INTRODUCTION

The genome structure of plants can be altered by genetic transformation. During the process of gene transfer, Agrobacterium tumefaciens integrate part of their genome into the genome of susceptible species. Recently, genetic transformation techniques have been used to modify significantly the organization of the genome. Introducing transgenes into plants can both modify the number of copies of a given sequence and affect gene expression. Because the expression of a transgene cannot always be predicted, studying the consequences of genetic transformations at the genome level has been important in consideration of its practical application over the the past ten years1, 2, 3, 4, 5. Transgenes can become silent after a long phase of expression, and can sometimes silence the expression of homologous elements located at ectopic positions in the genome. The silencing of transgenes can trigger resistance against homologous viruses and infection by viruses can also trigger silencing of homologous transgenes2, 3. Gene silencing effects that rely on recognition of nucleic acid sequence homology at either the DNA or RNA level have been identified in plants 4, 5. At present, RNA has been implicated in two types of homologydependent gene silencing (HDGS): 1) Posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS) involves targeted degradation of homologous RNAs in the cytoplasm; 2) RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) can be induced by RNA derived from homologous DNA sequence at the genome level6. The mechanisms of these different modes of HDGS and the characteristics of the RNAs involved are being actively investigated. Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) plays a dual role in plant gene silencing by initiating both the RNA-degradation step of PTGS and RdDM. Experimental results from PTGS-defective Arabidopsis thaliana mutants and viral suppressors of PTGS showed that transcriptional gene silencing (TGS), Posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS), and promoter methylation can be triggered by dsRNA.

Gene silencing mechanism mediated by dsRNA

RNA-based silencing mechanisms, which are effective at the genome level and in the cytoplasm, are able to combat parasitic sequences that have an RNA genome (RNA viruses) or a dsRNA replication intermediate (some transposable elements)7. Homology-dependent gene silencing (HDGS) at both the transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels in plants can be attributed to the action of dsRNA. The ability of dsRNA molecules to trigger degradation of homologous RNAs was discovered more than a decade ago in plants1. Unifying studies in plants have shown that silencing is accompanied by the accumulation of small RNAs (21-25 nucleotides) of both sense and antisense orientation that are homologous to the silenced locus through a specific biochemical mechanism involved in sequence-specific RNA degradation8, 9, 10. Silencing can be triggered locally and then spread through the organism in plants via a mobile silencing signal11. Many mechanisms of gene silencing in plants have been suggested in the past ten years. The common features of these models include: 1) The synthesis and amplification of dsRNA; 2) Unwinding of dsRNA; and 3) Targeting of mRNAs after binding to the ribosome. The cellular RNA-directed RNA polymerase (RdRP) plays a central role in PTGS and is required where the process is induced directly by exogenously supplied dsRNA12. In Arabidopsis, RdRP is required for transgene-induced PTGS where one possible function is the synthesis of cRNA from aberrant RNA templates, leading to the formation of dsRNA (Fig 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

A general model for dsRNA-mediated gene silencing. Steps involving dsRNA and steps that are affected by viral suppressors of PTGS and in various PTGS mutants are shown. TGS may be triggered directly by transcription of inverted repeat sequences in the nucleus and methylation of homologous promoter regions in the genome. The dsRNA and other aberrant RNAs formed in the nucleus may enter the PTGS pathway. Virus-induced gene silencing mediated by the viral RdRP and transgene-induced gene silencing mediated by the cellular RdRP lead to PTGS in the cytoplasm. The dsRNA from either of these sources can be targeted by a putative dsRNA specific ribonuclease that generates 21-25 nucleotide RNAs of both polarities. PTGS can be induced locally and then spread throughout the organism via production and transport of a mobile silencing signal. HC-Pro suppresses gene silencing via activation of an endogenous cellular suppressor of PTGS, rgs-CaM. The PVX p25 suppressor of PTGS prevents the accumulation of the mobile silencing signal by interfering with the cellular RdRP branch of the pathway.

A prominent feature of PTGS suppression by HC-Pro is the absence of the small RNAs associated with silencing13. Grafting experiments have shown that HC-Pro suppression of PTGS does not interfere with either the production or movement of the silencing signal but prevents the plant from responding to that signal. HC-Pro suppression of PTGS occurs downstream of the mobile silencing signal at a step preceding the accumulation of the small RNAs (Fig 1). A study using the yeast two-hybrid system has identified a plant calmodulin-related protein (rgs-CaM) that interacts with HC-Pro14. This calmodulin-related protein suppresses gene silencing and might be a cellular intermediary of HC-Pro suppression of PTGS (Fig 1). Because calmodulin and related proteins normally act by binding calcium and subsequently activating target proteins, HC-Pro suppression of PTGS possibly occurs via activation of rgs-CaM and its unknown target protein (Fig 1). In contrast to HC-Pro, the PVX p25 protein appears to suppress PTGS by targeting the mobile silencing signal. The small sense and antisense RNAs associated with silencing derive from cleavage of dsRNA and a specific ribonuclease will serve as a guide to find homologous target RNAs15, 16. Small RNAs accumulate during both virus and transgene-induced gene silencing, indicating convergence of these two branches of silencing before the formation of the sequence-specific ribonuclease, because: 1) HC- Pro suppression of silencing interferes with accumulation of the small RNAs but does not eliminate either the production or movement of the silencing signal; 2) the PVX p25 protein interferes with the mobile silencing signal, but does not affect the accumulation of small RNAs produced in the viral RdRP dependent branch of PTGS17.

Methylation and posttranscriptional gene silencing

Methylation in either coding or transcribed regions of transgenes has been detected in many cases of PTGS in plants1. The relevance of methylation and whether is induced by RdDM or other signals probably differ for various PTGS systems. PTGS in plants can be released when transgene methylation is reduced by drug treatment18 or in methylation and chromatin structure mutants of Arabidopsis. Transgene methylation is reduced in plants mutant for RdRP19, AGO-20, and SGS-321. These findings suggest that the establishment and maintenance of PTGS might require DNA epigenetic modifications. Methylation triggered by RdDM is required to subdue at least some retrotransposons in Arabidopsis22. The mechanism of RdDM is unknown but is assumed to involve RNA-DNA interactions based on sequence homology6. The minimal DNA target size for RdDM of 30bp opens the possibility that the 21-25 nucleotide RNA degradation products of dsRNA could be responsible for directing methylation. The small RNAs could conceivably guide the DNA methyl transferase to unmodified homologous DNA sequences. However, HC-Pro suppresses PTGS by preventing the accumulation of small RNAs and does not13 maintain methylation of a PTG- silenced transgene. Studies with HC-Pro using other PTGS systems and cases of RNA-mediated TGS will establish whether small RNAs are indeed essential for the initiation and maintenance of RdDM or whether intact dsRNA is involved.

RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) was first discovered with viroids, which are plant pathogens consisting solely of noncoding, highly base-paired, rod-shaped RNAs several hundred nucleotides in length. During viroid infection of tobacco, viroid cDNA copies integrated into nuclear DNA became methylated, implicating replicating viroid RNA in DNA modification23. RdDM provides an alternate means to induce the sequence-specific methylation observed in both PTGS and TGS. RdDM of nuclear transgenes has been observed recently in plants infected with cytoplasmic RNA viruses carrying transgene sequences24, 25 and in a nonpathogenic transgenic system26. RdDM results in dense methylation at most symmetrical and nonsymmetrical cytosines within the region of homology between the inducing RNA and the target DNA27. Methylation of sequence duplications is associated with HDGS invoked DNA-DNA pairing and DNA targets as short as 30 bp can be modified 28.

Viral suppressors of posttranscriptional gene silencing

The potential for using viral suppressors of PTGS to piece together silencing pathways and to identify cellular components is just beginning to be realized. The natural role of PTGS as an antiviral defense had been reported because many plant viruses encoding proteins suppress gene silencing 29. Different viral suppressors act at distinct steps in PTGS30 and can help to elucidate the silencing pathway. The viral suppressors such as, the helper component protease (HC-Pro) of potyviruses and the p25 cell movement protein of potato virus X (PVX), have been particularly informative about the underlying mechanisms of PTGS. Investigations on virus supressors showed that a mobile silencing signal is produced in PVX-induced PTGS. However, the systemic silencing induced by PVX could not be detected unless the coding region of p25 was either deleted or modified17. These results suggest that the PVX p25 protein blocks PTGS by suppressing the cellular RdRP branch of the pathway (Fig 1). The ability of viroids and RNA viruses to trigger RdDM suggested a general requirement for dsRNA in this process. This has been confirmed in a transgenic TGS system involving in promoter RNAs. A cytoplasmic RNA virus vector carrying 35S promoter sequences was able to induce methylation and TGS of nuclear transgenes under the control of the 35S promoter in Nicotiana benthamiana25. A double-stranded RNA transcribed from an IR containing promoter sequences was able to trigger methylation and silencing of homologous promoters31. The promoter dsRNA was degraded to small RNAs ∼ 23 nucleotides in length, indicating that it entered the same degradation pathway as dsRNAs involved in PTGS. The dsRNA provides a common molecular link between RdDM and the RNA degradation step of PTGS. Although additional studies are needed to assess the generality of dsRNA-mediated promoter methylation, preliminary work suggests that at least some endogenous plant promoters can be silenced by this method.

On the basis of the patterns of suppression produced by viral suppressors, some of them affect silencing differently from either HC-Pro or PVX p25 and are likely to define additional steps in the PTGS pathway. The obligatory nuclear localization of the cucumber mosaic virus 2b protein32 should help to identify steps of PTGS that occur in the nucleus. The host defense function of RNA-mediated silencing is demonstrated by the increased of sensitivity of Arabidopsis PTGS mutants to some viruses21 and the mobilization of transposons in the Mut6 mutant Chlamydomonas33. Apart from an enhanced susceptibility to viral infection, Arabidopsis sgs/sde mutants appear normal21. However, expression of HC-Pro or overexpression of rgs-CaM causes developmental aberrations in Nicotiana species14 (Tab 1) and Arabidopsis ago1 mutants exhibit marked developmental abnormalities and are infertile20. Although the PTGS pathway appears to be as a whole dispensable for development, the phenotypic irregularities found in a subset of cases where silencing is blocked suggest that PTGS and development share common enzymes or pathways20. Determining the extent to which PTGS and RdDM contribute to normal plant development, and not just host defense, is one of the most exciting prospects for the future. The powerful tools provided by viral suppressors of silencing and the steadily growing collection of silencing-defective mutants promise a continuation of the rapid progress that has become the norm in plant gene silencing research.

Table 1 Cellular proteins involved in posttranscriptional gene silencing

Cellular protein involved in posttranscriptional gene silencing

Although a requirement for RdRP and other proteiuns in PTGS phenomena is undisputed, the nature of the substrates for these enzymes is not fully clear5. In plants, dsRNA that triggers PTGS can be produced in the nucleus by transcription through inverted DNA repeats (IRs)34, 35 (Fig 1) or through the action of RdRP, which is postulated to use pre-existing dsRNA36 or aberrant sense RNAs as templates for the synthesis of antisense RNAs 5. Aberrant RNAs are presumed be either improperly spliced or terminated. Aberrant RNAs that are misspliced and polyadenylated irregularly have been detected in a chalcone synthase PTGS system in petunia 37. A new aspect of silencing processes is the possible link with nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), an evolutionarily conserved pathway in which mRNAs that contain a premature stop codon are selectively degraded. Antisense constructs probably also produce RNAs that feed into the dsRNA-induced degradation pathway38, 39. A DEAH-box RNA helicase (Mut6) that is involved in degrading misspliced and nonpolyadenylated transcript was shown to be required for transgene and transposon silencing in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii33. These results suggest a partial overlapbetween NMD and PTGS pathways and provide new insights for unraveling the PTGS pathway. Cellular proteins involved in PTGS are being widely studied (Tab 1) and will be one of the exciting prospects for the future in plant molecular genetics.

Conclusions

The convergence on dsRNA as a molecular trigger in various types of HDGS is an important aspect in plant gene silencing, which frequently invoked DNA-DNA pairing and posited distinct mechanisms for PTGS and TGS. This strict separation is becoming untenable as the involvement of dsRNA and DNA methylation in both types of silencing is increasingly recognized. Continued use of methylation and chromatin structure mutants will clarify how epigenetic modifications influence the initiation and maintenance of PTGS and RNA-mediated TGS. RdDM might provide the key for understanding viroid pathogenicity. The generation of RdDM mutants in Arabidopsis and the identification of endogenous DNA-target sequences will help to establish the mechanism and natural roles of this process. The identification of cellular proteins involved in PTGS such as SGS3 will reveal plant-specific features of RNA-based silencing. The powerful tools provided by dsRNA promise a continuation of the rapid progress in plant gene slicing.