Sir,
We thank Shamash and Sarker for their interest in our recent article (Omlin et al, 2013). They make three comments: first, that the activity of diethylstilboestrol (DES) when combined with a corticosteroid such as dexamethasone (D) is increased compared to DES alone; second, that chemotherapy may re-induce sensitivity to a hormonal agent; finally, their experience in 11 patients who received the sequence of docetaxel followed by DES and D and then abiraterone acetate (AA) and prednisone. In this setting the activity of AA was limited, as indicated by a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 1.8 months (range 0.6–8.1).
We wish to clarify that we did not report any data on DES activity prior to treatment with AA because it was not possible to get complete DES activity data for patients treated outside of our institution. We therefore only reported duration of DES treatment. Our large institutional experience with single-agent DES and aspirin in 231 men with castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) showed a median time to PSA progression of 4.6 months, ⩾50% PSA declines in 28.9% of patients and a VTE rate of 9.9% (Wilkins et al, 2012). We acknowledge that the activity of DES may be modestly higher when it is combined with D, which has been shown to have single-agent anti-tumour activity in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer, although there is little evidence that this therapeutic manoeuvre imparts significant clinical benefit (Venkitaraman et al, 2008). The comparison of DES plus D with D alone by Shamash et al (2011) is interesting but raised concerns that DES is associated with a major risk of serious toxicity, unlike AA, with veno-thromboembolic events (VTEs) in 22% of patients despite prophylactic treatment with aspirin. Given that AA provides overall survival benefit in Phase III trials, AA is a preferable treatment to DES for CRPC (de Bono et al, 2011; Ryan et al, 2013). Indeed we believe that there may now be little merit in administering DES to patients suffering from CRPC.
The hypothesis that chemotherapy may induce sensitivity to endocrine agents is also intriguing. However, clinical trials of AA and enzalutamide have all reported higher response rates pre-chemotherapy than afterwards, suggesting overlapping mechanisms of resistance (Scher et al, 2010, 2012; de Bono et al, 2011; Ryan et al, 2013). The study referenced by Shamash et al (2008) did not utilise taxanes (that through their postulated disruption of AR signalling may be associated with cross-resistance with endocrine treatments) and allowed cessation of androgen deprivation with 49% of patients having non-castrate levels of testosterone at the completion of chemotherapy (Shamash et al, 2008). The responses observed could therefore be related to re-initiation of castration. Nevertheless, we too envision that in the future we will be able to interrogate the evolution – emergence, disappearance and possibly re-emergence – of different CRPC clones/sub-clones following different therapeutic pressures. We believe that the pursuit of translational studies of circulating biomarkers and CRPC tissue urgently need to be prioritised to address these issues.
Finally, Shamash et al (2008) report minimal activity in 11 patients who received AA after docetaxel followed by DES given with D. Recently published case series have similarly indicated that the activity of AA is reduced when administered after docetaxel and enzalutamide (Loriot et al, 2013; Noonan et al, 2013). Our report observed PSA declines ⩾50% in 28.4% of 81 patients treated with AA after DES and docetaxel and radiological responses in 25% of patients (Omlin et al, 2013). The differences of these two reports could be explained by the post hoc nature of the analyses and the differences in use of steroids. As AA is now commonly used pre-chemotherapy and prior to DES, the latter is often an option of last resort. Overall, however, our report indicates that the limited activity and the significant toxicity of DES should limit its use in patients who have previously progressed on AA and docetaxel, and that patients should be offered agents with a proven survival benefit or clinical trials in this situation.
References
de Bono JS, Logothetis CJ, Molina A, Fizazi K, North S, Chu L, Chi KN, Jones RJ, Goodman OB Jr, Saad F, Staffurth JN, Mainwaring P, Harland S, Flaig TW, Hutson TE, Cheng T, Patterson H, Hainsworth JD, Ryan CJ, Sternberg CN, Ellard SL, Flechon A, Saleh M, Scholz M, Efstathiou E, Zivi A, Bianchini D, Loriot Y, Chieffo N, Kheoh T, Haqq CM, Scher HI (2011) Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 364 (21): 1995–2005.
Loriot Y, Bianchini D, Ileana E, Sandhu S, Patrikidou A, Pezaro C, Albiges L, Attard G, Fizazi K, De Bono JS, Massard C (2013) Antitumour activity of abiraterone acetate against metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel and enzalutamide (MDV3100). Ann Oncol 24 (7): 1807–1812.
Noonan KL, North S, Bitting RL, Armstrong AJ, Ellard SL, Chi KN (2013) Clinical activity of abiraterone acetate in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after enzalutamide. Ann Oncol 24 (7): 1802–1807.
Omlin A, JP C, Zaidi S, Lorente D, Mukherji D, Bianchini D, Ferraldeschi R, Sandhu S, Dearnaley D, Parker C, Van As N, de Bono JS, Attard G (2013) Antitumour activity of abiraterone and diethylstilboestrol when administered sequentially to men with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 109 (5): 1079–1084.
Ryan CJ, Smith MR, de Bono JS, Molina A, Logothetis CJ, de Souza P, Fizazi K, Mainwaring P, Piulats JM, Ng S, Carles J, Mulders PF, Basch E, Small EJ, Saad F, Schrijvers D, Van Poppel H, Mukherjee SD, Suttmann H, Gerritsen WR, Flaig TW, George DJ, Yu EY, Efstathiou E, Pantuck A, Winquist E, Higano CS, Taplin ME, Park Y, Kheoh T, Griffin T, Scher HI, Rathkopf DE (2013) Abiraterone in metastatic prostate cancer without previous chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 368 (2): 138–148.
Scher HI, Beer TM, Higano CS, Anand A, Taplin ME, Efstathiou E, Rathkopf D, Shelkey J, Yu EY, Alumkal J, Hung D, Hirmand M, Seely L, Morris MJ, Danila DC, Humm J, Larson S, Fleisher M, Sawyers CL (2010) Antitumour activity of MDV3100 in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a phase 1-2 study. Lancet 375 (9724): 1437–1446.
Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, Taplin ME, Sternberg CN, Miller MD, de Wit R, Mulders P, Chi KN, Shore ND, Armstrong AJ, Flaig TW, Flechon A, Mainwaring P, Fleming M, Hainsworth JD, Hirmand M, Selby B, Seely L, de Bono JS (2012) Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 367 (13): 1187–97.
Shamash J, Davies A, Ansell W, McFaul S, Wilson P, Oliver T, Powles T (2008) A phase II study investigating the re-induction of endocrine sensitivity following chemotherapy in androgen-independent prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 98 (1): 22–24.
Shamash J, Powles T, Sarker SJ, Protheroe A, Mithal N, Mills R, Beard R, Wilson P, Tranter N, O'Brien N, McFaul S, Oliver T (2011) A multi-centre randomised phase III trial of Dexamethasone vs Dexamethasone and diethylstilbestrol in castration-resistant prostate cancer: immediate vs deferred Diethylstilbestrol. Br J Cancer 104 (4): 620–628.
Venkitaraman R, Thomas K, Huddart RA, Horwich A, Dearnaley DP, Parker CC (2008) Efficacy of low-dose dexamethasone in castration-refractory prostate cancer. BJU Int 101 (4): 440–443.
Wilkins A, Shahidi M, Parker C, Gunapala R, Thomas K, Huddart R, Horwich A, Dearnaley D (2012) Diethylstilbestrol in castration-resistant prostate cancer. BJU Int 110 (11 Pt B): E727–35.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
Abiraterone acetate was developed at The Institute of Cancer Research, which therefore has a commercial interest in the development of this agent. CP received lecture fees from Sanofi-Aventis and travel support from Sanofi-Aventis and Janssen-Cilag. DD received honoraria for advisory boards and served as a consultant for Takeda, Amgen, Astellas Pharma and Succinct Healthcare. JSdB received consulting fees from Ortho Biotech Oncology Research and Development (a unit of Cougar Biotechnology), consulting fees and travel support from Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Dendreon, Enzon, Exelixis, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Medivation, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi-Aventis, Supergen and Takeda, and grant support from AstraZeneca and Genentech. GA received consulting fees and travel support from Janssen-Cilag, Veridex, Roche/Ventana and Millennium Pharmaceuticals, lecture fees from Janssen-Cilag, Ipsen, Takeda and Sanofi-Aventis and grant support from AstraZeneca and Genentech. GA and DD are on The ICR rewards to inventors list of abiraterone acetate.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Omlin, A., Pezaro, C., Zaidi, S. et al. Reply: ‘Comment on Anti-tumour activity of abiraterone and diethylstilboestrol when administered sequentially to men with castration-resistant prostate cancer’. Br J Cancer 110, 267–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.737
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.737