Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Exposure to tap water during pregnancy

Abstract

Studies of disinfection byproducts (DBPs) in drinking water and risk of adverse reproductive outcome have usually relied on approximate measures of exposure. Individual differences in consumption of bottled or filtered water, variability in tap water consumption at home and at work, dermal and inhalation exposure to volatile contaminants, and changes in residency during pregnancy may lead to exposure misclassification. We characterized exposures to tap water and other risk factors among 71 pregnant and 43 non-pregnant women attending public health clinics. Nearly all residences had a municipal water source, but 25% of women drank filtered or bottled water. Fifty percent of the women in our sample reported working outside the home where, on average, one third of their daily water intake took place. Pregnant women consumed more water than non-pregnant women (3.4 vs. 3.0 total l/day), especially cold tap water at home (1.8 vs. 1.3 l/day, 95% CI for the difference=0.1, 0.9). Patterns of showering were similar for both groups of women, but pregnant women were more likely to bathe and to bathe more frequently. The prevalence of smoking was lower among pregnant women (22.5% vs. 32.6%), as was the consumption of alcohol (4.2% vs. 53.5%, 95% CI for the difference=−64.9, −33.7). Thirty-two percent of women had moved during their current pregnancy. The data reaffirm the importance of collecting individual-level data for water consumption and exposure to potential confounders to avoid misclassification bias. This study is the first to target women of low socio-economic status (SES) and therefore of particular interest in studies of adverse reproductive outcomes for which this group is at increased risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aggazzotti G, Fantuzzi G, Righi E, Tartoni P, Cassinadri T, and Predieri G, Chloroform in alveolar air of individuals attending indoor swimming pools. Arch Environ Health (1993) 48: 250–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Backer LC Ashley DL Bonin MA Cardinali FL Kieszak SM and Wooten JV, Household exposures to drinking water disinfection by-products: whole blood trihalomethane levels. J Expos Anal Environ Epidemiol (2000) 10: 321–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bove FJ Fulcomer MC Klotz JB Esmart J Dufficy EM Savrin JE et al, Public water contamination and birth outcomes. Am J Epidemiol (1995) 141: 50–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burmaster DE, Lognormal distributions for total water intake and tap water intake by pregnant and lactating women in the United States. Risk Anal (1998) 18: 215–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dodds L, King W, Wolcott C, and Pole J, Trihalomethanes in public water supplies and adverse birth outcomes. Epidemiology (1999) 10: 233–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ershow AG Brown LM and Cantor KP, Intake of tap water and total water by pregnant and lactating women. Am J Public Health (1991) 81: 328–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallagher MD Nuckols JR Stallones L and Savitz DA, Exposure to trihalomethanes and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Epidemiology (1998) 9: 484–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hopkins SM and Ellis JC, Drinking water consumption in Great Britain Water Research Centre, Marlow, Bucks, 1980, TR 137

    Google Scholar 

  9. Khoury MJ Stewart W Weinstein A Panny S Lindsay P and Eisenberg M, Residential mobility during pregnancy: implications for environmental teratogenesis. J Clin Epidemiol (1988) 41: 15–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. King W, Dodds L, and Allen A, Relation between stillbirth and specific chlorination by-products in public water supplies. Environ Health Perspect (2000) 108: 883–886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Levesque B, Ayotte P, LeBlanc A, Dewailly E, Prudhomme D, Lavoie R, Sylvain A, and Levallois P, Evaluation of dermal and respiratory chloroform exposure in humans. Environ Health Perspect (1994) 102: 1082–1087

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Milton SJ, Statistical Methods in the Biological and Health Sciences 3rd ed McGraw-Hill, New York, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  13. Neutra RR Swann SH Hertz-Picciotto I Windham GC Wrensch M Shaw GM Fenster L and Deane M, Potential sources of bias and confounding in environmental epidemiologic studies of pregnancy outcomes. Epidemiology (1992) 3: 134–142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nieuwenhuijsen MJ Toledano MB Eaton NE Fawell J and Elliott P, Chlorine disinfection by-products in water and their association with adverse reproductive outcomes: a review. J Occup Environ Med (2000) 57: 73–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Reif JS Hatch MC Bracken M Holmes L Schwetz B and Singer PC, Reproductive and developmental effects of disinfection byproducts in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect (1996) 104: 1056–1061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Shaw GM and Malcoe LH, Residential mobility during pregnancy for mothers of infants with or without congenital cardiac anomalies: a reprint. Arch Environ Health (1992) 47: 236–238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimokura GH Savitz DA and Symanski E, Assessment of water use for estimating exposure to tap water. Environ Health Perspect (1998) 106: 55–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Starfield B Shapiro S Weiss J Liang KY Ra K Paige D and Wang X, Race, family income, and low birth weight. Am J Epidemiol (1991) 134: 1167–1174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Swan SH Waller K Hopkins B Windham G Fenster L Schaefer C and Neutra R, A prospective study of spontaneous abortion; relation to amount and source of drinking water consumed in early pregnancy. Epidemiology (1998) 9: 126–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Weisel CP and Chen WJ, Exposure to chlorination by-products from hot water uses. Risk Anal (1994): 101–106

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Weisel CP and Jo WK, Ingestion, inhalation and dermal exposures to chloroform and trichloroethane from tap water. Environ Health Perspect (1996) 104: 48–51

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Weisel CP Kim H Haltmeier P and Klotz JB, Exposure estimates to disinfection by-products of chlorinated drinking water. Environ Health Perspect (1999) 107: 103–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported, in part, by a cooperative agreement with the U.S. EPA CR 822107-02-3. The authors thank Dr. Adrienne LeBailly of the Larimer County Department of Health and Environment for assistance in accessing participants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ROBYNN ZENDER.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ZENDER, R., BACHAND, A. & REIF, J. Exposure to tap water during pregnancy. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 11, 224–230 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500163

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jea.7500163

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links