Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Numerous studies have assessed the significance of meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) at term. However, to date, there has been very little documentation on the incidence and significance of meconium in the preterm population. Our objective was to define the incidence of MSAF in patients delivering prematurely (<37 weeks) and examine its association with underlying fetal acidosis, Apgars and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).
METHOD: All patients delivering at a single tertiary care center between June 1994 and September 1997 were reviewed for the presence of meconium and gestational age <37 weeks at delivery. Maternal demographics and birth outcomes including cord gases, Apgar scores and admission to the NICU were collected. Exclusion criteria included multiple gestations, breech presentations, fetal anomalies and patients not in labor.
RESULTS: Out of a total of 9570 patients there were 506 (5.3%) preterm births meeting the inclusion criteria, of whom 24 (4.8%) had MSAF noted either during labor or at delivery. Comparing the preterm group with and without meconium, there were no differences in maternal age, gravidity, rate of Cesarean section, or gestational age at delivery. Cord pH (7.27 meconium vs. 7.29 no meconium) and base excess (−5.1 meconium vs. −4.0 no meconium) were similar in both groups. There were no clinically significant differences in mean Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes. However, an increased number of NICU admissions were noted in the group with meconium (75% vs. 53%, p=0.04).
CONCLUSION: The incidence of meconium staining of the amniotic fluid in labor in the preterm population is less than 5% and by itself is not a significant marker of fetal acidosis.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berkus MD, Langer O, Samueloff A, Xenakis EMJ, Field NT, Ridgway LE Meconium-stained amniotic fluid: increased risk for adverse neonatal outcome Obstet Gynecol 1994 84 115–120
Morel MG, Anyaegbunam AM, Mikhail MS, Legorreta A, Whitty J Oxytocin augmentation in arrest disorders in the presence of thick meconium: influence on neonatal outcome Gynecol Obstet Invest 1994 37 21–24
Nathan L, Leveno K, Carmody TJ, Kelly MA, Sherman ML Meconium: a 1990's perspective on an old obstetric hazard Obstet Gynecol 1994 83 329–332
Steer PJ, Eigbe F, Lissauer TJ, Beard RW Interrelationships among abnormal cardiotocograms in labor, meconium staining of the amniotic fluid, arterial cord blood pH, and apgar scores Obstet Gynecol 1989 74 715–720
Meis PJ, Hobel CJ, Ureda JR Late meconium passage in labor — a sign of fetal distress? Obstet Gynecol 1982 59 332–335
Krebs HB, Petres RE, Dunn LJ, Jordaan HVF, Segreti A Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: association of meconium with abnormal fetal heart rate patterns Am J Obstet Gynecol 1980 137 936–941
Starks GC Correlation of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, early intrapartum fetal pH and apgar scores as predictors of perinatal outcome Obstet Gynecol 1980 56 604–609
Mazor M, Furman B, Wiznitzer A, Shoham-Vardi I, Cohen J, Ghezzi F Maternal and perinatal outcome of patients with preterm labour and meconium stained amniotic fluid Obstet Gynecol 1995 86 830–833
Allen R The significance of meconium in midtrimester amniocentesis Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985 152 413–417
Creasy RK, Resnik R Maternal–Fetal Medicine: Principles and Practice Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1994 p. 416
Sienko A, Altshuler G Meconium induced umbilical vascular necrosis in abortuses and fetuses: a histopathologic study fro cytokines Obstet Gynecol 1999 94 415–420
Spinillo A, Fazzi E, Capuzzo E, Stronati M, Piazzi G, Ferrari A Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and risk for cerebral palsy in preterm infants Obstet Gynecol 1997 90 (4) 519–523
Miller FC, Sacks DA, Yeh Sze-Ya, et al Significance of meconium during labor Am J Obstet Gynecol 1975 122 573–580
Yeomans ER, Gilstrap LC, Leveno KJ, Burris JS Meconium in the amniotic fluid and fetal acid–base status Obstet Gynecol 1989 73 175–178
Dijxhoorn MJ, Visser GHA, Fidler VJ, Touwen BCL, Huisjes HJ Apgar score, meconium and acidaemia at birth in relation to neonatal neurological morbidity in term infants Br J Obstet Gynecol 1986 93 217–222
Altshuler G, Arizawa M, Molnar-Nadasdy G Meconium induced umbilical cord vascular necrosis and ulceration: a potential link between the placenta and poor pregnancy outcome Obstet Gynecol 1992 79 760–766
Richey SD, Ramin SM, Bawdon RE, et al Markers of acute and chronic asphyxia in infants with meconium-stained amniotic fluid Am J Obstet Gynecol 1995 172 1212–1215
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, H., Walker, M. & Gruslin, A. Significance of Meconium-Stained Amniotic Fluid in the Preterm Population. J Perinatol 21, 174–177 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200521
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7200521
This article is cited by
-
The effect of meconium-stained amniotic fluid on perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2020)
-
Meconium Amniotic Fluid is Associated with Endomyometritis
The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India (2016)
-
Color of Meconium and Interleukin-6
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics (2012)
-
Obstetric approaches to the prevention of meconium aspiration syndrome
Journal of Perinatology (2008)
-
The in utero passage of meconium by very low birth weight infants: a marker for adverse outcomes
Journal of Perinatology (2006)