Abstract
A prospective study was conducted to evaluate the impact of home enteral tube feeding on quality of life in 39 consecutive patients treated for head and neck or oesophageal cancer at the Centre François Baclesse in Caen, France. Patients were taken as their own controls. Quality of life was evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 core questionnaire, and the EORTC H&N35 and OES24 specific questionnaires. The feeding technique tolerance was evaluated using a questionnaire specifically developed for this study. Two evaluations were made, the first a week after hospital discharge (n = 39) and the second 3 weeks later (n = 30). Overall, the global health status/quality of life scale score slightly improved; among symptoms, scale scores that significantly improved (P< 0.05) concerned constipation, coughing, social functioning and body image/sexuality. The physical feeding technique tolerance was acceptable while the technique was psychologically less tolerated with two-thirds of the patients longing to have the tube removed. One third of the patients was also uncomfortable about their body image. Home enteral tube feeding was responsible for not visiting family or close relations in 15% of patients, and not going out in public in 23%. We conclude that home enteral tube feeding is a physically well accepted technique although a substantial proportion of patients may experience psychosocial distress. © 2000 Cancer Research Campaign
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A and Duez NJ (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–375
Aaronson NK, Cull A, Kaasa S and Sprangers MA (1994) The EORTC modular approach to Quality of Life assessment in oncology. Int J Mental Health 23: 75–96
Barber MD, Fearon KCH, Delmore G and Loprinzi CL (1998) Should cancer patients with incurable disease receive parenteral or enteral nutritional support?. Eur J Cancer 34: 279–285
Beeken L and Calman F (1994) A return to normal eating after curative treatment for oral cancer. What are the long-term prospects?. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 30B: 367–392
Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, de Graeff A, Boysen M, Evensen JF, Biörklund A, de Leeuw JRJ, Fayers PM, Jannert M, Westin T and Kaasa S (1999) Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire – H&N35. J Clin Oncol 17: 1008–1019
Blazeby JM, Alderson D, Winstone K, Steyn R, Hammerlid E and Arraras J Farndon JR on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group (1996) Development of an EORTC questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessment for patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 32A: 1912–1917
Boyd KJ and Beeken L (1994) Tube feeding in palliative care: benefits and problems. Palliat Med 8: 156–158
Bozetti F (1994) Is enteral nutrition a primary therapy in cancer patients?. Gut 35: S65–S68
Bruning PF, Halling A, Hilgers FJ, Kappner G, Klein Poelhuis E, Kobashi-Schoot AM and Schonwenburg PF (1988) Postoperative nasogastric tube feeding in patients with head and neck cancer: prospective assessment of nutritional status and well-being. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 24: 181–188
Campos AC, Butters M and Meguid MM (1990) Home enteral nutrition via gastrostomy in advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck 12: 137–142
Chaturvedi SK, Shenoy A, Prasad K, Senthilnathan S and Premlatha B (1996) Concerns, coping and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 4: 186–190
Coben RM, Weintraub A, DiMarino AJ and Cohen S (1994) Gastroesophageal reflux during gastrostomy feeding. Gastroenterology 106: 13–18
Cytel Software Corporation (1995). StatXact3 for Windows. Cytel Software Corporation: Cambridge, MA
Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Abrams HB, Whittaker JS, Whitwell J and L’abbé K (1986) A cost-utility analysis of the home parenteral nutrition program at Toronto General Hospital: 1970–1982. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 10: 49–57
Dewys WD, Begg C, Lavin PT, Band PR, Bennett JM, Bertino JR, Cohen MH, Douglass HO, Engstrom PF, Ezdinli EZ, Horton J, Johnson GJ, Moertel CG, Oken MM, Perlia C, Rosembaum C, Silverstein MN, Skeel RT, Sponzo RW and Tormey DC (1980) Prognostic effects of weight loss prior to chemotherapy in cancer patients. Am J Med 69: 491–497
Elia M (1994) Home enteral nutrition: general aspects and comparison between the United States and Britain. Nutrition 10: 115–123
Elia M (1995) An international perspective on artificial nutritional support in the community. Lancet 345: 1345–1349
Fayers P, Aaronson N, Bjordal K and Sullivan M (1995). EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group: Brussels
Grindel GC, Whitmer K and Barsevick A (1996) Quality of life and nutritional support in patients with cancer. Cancer Pract 4: 81–87
Gulledge AD, Srp F, Sharp JW, Matarese LE, O’Neill M and Steiger E (1987) Psychosocial issues of home parenteral and enteral nutrition. Nutr Clin Pract 2: 183–194
Guyatt G, Feeny DH and Patrick D (1995) Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med 118: 622–629
Holden CE, Puntis JW, Charlton CP and Booth IW (1991) Nasogastric feeding at home: acceptability and safety. Arch Dis Child 66: 148–151
Howard L (1993) Home parenteral and enteral nutrition in cancer patients. Cancer 72: 3531–3541
Howard L, Ament L, Fleming CR, Shike M and Steiger E (1995) Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral and enteral nutrition therapies in the United States. Gastroenterology 109: 355–365
Launois R (1994) La prise en compte des préférences des patients dans les choix de santé individuels et collectifs. Rev Epidémiol Santé Publ 42: 246–262
Lees J (1997) Nasogastric and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in head and neck cancer patients receiving radiotherapy treatment at a regional oncology unit: a two year study. Eur J Cancer Care Engl 6: 45–49
Lipman TO (1991) Clinical trials of nutritional support in cancer. Parenteral and enteral therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 5: 91–102
List MA, Mumby P, Haraf D, Siston A, Mick R, MacCracken E and Vokes E (1997) Performance and quality of life outcome in patients completing concomitant chemoradiotherapy protocols for head and neck cancer. Qual Life Res 6: 274–284
Lopez MJ, Robinson P, Madden T and Highbarger T (1994) Nutritional support and prognosis in patients with head and neck cancer. J Surg Oncol 55: 33–36
Malone M (1994) Quality of life of patients receiving home parenteral or enteral nutrition support. Pharmacoeconomics 5: 101–108
Michaelis CA, Warzak WJ, Stanek K and Van Riper C (1992) Parental and professional perceptions of problems associated with long-term pediatric home tube feeding. J Am Diet Assoc 92: 1235–1238
Ministère de la Solidarité de la Santé et de la Protection Sociale (1988). Circulaire n°88 – ABM 62 du 24 novembre 1988 relative aux modalités de prise en charge du matériel et des produits nécessaires à la nutrition entérale à domicile
Ministère des Affaires Sociales de la Santé et de la Ville (1993). Circulaire DSS/AM 3 n°93 – 69 du 7 juillet 1993 relative aux modalités de prise en charge du matériel et des produits nécessaires à la nutrition entérale à domicile
Nelson JK, Palumbo PJ and O’Brien PC (1986) Home enteral nutrition: observation of a newly established program. Nutr Clin Pract 1: 193–199
Osoba D (1994) Lessons learned from measuring health-related quality of life in oncology. J Clin Oncol 12: 608–616
Padilla GV and Grant MM (1985) Psychosocial aspects of artificial feeding. Cancer 55: 301–304
Padilla GV, Grant M, Wong H, Hansen BW, Hanson RL, Bergstrom N and Kubo WR (1979) Subjective distresses of nasogastric tube feeding. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 3: 53–57
Parkin DM, Whelan SL, Ferlay J, Raymond L and Young J (1997) Cancer Incidence in Five Continents, Vol VII. IARC Scientific Publications n°.143. IARC: Lyon, France
Patrick DL and Deyo RA (1989) Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care 27: S217–S232
Perl M, Hall R, Dubrick S, Englert D, Stickney S and Gardner E (1980) Psychological aspects of long-term home hyperalimentation. J Parenter Enteral Nutr (1980). 4: 554–560
Peteet JR, Medeiros C and Slavin L (1981) Psychological aspects of artificial feeding in cancer patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 5: 138–140
Rains BL (1981) The non-hospitalized tube-fed patient. Oncol Nurs Forum 8: 8–13
Sami H, Saint-Aubert B, Szawlowski AW, Astre C and Joyeux H (1990) Home enteral nutrition system: one patient, one daily ration of an ‘all in one’ sterile modular formula in a single container. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 14: 173–176
Shike M (1996) Nutrition therapy for the cancer patient. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 10: 221–234
Société Française de Nutrition Entérale et Parentérale et Société Française d’Anesthésie Réanimation (1995) ‘Conférence de consensus – Nutrition artificielle périopératoire en chirurgie programmée de l’adulte’. Recommandations du jury. Ann Fr Anesth Réanim 14: 7–16
Souba WW (1997) Nutritional support. N Engl J Med 336: 41–48
Srp F, Steiger E, Gulledge AD, Matarese LE, Paysinger J, Roncagli T, Stebbins J and Sullivan M (1989) Psychosocial issues of nutritional support. A multidisciplinary interpretation. Nurs Clin North Am 24: 447–459
Stata Corp (1996). Stata Statistical Software: release 5.0. Stata Corporation: College Station, TX
Vigano A, Watanabe S and Bruera E (1994) Anorexia and cachexia in advanced cancer patients. Cancer Surv 21: 99–115
Wartelle M, Kramar A, Jan P and Kruger D (1983) PIGAS: an interactive statistical database management system. Proceedings of Second International Workshop on Statistical Database Management, Hammond R, McCarthy JL (eds), pp. 124–132. National Technical Information Service, US Department of Commerce: Springfield, VA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Roberge, C., Tran, M., Massoud, C. et al. Quality of life and home enteral tube feeding: a French prospective study in patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer. Br J Cancer 82, 263–269 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0913
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.1999.0913
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Risk Factors for Feeding Tube Dependency in Patients Undergoing Function Preservation Surgery for Advanced-Stage Laryngohypopharyngeal Cancer
Dysphagia (2023)
-
The role of palliative care in relapsed and metastatic head and neck cancer patients in a single ESMO integrated oncology and palliative care centre
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology (2022)
-
Supplemental enteral tube feeding nutrition after hospital discharge of esophageal cancer patients who have undergone esophagectomy
Esophagus (2021)
-
Patient and carer experience of nutrition care throughout treatment for head and neck cancer: a systematic qualitative review and thematic synthesis
Supportive Care in Cancer (2020)
-
Quality of life and dietary changes among cancer patients: a systematic review
Quality of Life Research (2015)