Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Neonatal outcomes of non-vigorous neonates with meconium-stained amniotic fluid before and after change in tracheal suctioning recommendation

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the short-term outcomes of non-vigorous infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) before and after implementation of no-tracheal suctioning guidelines.

Study design

Single-center retrospective study of ≥36-week gestation neonates with MSAF.

Results

During routine-suction era (9/2013–12/2014), 280/2306 neonates (12%) were born through MSAF and 39 (14%) were non-vigorous. Thirty (77%) of non-vigorous infants underwent tracheal suctioning. In the no-suction era (1/2017–12/2018), 282/2918 neonates (9.7%) were born through MSAF and 30 (10.6%) were non-vigorous and one needed intubation. Admissions for meconium aspiration syndrome (15% vs 53%) and respiratory distress (18% vs 57%) were significantly higher among non-vigorous infants in the no-suction era.

Conclusions

In this single-center study, non-vigorous infants born through MSAF without routine-tracheal suctioning had a higher incidence of NICU admission for MAS and respiratory distress compared to the routine-suction era. Multicenter randomized trials evaluating tracheal suction in non-vigorous infants with MSAF are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Difficulties in interpreting before-and-after studies with implementation of no-routine tracheal suctioning guidelines for infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF).

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cleary GM, Wiswell TE. Meconium-stained amniotic fluid and the meconium aspiration syndrome. An update. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1998;45:511–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Walsh MC, Fanaroff JM. Meconium stained fluid: approach to the mother and the baby. Clin Perinatol. 2007;34:653–65. viii

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fanaroff AA. Meconium aspiration syndrome: historical aspects. J Perinatol. 2008;28:S3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh BS, Clark RH, Powers RJ, Spitzer AR. Meconium aspiration syndrome remains a significant problem in the NICU: outcomes and treatment patterns in term neonates admitted for intensive care during a ten-year period. J Perinatol. 2009;29:497–503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wiswell TE. Delivery room management of the meconium-stained newborn. J Perinatology: Off J Calif Perinat Assoc. 2008;28:S19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee J, Romero R, Lee KA, Kim EN, Korzeniewski SJ, Chaemsaithong P, et al. Meconium aspiration syndrome: a role for fetal systemic inflammation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214:e361–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nangia S, Sunder S, Biswas R, Saili A. Endotracheal suction in term non vigorous meconium stained neonates-A pilot study. Resuscitation. 2016;105:79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chettri S, Bhat BV, Adhisivam B. Current Concepts in the Management of Meconium Aspiration Syndrome. Indian J Pediatr. 2016;83:1125–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dargaville PA, Copnell B, Australian, New Zealand Neonatal N. The epidemiology of meconium aspiration syndrome: incidence, risk factors, therapies, and outcome. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1712–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wiswell TE, Gannon CM, Jacob J, Goldsmith L, Szyld E, Weiss K, et al. Delivery room management of the apparently vigorous meconium-stained neonate: results of the multicenter, international collaborative trial. Pediatrics. 2000;105:1–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chettri S, Adhisivam B, Bhat BV. Endotracheal Suction for Nonvigorous Neonates Born through Meconium Stained Amniotic Fluid: a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2015;166:1208–13. e1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh SN, Saxena S, Bhriguvanshi A, Kumar M, Chandrakanta, Sujata. Effect of endotracheal suctioning just after birth in non-vigorous infants born through meconium stained amniotic fluid: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Epidemiol Global Health. 2018;29:497–503.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar A, Kumar P, Basu S. Endotracheal suctioning for prevention of meconium aspiration syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Pediatrics. 2019;178:1825–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Trevisanuto D, Strand ML, Kawakami MD, Fabres J, Szyld E, Nation K, et al. Tracheal suctioning of meconium at birth for non-vigorous infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Resuscitation. 2020;149:117–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wyllie J, Perlman JM, Kattwinkel J, Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Guinsburg R, et al. Part 7: Neonatal resuscitation: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2015;95:e169–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Escobedo MB, Kapadia VS, Kattwinkel J, Perlman JM, et al. Part 13: Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation. 2015;132:S543–560. 18 Suppl 2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Weiner GM, Zaichkin J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation, 7 edn. American Academy of Pediatrics. Elk Grove Village, IL; 2016.

  18. Weiner GM, Zaichkin J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation, 8 edn. American Academy of Pediatrics. Itasca, IL; 2021.

  19. Wiswell TE. Appropriate Management of the Nonvigorous Meconium-Stained Neonate: an unanswered question. Pediatrics. 2018;142:e20183052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chiruvolu A, Miklis KK, Chen E, Petrey B, Desai S. Delivery Room Management of Meconium-Stained Newborns and Respiratory Support. Pediatrics. 2018;142:e20181485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Edwards EM, Lakshminrusimha S, Ehret DEY, Horbar JD. NICU Admissions for Meconium Aspiration Syndrome before and after a National Resuscitation Program Suctioning Guideline Change. Children (Basel). 2019;6:68.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gupta A, Lee HC. Revisiting the Latest NRP Guidelines for Meconium: Searching for Clarity in a Murky Situation. Hosp Pediatr. 2020;10:300–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Phattraprayoon N, Tangamornsuksan W, Ungtrakul T. Outcomes of endotracheal suctioning in non-vigorous neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021;106:31–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kalra VK, Lee HC, Sie L, Ratnasiri AW, Underwood MA, Lakshminrusimha S. Change in neonatal resuscitation guidelines and trends in incidence of meconium aspiration syndrome in California. J Perinatol: Off J Calif Perinat Assoc. 2020;40:46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Myers P, Gupta AG. Impact of the Revised NRP Meconium Aspiration Guidelines on Term Infant Outcomes. Hosp Pediatr. 2020;10:295–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aldhafeeri FM, Aldhafiri FM, Bamehriz M, Al-Wassia H. Have the 2015 Neonatal Resuscitation Program Guidelines changed the management and outcome of infants born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid? Ann Saudi Med. 2019;39:87–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Oommen VI, Ramaswamy VV, Szyld E, Roehr CC. Resuscitation of non-vigorous neonates born through meconium-stained amniotic fluid: post policy change impact analysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2021;106:324–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lakshminrusimha S, Mathew B, Nair J, Gugino SF, Koenigsknecht C, Rawat M, et al. Tracheal suctioning improves gas exchange but not hemodynamics in asphyxiated lambs with meconium aspiration. Pediatr Res. 2015;77:347–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Funded by HD072929 (SL).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VK: Conception, data analysis and interpretation, paper draft, critical revision; AL: Data collection, article draft, critical revision; PV: Data collection, data analysis and interpretation; PG: Data collection, data analysis and interpretation, paper draft; SC: Critical revision; SL: Critical revision and final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandra J. Leegwater.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests. Dr SL is a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)—Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) steering committee. The views expressed in this paper are his own and do not reflect the official position of the AAP or NRP.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalra, V., Leegwater, A.J., Vadlaputi, P. et al. Neonatal outcomes of non-vigorous neonates with meconium-stained amniotic fluid before and after change in tracheal suctioning recommendation. J Perinatol 42, 769–774 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01287-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-021-01287-0

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links