INTRODUCTION

Cytokinesis is a very complicated and carefully orchestrated process. During the last step of this process, an intercellular bridge is formed between the two daughter cells. A number of studies suggest that this intercellular bridge is not merely a remnant of the mitotic spindle and cell membrane. In fact, it plays a significant role in cytokinesis completion and the following progression of cell cycle from G1 to S phase 1. In addition to microtubules, numerous proteins have recently been identified at the intercellular bridge and they play a role in cytokinesis completion. These proteins include cytoskeleton proteins (actin, intermediate filament proteins), chromosomal passenger proteins (INCENP, TD-60), motor proteins (CENP-E, KLP-3A), protein kinases (Polo and Aurora families), and γ–tubulin 2, 3. Some of the proteins localize at the centriole region during metaphase, redistribute to central spindle, and finally localize to the intercellular bridge.

The Ca2+/CaM signal has long been thought to play an important role in cytokinesis due to the observation that there was a close association between the localized elevation of Ca2+ and the onset of cytokinesis 4, 5. Calmodulin (CaM) also relocalizes from the spindle pole during metaphase to the central spindle and intercellular bridge during cytokinesis 6, 7. CaM plays a significant role in cytokinesis including furrow formation and regression. The association of CaM with central spindle regulates the initiation of cytokinesis 8. The injection of either anti-sense mRNA of CaM or CaM-inhibiting peptide always results in failed cytokinesis 9, 10. Here we report that CaM is associated with regulation of centriole reposition, a remarkable morphological change that controls the completion of cytokinesis and subsequent transition of the cell cycle from G1 to S phase. The data gives further evidence that CaM could regulate the completion of cytokinesis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Cell culture and drug treatment

Both HeLa cells and PtK2 cells were used in this study. PtK2 cells are more flat than HeLa cells during mitosis and the cell bridge can be more easily observed. Cells were cultured as a monolayer at 37°C in MEM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and 100 i.u./ml penicillin and streptomycin.

The cell permeable antagonist of calmodulin, W7 [N-(6-Aminohexyl)-5-cholro-1-naphthalenesulfonamide, HCl], which inhibits Ca2+/CaM-dependent phosphodiesterase and myosin light chain kinase (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA), was added to medium of the synchronized cells. The concentration was calibrated in other experiments by using different concentrations. The maximum inhibitory effect was at 15 mM, and was reversible. All the experiments were repeated independently at least 3 times.

Cell synchronization

Synchronization of PtK2 cells was accomplished by using the double-thymidine block method. Cells were blocked at S phase and then incubated in fresh medium for 12 h until cytokinesis before W7 was applied.

To obtain synchronized metaphase HeLa cells, cells cycled to mitosis were blocked by nocodazole (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) at a final concentration of 0.2 μg/ml for 10 h. Synchronized mitotic HeLa cells were then collected and recovered in fresh medium for 100 min before W7 treatment.

BrdU incorporation

To compare the BrdU incorporation rate in W7 treated and untreated HeLa cells, BrdU (Zymed-Lab, South San Francisco, CA) was added directly to the culture medium of the synchronized HeLa cells with a final concentration of 10 μM. After incubation for 1520 h, cells on coverslips were fixed and then immersed in formamide at 100°C for 5 min to denature DNA before staining with anti-BrdU monoclonal antibody.

Immunofluorescence staining

The immunostaining procedure essentially followed that of Harlow and Lane 10. For microtubules staining, Triton X-100 was used to permeable cell to get a clear image (0.2%, added in fixation buffer).

The mouse monoclonal anti-β-tubulin antibody was purchased from Sera-Lab (Sussex, England), rabbit polyclonal anti-γ-tubulin antibody from Santa Cruzlab (SantaCruz, CA), and mouse monoclonal anti-BrdU antibody from Zymed-Lab (South San Francisco, CA). Texas-Red- or FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies and Texas-Red-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody were obtained from Calbiochem-Novabiochem Corp (La Jolla, CA).

Microscopy

In all cases, immunostained cells were co-stained for DNA with Hoechst 33342 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR). Microscopic observations were made on a Leica DMR microscope equipped with a 100×(N.A. 1.4) objective. Images were captured with a cooled charge-coupled device camera (Dignostic Instruments, MI) and processed using SPOT software (Dignostic Instruments, MI)

RESULTS

CaM affected intercellular bridge abscission

Successful cytokinesis requires the abscission and eventually resolving of the intercellular bridge connecting the two daughter cells. We have found that CaM concentrates to the cell bridge after cells enter telophase, especially near the “Flemming Body” where cell bridge abscission happens 11. In order to examine whether the intercellular bridge associated CaM is also involved in cytokinesis completion, we treated synchronized PtK2 cells with W7 (15 μM) for 4 h at a late stage in cytokinesis when most cells have begun to form intercellular bridges. When the completion of cytokinesis was prolonged by any perturbations, the two daughter cells would be linked by a longer intercellular bridge 12. As shown in Fig. 1A, W7 treated daughter cells were linked by longer intercellular bridges than those of the untreated cells. The average bridge length increased significantly from 7.14 μm (n=30) in the control cells to 12.56 μm (n=30) in the W7 treated cells (Fig. 1B, P<0.01). This suggests W7 treatment could perturb the abscission of the intercellular bridge and then the exit from cytokinesis.

Figure 1
figure 1figure 1

W7 treatment alters the length of the intercellular bridge. (A) Microtubule immunostaining shows that the intercellular bridge of the W7 treated PtK2 cells is much longer (b) than that of the normal cells (a). Bar=10 μm. (B) The average length of the intercellular bridge increased from a mean of 7.14±0.97 μm (n=30) in the control cells to a mean of 12.56 ±1.41 μm (n=30) in the W7 treated cells (*: P<0.01).

Centriole reposition was blocked by W7 treatment during cytokinesis

The post-mitotic centriole movement that occurs prior to the completion of cytokinesis has been extensively described by Mack and Rattner 13. Piel and co-workers further found that the post anaphase repositioning of the centriole controlled the final severing of the intercellular bridge 14. So we observed the patterns of centriole position after cytokinesis when inhibiting the activity of CaM. We found that the centrioles of most of the control cells would return to the perinucleus region, while the centrioles would retain in the vicinity of intercellular bridge in the perturbed cells, which had longer intercellular bridge and can not enter G1 stage normally. We treated HeLa cells with W7 100 min after synchronization treatment when most cells had formed depressed cleavage furrows. After 2 h of W7 treatment, cells were either left in W7 (no-washout group), or rinsed with fresh culture medium and recovered for two more hours (washout group). We found that the unresolved intercellular bridges in W7 treated cells were associated with the blockage of centriole reposition. According to the relative position of the centrioles (as revealed by the two red dots of γ-tubulin staining in each daughter cell) and intercellular bridge (as revealed by green staining of β-tubulin), we were able to classify the cells into three centrioles localization patterns: neither of the two centrioles in the vicinity of the bridge (Fig. 2Aa); one of the two centrioles in the vicinity of the bridge (Fig. 2Ab) and both of the two centrioles in the vicinity of the bridge (Fig. 2Ac). We can clearly see that the washout group exhibited similar centrioles repositioning behavior as that of the untreated control cells. On the other hand, a much higher percentage of cells in the no-washout group had both pair of centrioles positioned at the vicinity of the bridge (Fig. 2B, P<0.01). These results indicate that W7 may affect the motility of centrioles at the final stage of cytokinesis.

Figure 2
figure 2figure 2

Three kinds of distribution patterns of the paired centrioles in the intercellular bridge. (A) (a) neither of the paired centrioles in the vicinity of the bridge; (b) one of the paired centrioles (arrow) adjacent to the bridge; (c) both of the paired centrioles (arrowhead) adjacent to the bridge. Bar=10 μm. (B) In the W7 treated group, 63% (n=138) of cells have both paired centrioles at the vicinity of the bridge (Fig. 2A c), much higher than the control group (16.75% n=156) and washout group (19.4% n=135) (*: P<0.01). The washout group shows similar centrioles repositioning behavior as that of the control group. (The legend: 1 indicates one centriole in the vicinity of the bridge; 2 indicates both of the paired centrioles at the vicinity of the bridge; 0 indicates neither of the centriole in the vicinity of the bridge.)

W7 inhibited cytokinesis completion

To further investigate whether the detained centrioles in the vicinity of the intercellular bridge reflected a signal of a delayed exit from cytokinesis, we checked the progression of cell cycle of HeLa after W7 treatment. It have been indicated that the cells that didn't finish cytokinesis were arrested at G1 stage and could not enter S phase 15. We found that W7 treated cells (both the washout and no-washout groups) showed a decrease in BrdU staining (Fig. 3A, B). This decrease was particularly notable in the no-washout group (P<0.01). This result confirmed that inhibition of the activity of CaM could block the completion of cytokinesis.

Figure 3
figure 3figure 3

(A) BrdU incorporation is decreased by W7 treatment after 15 h treatment. (a: no-washout group, b: washout group, c: control group). (B) The histogram shows the percentage of cells incorporating BrdU in three cell groups at 15 h and 20 h after BrdU addition. The W7 treated cells showed a decrease in BrdU staining, and the decrease is more obvious in the no-washout group (*: P<0.01).

DISCUSSION

Cytokinesis, the conceptually simple event referring to the separation of the two daughter cells after mitosis, is in fact a precisely regulated process. Several important structures are formed during this process. Our previous study appeared that CaM might regulate the initiation of cytokinesis by associating with the central spindle 8. The intercellular bridge is the key structure in controlling cytokinesis completion. Consistent with this view, lots of proteins have been shown to distribute at the intercellular bridge during cytokinesis 2, 3. Some of these proteins may serve as structural components of the intercellular bridge, while others may function as signal proteins that mediate the progression of cytokinesis. In our previous study, we have found that CaM might function during the completion of cytokinesis because it distributed in the middle of the cell bridge near the “Flemming body” where the final abscission happens 11.

Although the intrinsic mechanism is unknown, it has been suggested that the centriole (especially the mother centriole) can 'examine' the spatial organization of the cell, and then determine whether the final cut should occur 13, 14. Further studies have demonstrated that the motility of the centrioles is dependent on the microtubule-network and regulated by motor proteins, such as dynein and HsEg5 16, 17. Intriguingly, both dynein and HsEg5 contain CaM binding sites, and CaM can regulate dynein's activity in flagellar motility 18. The data presented in this report indicate that CaM is required for the successful completion of cytokinesis. When cells were treated with a CaM inhibitor, centrioles retained in the vicinity of the intercellular bridge and the abscission was always deficient. These results are consistent with several other reports that the post-anaphase repositioning of the centrioles controls the exit from cytokinesis 13, 14.

It is apparent that the repositioning of centriole controls the release of central microtubules from the midbody and thus regulates the completion of cell division. CaM may also directly affect the dynamic stability of the microtubules of the intercellular bridge, since it is well known that CaM can interact with several MAPs (microtubule associated proteins) such as tau and MAP2 19, 20, 21, and thus indirectly affect the centrioles motility. We hope that the further investigation of CaM's target protein in cytokinesis completion will provide us with more information about this crucial protein and lead us to a better understanding of this complicated process—cytokinesis.