Abstract
A combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone (CHOP) has been a standard therapy for histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas for over 20 years, but several newer regimens, referred to as second or third generation, have been reported to give improved results in single-centre studies. Positive evidence from randomised trials has been lacking, and the British National Lymphoma Investigation therefore commenced a randomised comparison of CHOP vs a third-generation regimen, PACEBOM, in November 1987. A total of 459 eligible patients were entered into the trial: 226 in the CHOP arm and 233 in the PACEBOM arm. Overall, there was no significant difference in outcome between the two arms of the trial. In patients with stage IV disease there was an apparent improvement in survival for those treated with PACEBOM, but considerable caution must be exercised with such subgroup analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 24 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $10.79 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Linch, D., Vaughan Hudson, B., Hancock, B. et al. A randomised comparison of a third-generation regimen (PACEBOM) with a standard regimen (CHOP) in patients with histologically aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a British National Lymphoma Investigation report. Br J Cancer 74, 318–322 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.360
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1996.360