Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Closed Suctioning of Intubated Neonates Maintains Better Physiologic Stability: A Randomized Trial

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the physiological variance in a closed (CS) vs an open suction (OS) protocol in intubated infants.

STUDY DESIGN: Infants were stratified into three weight groups in a randomized crossover trial. Heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide, and end-tidal carbon dioxide were recorded prior to suctioning, during suctioning, and recovery to baseline. Following the procedures, recovery time to baseline parameters was measured. Data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA.

RESULTS: Overall, there was significantly less deviation from baseline physiological parameters with CS. Infants <1000 g had clinically significant decreases in heart rate with the OS method (−18% OS vs −6% CS; p=0.016). Recovery time in the OS group was twice that of the CS cohort (4 vs 2 minutes; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION: CS maintains better physiologic stability in intubated infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shah A, Kurth C, Gwiazdowski S, Chance B, Delivoria-Papadopoulos M . Fluctuation in cerebral oxygenation and blood volume during endotracheal suctioning in premature infants. J Pediatr 1992;120:769–774.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hodge D . Endotracheal suctioning and the infant: A nursing care protocol to decrease complications. Neonatal Netw 1991;9:7–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Flenady VJ, Woodgate PG . Tracheal suctioning without disconnection in intubated ventilated newborns (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library 1999;2:1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wright J, Fraser Askin D . Closed suctioning procedures in neonates. Neonatal Netw 1996;15:87–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wrightson D, Fraser Askin D . Suctioning smarter: Answers to eight common questions about endotracheal suctioning in neonates. Neonatal Netw 1999;18:51–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Minde K, Whitelaw A, Brown J, Fitzhardinge P . Effects of neonatal complications in premature infants on early parent - infant interactions. Dev Med Child Neurol 1983;25:763–777.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Richardson D, Gray J, McCormick M, Workman K, Goldman D . Score for neonatal acute physiology: A physiologic severity index for neonatal intensive care. Pediatrics 1993;91:617–623.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bodai B, Briggs S, Goldstein M, McLaughlin G, Hodgman J, Haas A . Evaluation of the ability of the Neo2Safe valve to minimize desaturation in neonates during suctioning. Respir Care 1989;34:355–359.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cabal L, Devaskar S, Siassi B et al. New endotracheal tube adaptor reducing cardiopulmonary effects of suctioning. Crit Care Med 1979;7:552–555.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gunderson L, McPhee A, Donovan E . Partially ventilated endotracheal suction. Use in newborns with respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Dis Child 1986;140:462–465.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mosca F, Colnaghi M, Lattanzio M, Bray M, Pugliese S, Fumagalli M . Closed versus open endotracheal suctioning in preterm infants: Effects on cerebral oxygenation and blood volume. Biol Neonate 1997;72:9–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Zmora E, Merritt A . Use of side-hole endotracheal tube adapter for tracheal aspiration. Am J Dis Child 1980;134:250–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tan L, Torres B, Kanarek K, Blair C . Randomized comparison of closed tracheal suction with open tracheal suction: Effects in oxygen saturation, heart rate, blood pressure, TcPCO2. TcPO2, and motor response. Pediatric Resident 1992;31:225A.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brochard L, Mion G, Isabey D et al. Constant-flow insufflation prevents arterial oxygen desaturation during endotracheal suctioning. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:395–400.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Simbruner G, Coradello H, Fodor M, Havelec L, Lubec G, Pollak A . Effects of tracheal suctioning on oxygenation, circulation, and lung mechanics in newborn infants. Arch Dis Child 1981;56:326–330.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Perlman J, Volpe J . Suctioning in the preterm infant: Effects on cerebral blood flow velocity, intracranial pressure, and arterial blood pressure. Pediatrics 1983;72:329–334.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge CORPAK MedSystems for donation of the Neo-LINK™ adaptors and SpaceLabs Medical for donation of the research monitor. We would like to thank the other members of the team (Marianne Janes, Jackie Cusworth, Byron Gutoskie) as well as the research assistants (Patti Bosher, Judy D'Ilario, Steve Turner and Jody Locke). We thank Kelly Smith for the statistical analysis and interpretation, and all the parents and babies that participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was funded by The Hamilton Health Sciences Foundation and Neonatal Donations Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalyn, A., Blatz, S., Sandra Feuerstake et al. Closed Suctioning of Intubated Neonates Maintains Better Physiologic Stability: A Randomized Trial. J Perinatol 23, 218–222 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210883

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210883

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links