Abstract
Alcohol use disorders (AUD) are defined as alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence, which create large problems both for society and for the drinkers themselves. To date, no therapeutic can effectively solve these problems. Understanding the underlying mechanisms leading to AUD is critically important for developing effective and safe pharmacological therapies. Benzodiazepines (BZs) are used to reduce the symptoms of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. However, frequent use of BZs causes cross-tolerance, dependence, and cross-addiction to alcohol. The FDA-approved naltrexone and acamprosate have shown mixed results in clinical trials. Naltrexone is effective to treat alcohol dependence (decreased length and frequency of drinking bouts), but its severe side effects, including withdrawal symptoms, are difficult to overcome. Acamprosate showed efficacy for treating alcohol dependence in European trials, but two large US trials have failed to confirm the efficacy. Another FDA-approved medication, disulfiram, does not diminish craving, and it causes a peripheral neuropathy. Kudzu is the only natural medication mentioned by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, but its mechanisms of action are not yet established. It has been recently shown that dihydromyricetin, a flavonoid purified from Hovenia, has unique effects on GABAA receptors and blocks ethanol intoxication and withdrawal in alcoholic animal models. In this article, we review the role of GABAA receptors in the treatment of AUD and currently available and potentially novel pharmacological agents.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Alcohol use disorders (AUD) represent a substantial public health problem worldwide. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2011 report, the harmful use of alcohol results in approximately 2.5 million deaths each year, with a net loss of life of 2.25 million, taking into account the estimated beneficial impact of low levels of alcohol use on some diseases in some population groups. Also, alcohol abuse is the leading risk factor for death in males ages 15–59, primarily due to injuries, violence and cardiovascular diseases. Globally, 6.2% of all male deaths are attributable to alcohol, compared to 1.1% of female deaths1. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that excessive alcohol consumption is the third leading cause of preventable death in the United States2. Approximately 18 million Americans (8.5% of the population age 18 and older) suffer from AUD. Only 7.1% of these individuals received any treatment for their AUD in 20063. Problems related to the excessive consumption of alcohol cost the US society an estimated $185 billion annually3.
AUD is defined as alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence. Alcohol abuse is defined as a recurring pattern of high-risk drinking that creates problems for the drinker, for others, or for society. Alcohol dependence, also called alcoholism (alcohol addiction), is a complex disease characterized by persistent and intense alcohol-seeking, which results in a loss of control over drinking, a preoccupation with drinking, compulsion to drink or inability to stop, and the development of tolerance and dependence3. The development of AUD involves repeated alcohol use leading to tolerance, alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS), and physical and psychological dependence, with the loss of ability to control excessive drinking. Continued excessive alcohol consumption can lead to dependence that is always associated with AWS when alcohol consumption is ceased or substantially reduced4. Without a pharmacological adjunct to psychosocial therapy, the clinical outcome is poor, with up to 70% of patients resuming drinking within 1 year5. Clearly, in addition to external factors, the prevention and treatment of AUD must include stopping repeated alcohol abuse and AWS. Currently, three oral medications (naltrexone, acamprosate, and disulfiram) and one injectable medication (extended-release injectable naltrexone) are approved for treating alcohol dependence by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Topiramate, an oral medication used to treat epilepsy and migraines, has recently been shown to be effective in treating alcohol dependence, although it is not approved by the US FDA for this indication6. However, the efficacy of these medications is only approved for use in patients who are abstinent at the start of treatment. Although the clinical trials in the US have shown controversial, insignificant, and unsuccessful results7,8, the NIH has continually invested much effort and funding in clinical trials, which indicates some hope rather than no hope. However, the NIH nevertheless declared that there is an urgent need for the development of new and more effective medication (http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-100.html). Therefore, understanding the mechanisms leading to AUD becomes critically important for finding the proper therapeutic.
The history of alcohol use can be traced back to 9000 years ago, when people discovered how to make fermented beverages9. Since then, people around the world have been drinking alcoholic beverages. The reasons for drinking alcoholic beverages vary, and include being part of a standard diet, for medical purposes, as a relaxant, for anxiolytic effects, for artistic inspiration, and for happiness. Clearly, alcohol consumption occurs to mark major life events from birth to death. Medical science noticed that drinking brings people happiness and relaxation but also adverse consequences. Short-term effects of alcohol consumption include intoxication and dehydration. Long-term effects of alcohol include changes in the metabolism of the liver and the brain. Like other food culture, once someone falls in love with alcohol, it is not easily stopped.
Underlying mechanisms of AUD
The biological mechanisms leading to AUD are poorly understood. Alcohol consumption has profound effects on brain function and behavior10. Continued excessive alcohol consumption can develop a dependence on alcohol. Discontinuation or substantially reduced alcohol consumption triggers AWS4. To date, the mechanisms for how excess alcohol consumption leads to alterations in the human brain that produce alcohol dependence remain murky. The formation of AUD is a chronic and complex process. For example, a relapse in alcohol consumption may be spontaneous. A relapse may be due to internal stimuli of the body, such as mood changes, anxiety, or for reducing or stopping AWS; it also may be due to external stimuli, such as the observance of social drinking or bottles of the addict's preferred alcoholic beverage. Regardless of the perspective, the role of alcohol on the human brain cannot be ignored, given the many neuropharmacological and psychological actions of ethanol (EtOH), including its intoxicating, sedative, anxiolytic, reinforcing, and addictive properties11,12.
Alcohol affects brain function by interacting with multiple neurotransmitter systems. Alcohol can disrupt the delicate balance between γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), the primary inhibitory neurotransmitter, and glutamate, the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS)13,14. Short-term alcohol exposure tilts this balance, while under long-term alcohol exposure, the brain attempts to compensate by bringing the balance back toward equilibrium. These neurological changes present as the development of tolerance to alcohol's sedative effects. When alcohol consumption is abruptly discontinued or reduced, these compensatory changes are no longer opposed by the presence of alcohol, thus leading to the excitation of neurotransmitter systems and the development of AWS10. Long-term, or chronic, alcohol consumption also induces changes in many neurotransmitter systems that ultimately lead to the development of tolerance and dependence15. Chronically relapsing alcohol consumption involves elements of both impulsivity and compulsivity that yield a composite addiction cycle composed of three stages: 'binge/intoxication', 'withdrawal/negative affect', and 'preoccupation/anticipation' (craving). Animal and human imaging studies have revealed discrete circuits that mediate the three stages of the addiction cycle with key roles of the ventral tegmental area (VTA), ventral striatum and amygdala. The transition to addiction involves neuroplasticity in all of these structures that may begin with changes in the mesolimbic dopamine system and a cascade of neuroadaptations from the ventral to dorsal striatum16. Furthermore, the study has shown that chronic drug experience increases the contrast, or 'signal to noise', of phasic dopamine release to basal dopamine levels in response to drug-related stimuli, which could result in aberrant associations between cues and reinforcers that contribute to the development of addiction17,18. Since dopamine D2 receptors in the striatum are primarily localized in GABAergic neurons, these results provide evidence of GABAergic involvement in the dopaminergic abnormalities seen in alcoholics19. Therefore, the contribution of dopamine dynamics in the reward neurocircuitry, particularly the VTA, nucleus accumbens (NAcc), amygdala, and prefrontal cortex dopaminergic pathway, is an underlying mechanism leading to alcohol dependence17,18,20,21,22.
GABA is the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian brain. As a neurotransmitter, GABA is released into a synaptic cleft by its presynaptic nerve terminus when a GABAergic (GABA releasing) neuron fires an action potential. GABAARs are a family of ligand-gated chloride anion (Cl−) channels expressed throughout the CNS (ionotropic receptors)23 and composed of five subunits, each of which has several isoforms, composed from a family of 19 related subunits (α1−6, β1−3, γ1−3, δ, ε, θ, π, ρ1−3)23,24,25,26,27. The neurotransmitter GABA binds to GABAARs, changing their conformation state and then opening the pore to allow Cl− to pass down an electrochemical gradient. GABAARs in the postsynaptic membrane mediate fast or phasic inhibition (through ionotropic GABAARs) and slow synaptic inhibition (through metabotropic GABABRs); GABAARs in the peri- and extrasynaptic membrane mediate tonic inhibition.
GABAARs mediate several important effects of alcohol. Considerable evidence indicates that GABAARs are the major target of EtOH in the CNS28,29,30,31,32. Some studies show that short-term alcohol exposure increases the inhibitory effect of GABAARs; however, many factors determine whether GABAARs respond to short-term alcohol exposure33. Alcohol can act as a depressant by increasing inhibitory neurotransmission, by decreasing excitatory neurotransmission, or through a combination of both13,34. Commonly, alcohol consumption can induce decreases in attention, alterations in memory, reductions in executive decision-making, changes in mood, and drowsiness. Continuous alcohol consumption may result in lethargy, confusion, amnesia, loss of sensation, difficulty in breathing, and death13. GABAARs mediate alcohol-induced sedation, anxiolysis, impairment of motor coordination, and withdrawal symptoms such as anxiety, hyperexcitability, insomnia, and seizures35,36,37,38,3940,41,42,43,44. EtOH acts on certain subtypes of GABAARs and induces rapid alteration of their subunit assembly, consequently altering the functional properties of these GABAARs38,45. As a result, GABAAR-mediated behaviors are altered after alcohol exposure43,44,46. Clearly, GABAARs play a critical role in the response to EtOH, modulating the altered balance between excitation and inhibition induced by EtOH, and contributing to withdrawal syndrome.
Human studies found that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene encoding the GABA α2 receptor subunit (GABRA2) are associated with complex behaviors considered to be part of alcohol dependence, suggesting that GABAARs containing the α2 subunit contribute to the genetic risk for alcohol dependence47. The GABAAR γ1 subunit gene GABRG1 and GABRA2 variants are associated with alcohol dependence in African Americans48. Indeed, a cluster of GABAAR subunit genes encoding α2, α4, β1, and γ1 subunits on chromosome 4p has been associated with alcohol dependence47,49,50,51,52. In human brain imaging studies, a persistent down-regulation of central GABAARs in early abstinence was demonstrated52,53,54. One hundred and ten healthy social drinkers (53 men) in a drinking study showed that the GABRA2 gene is associated with subjective (pleasant or unpleasant sensations) effects of alcohol, suggesting that GABRA2 may play a role in the risk of developing alcohol use disorders by moderating the subjective effects of alcohol55. However, the neurobiological basis by which genetic variation and in which brain region translates into alcohol dependence is largely unknown.
GABAARs have very unique characteristics. The large number of GABAAR subunits generates the potential for various subunit compositions that may account for variable sensitivity to modulatory drugs such as EtOH, benzodiazepines (BZs), barbiturates, neurosteroids, and general anesthetics31,32,50,56,57. The change in numbers and subunit compositions of GABAARs on cell surfaces has been demonstrated to be important in mediating inhibitory synaptic transmission58,59. Nevertheless, GABAARs can exist as either synaptic or extrasynaptic receptors that may facilitate rapid changes in inhibition. Most synaptic GABAARs are composed of two α, two β, and one γ subunit, where the γ subunit is located between an α and β subunit60,61 and contributes to synaptically mediated (phasic) inhibition. In contrast, tonic inhibition is mediated by highly sensitive GABAARs in peri- and extrasynaptic membrane where α4/α6-containing GABAAR subunits are predominantly located and partner with the exclusively extrasynaptic δ subunits27,62,63. They are activated by ambient extracellular GABA or from 'spillover' of GABA from synaptic signaling, thought to be in the range of 100 nmol/L to 1 μmol/L64,65,66. Given this distinction, the study of synaptic vs extrasynaptic GABAARs and EtOH effects on these receptors is essential to elucidate the mechanisms involved in the development of EtOH tolerance and dependence. On the other hand, synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAARs are dynamic in response to EtOH. GABAARs cycle in response to EtOH exposure between the surface of the synaptic membrane and intracellular sites, and traffic from intracellular pools to the surface of synaptic membranes is critically important in the postsynaptic and extrasynaptic control of neuronal excitability63,67,68. Due to the properties of GABAARs, such as 1) various subunit compositions, 2) dynamic movement between extracellular and intracellular pools, and 3) postsynaptic and extrasynaptic membrane locations, studies of the interactions between GABAARs and EtOH become very challenging.
Effects of single alcohol consumption
Single or acute alcohol consumption is an alcohol intake that occurs over a short period of time. The effects of single alcohol consumption depend on alcohol concentration and the amount of intake. EtOH concentrations in the brain vary in a range from few millimolars to more than 100 millimolars. As a CNS depressant, EtOH in a concentration range of 5–10 mmol/L (less than 3 drinks) potentiates GABAARs and decreases excitatory neurotransmission, leading to sedation accompanied by decreased attention, alterations in memory, mood changes, and lethargy37.
A large number of animal experiments have shown EtOH effects on the brain. EtOH can produce an acute anxiolytic effect, which is related to the potentiation of GABAergic neurotransmission in the basolateral amygdala (BLA)69. Single-dose EtOH stimulates GABA-activated Cl− channels70,71. In studies of acute EtOH effects on the kinetics of miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs), an EtOH (3 g/kg) intraperitoneal injection in rats produced a rapid down-regulation of extrasynaptic α4βδ–GABAARs in hippocampus within 5–15 min. This change was accompanied by a decreasing surface expression of α4, β3, and δ–containing GABAARs (internalized) and increasing phosphorylation of β3. In contrast, the down-regulation of postsynaptic α1βγ2 GABAARs are observed, but only after several hours68,72. Finally, there is an up-regulation of GABAARs containing α4βγ2 after 1–2 d post-EtOH and increases in α2βγ1 GABAARs68. These effects of acute EtOH exposure on GABAARs are transient and reversible, but altered GABAARs will need two weeks to recover after acute alcohol intoxication. From the process of GABAARs interacting with EtOH to recovery can provide valuable information for how alcohol dependence develops with long term exposure to EtOH.
Effects of social drinking
Social drinking is casual drinking in social situations and only in moderate quantities, also referred to as moderate drinking. For men, it is no more than 4 drinks on any single day and no more than 14 drinks per week. For women, moderate drinking is no more than 3 drinks on any single day and no more than 7 drinks per week based on the NIH/NIAAA criterion. Social drinking can produce a low-to-moderate concentration of EtOH (≤30 mmol/L) in the brain. Animal studies have shown that a low dose of EtOH (0.01 g/kg, <10 mmol/L) applied to VTA could significantly increase GABA neuron firing rate and afferent-evoked synaptic responses73. Voluntary EtOH (6%, equal 1 g/kg, ∼13 mmol/L) consumption induced an elevation of dopamine in the rat mesolimbic reward pathway74. Using viral-mediated RNA interference to transiently reduce α4-containing GABAARs in the shell region of the NAc could reduce self-administration of EtOH intake75. Blockade of GABAARs in the para-ventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, which is the main integration site controlling the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) neuroendocrine stress system, could reduce voluntary EtOH drinking76. Voluntary EtOH consumption (<10% EtOH) could induce an increase of GABAAR α4/δ subunits in the hippocampus in socially isolated C57BL/6J mice and rats77,78. These α4/δ-containing GABAARs have been shown to exist on extrasynaptic membrane sites, which are sensitive to as low as 3 mmol/L EtOH (approximately 0.3% EtOH)79. Therefore, EtOH entering the brain by each episode of social drinking will target and stimulate GABAARs, primarily extrasynaptic GABAARs; these GABAARs respond to the alcohol, then GABAAR dynamic changes occur.
EtOH preference studies have shown that BZ receptor ligands modulate some of the reinforcing and/or aversive properties of alcohol in alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) rats, suggesting the potential importance of the GABAA-BZ receptor complex in mediating palatability- (environmentally) induced EtOH drinking even in rats selectively bred for low alcohol preference80. Intrahippocampal infusions of an α5-containing GABAAR subunit-selective BZ inverse agonist RY (RY, tert-butyl 8-(trimethylsilyl) acetylene-5,6-dihydro-5-methyl-6-oxo-4H-imidazo[1,5a][1,4]benzodiazepine-3-carboxylate), reduced EtOH-maintained responding in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that the α5-containing GABAARs in the hippocampus play an important role in regulating EtOH-seeking behaviors81. Mutations to the GABAAR β1 subunit gene (GABRB1) increased alcohol consumption accompanied by spontaneous GABAAR ion channel opening and increased NAcc tonic (extrasynaptic) current, providing an important link between GABAAR function and increased alcohol consumption that may underlie some forms of alcohol abuse52. The GABAAR α5 subunit knockout mice showed reduced EtOH preference31,82,83. Additionally, GABAAR δ-deficient mice have reduced EtOH preference82. Both studies suggest GABAAR involvement in mediating drinking behavior. The PKCepsilon phosphorylation of γ2 regulates the response of GABAARs to specific allosteric modulators, and in particular, PKCepsilon inhibition renders these receptors sensitive to low concentrations of EtOH84. Thus, alcohol consumption at a social level can target GABAAR-mediated extrasynaptic inhibition; social drinking also appears to involve the mesolimbic dopamine system.
Effects of chronic alcohol consumption
Chronic alcohol abuse refers to relapsing long-term alcohol consumption. In studies of animal models for chronic and repeated EtOH administration, rats receive multiple chronic intermittent EtOH (CIE) gavage administration with withdrawal (more than 2 d). CIE rats exhibit hyperexcitability in locomotion, rearing, and exploratory behavior. They are not altered in sensorimotor performance and exhibit no detectable brain or liver pathology29. In addition to the quantitative reduction in seizure threshold to pentylenetetrazol (PTZ), they exhibit increased anxiety, impaired hippocampal spatial memory, and perturbed sleep patterns. They also exhibit tolerance to the soporific effects of EtOH, BZs, neurosteroids, and several general sedative/hypnotic/anesthetics, including most commercial sleep aids. Significant tolerance to the soporific/anesthetic properties of diazepam remains long (>40 d) after the final EtOH dose in CIE rats, accompanied by decreased GABAAR-mediated inhibition43,44,45,46,63,85,86. Behaviorally, CIE rats show increased EtOH drinking32. Although no animal model can fully emulate the human AUD condition, the behavioral adaptations of human alcohol dependence/withdrawal are remarkably similar to those of CIE rats, particularly with respect to anxiety, increased seizure susceptibility, and tolerance to EtOH and cross tolerance to BZs44,46. The mechanism studies have shown that the behavioral changes are primarily due to the plastic changes of GABAARs that occur after chronic EtOH exposure, which include significantly reduced postsynaptic α1 and increased α4-containing GABAARs46,63,87,88. The subunit composition of GABAAR subtypes is expected to determine their physiological properties and pharmacological profiles. An in-depth study of GABAAR subunits using genetically engineered mice has shown that the α1 subunit is involved in sedation, anticonvulsant activity, and anterograde amnesia functions, etc41, while the α4 subunit is involved in changes of mood and anxiety89. Thus, these GABAAR subunit composition changes are a mechanism underlying the behavioral changes after chronic EtOH exposure.
Studies of psychological changes and alcohol consumption have determined that in young rats (postnatal days 28–42), binge drinking is related to anxiety-like behavior and leads to alcohol-dependence in adulthood90. Stress and withdrawal-induced anxiety are correlated to increased voluntary EtOH drinking in alcohol-preferring P rats91, and chronic psychosocial stressed male mice show increased voluntary EtOH drinking92. The data provide strong evidence that heavy drinking triggered by chronic stress and any type of induced anxiety are risk factors for developing alcohol dependence. Stopping or reducing alcohol consumption in turn aggravates stress or anxiety. The repeated psychological changes make it difficult to stop alcohol consumption.
Withdrawal occurs following the restriction of alcohol intake. The pathophysiology of alcohol withdrawal is complex because prolonged alcohol intoxication affects various circuits, each involving various neurotransmitter systems. After withdrawal from alcohol, the downregulation of the GABAARs contributes to many of the symptoms of AWS. Prolonged intoxication also inhibits activity in the glutamate neurotransmitter system, the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS, by acting on the ion-gated N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptors. Abstinence from alcohol reverses the inhibition of the NMDA receptor, producing many of the signs and symptoms of AWS93,94. Other mechanisms are also activated during alcohol withdrawal. Dysfunctional dopaminergic transmission95 may be responsible for hallucinations. Signs and symptoms of alcohol withdrawal occur primarily in the central nervous system, including sleep disturbance and anxiety and negative emotional states, such as dysphoria. Chronic alcohol consumption leads to changes in brain neurotransmission, particularly in the GABAergic system, via induced GABAAR plasticity and DA release in the reward neurocircuitry. During acute alcohol withdrawal, changes also occur such as upregulation of α4-containing GABAARs and downregulation of α1- and α3-containing GABAARs29,39,44,46,63,87. GABAAR downregulation may contribute to the anxiety and seizures of withdrawal. During periods of withdrawal, rats show a significant decrease in DA and serotonin (5-HT) levels in the reward neurocircuitry96,97,98, which is commonly associated with dysphoria, depression and anxiety disorders98,99,100. These psychological changes may contribute to EtOH-seeking behavior. Studies have shown that GABAARs and opioid receptors within the central nucleus of the amygdala selectively regulate EtOH-maintained responding101. As in adults68, CIE exposure during adolescence increased the EtOH sensitivity of tonic inhibition mediated by extrasynaptic GABAARs and decreased the EtOH sensitivity of phasic, synaptic GABAAR-mediated current in adult dentate gyrus cells, demonstrating long-lasting changes in the function and EtOH sensitivity of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAARs in DGCs102. GABAergic neurons in the VTA are a primary inhibitory regulator of DA neurons, generally recognized as having an important role in the development of addiction103,104. In addition, a subset of VTA GABAARs is implicated in the development of addictive behavior. In particular, the activation of central GABAergic neurotransmission is linked to mesolimbic dopaminergic neurotransmission during rewarding processes73,100,105. We suggest that preclinical and clinical studies should place more emphasis on the GABAergic system as a pharmacotherapeutic target for the treatment of AUD.
Cognition and alcohol dependence
Alcohol consumption is like other food culture; once an individual falls in love with alcohol, its consumption can be difficult to stop. In addition to the involvement of nervous system regulation, the changes in cognition caused by chronic alcohol consumption cannot be ignored. In mammals, alcohol acts on the CNS over time to enhance the excitatory NMDA signaling and discourage GABA signaling, inducing adaptation of GABAAR-mediated inhibition and a hyperexcitable nervous system. This hyperactive nervous system is dependent on the presence of alcohol; otherwise, the hyperactive state can lead to over-excitatory consequences such as seizures29. Humans often drink too much because they find being drunk rewarding in some way, and/or they find abstinence difficult. Interestingly, in studies of alcohol recognition in Drosophila, flies exhibit voluntary consumption of EtOH. Kaun et al106 developed a conditioned place preference paradigm for flies, and showed that flies perceive intoxicating levels of ethanol as rewarding. Flies were exposed to two odors, one in the presence of intoxicating levels of EtOH vapors, and the other without. After training, flies preferred the odor that had been paired with the high level of EtOH. Furthermore, trained larvae are able to learn, and develop cognitive dependence to EtOH107. A study of the human brain showed that that hippocampus is involved not only in learning but also in recognition ability108. Taken together, these studies may not provide direct evidence, but they suggest that EtOH-induced changes in multiple neurotransmissions likely involve EtOH-induced formation of cognition. These studies led us to consider that alcohol not only induces adaptation in the central nervous system but also forms cognition and memory of alcohol in the brain that promote the development of alcohol dependence. Understanding the effects of alcohol on the brain leading to AUD is essential to determine the direction for anti-AUD drug development.
Current pharmacological therapies
One ideal property of therapeutic drugs for AUD is that the active ingredient acts on receptors directly targeted by alcohol to prevent interactions of these receptors with alcohol. To neutralize the effects of alcohol on GABAARs and ameliorate the symptoms of AWS and/or to diminish cravings for alcohol is more likely to achieve success.
Benzodiazepines
GABAARs are down-regulated during chronic alcohol use. After abstinence from alcohol, the downregulation of GABAARs contributes to many of the symptoms of AWS. BZs are classical medications for reducing the symptoms of AWS109,110,111. BZs, like EtOH, have a binding site on GABAARs27,112,113. Clinical studies suggest that BZs have efficacy in ameliorating symptoms and in decreasing the risk of seizures. However, due to their addictive potential and lack of safety when combined with alcohol, BZs are usually not recommended for the maintenance of alcohol abstinence. BZs are usually not prescribed for more than 2 weeks or administered for more than 3 nights per week due to tolerance114,115 and other side effects. Two common side effects are that BZs may actually cause anxiety in patients and that they are potentially dangerous CNS depressants when used in combination with alcohol. Many pilot studies for improving BZs and/or related non-BZs acting at the same sites have failed. Furthermore, the frequent use of BZs can lead to dependence and cross-tolerance to alcohol109,116. Together they are an even worse addiction problem and difficult to overcome. Therefore, BZs are not considered to be the proper choice for AWS117,118.
Other GABAergic medications represent potentially promising drugs useful for the treatment of AWS and for the maintenance of alcohol abstinence. Clomethiazole, gabapentin, and γ-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) present a similar efficacy as BZs in suppressing AWS. Current evidence also suggests that gabapentin and valproic acid may be beneficial in maintaining alcohol abstinence in alcoholics with psychiatric co-morbidity. Thus, given the importance of GABAergic mechanisms in the development and maintenance of alcohol dependence, and the interesting results that have currently been demonstrated, more research on GABAergic agents is warranted119.
In addition to BZs, only three medications (oral naltrexone, acamprosate, and disulfiram) as well as extended-release injectable naltrexone are currently approved by the FDA for treating alcohol dependence6.
Naltrexone
Naltrexone is an opiate antagonist used primarily in the management of alcohol dependence and opioid dependence. In laboratory studies, naltrexone has been shown to reduce the number of drinks consumed120,121. In clinical trials, naltrexone reduced the percentage of heavy drinking days122. Additionally, oral naltrexone reduces relapse to heavy drinking123,124,125. The standard dose is 50 mg daily, but a multisite study demonstrated that 100 mg daily was also effective when combined with medical management7. Naltrexone is less effective for the maintenance of abstinence126,127. Naltrexone has some side effects, including the development of withdrawal symptoms, nausea, dysphoria, and fatigue128,129,130. Naltrexone also impairs thinking or reactions and induces anxiety131,132,133.
Acamprosate
Acamprosate (Campral) is thought to stabilize the chemical balance in the brain that would otherwise be disrupted by alcoholism, possibly by antagonizing glutamatergic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and agonizing GABAARs134. A study at the molecular and cellular level suggests that acamprosate attenuates hyper-glutamatergic states, which are thought to trigger relapse135. Two large US trials failed to confirm the efficacy of acamprosate, although secondary analyses in one of the studies suggested possible efficacy in patients who had a baseline goal of abstinence136,137. Recent studies have shown that acamprosate had a significantly larger effect size than naltrexone on the maintenance of abstinence, and naltrexone had a larger effect size than acamprosate on the reduction of heavy drinking and cravings, indicating that in treatment for alcohol use disorders, acamprosate is slightly more efficacious in promoting abstinence, and naltrexone is slightly more efficacious in reducing heavy drinking and cravings138. For best results, detoxification is needed before using acamprosate. The most common side effects reported for patients taking acamprosate in clinical trials included headache, diarrhea, flatulence, and nausea139,140.
Disulfiram
Disulfiram (Antabuse) interferes with the degradation of alcohol, resulting in the accumulation of acetaldehyde which, in turn, produces a very unpleasant reaction including flushing, nausea, and palpitations if the patient drinks alcohol136. During normal metabolism, alcohol is broken down in the liver by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase to acetaldehyde, which is then converted by the enzyme acetaldehyde dehydrogenase to the harmless acetic acid. Disulfiram blocks this reaction at the intermediate stage by blocking the enzyme acetaldehyde dehydrogenase. After alcohol intake under the influence of disulfiram, the concentration of acetaldehyde in the blood may be 5 to 10 times higher than that found during metabolism of the same quantity of alcohol alone. Because acetaldehyde is one of the major causes of the symptoms of a “hangover”, this produces a severe negative reaction to alcohol intake. Symptoms include flushing of the skin, accelerated heart rate, shortness of breath, etc.
The utility and effectiveness of disulfiram are considered limited because compliance is generally poor when it is given to patients to take at their own discretion141. Some patients, however, will respond to self-administered disulfiram, especially if they are highly motivated to abstain. Others may use it episodically for high-risk situations, such as social occasions where alcohol is present. It is also known that disulfiram may cause a peripheral neuropathy142.
Topiramate
Topiramate requires a very gradual dose escalation. The precise mechanism of action is unclear. The most common adverse events include cognitive dysfunction, abnormal sensations (eg, numbness and tingling), and anorexia and taste abnormalities. Additional rare but serious adverse events have been identified, such as metabolic acidosis, acute myopia, and secondary narrow-angle glaucoma. The optimal dose for alcohol dependence has yet to be established and may be lower than the target dose of 300 mg per day tested in previous research143,144.
Traditional herbal medications and their effects on alcohol consumption and AWS
Historically, people in Asia have used herbal medicines and dietary supplements for the treatment of excessive alcohol consumption and AWS. Although the precise chemical composition and mechanism are often unclear, many medicinal plants have been used to treat alcohol consumption and alcohol abuse for centuries, and some have shown efficacy. However, due to the lack of scientific evaluation of the properties of herbal medicines, the use of these herbal medicines has been greatly restricted. Recently, medical scientists re-evaluated the efficacy of some herbal medicines using modern scientific approaches.
Progress has been made toward research into the development of natural therapeutic agents for decreasing alcohol consumption and ameliorating AWS symptoms. Investigations of natural medicines have been focused on three aspects of alcohol intoxication: (1) decreasing alcohol consumption through decreasing the appetite for drinking and thereby suppressing alcohol intake; (2) inhibiting alcohol absorption in the gastrointestinal tract, and reducing alcohol concentration in the blood; and (3) enhancing liver metabolic functions to accelerate the elimination of alcohol and its metabolites and to alleviate injury to tissue and cells.
To date, several single herbal remedies have drawn attention for their anti-alcohol effects. These herbal remedies have a long history of use for the treatment of alcoholism in Asian countries such as China and Korea. For example, extracts of Kudzu, also known as Pueraria lobata, and Hovenia have been used as herbal medications in China since 200 BC, and both are noted in the Chinese pharmacopoeia of AD 600 as remedies for combating drunkenness. In addition to Kudzu and Hovenia, Salvia miltiorrhiza is another single herbal remedy for reducing cravings. Several compound formulas of herbal medicines are also commonly used to reduce the symptoms of excessive alcohol consumption, such as 'ge-hua-jie-xing-tang,' 'zhi-ge-yin,' and 'wu-ling-san.' These compound formulas consist of more than two single herbs. Even for medical scientists who specialized in herbal medicines, it is difficult or impossible to correctly distinguish which component is responsible for any given effect and if the medicine works.
A recent study showed that a complex containing Kudzu, bitter herbs (gentian, tangerine peel) and bupleurum reduced AUD identification test (AUDIT) scores in moderate to heavy drinkers. The underlying mechanisms may be through daidzin, which inhibits aldehyde dehydrogenase 2 (ALDH-2) and Radix bupleuri in the compound formula, which has some protective benefits not only in terms of ethanol-induced liver toxicity but also neurochemical effects involving endorphins, dopamine, and epinephrine145. Pilot studies provided useful evidence for using compound formulae to reduce heavy drinking. However, more time and effort are needed to understand the mechanisms and the safety/toxicity and to establish regulatory policies for using natural or other types of herbs.
Kudzu
Kudzu is the only herbal medicine mentioned by the NIAAA118. Kudzu is popular as an agent for alcoholism and hangovers as noted in the Chinese Pharmacopeia.
Alcohol is removed from the body primarily through metabolism in the liver. Approximately 90% of the alcohol is metabolized in the liver by alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) followed by aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH), while the gastrointestinal tract, lungs and kidneys play only a minor role146. Because alcohol-metabolizing enzymes such as ADH, ALDH and the microsomal alcohol oxidizing system (MEOS) contribute to the clearance of alcohol and toxic acetaldehyde, substances that stimulate these enzyme activities are expected to ameliorate alcohol toxicity. The development of an alcohol-metabolizing enzyme stimulant is one of the strategies for developing an alcoholism remedy. Attempts have been made to develop effective alcohol metabolic stimulants from natural dietary components and herbs; Kudzu is one of them.
Kudzu (Pueraria lobata) has two components. Pueraria lobata is the root-based herb, and Puerariae flos is the flower-based herb. Both of these herbal components have different claims and constituents. Puerariae flos enhances acetaldehyde removal and can be used as a hangover remedy. The extract of Pueraria lobata is a known inhibitor of mitochondrial ALDH2 and increases acetaldehyde147. A study of Kudzu effects on alcohol dependence/withdrawal shows that Kudzu root extract does not disturb sleep/wake cycles of moderate drinkers, indicating its utility as an adjunct treatment for alcohol dependence free of the potential side effects on sleep148. Furthermore, Kudzu root contains a number of useful isoflavones, including puerarin, daidzein and daidzin149. A study on the effects of Pueraria lobata on alcohol dependence showed that at times of high alcohol consumption, Pueraria lobata extract predisposed subjects to an increased risk of acetaldehyde-related neoplasm and pathology147. To date, the studies on the effects of Kudzu root extract on alcohol consumption have shown contradictory results. A study on voluntary drinking and withdrawal showed that Kudzu root extract suppressed voluntary alcohol intake and alcohol withdrawal symptoms in alcohol-preferring (P) and non-preferring rats150,151,152. However, human clinical studies showed that compared with placebo, Kudzu root extract did not significantly reduce alcohol cravings and consumption153. A recent pilot study has shown that a single isoflavone, puerarin, found in the Kudzu root can alter alcohol drinking in humans, suggesting that alcohol consumption patterns are influenced by puerarin administration and that this botanical medication may be a useful adjunct in the treatment of excessive alcohol intake154. Clearly, systematic studies are needed for understanding Kudzu's effects on alcohol dependence.
Hovenia
Hovenia is listed among the premier anti-alcohol intoxication herbal medicines in the Compendium of Materia Medica. Hovenia has been frequently used for protecting liver injuries155,156,157,158,159. Its therapeutic effects on alcohol intoxication and alcohol dependence have been observed160,161. In the past three decades, effort has been made to evaluate the efficacy of Hovenia on alcoholism and to understand the mechanisms of actions of its active constituents. There is evidence that Hovenia markedly decreases alcohol concentration in the blood and promotes the clearance of alcohol. Hovenia extract enhances ALDH activity more than ADH activity161,162,163, suggesting that Hovenia may relieve alcohol intoxication effectively by decreasing acetaldehyde concentration quickly in the liver and blood164. These studies showed that Hovenia eliminated excessive free radicals induced by drinking alcohol161 and block lipoperoxidation165, alleviating alcoholic liver injury and consequently avoiding alcohol-induced dysfunction. Hovenia also showed neuroprotective activity against glutamate-induced neurotoxicity in the mouse hippocampus166.
Studies in purifying Hovenia show that it contains a number of useful flavonoids, including myricetin, dihydromyricetin, hovenitin, laricitrin, and quercetin. Their unique characteristics have attracted the attention of scientists. In-depth studies are underway that focus on the effects of these flavonoids as anti-cancer agents167,168,169,170, in protecting against liver injury171,172, as anti-diabetes agents173,174,175, in protecting against neurodegeneration176,177, and as anti-alcohol intoxication blockers.
Dihydromyricetin
The plant Hovenia has been used in traditional herbal medicine as a treatment for alcohol hangovers for hundreds of years. In a recent study conducted with animals, researchers found that dihydromyricetin (DHM), a flavonoid compound isolated from Hovenia and teas, blocked acute alcohol intoxication and alcohol tolerance and prevented signs of withdrawal when co-administered with ethanol. DHM also greatly reduced voluntary alcohol drinking in rats. At the cellular level, the researchers found that DHM inhibited the effect of alcohol on GABAARs in the brain. DHM anti-alcohol effects were blocked by the BZ antagonist flumazenil, and DHM competitively inhibited BZ-site [3H]flunitrazepam binding, suggesting that DHM interaction with EtOH involves the BZ sites on GABAARs. Importantly, unlike BZs, DHM blocks acute EtOH intoxication within the effective dosage range, but does not cause sedation, sleep, or tolerance. These findings provide a foundation for further preclinical and clinical evaluation of DHM as a pharmacotherapy for alcohol dependence175,178,179.
Great progress in the study of traditional herbal medicines has been made, especially the potential therapeutics for anti-alcohol abuse. This progress not only includes new experimental findings but also demonstrates a method to utilize the treasure of traditional Eastern medications.
Alcohol use disorders continue to be a health concern worldwide. The need for continuing research into treatments for AUD is urgent to provide patients with more effective options having limited side effects. The goal of drug development for AUD can be targeted to reduce alcohol intoxication, reduce AWS, and reduce cravings. The potential options for producible medications include traditional medicines and alternative medications for the management of alcohol dependence.
Abbreviations
AUD, alcohol use disorders; AWS, alcohol withdrawal syndrome; BAC, blood alcohol concentration; EtOH, alcohol, ethanol; CNS, central nervous system; WHO, World Health Organization; FDA, the US Food and Drug Administration; CDC, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; DA, dopamine; VTA, ventral tegmental area; NAcc, nucleus accumbens; HPA, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal; PTZ, pentylenetetrazol.
References
WHO. Global status report on alcohol and health (2011).
CDC. Alcohol-attributable deaths and years of potential life lost — United States, 2001. 2004; 53; 866–70.
NIH/NIAAA. Alcohol across the lifespan (2007).
Becker H . Alcohol dependence, withdrawal, and relapse. Alcohol Research and Health NIAAA publication 2008; 31: 348–61.
Johnson BA . Medication treatment of different types of alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167: 630–9.
NIH/NIAAA. Helping patients who drink too much: a clinician's guide. 2008.
Anton RF, O'Malley SS, Ciraulo DA, Cisler RA, Couper D, Donovan DM, et al. Combined pharmacotherapies and behavioral interventions for alcohol dependence: the COMBINE study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2006; 295: 2003–17.
Mason B, Goodman A, Chabac S, Lehert P . Effect of oral acamprosate on abstinence in patients with alcohol dependence in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: the role of patient motivation. J Psychiatr Res 2006; 40: 383–93.
McGovern P, Zhang J, Tang J, Zhang Z, Hall GR, Moreau RA, et al. Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 17593–8.
Bayard M, McIntyre J, Hill KR, Woodside J Jr . Alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Am Fam Physician 2004; 69: 1443–50.
Hobbs W, Rall T, Verdoorn T . Hypnotics and sedatives: ethanol. In: The pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 9th edtion. 1996.
Paul SM . Alcohol-sensitive GABA receptors and alcohol antagonists. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 8307–8.
Valenzuela CF . Alcohol and neurotransmitter interactions. Alcohol Health Res World 1997; 21: 144–8.
Mukherjee S, Das SK, Vaidyanathan K, Vasudevan DM . Consequences of alcohol consumption on neurotransmitters — an overview. Curr Neurovasc Res 2008; 5: 266–72.
Koob G, Rassnick S, Heinrichs S, Weiss F . Alcohol, the reward system and dependence. EXS 1994; 71: 103–14.
Koob G, Volkow N . Neurocircuitry of addiction. Neuropsychopharmacol Rev 2010; 35: 217–38.
Wanat M, Willuhn I, Clark J, Phillips P . Phasic dopamine release in appetitive behaviors and drug addiction. Curr Drug Abuse Rev 2009; 2: 195–213.
NIDA (2008) Addiction Science: From Molecules to Managed Care. http://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/addiction-science.
Volkow N, Wang G, Fowler J, Logan J, Hitzemann R, Ding Y, et al. Decreases in dopamine receptors but not in dopamine transporters in alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1996; 20: 1594–8.
Feltenstein M, See R . The neurocircuitry of addiction: an overview. Br J Pharmacol 2008; 154: 261–74.
Olsen R . Extrasynaptic GABAA receptors in the nucleus accumbens are necessary for alcohol drinking. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011 108: 4699–700.
Noori H, Spanagel R, Hansson A . Neurocircuitry for modeling drug effects. Addict Biol 2012; 17: 827–64.
Nayeem N, Green T, Martin I, Barnard E . Quaternary structure of the native GABAA receptor determined by electron microscopic image analysis. J Neurochem 1994; 62: 815–8.
Macdonald RL, Olsen RW . GABAA receptor channels. Annu Rev Neurosci 1994; 17: 569–602.
Barnard EA, Skolnick P, Olsen RW, Mohler H, Sieghart W, Biggio G, et al. International union of pharmacology. XV. Subtypes of gamma-aminobutyric acid A receptors: classification on the basis of subunit structure and receptor function. Pharmacol Rev 1998; 50: 291–313.
Olsen R, Sieghart W . International union of pharmacology. LXX. Subtypes of g-aminobutyric acid(A) receptors: classification on the basis of subunit composition, pharmacology, and function. Update. Pharmacol Rev 2008; 60: 243–60.
Olsen R, Sieghart W . GABAA receptors: subtypes provide diversity of function and pharmacology. Neuropharmacology 2009; 56: 141–8.
Weiner JL, Zhang L, Carlen PL . Guanosine phosphate analogs modulate ethanol potentiation of GABAAR-mediated synaptic currents in hippocampal CA1 neurons. Brain Res 1994; 665: 307–10.
Olsen R, Spigelman I . GABAA receptor plasticity in alcohol withdrawal. Noebels JL, Avoli M, Rogawski MA, Olsen RW, Delgado-Escueta AV, editors. SourceJasper's basic mechanisms of the epilepsies [internet]. 4th edition. Bethesda (MD): National Center for Biotechnology Information (US) 2012.
Becker HC, Veatch LM, Diaz-Granados JL . Repeated ethanol withdrawal experience selectively alters sensitivity to different chemoconvulsant drugs in mice. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1998; 139: 145–53.
Boehm S, Ponomarev I, Jennings A, Whiting P, Rosahl TW, Garrett EM, et al. γ-Aminobutyric acid A receptor subunit mutant mice: new perspectives on alcohol actions. Biochem Pharmacol 2004; 68: 1581–602.
Koob GF . A role for GABA mechanisms in the motivational effects of alcohol. Biochem Pharmacol 2004; 68: 1515–25.
Mihic S, Harris R . GABA and GABAA receptor. Alcohol Health & Research World 1997; 21: 127.
Lithari C, Klados M, Pappas C, Albani M, Kapoukranidou D, Kovatsi L, et al. Alcohol affects the brain's resting-state network in social drinkers. PLoS One 2012; 7: e48641.
Buck K . New Insight into the mechanisms of ethanol effects on GABA, receptor function and expression, and their relevance to behavior. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1996; 20: 198A–202A.
Buck KJ, Finn DA . Genetic factors in addiction: QTL mapping and candidate gene studies implicate GABAergic genes in alcohol and barbiturate withdrawal in mice. Addiction 2001; 96: 139–49.
Davies M . The role of GABAA receptors in mediating the effects of alcohol in the central nervous system. J Psychiatry Neurosci 2003; (4): 263–74.
Grobin AC, Matthews DB, Devaud LL, Morrow AL . The role of GABAA receptors in the acute and chronic effects of ethanol. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1998; 139: 2–19.
Kumar S, Porcu P, Werner D, Matthews D, Diaz-Granados J, Helfand R, et al. The role of GABAA receptors in the acute and chronic effects of ethanol: a decade of progress. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2009; 205: 529–64.
Tobler I, Kopp C, Deboer T, Rudolph U . Diazepam-induced changes in sleep: role of the a1 GABAA receptor subtype. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98: 6464–9.
Rudolph U, Knoflach F . Beyond classical benzodiazepines: novel therapeutic potential of GABAA receptor subtypes. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2011; 10: 685–97.
Hanchar HJ, Dodson PD, Olsen RW, Otis TS, Wallner M . Alcohol-induced motor impairment caused by increased extrasynaptic GABAA receptor activity. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 339–45.
Liang J, Spigelman I, Olsen RW . Tolerance to sedative/hypnotic actions of GABAergic drugs correlates with tolerance to potentiation of extrasynaptic tonic currents of alcohol-dependent rats. J Neurophysiol 2009; 102: 224–33.
Liang J, Cagetti E, Olsen RW, Spigelman I . Altered pharmacology of synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA receptors on CA1 hippocampal neurons is consistent with subunit changes in a model of alcohol withdrawal and dependence. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2004; 310: 1234–45.
Kang M, Spigelman I, Sapp DW, Olsen RW . Persistent reduction of GABAA receptor-mediated inhibition in rat hippocampus after chronic intermittent ethanol treatment. Brain Res 1996; 709: 221–8.
Cagetti E, Liang J, Spigelman I, Olsen RW . Withdrawal from chronic intermittent ethanol treatment changes subunit composition, reduces synaptic function, and decreases behavioral responses to positive allosteric modulators of GABAA receptors. Mol Pharmacol 2003; 63: 53–64.
Soyka M, Preuss M, Hesselbrock V, Zill P, Koller, Bondy B . GABA-A2 receptor subunit gene (GABRA2) polymorphisms and risk for alcohol dependence. J Psychiatr Res 2008; 42: 184–91.
Ittiwut C, Yang B, Kranzler H, Anton R, Hirunsatit R, Weiss R, et al. GABRG1 and GABRA2 variation associated with alcohol dependence in African Americans. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2012; 36: 588–93.
Edenberg H, Dick D, Xuei X, Tian H, Almasy L, Bauer L, et al. Variations in GABRA2, encoding the α2 subunit of the GABAA receptor, are associated with alcohol dependence and with brain oscillations. Am J Hum Genet 2004; 74: 705–14.
Enoch M . The role of GABAA receptors in the development of alcoholism. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2008; 90: 95–104.
Parsian A, Zhang Z . Human chromosomes 11p15 and 4p12 and alcohol dependence: possible association with the GABRB1 gene. Am J Med Genet 1999; 88: 533–8.
Anstee QM, Knapp S, Maguire EP, Hosie AM, Thomas P, Mortensen M, et al. Mutations in the Gabrb1 gene promote alcohol consumption through increased tonic inhibition. Nat Commun 2013; 4: 2816.
Heinz A, Goldman D, Gallinat J, Schumann G, Puls I . Pharmacogenetic insights to monoaminergic dysfunction in alcohol dependence. Psychopharmacology 2004; 174: 561–70.
Staley J, Gottschalk C, Petrakis I, Gueorguieva R, O'Malley S, Baldwin R, et al. Cortical γ-aminobutyric acid type A-benzodiazepine receptors in recovery from alcohol dependence: relationship to features of alcohol dependence and cigarette smoking. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 877–88.
Roh S, Matsushita S, Hara S, Maesato H, Matsui T, Suzuki G, et al. Role of GABRA2 in moderating subjective responses to alcohol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2011; 35: 400–7.
Morrow AL, Montpied P, Lingford-Hughes A, Paul SM . Chronic ethanol and pentobarbital administration in the rat: effects on GABAA receptor function and expression in brain. Alcohol 1990; 7: 237–44.
Wallner M, Olsen R . Physiology and pharmacology of alcohol: the imidazobenzodiazepine alcohol antagonist site on subtypes of GABAA receptors as an opportunity for drug development? Br J Pharmacol 2008; 154: 288–98.
Jacob T, Moss S, Jurd R . GABAA receptor trafficking and its role in the dynamic modulation of neuronal inhibition. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9: 331–43.
Vithlani M, Moss S . The role of GABAAR phosphorylation in the construction of inhibitory synapses and the efficacy of neuronal inhibition. Biochem Soc Trans 2009; 37: 1355–8.
Sieghart W, Fuchs K, Tretter V, Ebert V, Jechlinger M, Höger H, et al. Structure and subunit composition of GABAA receptors. Neurochem Int 1999; 34: 379–85.
Tretter V, Ehya N, Fuchs K, Sieghart W . Stoichiometry and assembly of a recombinant GABAA receptor subtype. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 2728–37.
Mody I . Distinguishing between GABAA receptors responsible for tonic and phasic conductances. Neurochem Res 2001; 26: 907–13.
Liang J, Zhang N, Cagetti E, Houser CR, Olsen RW, Spigelman I . Chronic intermittent ethanol-induced switch of ethanol actions from extrasynaptic to synaptic hippocampal GABAA receptors. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 1749–58.
Santhakumar V, Hanchar H, Wallner M, Olsen R, Otis T . Contributions of the GABAA receptor α6 subunit to phasic and tonic inhibition revealed by a naturally occurring polymorphism in the α6 gene. 2006; 26: 3357–64.
Wei W, Zhang N, Peng Z, Houser CR, Mody I . Perisynaptic localization of δ subunit-containing GABAA receptors and their activation by GABA spillover in the mouse dentate gyrus. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 10650–61.
Tossman U, Jonsson G, Ungerstedt U . Regional distribution and extracellular levels of amino acids in rat central nervous system. Acta Physiol Scand 1986; 127: 533–45.
Kittler JT, Delmas P, Jovanovic JN, Brown DA, Smart TG, Moss SJ . Constitutive endocytosis of GABAA receptors by an association with the adaptin AP2 complex modulates inhibitory synaptic currents in hippocampal neurons. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 7972–7.
Liang J, Suryanarayanan A, Abriam A, Snyder B, Olsen RW, Spigelman I . Mechanisms of reversible GABAA receptor plasticity after ethanol intoxication. J Neuroscience 2007; 27: 12367–77.
Silberman Y, Ariwodola OJ, Weiner JL . β1-Adrenoceptor activation is required for ethanol enhancement of lateral paracapsular GABAergic synapses in the rat basolateral amygdala. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2012; 343: 451–9.
Suzdak PD, Schwartz RD, Skolnick P, Paul SM . Ethanol stimulates γ-aminobutyric acid receptor-mediated chloride transport in rat brain synaptoneurosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1986; 83: 4071–5.
Harris R, Allan A . Alcohol intoxication: ion channels and genetics. FASEB 1989; 3: 1689–95.
Gonzalez C, Moss S, Olsen R . Ethanol promotes clathrin adaptor-mediated endocytosis via the intracellular domain of δ-containing GABAA receptors. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 17874–81.
Steffensen S, Walton C, Hansen D, Yorgason J, Gallegos R, Criado J . Contingent and non-contingent effects of low-dose ethanol on GABA neuron activity in the ventral tegmental area. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2009; 92: 68–75.
Chau P, Höifödt-Lidö H, Löf E, Söderpalm B, Ericson M . Glycine receptors in the nucleus accumbens involved in the ethanol intake-reducing effect of acamprosate. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2010; 34: 39–45.
Rewal M, Donahue R, Gill T, Nie H, Ron D, Janak P . α4 subunit-containing GABAA receptors in the accumbens shell contribute to the reinforcing effects of alcohol. Addict Biol 2012; 17: 309–21.
Li J, Bian W, Dave V, Ye J . Blockade of GABAA receptors in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus attenuates voluntary ethanol intake and activates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Addict Biol 2011; 16: 600–14.
Sanna E, Talani G, Obili N, Mascia M, Mostallino M, Secci PP, et al. Voluntary ethanol consumption induced by social isolation reverses the increase of α4/δ GABAA receptor gene expression and function in the hippocampus of C57BL/6J Mice. Front Neurosci 2011; 5: 15.
Pisu M, Mostallino M, Dore R, Maciocco E, Secci P, Serra M . Effects of voluntary ethanol consumption on emotional state and stress responsiveness in socially isolated rats. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 21: 414–25.
Wallner M, Hanchar HJ, Olsen RW . Ethanol enhances α4β3δ and α6β3δ γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors at low concentrations known to affect humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003; 100: 15218–23.
June H, Murphy J, Hewitt R, Greene T, Lin M, Mellor-Burke J, et al. Benzodiazepine receptor ligands with different intrinsic efficacies alter ethanol intake in alcohol-nonpreferring (NP) rats. Neuropsychopharmacology 1996; 14: 55–66.
June H, Harvey S, Foster K, McKay PF, Cummings R, Garcia M, et al. GABAA receptors containing α5 subunits in the CA1 and CA3 hippocampal fields regulate ethanol-motivated behaviors: an extended ethanol reward circuitry. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 2166–77.
Mihalek RM, Bowers BJ, Wehner JM, Kralic JE, VanDoren MJ, Morrow AL, et al. GABAA-receptor δ subunit knockout mice have multiple defects in behavioral responses to ethanol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2001; 25: 1708–18.
Stephens D, Pistovcakova J, Worthing L, Atack J, Dawson G . Role of GABAA α5-containing receptors in ethanol reward: the effects of targeted gene deletion, and a selective inverse agonist. Eur J Pharmacol 2005; 526: 240–50.
Choi D, Wei W, Deitchman J, Kharazia V, Lesscher HM, McMahon T, et al. Protein kinase Cdelta regulates ethanol intoxication and enhancement of GABA-stimulated tonic current. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 11890–9.
Kokka N, Sapp DW, Taylor AM, Olsen RW . The kindling model of alcohol dependence: similar persistent reduction in seizure threshold to pentylenetetrazol in animals receiving chronic ethanol or chronic pentylenetetrazol. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1993; 17: 525–31.
Cagetti E, Pinna G, Guidotti A, Baicy K, Olsen RW . Chronic intermittent ethanol (CIE) administration in rats decreases levels of neurosteroids in hippocampus, accompanied by altered behavioral responses to neurosteroids and memory function. Neuropharmacology 2004; 46: 570–9.
Kumar S, Kralic JE, O'Buckley TK, Grobin AC, Morrow AL . Chronic ethanol consumption enhances internalization of alpha1 subunit-containing GABAA receptors in cerebral cortex. J Neurochem 2003; 86: 700–8.
Papadeas S, Grobin AC, Morrow AL . Chronic ethanol consumption differentially alters GABAA receptor α1 and α4 subunit peptide expression and GABAA receptor-mediated 36 Cl(-) uptake in mesocorticolimbic regions of rat brain. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2001; 25: 1270–5.
NIH (2014) Gabra4 γ-aminobutyric acid GABAA receptor, subunit α4 [Mus musculus (house mouse)] http://www.ncbinlmnihgov/gene/140675.
Gilpin N, Karanikas C, Richardson H . Adolescent binge drinking leads to changes in alcohol drinking, anxiety, and amygdalar corticotropin releasing factor cells in adulthood in male rats. PLoS One 2012; 7: e31466.
Overstreet D, Knapp D, Breese G . Drug challenges reveal differences in mediation of stress facilitation of voluntary alcohol drinking and withdrawal-induced anxiety in alcohol-preferring P rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2007; 31: 1473–81.
Bahi A . Increased anxiety, voluntary alcohol consumption and ethanol-induced place preference in mice following chronic psychosocial stress. Stress 2013; 16: 441–51.
Glue P, Nutt D . Overexcitement and disinhibition. Dynamic neurotransmitter interactions in alcohol withdrawal. Br J Psychiatry 1990; 157: 491–9.
Adinoff B . The alcohol withdrawal syndrome: neurobiology of treatment and toxicity. Am J Addict 1994; 3: 277–88.
Heinz A, Schmidt K, Baum S, Kuhn S, Dufeu P, Schmidt L, et al. Influence of dopaminergic transmission on severity of withdrawal syndrome in alcoholism. J Stud Alcohol 1996; 57: 471–4.
Weiss F, Parsons L, Schulteis G, Hyytiä P, Lorang M, Bloom F, et al. Ethanol self-administration restores withdrawal-associated deficiencies in accumbal dopamine and 5-hydroxytryptamine release in dependent rats. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 3474–85.
Clapp P, Bhave S, Hoffman P . How adaptation of the brain to alcohol leads to dependence: a pharmacological perspective. Alcohol Res Health 2008; 31: 310–39.
Heinz A, Ragan P, Jones D, Hommer D, Williams W, Knable MB, et al. Reduced central serotonin transporters in alcoholism. Am J Psychiatry 1998; 155: 1544–9.
Koob G . Neurobiology of addiction. Toward the development of new therapies. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 909: 170–85.
Diana M, Brodie M, Muntoni A, Puddu M, Pillolla G, Steffensen S, et al. Enduring effects of chronic ethanol in the CNS: basis for alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2003; 27: 354–61.
Foster K, McKay P, Seyoum R, Milbourne D, Yin W, Sarma P, et al. GABAA and opioid receptors of the central nucleus of the amygdala selectively regulate ethanol-maintained behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004; 29: 269–84.
Fleming R, Acheson S, Moore S, Wilson W, Swartzwelder H . In the rat, chronic intermittent ethanol exposure during adolescence alters the ethanol sensitivity of tonic inhibition in adulthood. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2012; 36: 279–85.
Koob G . Drugs of abuse: anatomy, pharmacology and function of reward pathways. Trends Pharmacol Sci 1992; 13: 177–84.
Melis M, Spiga S, Diana M . The dopamine hypothesis of drug addiction: hypodopaminergic state. Int Rev Neurobiol 2005; 63: 101–54.
Fadda P, Scherma M, Fresu A, Collu M, Fratta W . Baclofen antagonizes nicotine-, cocaine-, and morphine-induced dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens of rat. Synapse 2003; 50: 1–6.
Kaun K, Azanchi R, Maung Z, Hirsh J, Heberlein U . A Drosophila model for alcohol reward. Nat Neurosci 2011; 14: 612–9.
Robinson B, Khurana S, Kuperman A, Atkinson N . Neural adaptation leads to cognitive ethanol dependence. Curr Biol 2012; 22: 2338–41.
Horner A, Gadian D, Fuentemilla L, Jentschke S, Vargha-Khadem F, Duzel E . A rapid, hippocampus-dependent, item-memory signal that initiates context memory in humans. Curr Biol 2012; 22: 2369–74.
Miller N, Gold M . Management of withdrawal syndromes and relapse prevention in drug and alcohol dependence. Am Fam Physician 1998; 58: 139–46.
Shen W . Pharmacotherapy of alcoholism: the American current status. Keio J Med 1991; 40: 9–12.
Ricks J, Replogle W, Cook N . FPIN's clinical inquiries. Management of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Am Fam Physician 2010; 82: 344–7.
Olsen RW, McCabe RT, Wamsley JK . GABAA receptor subtypes: autoradiographic comparison of GABA, benzodiazepine, and convulsant binding sites in the rat central nervous system. J Chem Neuroanat 1990; 3: 59–76.
Olsen RW, Sapp DM, Bureau MH, Turner DM, Kokka N . Allosteric actions of central nervous system depressants including anesthetics on subtypes of the inhibitory γ-aminobutyric acid A receptor-chloride channel complex. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1991; 625: 145–54.
Ozdemir V, Bremner KE, Naranjo CA . Treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome. Ann Med 1994; 26: 101–5.
Krystal J, Cramer J, Krol W, Kirk G, Rosenheck R . Naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence. N Engl J Med 2001; 354: 1734–9.
Miller NS . Pharmacotherapy in alcoholism. J Addict Dis 1995; 14: 23–46.
Neave N, Reid C, Scholey A, Thompson J, Moss M, Ayre G, et al. Dose-dependent effects of flumazenil on cognition, mood, and cardio-respiratory physiology in healthy volunteers. Br Dent J 2000; 189: 668–74.
NIH (2010) Alcohol Use Disorders: Treatment, Services Research, and Recovery (R01).
Caputo F, Bernardi M . Medications acting on the GABA system in the treatment of alcoholic patients. Curr Pharm Des 2010; 16: 2118–25.
Anton R, Drobes D, Voronin K, Durazo-Avizu R, Moak D . Naltrexone effects on alcohol consumption in a clinical laboratory paradigm: temporal effects of drinking. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2004; 173: 32–40.
O'Malley S, Krishnan-Sarin S, Farren C, Sinha R, Kreek M . Naltrexone decreases craving and alcohol self-administration in alcohol-dependent subjects and activates the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical axis. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2002; 160: 19–29.
Pettinati H, O'Brien C, Rabinowitz A, Wortman S, Oslin D, Kampman K, et al. The status of naltrexone in the treatment of alcohol dependence: specific effects on heavy drinking. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2006; 26: 610–25.
Froehlich JC, Harts J, Lumeng L . Naloxone attenuates voluntary ethanol intake in rats selectively bred for high ethanol preference. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1991; 35: 385–90.
Froehlich J, Wand G . The neurobiology of ethanol-opioid interaction in ethanol reinforcement. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1997; 20: A181–6.
Froehlich JC, Badia-Elder NE, Zink RW . Contribution of the opioid system to alcohol aversion and alcohol drinking behaviour. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1998; 287: 284–92.
Bouza C, Angeles M, Munoz A, Amate J . Efficacy and safety of naltrexone and acamprosate in the treatment of alcohol dependence: A systematic review. Addiction 2004; 99: 811–28.
Srisurapanont M, Jarusuraisin N . Naltrexone for the treatment of alcoholism: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 2005; 8: 267–80.
Jones E, Dekker L . Opiate antagonist therapy for the pruritus of cholestasis: the avoidance of opioid withdrawal-like reactions. Gastroenterology 2000; 118: 431–2.
Oncken C, Van-Kirk J, Kranzler H . Adverse effects of oral naltrexone: analysis of data from two clinical trials. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2001; 154: 397–402.
O'Malley SS, Rounsaville BJ, Farren C, Namkoong K, Wu R, Robinson J, et al. Initial and maintenance naltrexone treatment for alcohol dependence using primary care vs specialty care: a nested sequence of 3 randomized trials. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 1695–704.
Losekam S, Kluge I, Nittel KS, Kircher T, Konrad C . Letter to the Editor: Shopping frenzy induced by naltrexone – a paradoxical effect in bipolar disorder? Psychol Med 2013; 43: 895.
Sonne S, Brady K . Naltrexone for individuals with comorbid bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2000; 20: 114–5.
Sullivan M, Nunes E . New-onset mania and psychosis following heroin detoxification and naltrexone maintenance. Am J Addict 2005; 14: 486–7.
Williams S . Medications for treating alcohol dependence. Am Fam Physician 2005; 9: 1775–80.
Mann K, Kiefer F, Spanagel R, Littleton J . Acamprosate: recent findings and future research directions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2008; 32: 1105–10.
NIH/NIAAA (2005) Prescribing Medications for Alcohol Dependence.
Anton RF, O'Malley SS, Ciraulo DA, Cisler RA, Couper D, Donovan DM, et al. Effect of oral acamprosate on abstinence in patients with alcohol dependence in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: the role of patient motivation. JAMA 2006; 295: 2003–17.
Maisel N, Blodgett J, Wilbourne P, Humphreys K, Finney J . Meta-analysis of naltrexone and acamprosate for treating alcohol use disorders: when are these medications most helpful? Addiction 2013; 108: 275–93.
Mann K . The pharmacological treatment of alcohol dependence: needs and possibilities. Review Alcohol Alcohol 1996; 1: 55–8.
Kiefer F, Wiedemann K . Combined therapy: what does acamprosate and naltrexone combination tell us? Alcohol Alcoholism 2004; 39: 542–7.
Fuller R, Gordis E . Does disulfiram have a role in alcoholism treatment today? Addiction 2004; 99: 21–4.
Filosto M, Tentorio M, Broglio L, Buzio S, Lazzarini C, Pasolini M, et al. Disulfiram neuropathy: two cases of distal axonopathy. Clin Toxicol (Phila) 2008; 46: 314–6.
Roy Chengappa KN, Schwarzman LK, Hulihan JF, Xiang J, Rosenthal NR ; Clinical Affairs Product Support Study-168 Investigators. Adjunctive topiramate therapy in patients receiving a mood stabilizer for bipolar I disorder: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2006; 67: 1698–706.
O'Malley S, O'Connor P . Medications for unhealthy alcohol use: across the spectrum. Alcohol Res Health 2011; 33: 300–12.
Kushner S, Han D, Oscar-Berman M, William Downs B, Madigan M, Giordano J, et al. Declinol, a complex containing Kudzu, Bitter Herbs (Gentian, Tangerine Peel) and Bupleurum, significantly reduced alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) scores in moderate to heavy drinkers: a pilot study. J Addict Res Ther 2013; 4: 153.
Lieber CS . Alcohol and the liver: gastroenterology 1994; 106: 1085–105.
McGregor N . Pueraria lobata (Kudzu root) hangover remedies and acetaldehyde-associated neoplasm risk. Alcohol 2007; 41: 469–78.
Bracken B, Penetar D, Maclean R, Lukas S . Kudzu root extract does not perturb the sleep/wake cycle of moderate drinkers. J Altern Complement Med 2011; 17: 961–6.
Ohshima Y, Okuyama T, Takahashi K, Takizawa T, Shibata S . Isolation and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) of isoflavonoids from the Pueraria root. Planta Med 1988; 54: 250–4.
Benlhabib E, Baker J, Keyler D, Singh A . Kudzu root extract suppresses voluntary alcohol intake and alcohol withdrawal symptoms in P rats receiving free access to water and alcohol. J Med Food 2004; 7: 168–79.
Lin R, Guthrie S, Xie C, Mai K, Lee D, Lumeng L, et al. Isoflavonoid compounds extracted from Pueraria lobata suppress alcohol preference in a pharmacogenetic rat model of alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1996; 20: 659–63.
Lin RC, Li TK . Effects of isoflavones on alcohol pharmacokinetics and alcohol-drinking behavior in rats. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68: 1512S–5S.
Shebek J, Rindone J . A pilot study exploring the effect of kudzu root on the drinking habits of patients with chronic alcoholism. J Altern Complement Med 2000; 6: 45–8.
Penetar D, Toto L, Farmer S, Lee D, Ma Z, Liu Y, et al. The isoflavone puerarin reduces alcohol intake in heavy drinkers: a pilot study. Drug Alcohol Depend 2012; 126: 251–6.
Hase K, Ohsugi M, Xiong Q, Basnet P, Kadota S, Namba T . Hepatoprotective effect of Hovenia dulcis THUNB. on experimental liver injuries induced by carbon tetrachloride or D-galactosamine/ lipopolysaccharide. Biol Pharm Bull 1997; 20: 381–5.
Ji Y, Li J, Yang P . Effects of fruits of Hovenia dulcis Thunb on acute alcohol toxicity in mice. Zhong Yao Cai 2001; 24: 126–8.
Ji Y, Chen S, Zhang K, Wang W . Effects of Hovenia dulcis Thunb on blood sugar and hepatic glycogen in diabetic mice. Zhong Yao Cai 2002; 25: 190–1.
Liu X, Zhnag H, Wang F . Effect of Hovenia dulcis extract on expression of MMP-13 and TIMP-1 in hepatic tissue. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi 2006; 31: 1097–100.
Fang H, Lin H, Chan M, Lin W, Lin W . Treatment of chronic liver injuries in mice by oral administration of ethanolic extract of the fruit of Hovenia dulcis. Am J Chin Med 2007; 35: 693–703.
Sakai K, Yamane T, Saitoh Y . Effect of water extracts of crude drugs in decreasing blood ethanol concentrations in rats. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 1987; 35: 4597–604.
Yutaka O, Hisashi I, Yosio I . Effect of extracts from Hovenia dulcis Thunb. on alcohol concentration in rats and men administered alcohol. Jpn Nutr Crop Sci Bull 1995; 48: 167–72.
Wang Y, Han Y, Qian J . Experimental study on antilipoperoxidation of Hovenia dulcis Thunb. China Trad Herbal Drugs 1994; 25: 306–7.
Kim K, Chung Y, Lee J . Hepatic detoxification activity and reduction of serum alcohol concentration of Hovenia dulcis Thunb from Korea and China. Korean J Med Crop Sci 2000; 8: 225–33.
Ji Y, Yang P, Li J . Preventive effect of Hovenia dulcis Thunb on alcohol-induced liver injury. Pharmacol Clinics Chin Mat Med 2000; 6: 9–20.
Xu B, Zheng Y, Sung C . Natural medicines for alcoholism treatment: a review. Drug Alcohol Rev 2005; 24: 525–36.
Li G, Min BS, Zheng C, Lee J, Oh SR, Ahn KS, et al. Neuroprotective and free radical scavenging activities of phenolic compounds from Hovenia dulcis. Arch Pharm Res 2005; 28: 804–9.
Sun F, Zheng XY, Ye J, Wu T, Wang J, Chen W . Potential anticancer activity of myricetin in human T24 bladder cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo. Nutr Cancer 2012; 64: 599–606.
Lee K, Kang N, Rogozin EA . Myricetin is a novel natural inhibitor of neoplastic cell transformation and MEK1. Carcinogenesis 2007; 28: 1918–27.
Li C, Lim SC, Kim J, Choi JS . Effects of myricetin, an anticancer compound, on the bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of tamoxifen and its main metabolite, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, in rats. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2011; 36: 175–82.
Zheng S, Li Y, Jiang D, Zhao J, Ge J . Anticancer effect and apoptosis induction by quercetin in the human lung cancer cell line A-549. Mol Med Rep 2012; 5: 822–6.
Chen X . Protective effects of quercetin on liver injury induced by ethanol. Pharmacogn Mag 2010; 6: 135–41.
Thiyagarajah P, Kuttan SC, Lim SC, Teo TS, Das NP . Effect of myricetin and other flavonoids on the liver plasma membrane Ca2+ pump. Kinetics and structure-function relationships. Biochem Pharmacol 1991; 41: 669–75.
Li Y, Ding Y . Minireview: Therapeutic potential of myricetin in diabetes mellitus. Food Sci Human Wellness 2012; 1: 19–25.
Mahmoud M, Hassan N, El Bassossy H, Fahmy A . Quercetin protects against diabetes-induced exaggerated vasoconstriction in rats: effect on low grade inflammation. PLoS One 2013; 8: e63784.
NIAAA (2012) NIAAA Director's Report on Institute Activities to the 130th Meeting of the National Advisory Council on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism — Animal study finds that dihydromyricetin blocks alcohol intoxication.
Ma Z, Wang J, Jiang H, Liu T, Xie J . Myricetin reduces 6-hydroxydopamine-induced dopamine neuron degeneration in rats. Neuroreport 2007; 18: 1181–5.
Prasad J, Baitharu I, Sharma A, Dutta R, Prasad D, Singh S . Quercetin reverses hypobaric hypoxia-induced hippocampal neurodegeneration and improves memory function in the rat. High Alt Med Biol 2013; 14: 383–94.
Shen Y, Lindemeyer AK, Gonzalez C, Shao XM, Spigelman I, Olsen RW, et al. Dihydromyricetin as a novel anti-alcohol intoxication medication. J Neurosci 2012; 32: 390–401.
Davies D, Bortolato M, Finn D, Ramaker M, Barak S, Ron D, et al. Recent advances in the discovery and preclinical testing of novel compounds for the prevention and/or treatment of alcohol use disorders. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013; 37: 8–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liang, J., Olsen, R. Alcohol use disorders and current pharmacological therapies: the role of GABAA receptors. Acta Pharmacol Sin 35, 981–993 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2014.50
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2014.50
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
N-acetylcysteine does not alter neurometabolite levels in non-treatment seeking adolescents who use alcohol heavily: A preliminary randomized clinical trial
Neuropsychopharmacology (2023)
-
Randomised trial of intravenous thiamine and/or magnesium sulphate administration on erythrocyte transketolase activity, lactate concentrations and alcohol withdrawal scores
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Illicit Drug Use and Endoscopy: When Do We Say No?
Digestive Diseases and Sciences (2022)
-
Dihydromyricetin Protects Against Ethanol-Induced Toxicity in SH-SY5Y Cell Line: Role of GABAA Receptor
Neurotoxicity Research (2022)
-
A standardized polyherbal preparation POL-6 diminishes alcohol withdrawal anxiety by regulating Gabra1, Gabra2, Gabra3, Gabra4, Gabra5 gene expression of GABAA receptor signaling pathway in rats
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies (2021)