Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Fetal Pulse Oximetry and Neonatal Outcome: A Study in a Developing Country

Journal of Perinatology volume 25, pages 759–762 (2005)Cite this article

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this cohort, prospective study was to compare the diagnostic value of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry (FPO) with that of fetal scalp blood gas (FSBG) for an abnormal neonatal outcome in cases with abnormal fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings.

METHODS:

Fetal oxygen saturation was continuously monitored with Nellcor N-400 FPO during labor. Simultaneous FSBG determinations were obtained. The results were analyzed in relation to umbilical arterial cord blood pH and neonatal outcome. Studied FPO cutoff levels were 30 and 40% hemoglobin saturation and that of FSBG pH was 7.2.

RESULTS:

During the study, there were 9825 deliveries; 415 had abnormal FHR. Only 150 fulfilled the whole screening panel. When the outcome variable was umbilical arterial pH, the positive predictive values of the three methods (FPO30, FPO40, FSBG) were 57, 61 and 65% and the negative predictive values were 43, 39 and 35% respectively. The sensitivity of FPO30 was highest (75%). Considering abnormal neonatal outcome, again the sensitivity was also highest for FPO30 (89%). The sensitivity of FSBG was 82%. The specificity of the three methods were 53, 49 and 38% respectively.

CONCLUSION:

The diagnostic value of intrapartum FPO compares favorably with FSBG. FPO seems to be a reliable and less invasive tool and may decrease unnecessary interventions and unnecessary fetal scalp blood sampling in cases of suspected fetal distress. The FPO cutoff of 30% saturation defined by previous studies appears to be appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Prentice A, Lind T . Fetal heart rate monitoring during labor. Lancet 1987;2:1375–1377.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. MacDonald D, Grant A, Sheridan-Pereira M, Boylan P, Chalmers I . The Dublin controlled randomized trial of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;152:524–539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Boog G . Acute fetal distress. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 2001;30(5):393–432.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saling E . Fetal scalp blood analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153:717–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clark SL, Paul RH . Intrapartum fetal surveillance: the role of fetal scalp blood sampling. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985;153:717–720.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Van den Berg P, Schmidt S, Gesche J, Saling E . Fetal distress and the condition of the newborn using cardiotocography and fetal blood analysis during labor. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1998;94:72–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chua S, Yam J, Razvi K, Yeong SM, Arulkumaran S . Intrapartum fetal oxygen saturation monitoring in a busy labour ward. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999;82(2):185–189.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gardosi JO, Schram CM, Symonds EM . Adaptation of pulse oximetry for fetal monitoring during labor. Lancet 1991;1:1265–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson N, Johnson VA, Fisher J . Fetal monitoring with pulse oximetry. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991;98:36–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dildy CA, Clark SL, Loucks CA . Preliminary experience with intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry in humans. Obstet Gynecol 1993;81:630–635.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. MacNamara H, Chung DC, Lilford R, Johnson M . Do fetal pulse oximetry readings correlate with cord blood oxygenation and acidemia? Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:735–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carbonne B, Audibert F, Segard L, Sebban E . Fetal pulse oximetry: correlation between changes in oxygen saturation and neonatal outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1994;57:73–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Langer B, Boudier E, Haddad J . Fetal pulse oximetry during labor of 62 patients. Fetal Diagn Ther 1996;11:37–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dildy GA, Katz M, Clark SL, Jongsma SW . Intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry, fetal oxygen saturation trends during labor and relation to delivery outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:179–184.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Skoczylas M, Laudanski T . Usefulness of the examination of fetal blood oxygen saturation (FSpO2) and fetal heart rate (FHR) as a prognostic factor of the newborn outcome. Ginekol Pol 2003;74(10):1284–1289.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reuss JL . Factors influencing fetal pulse oximetry performance. J Clin Monit Comput 2004;18(1):13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Carbonne B, Langer B, Goffinet F, et al. Multicenter study on the clinical value of fetal pulse oximetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998;178(5):1100–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Garite TJ, Dildy GA, McNamara H, et al. A multicenter controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry in the intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183(5):1049–1058.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Luttkus AK, Dudenhausen JW . Fetal pulse oximetry. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1996;10:295–306.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt S, Koslowski S, Sierra F, Meyer-Wittkopf M, Heller G . Clinical usefulness of pulse oximetry in the fetus with non-reassuring heart rate pattern? J Perinat Med 2000;28(4):298–305.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Seelbach-Gobel B, Heupel M, Kuhnert M, Butterwegge M . The prediction of fetal acidosis by means of intrapartum fetal pulse oximetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180(1 Part 1):73–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Westgate J, Garibaldi JM, Greene KR . Umbilical cord blood gas analysis at delivery: a time for quality data. BJOG 1994;101(12):1054–1063.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Van den Berg P, Schmidt S, Gesche J, Saling E . Fetal distress and the condition of the newborn using cardiotocography and fetal blood analysis during labor. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1998;94:72–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuhnert M, Schmidt S . Intrapartum management of nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns: a randomized controlled trial of fetal pulse oximetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191(6):1989–1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Alexandria (A.E.B., M.A.A., T.K.), Alexandria, Egypt

    Ahmad Fayez Bakr MD, Mohammad Al-Abd MD & Tarek Karkour MD

Authors
  1. Ahmad Fayez Bakr MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mohammad Al-Abd MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Tarek Karkour MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Source of Support: None, institutional resources.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bakr, A., Al-Abd, M. & Karkour, T. Fetal Pulse Oximetry and Neonatal Outcome: A Study in a Developing Country. J Perinatol 25, 759–762 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211406

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211406

Search

Advanced search

Quick links