the p-p70S6K, p-Gli1, p-mTOR, and p-AKT protein expression were inhibited by the combination treatment in BTC cells. In an Mz-ChA-1 xenograft model, combination treatment resulted in 80% inhibition of tumour growth and prolonged tumour doubling time. In 4 of 10 human BTC specimens, tumour p-p70S6K and Gli1 protein expression levels were decreased with the combination treatment.
Conclusions:
Targeted inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR and Hhpathways indicates a new avenue for BTC treatment with combination therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), which include cancer of the biliary duct, cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), and gallbladder cancer, are aggressive and have distinct epidemiologic patterns. A high incidence (85/100 000) of BTC has been reported for northeast Thailand, where CCA represents approximately 85% of primary liver cancers (Poomphakwaen et al, 2009). The incidence of intrahepatic CCA is rising rapidly particularly in the western world, including the United States, where an estimated 10 650 people will be diagnosed with BTC in 2014, with the majority presenting at an advanced and inoperable disease stage (Siegel et al, 2014). In Latin America, particularly in Chile, and in South Asia and East Asia, gallbladder cancer is more common. Systemic treatment for BTC is commonly gemcitabine plus cisplatin, but despite treatment, the median overall survival rate is <1 year. Novel therapeutics based on the underlying molecular profile of these tumors will be key to changing the treatment paradigm of BTCs.
Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a 289-kDa serine/threonine protein kinase of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway that regulates cell proliferation, survival, and angiogenesis. mTOR expression is common in gallbladder cancer and CCA and may have prognostic significance (Herberger et al, 2007; Leal et al, 2013; Moolthiya et al, 2014; Simbolo et al, 2014). Inhibition of mTOR has demonstrated anti-tumour effects in preclinical models of gallbladder cancer and CCA (Wu et al, 2007; Herberger et al, 2009; Zong et al, 2014). Furthermore, a clinical trial demonstrated a 5.1% objective response rate in BTC patients treated with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus (Buzzoni et al, 2014).
In contrast, the Hh pathway plays a fundamental role in stem cell maintenance, cell differentiation, tissue polarity, and cell proliferation. Dysregulation of the Hh signalling pathway has been associated with the presence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and implicated in the initiation of pancreatic and other cancers (Rodova et al, 2012). Constitutive activation of the Hh pathway leading to tumourigenesis is seen in various cancers, including basal cell carcinoma and medulloblastoma. Cholangiocellular injury activates Hh ligands, which promotes dysfunctional repair and tumourigenesis. Inhibition of the Hh pathway attenuates the carcinogenesis of CCA cells and enhances necrosis. Expression analysis of human CCA samples has indicated Hh activation in almost 50% of cases (El Khatib et al, 2013). In these cases, non-canonical Hh pathway activation appears to play a key role and can be inhibited by cyclopamine (Kim et al, 2012; Razumilava et al, 2014; Riedlinger et al, 2014).
Our group recently reported crosstalk between the mTOR/S6K1and Hh signalling pathways in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (Wang et al, 2012). mTOR inhibition is already being investigated in the clinical setting in BTCs and modest clinical efficacy has been observed (Buzzoni et al, 2014). We hypothesised that non-canonical Hh pathway activation via mTOR plays an oncogenic role in BTC and that simultaneous inhibition of these two pathways in BTC will provide incremental clinical benefit to patients.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and cell culture
Human BTC Mz-ChA-1and Sk-ChA-1cells were obtained from Dr. Reddy’s lab (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). Human BTC M214, M139, M156, M213, M055, M213LOH, and M213L5H cells were kindly provided by Dr. Lee’s lab (The University of Texas Medical Branch). Cells were cultured in 5% CO2 at 37 °C in DMEM containing 10% foetal calf serum, 100 units ml−1 penicillin, and 100 mg ml−l streptomycin. Cancer stem cell culture medium consisting of DMEM/F12, glutaMAX, B27 supplement, epidermal growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor were purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY, USA).
Reagents and antibodies
Rapamycin was purchased from LC laboratories (Woburn, MA, USA) and vismodegib was obtained from Genentech (South San Francisco, CA, USA). Antibodies recognising p70S6K, Phospho-p70 S6 Kinase (Thr389), mTOR, phospho-mTOR (Ser2448), AKT, and phospho-Akt (Ser473) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA) Antibodies against Gli1and phospho-Gli1(Ser84) were a kind gift of Dr. Mien-Chie Hung’s lab (The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center). Monoclonal anti-β-actin antibody was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
Cell viability assay
Biliary tract cancer Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 cells were seeded into white 96-well plates at 5 × 103 cells per well. After incubation overnight, the cells were treated with rapamycin, vismodegib, or both at serial concentrations from 0.25 to 50 μmol l−1 for 72 h. The CellTiter-Glo luminescent cell viability assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used to determine the number of viable cells in culture. Following treatment, cellular proliferation was measured according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All treatments were performed in triplicate and in three independent experiments.
Colony-formation assay
Colony-formation assay was performed as described previously. In short, 1 × 103 viable cells were subcultured in 6-well plates in triplicate. Cells were cultured overnight and then treated with 1 μmol l−1 rapamycin, 10 μmol l−1 vismodegib, or both for 72 h. Culture medium was aspirated, the cells were washed, and fresh complete medium was added. Cells were incubated for an additional 14 days. Thereafter, the colonies were fixed with 6.0% glutaraldehyde and stained with 0.5% crystal violet. Clonogenic cells were defined as those able to form a colony consisting of at least 50 cells.
Sphere-formation assay
To evaluate the formation of primary spheres, Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 cells were transferred to ultralow-adherence six-well plates (Corning, Inc., Corning, NY, USA) at a density of 5000 per well in 4 ml of CSC medium consisting of DMEM/F12 plus glutaMAX, B27 supplement, 20 ng ml−1 epidermal growth factor and 20 ng l−1 basic fibroblast growth factor. Tumour spheres were allowed to grow for 7 days. To establish spheres, cells were individualised by enzymatic dissociation, strained, and then plated at a density of 5 × 102 or 1 × 103 cells per well in 24-well plates (3 wells per treatment). Cells were treated with rapamycin1 μmol l−1, vismodegib10 μmol l−1, or both for 7 days, after which the culture medium was changed to fresh CSC medium. The resultant spheres were photographed after 14 days of culture.
Cell cycle assay
Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 cells were seeded in 25-cm2 tissue culture flasks and then incubated with 1 μmol l−1 rapamycin, 10 μmol l−1 vismodegib, or both agents. After treatment for 48 h, cells (2 × 106) were harvested by trypsinisation. Then, cells were fixed in 70% ethanol and then incubated with RNase A (100 μg ml−1) and propidium iodide (100 μg ml−1) for 30 min. The data from 10 000 cells for each sample were collected and assessed using a FACS scan (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
Quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from cells using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesised from 1 μg of total RNA using an iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Life Technologies Corp., Hercules, CA, USA). Real-time RT-PCR analysis was performed using a QuantiFast SyBR green PCR kit (Qiagen). The primer sequences were synthesised by Sigma (Supplementary Information 1). Gene expression levels were normalised against the average cycle threshold (Ct) values for the internal control gene GAPDH. Cycle threshold values were extracted using SDS version 2.3 software (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Data analysis was performed using the ΔΔCt method.
Flow cytometric analysis of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity
Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 cells (2.5 × 105) were treated with 1 μmol l−1 rapamycin, 10 μmol l−1 vismodegib, or both for 72 h. The cells were then harvested via trypsinisation and stained for 30 min at 37 °C using an Aldefluor kit (Stem Cell Technologies, Durham, NC, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells treated with diethylaminobenzaldehyde, a specific ALDH inhibitor, were used as a control. The ALDH-positive control population was detected using the FACS scan. ALDH-positive cells were identified with a dot plot.
Western blotting assay
Biliary tract cancer cells were treated with vehicle, 1 μmol l−1 rapamycin, 10 μmol l−1 vismodegib, or the combination of the two drugs for 48 h. Total cellular lysates were obtained by lysing cells in a buffer containing RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% v/v Nonidet P-40, 0.5% v/v sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) and a mixture of protease and phosphatase inhibitors. The protein concentration was measured using a bicinchoninic acid protein assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Electrophoresis was carried out through a 4%–20% Ready Gel Tris-HCl precast polyacrylamide gel (Life Science Technology, Hercules, CA, USA). Gels were transferred to Hybond–C extra nitrocellulose membrane (Amersham Bioscience, Freiburg, Germany). Proteins were detected with antibodies against Gli1, p-Gli1, mTOR, p-mTOR, p70S6K, p-p70S6K, AKT, and p-AKT(Ser473) Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Signals were detected by incubating the membrane with Pierce ECL western blotting substrate (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) and exposed to X-ray (BioExpress, Kaysville, UT, USA).
Mouse xenograft model
All experiments were performed at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. We examined the anti-tumour efficacy of rapamycin, vismodegib, or both in a subcutaneous cancer cell xenograft model. Nude (nu/nu) 6– 8-week-old mice were purchased from Charles River (Wilmington, MA, USA). Five million Mz-ChA-1 cells were subcutaneously injected into each flank in 50:50 PBS:Matrigel (BD Biosciences, Billerica, MA, USA). When tumours reached a mean volume of 100 mm3, animals were matched by size and distributed into four treatment groups consisting of eight mice per group. Mice were treated by oral gavage twice a day with vehicle, 1 mg kg−g rapamycin, 100 mg kg−1 vismodegib, or both rapamycin and vismodegib. Tumour volume was calculated with the formula 1/2(L × W2), where L is length (longest dimension) and W is width (shortest dimension). To calculate tumour growth inhibition, the following formula was used: (TuGcontrol − TuGtest)/TuGcontrol × 100%, where tumour growth (TuG) equals the final tumour size minus the pretreatment tumour size for individual treatment groups. ‘TuGcontrol’ refers to the growth in mice treated with vehicle only and ‘TuGtest’ refers to the growth in mice treated with rapamycin, vismodegib, or both rapamycin and vismodegib. Each mouse was killed by CO2 asphyxiation at the experimental end point or when its tumour was oversized, ulcerated, or necrotic.
Immunohistochemical analysis
Immunohistochemical was performed to examine the p-p70S6K and Gli1 protein expression levels in tumour xenografts and archival tumours from patients with resected gallbladder cancer. Xenograft tumour tissue was covered with OCT embedding compound and stored at −80 °C until ready for sectioning. Frozen sections were mounted on 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane-coated slides. For xenograft tumour tissue slides, the tissue sections were immersed in pre-cooled acetone (−20 °C) for 10 min and the acetone was allowed to evaporate from the tissue sections. Human formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections were deparaffinised using xylene and ethanol. All sections were heated for epitope retrieval in citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubation in 3% hydrogen peroxide. Sections were incubated with the primary polyclonal rabbit anti-p-p70S6K antibody at a dilution of 1 : 400, rabbit anti-Gli1 antibody for 30 min at 37 °C, and then biotin-conjugated secondary goat anti-rabbit antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) for 30 min. Sections were stained with the avidin–biotin complex technique using reagents as described by the manufacturer (Vectastain kit, Vector Laboratories). Positive labelling was visualised by incubating the slides with horseradish peroxidase–conjugated streptavidin (DAB substrate kit, Vector Laboratories). Sections were counterstained with haematoxylin. Stained slides were dehydrated by sequential steps through a graded series of alcohol washes and xylene (Fisher, Suwanee, GA, USA) and were mounted using cover slips.
Statistical analysis
To determine whether the interaction between rapamycin and vismodegib was synergistic, additive, or antagonistic, we used the combination index (CI) method of Chou and Talalay (Chou and Talalay, 1984). Combination index=1 indicates an additive effect, CI<1 a synergistic effect, and CI>1 an antagonistic effect. Results are expressed as the mean±s.d. of the indicated number of independent experiments. Student’s t-test was calculated to compare the mean of each group with that of the control group. P values of <0.05 were considered significant. The statistical analysis of data in this study was performed using Student’s t-test.
Results
Hedgehog and mTOR pathway gene and protein expression in BTC cell lines
We first examined the mutation profile of nine known BTC cell lines for commonly mutated human oncogenes. We used a mass spectroscopy-based profiling for 159 point (‘hot spot’) mutations in 33 genes commonly involved in solid tumours. Our results indicated there were no significant hotspot mutations in these cell lines (Supplementary Information 2). We then conducted quantitative real-time RT-PCR assays to examine the relative expression levels of p70S6K and Gli1 in all 9 BTC cell lines, as indicated by the fold change relative to the gene with the lowest expression level (Figure 1). The real-time RT-PCR results showed a relatively high p70S6K and low Gli1 gene expression in Mz-ChA-1 cells and relatively low p70S6K and high Gli1 gene expression in Sk-ChA-1 cells. On western blotting, downregulation of p-p70S6K and p-Gli1 with vismodegib and rapamycin was noted in Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 cell lines (Supplementary Information 3). Therefore, we chose these two cell lines for further study. Prior phase I studies with the Hh antagonist, vismodegib, have successfully examined Gli1 expression using RT-PCR to measure the pharmacodynamic modulation of the Hh pathway in the clinical setting (Von Hoff et al, 2009; Wong et al, 2011). As noted earlier, the crosstalk between the mTOR/S6K1 and Hh signalling pathway is through S6K1-mediated regulation of Gli1 in oesophageal cancer, thus p70 S6K1 was chosen for measurement of mTOR activity (Wang et al, 2012). We therefore used p70S6K and Gli1 as the surrogate biomarkers of mTOR and Hh pathway activation, respectively.
Effects of rapamycin, vismodegib, and both on BTC cell viability and proliferation
To explore the effects of rapamycin, vismodegib, and both on BTC cell proliferation, we used the CellTiter-Glo (Promega) luminescent cell viability assay to examine whether the combined treatment enhanced the inhibition of cell proliferation affected by either agent alone. Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 cells were treated at serial concentrations for 72 h. Our results showed that rapamycin and vismodegib inhibited proliferation in both cell lines in a concentration-dependent manner and that Mz-ChA-1 cells were more sensitive than Sk-ChA-1 cells to both drugs (Figure 2A and B). The results also suggested that combination therapy reduced cell viability more than either agent alone did.
To determine whether the combined treatment had a synergistic effect on cell viability, the CI values were calculated according to the method of Chou and Talalay (Table 1). The combination of vismodegib and rapamycin resulted in synergistic interaction in Mz-ChA-1 cells at IC50, IC75, and IC90, and the CI values were 0.40±0.12, 0.39±0.16, and 0.40±0.16, respectively. A modest additive effect also was observed for Sk-ChA-1 cells at IC50, IC75 and IC90, and the CI values were 0.96±0.18, 1.08±0.25, and 0.78±0.17, respectively. In the colony-formation assays, compared with the control or vismodegib, rapamycin individually, the combination treatment significantly inhibited Mz-ChA-1 cell colony formation (P<0.01). For Sk-ChA-1 cell, the combination treatment also inhibited the colony formation (P<0.05) (Figure 2C and D).
To evaluate whether vismodegib, rapamycin, or their combination can inhibit cell proliferation via regulation of cell-cycle arrest, cell-cycle analysis was carried out by flow cytometry (Figure 3). Cells were treated with rapamycin, vismodegib, or both for 48 h. Vismodegib alone increased the accumulation of Sk-ChA-1cells in the S phase but had no notable effect on Mz-ChA-1 cells. Rapamycin alone arrested Mz-ChA-1 cells in the G1 phase and decreased the cell population in the S phase but had no notable effect on the Sk-ChA-1 cell population. For both cell lines, the combination of vismodegib and rapamycin arrested cells in the G1 phase and decreased the S phase cell population, although vismodegib alone increased the transition from G1 to S phase in the SK-ChA-1 cell population.
Effects of vismodegib, rapamycin, or both on BTC stem cell populations
Cancer stem cells have the exclusive ability to regenerate tumors. The capacity to generate a tumour sphere in nonadherent culture condition is a CSC characteristic. Mz-ChA-1 cells and Sk-ChA-1 cells were cultured in 24-well ultralow-attachment plates and treated with vehicle (DMSO; control), 1 μmol l−1 rapamycin,10 μmol l−1 vismodegib, or both rapamycin and vismodegib for 7 days. The combination of the two drugs dramatically reduced the total number and size of the tumour spheres compared with the control group, especially for Mz-ChA-1 cells (Figure 4A and B).
In order to further evaluate the effects of vismodegib, rapamycin, and both agents on CSCs, we used real-time RT-PCR to examine CSC-related gene expression in the tumour spheres. The results showed that combined treatment significantly decreased the Nanog, Oct-4, and E-cadherin gene expression in both Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 CSCs compared with the DMSO (control) group (Figure 4C and D).
Aldehyde dehydrogenase was also investigated as a possible marker for identifying CSCs, including BTC stem cells. We performed the ALDEFLUOR assay to explore the effect of the treatment agents on the Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 CSC populations (Figure 5A and D). The combined treatment significantly reduced the ALDH-positive population in Mz-ChA-1 cells but not in Sk-ChA-1 cells (Figure 5C and D).
Effects of vismodegib, rapamycin, and both on mTOR and Hh pathway signalling
We investigated the activity of rapamycin, vismodegib, and both on mTOR and Hh signalling in BTC cells by using western blots. The Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 cells were treated with rapamycin, vismodegib, or both for 48 h. We examined the expression levels of p70S6K, p-p70S6K, AKT, p-AKT(Ser473), Gli1, p-Gli1, mTOR, and p-mTOR. The initial ratios of pS6K/S6 in Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 cells were 51.62±9.07% and 13.22±2.03%, respectively. The results showed that, for both cell lines, the expression of the phosphorylated proteins was significantly decreased in the combined treatment group (Figure 6). The western blotting results were repeated three times and with reproducible results.
Anti-tumour activity of the combination of rapamycin and vismodegib in a xenograft model
We next evaluated the anti-tumour activity of vismodegib, rapamycin, or both in vivo with a xenograft mouse model. Single-cell suspensions of 5 × 106 Mz-ChA-1 cells were subcutaneously injected into the right flank of 32 athymic nude mice. Once tumours grew to approximately 100 mm3, the mice were randomly allocated into four treatment arms (vehicle only, rapamycin, vismodegib, or both rapamycin and vismodegib) and treated twice daily through oral gavage. Compared with the control group, at day 27, tumour xenograft growth was 39.42±12.33%, 51.03±5.71%, and 80.39±11.18% (P <0.01) lower in the rapamycin, vismodegib, and combination groups, respectively (Figure 7A). The xenograft tumour doubling time was 7.11±0.88, 9.31±1.29, 12.40±2.01, and 20.04±5.48 days in the control, rapamycin, vismodegib, and combined treatment groups. Nude mice were killed on day 27 because of the tumour size.
The mice tolerated the treatments without overt signs of toxicity. Body weight did not differ significantly between treatment groups (Figure 7B), and no adverse effects such as hunched posture, ruffled fur, and hypothermia were observed. Immunohistochemical assay results for the xenograft tumour tissues showed that the combined treatment significantly decreased p-p70S6K and Gli1 protein expression levels as compared with the control (vehicle only) group in vivo (Figure 7C).
Immunohistochemical analysis of human samples of gallbladder cancer
In order to identify potential predictive biomarkers for vismodegib and mTOR inhibitors in human specimens, we investigated the protein expression levels of Gli1 and p-p70S6K in cases of resected gallbladder cancer. Our immunohistochemical results revealed a relatively high p-p70S6K protein level and low Gli1 protein expression level in 4 of 10 cases examined (Figure 8). This immunohistochemical pattern was similar to those we found in Mz-ChA-1 cell lines.
Discussion
The combination of rapamycin and vismodegib significantly inhibited BTC cell viability and proliferation in our study; this effect was confirmed with our in vivo study. The protein expression levels of p-p70S6K, p-mTOR, p-Gli1, and p-AKT in Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 cells were decreased by the combination regimen. Decreased expression of p-p70S6K and Gli1 was noted in the BTC xenografts treated with this combination. High p-p70S6K expression along with low Gli1 expression was observed in Mz-ChA-1 cell lines, which were sensitive to the combination regimen. This expression pattern was also noted in 40% of the human BTC cases we examined.
Biliary tract cancer represents a diverse and genetically heterogeneous group of cancers, which makes the implementation of molecular therapy challenging. CCA and gallbladder cancer are often grouped together as BTCs in clinical trials despite their divergent clinical presentation and genetic background. Furthermore, there are very few BTC cell lines and preclinical in vivo models. All of these factors make the development of novel therapies in BTC challenging. Recently, there have been promising genomic and transcriptional profiling studies in intrahepatic CCA that suggest that this disease has distinct molecular subsets, some of which may be amenable to targeted therapy (Andersen et al, 2012; Borger et al, 2012; Sia et al, 2013; Voss et al, 2013).
The activation of Hh signalling is common in BTC and has prognostic implications. Tang et al (2013) recently demonstrated that Gli1 expression was associated with a poor prognosis in CCA and demonstrated that inhibition of Hh signalling with cyclopamine led to apoptosis in CCA cells (Tang et al, 2013). Canonical activation of Hh signalling involves Hh ligand binding to its receptor, PTCH, which results in the activation of Smo and is followed by activation of Gli transcription factors. A critical role of Smo-independent regulation of Gli activity by several other signalling pathways, including the PI3K/AKT and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK pathways, has been suggested (Lauth and Toftgard, 2007; Jenkins, 2009). Canonical Hh signalling is attenuated in CCA, and non-canonical Hh signalling contributes to disease progression, thereby supporting a role for Hh and other targeted inhibitors in this disease (Razumilava et al, 2014). In our study, combined mTOR- and Hh-directed therapy had the optimal anti-tumour effect in BTC cell lines, particularly Mz-ChA-1. Although combined therapy was superior, inhibition of p70S6K also occurred with vismodegib and p-Gli1 with rapamycin, which supports the idea of bi-directional cross talk between the pathways. Our group described the proposed mechanism of this cross talk in a previous report: activated mTOR pathway promotes Gli1 transcriptional activity and oncogenic function through p70S6K1-mediated Gli1 phosphorylation at Ser84, which releases Gli1 from its endogenous inhibitor, SuFu (Wang et al, 2012).
For studies of the combined inhibition of Hh signalling and mTOR in BTC cells, it would be useful to identify a potential clinical phenotype for investigational therapy. For our study, we first characterised the BTC cell lines for p70S6K and Gli1 gene expression. We chose the Mz-ChA-1 and Sk-ChA-1 cell lines for further investigation, as these represented relative extremes of p70S6K and Gli1 gene expression levels, with Mz-ChA-1 cells having a high p70S6K gene expression level and Sk-ChA-1 having a high Gli1 gene expression level. Furthermore, these cell lines have been widely used in prior BTC preclinical studies. The cell line Mz-ChA-1, which is derived from gallbladder cancer, was significantly inhibited by the combination of vismodegib and rapamycin. The dose of rapamycin and vismodegib used in vivo, when converted to human equivalent doses are within clinically acceptable dose ranges (Supplementary Information 4) (LoRusso et al, 2011; Acevedo-Gadea et al, 2014). Our results also showed that the combination of vismodegib and rapamycin significantly inhibited stem cell tumour sphere formation and downregulated Nanog, Oct-4, and E-cadherin gene expression level. Nanog and Oct-4 are essential for maintaining the pluripotency of embryonic stem cells, whereas aberrant expression of E-cadherin has been associated with the development of metastases. Although the prevailing belief is that loss of E-cadherin is a prerequisite for progression to metastatic disease and tumourigenesis, tumours are actually remarkably heterogeneous and E-cadherin loss does not always correlate with invasion. E-cadherin is also highly overexpressed in prostate cancer, inflammatory breast cancer, and early-stage ovarian carcinoma. E-cadherin enhances proliferation and survival by inducing ligand-independent activation of the receptor tyrosine kinase epidermal growth factor receptor (Putzke et al, 2011; David and Rajasekaran, 2012). Loss of E-cadherin regulation and expression levels in stem cells is likely to reflect the different culture conditions for these cell lines (Mohamet et al, 2011). High ALDH activity is a characteristic of CSCs in several malignancies, including BTC (Douville et al, 2009). In our study, ALDH activity was notably decreased in Mz-ChA-1 cells with the combined treatment but not in Sk-ChA-1 cells, which supports a role for combination therapy against CSCs in a subset of BTCs.
In summary, the addition of vismodegib to an mTOR inhibitor may lead to an incremental anti-tumour effect in BTCs. In particular, a high p70S6K/Gli1gene expression ratio may predict responsiveness to the combination in the clinical setting.
Change history
17 March 2015
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Acevedo-Gadea C, Santin AD, Higgins SA, Urva S, Ratner E, Silasi DA, Azodi M, Rutherford T, Schwartz PE, Abu-Khalaf MM (2014) Phase I clinical trial of the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in combination with oral topotecan for recurrent and advanced endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24 (3): 528–533.
Andersen JB, Spee B, Blechacz BR, Avital I, Komuta M, Barbour A, Conner EA, Gillen MC, Roskams T, Roberts LR, Factor VM, Thorgeirsson SS (2012) Genomic and genetic characterization of cholangiocarcinoma identifies therapeutic targets for tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Gastroenterology 142 (4): 1021–1031 e1015.
Borger DR, Tanabe KK, Fan KC, Lopez HU, Fantin VR, Straley KS, Schenkein DP, Hezel AF, Ancukiewicz M, Liebman HM, Kwak EL, Clark JW, Ryan DP, Deshpande V, Dias-Santagata D, Ellisen LW, Zhu AX, Iafrate AJ (2012) Frequent mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1 and IDH2 in cholangiocarcinoma identified through broad-based tumor genotyping. Oncologist 17 (1): 72–79.
Buzzoni R, Pusceddu S, Bajetta E, De Braud F, Platania M, Iannacone C, Cantore M, Mambrini A, Bertolini A, Alabiso O, Ciarlo A, Turco C, Mazzaferro V (2014) Activity and safety of RAD001 (everolimus) in patients affected by biliary tract cancer progressing after prior chemotherapy: a phase II ITMO study. Ann Oncol 25 (8): 1597–1603.
Chou TC, Talalay P (1984) Quantitative analysis of dose-effect relationships: the combined effects of multiple drugs or enzyme inhibitors. Adv Enzyme Regul 22: 27–55.
David JM, Rajasekaran AK (2012) Dishonorable discharge: the oncogenic roles of cleaved E-cadherin fragments. Cancer Res 72 (12): 2917–2923.
Douville J, Beaulieu R, Balicki D (2009) ALDH1 as a functional marker of cancer stem and progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev 18 (1): 17–25.
El Khatib M, Kalnytska A, Palagani V, Kossatz U, Manns MP, Malek NP, Wilkens L, Plentz RR (2013) Inhibition of hedgehog signaling attenuates carcinogenesis in vitro and increases necrosis of cholangiocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 57 (3): 1035–1045.
Herberger B, Berger W, Puhalla H, Schmid K, Novak S, Brandstetter A, Pirker C, Gruenberger T, Filipits M (2009) Simultaneous blockade of the epidermal growth factor receptor/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway by epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors and rapamycin results in reduced cell growth and survival in biliary tract cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 8 (6): 1547–1556.
Herberger B, Puhalla H, Lehnert M, Wrba F, Novak S, Brandstetter A, Gruenberger B, Gruenberger T, Pirker R, Filipits M (2007) Activated mammalian target of rapamycin is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with biliary tract adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13 (16): 4795–4799.
Jenkins D (2009) Hedgehog signalling: emerging evidence for non-canonical pathways. Cel Signal 21 (7): 1023–1034.
Kim YJ, Park SB, Park JY, Park SW, Chung JB, Song SY, Bang S (2012) The sonic hedgehog pathway as a treatment target for extrahepatic biliary tract cancer. Mol Med Rep 5 (1): 12–16.
Lauth M, Toftgard R (2007) Non-canonical activation of GLI transcription factors: implications for targeted anti-cancer therapy. Cell Cycle 6 (20): 2458–2463.
Leal P, Garcia P, Sandoval A, Letelier P, Brebi P, Ili C, Alvarez H, Tapia O, Roa JC (2013) Immunohistochemical expression of phospho-mTOR is associated with poor prognosis in patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 137 (4): 552–557.
LoRusso PM, Rudin CM, Reddy JC, Tibes R, Weiss GJ, Borad MJ, Hann CL, Brahmer JR, Chang I, Darbonne WC, Graham RA, Zerivitz KL, Low JA, Von Hoff DD (2011) Phase I trial of hedgehog pathway inhibitor vismodegib (GDC-0449) in patients with refractory, locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 17 (8): 2502–2511.
Mohamet L, Hawkins K, Ward CM (2011) Loss of function of e-cadherin in embryonic stem cells and the relevance to models of tumorigenesis. J Oncol 2011: 352616.
Moolthiya P, Tohtong R, Keeratichamroen S, Leelawat K (2014) Role of mTOR inhibitor in cholangiocarcinoma cell progression. Oncol Lett 7 (3): 854–860.
Poomphakwaen K, Promthet S, Kamsa-Ard S, Vatanasapt P, Chaveepojnkamjorn W, Klaewkla J, Sujirarat D, Pichainarong N (2009) Risk factors for cholangiocarcinoma in Khon Kaen, Thailand: a nested case-control study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 10 (2): 251–258.
Putzke AP, Ventura AP, Bailey AM, Akture C, Opoku-Ansah J, Celiktas M, Hwang MS, Darling DS, Coleman IM, Nelson PS, Nguyen HM, Corey E, Tewari M, Morrissey C, Vessella RL, Knudsen BS (2011) Metastatic progression of prostate cancer and e-cadherin regulation by zeb1 and SRC family kinases. Am J Pathol 179 (1): 400–410.
Razumilava N, Gradilone SA, Smoot RL, Mertens JC, Bronk SF, Sirica AE, Gores GJ (2014) Non-canonical Hedgehog signaling contributes to chemotaxis in cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatol 60 (3): 599–605.
Riedlinger D, Bahra M, Boas-Knoop S, Lippert S, Bradtmoller M, Guse K, Seehofer D, Bova R, Sauer IM, Neuhaus P, Koch A, Kamphues C (2014) Hedgehog pathway as a potential treatment target in human cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 21 (8): 607–615.
Rodova M, Fu J, Watkins DN, Srivastava RK, Shankar S (2012) Sonic hedgehog signaling inhibition provides opportunities for targeted therapy by sulforaphane in regulating pancreatic cancer stem cell self-renewal. PLoS One 7 (9): e46083.
Sia D, Hoshida Y, Villanueva A, Roayaie S, Ferrer J, Tabak B, Peix J, Sole M, Tovar V, Alsinet C, Cornella H, Klotzle B, Fan JB, Cotsoglou C, Thung SN, Fuster J, Waxman S, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Bruix J, Schwartz ME, Beroukhim R, Mazzaferro V, Llovet JM (2013) Integrative molecular analysis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma reveals 2 classes that have different outcomes. Gastroenterology 144 (4): 829–840.
Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64 (1): 9–29.
Simbolo M, Fassan M, Ruzzenente A, Mafficini A, Wood LD, Corbo V, Melisi D, Malleo G, Vicentini C, Malpeli G, Antonello D, Sperandio N, Capelli P, Tomezzoli A, Iacono C, Lawlor RT, Bassi C, Hruban RH, Guglielmi A, Tortora G, de Braud F, Scarpa A (2014) Multigene mutational profiling of cholangiocarcinomas identifies actionable molecular subgroups. Oncotarget 5 (9): 2839–2852.
Tang L, Tan YX, Jiang BG, Pan YF, Li SX, Yang GZ, Wang M, Wang Q, Zhang J, Zhou WP, Dong LW, Wang HY (2013) The prognostic significance and therapeutic potential of hedgehog signaling in intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 19 (8): 2014–2024.
Von Hoff DD, LoRusso PM, Rudin CM, Reddy JC, Yauch RL, Tibes R, Weiss GJ, Borad MJ, Hann CL, Brahmer JR, Mackey HM, Lum BL, Darbonne WC, Marsters JC Jr ., de Sauvage FJ, Low JA (2009) Inhibition of the hedgehog pathway in advanced basal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 361 (12): 1164–1172.
Voss JS, Holtegaard LM, Kerr SE, Fritcher EG, Roberts LR, Gores GJ, Zhang J, Highsmith WE, Halling KC, Kipp BR (2013) Molecular profiling of cholangiocarcinoma shows potential for targeted therapy treatment decisions. Hum Pathol 44 (7): 1216–1222.
Wang Y, Ding Q, Yen CJ, Xia W, Izzo JG, Lang JY, Li CW, Hsu JL, Miller SA, Wang X, Lee DF, Hsu JM, Huo L, Labaff AM, Liu D, Huang TH, Lai CC, Tsai FJ, Chang WC, Chen CH, Wu TT, Buttar NS, Wang KK, Wu Y, Wang H, Ajani J, Hung MC (2012) The crosstalk of mTOR/S6K1 and Hedgehog pathways. Cancer Cell 21 (3): 374–387.
Wong H, Alicke B, West KA, Pacheco P, La H, Januario T, Yauch RL, de Sauvage FJ, Gould SE (2011) Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of vismodegib in preclinical models of mutational and ligand-dependent Hedgehog pathway activation. Clin Cancer Res 17 (14): 4682–4692.
Wu Q, Kiguchi K, Kawamoto T, Ajiki T, Traag J, Carbajal S, Ruffino L, Thames H, Wistuba I, Thomas M, Vasquez KM, DiGiovanni J (2007) Therapeutic effect of rapamycin on gallbladder cancer in a transgenic mouse model. Cancer Res 67 (8): 3794–3800.
Zong H, Yin B, Zhou H, Cai D, Ma B, Xiang Y (2014) Inhibition of mTOR pathway attenuates migration and invasion of gallbladder cancer via EMT inhibition. Mol Biol Rep 41 (7): 4507–4512.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation for their support. We thank Dr Shrikanth A. Reddy and Dr Yong Sun Lee for kindly providing the BTC cell lines.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License.
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on British Journal of Cancer website
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Zuo, M., Rashid, A., Churi, C. et al. Novel therapeutic strategy targeting the Hedgehog signalling and mTOR pathways in biliary tract cancer. Br J Cancer 112, 1042–1051 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.625
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.625
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Targeting cancer stem cell pathways for cancer therapy
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy (2020)
-
Safety and Tolerability of Sonic Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitors in Cancer
Drug Safety (2019)
-
Correlation of Gli1 and HER2 expression in gastric cancer: Identification of novel target
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of taladegib, a Smoothened inhibitor, in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors
Investigational New Drugs (2018)
-
Comparative Analysis of Mutational Profile of Sonic hedgehog Gene in Gallbladder Cancer
Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2017)