Abstract
Background:
It was recently found that cAMP mediates protein kinase A-independent effects through Epac proteins. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of Epac in migration and proliferation of prostate carcinoma cells.
Methods:
The effect of Epac activation was determined by [3H]thymidine incorporation and scratch assays in PC-3 and DU 145 cells. Furthermore, cytoskeletal integrity was analysed by phalloidin staining. The participation of intracellular Epac effectors such as mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, Rap1- and Rho-GTPases was determined by immunoblotting and pull-down assay.
Results:
The specific Epac activator 8-pCPT-2′-O-Me-cAMP (8-pCPT) interfered with cytoskeletal integrity, reduced DNA synthesis, and migration. Although 8-pCPT activated Rap1, it inhibited MAP kinase signalling and RhoA activation. These findings were translated into functional effects such as inhibition of mitogenesis, cytoskeletal integrity, and migration.
Conclusion:
In human prostate carcinoma cells, Epac inhibits proliferative and migratory responses likely because of inhibition of MAP kinase and RhoA signalling pathways. Therefore, Epac might represent an attractive therapeutic target in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Migration and proliferation are key events in cancer progression and metastasis and the underlying molecular mechanisms of interest for possible treatment options (Abate-Shen and Shen, 2000; Hao et al, 2007). It has been reported that progression of prostate cancer, one of the leading causes of male cancer death, is associated with an activation of members of the Ras family, which in turn activate effectors, such as the mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs). In fact, elevated levels of the subfamily of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (ERK-1/2) could be observed in advanced prostate tumours (Gioeli et al, 1999; Price et al, 1999; Uzgare et al, 2003). In prostate carcinoma cells, cAMP analogues, such as Bt2-cAMP or dbcAMP, not only inhibited proliferation and migration but also induced cell differentiation (Bang et al, 1992, 1994; Picascia et al, 2002; Chen et al, 2005), thereby presenting potential new therapeutical treatment options.
For many years, these cAMP effects have been attributed solely to the activation of protein kinase A (PKA) (Taylor et al, 1990). However, recent studies have also shown the PKA-independent effects of cAMP, suggesting a possible involvement of other cAMP effectors, such as Epac (also known as cAMP-GEF (guanine nucleotide exchange factors)), acting as GEFs for Rap and Ras (Taylor et al, 1990; Bos, 2003; Holz et al, 2008). We and others have recently shown that Epac proteins have an important role in several cellular processes, including proliferation and apoptosis, possibly by their signalling capacity to ERK and phosphoinositide-3 kinase-dependent Akt (Fang and Olah, 2007; Grandoch et al, 2009). It is important that very recent studies could show an involvement of Epac in cell migration (Mei and Cheng, 2005; Yokoyama et al, 2008; Bastian et al, 2009), although the effects (inhibitory or stimulatory) were not consistent.
Thus far, the role of Epac on migration and proliferation has not been investigated in the prostate tumour cell lines PC-3 and DU 145. Therefore, we focused here on the question whether Epac modulates those cellular functions in highly aggressive prostate tumour cell lines with a high proliferative and metastasising capacity.
Materials and methods
See also extended Materials and Methods section in Supplementary materials (available online).
Cell culture and toxin treatment
PC-3 and DU 145 were cultured under standard conditions and serum-deprived 12 h before experiments. Clostridium difficile toxin B (TcdB) was added for 24 h at 10 pg ml−1 (DU 145) or 100 pg ml−1 (PC-3).
Western blot
After cell lysis (1% (vol/vol) SDS and 10 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.4), proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE (10–15%), blotted onto nitrocellulose, incubated with the indicated primary antibodies (1 : 1000, 4°C), and detected by the appropriate secondary antibodies.
Mitogenesis and migration
DNA synthesis was measured using the [3H]thymidine incorporation assay. Cell migration was determined in the presence of 1 mM hydroxy urea after scratch wounding of monolayer cultures.
Affinity precipitation of GTP-bound Rap1 and RhoA
Activated Rap1 or RhoA was extracted from cell lysates with glutathione S-transferase-tagged RalGDS (Rap1) or Rhotekin (RhoA), bound to Glutathione Sepharose beads. Immunoblotting was performed with anti-Rap1 and anti-RhoA antibodies.
Immunofluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry
Cells were fixed (paraformaldehyde), permeablized (Triton X-100), and stained for filamentous actin using AlexaFluor 488-conjugated phalloidin. Cells were analysed microscopically and by flow cytometry.
Statistics
Data are means±s.e.m. of n independent experiments. Statistical significance was determined by one-way analysis of variance followed by the Bonferroni test for multiple comparisons. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
As shown in Figure 1A, PC-3 and DU 145 cells express Epac and the different PKA catalytic and regulatory subunits. To control the specificity of the Epac-specific activator 8-pCPT-2′-O-Me-cAMP (8-pCPT), we analysed the phosphorylation of vasodilator-activated phosphoprotein (VASP), which is known to be phosphorylated by PKA (Smolenski et al, 1998). Activation of the adenylyl cyclase by forskolin (100 μ M) and treatment with the cAMP analogue dbcAMP (1 mM) induced VASP phosphorylation in both cell lines through PKA. In contrast, the Epac activator 8-pCPT (300 μ M) did not induce VASP phosphorylation (Figure 1B).
Next we compared the effects of cAMP and 8-pCPT on the phosphorylation of ERK-1/2 in PC-3 cells. Both, forskolin and 8-pCPT induced a slow, time-dependent decrease in basal ERK-1/2 phosphorylation (Figure 1C and D). To study possible functional consequences of the Epac-mediated inhibition of the MAPK pathway, we studied the effects of Epac activation on mitogenesis in PC-3 and DU 145 cells. Both, dbcAMP (this cAMP analogue was used because of inconsistent effects of forskolin in this assay; data not shown) and 8-pCPT induced a significant decrease in DNA synthesis (Figure 1E). In addition, both forskolin and 8-pCPT significantly inhibited cell migration of PC-3 and DU 145 cells (Figure 1F). Importantly, the PKA-inhibitor H-89 (10 μ M) showed no significant effects on the inhibition of cell migration of PC-3 (Figure 1F) and DU 145 cells (data not shown). Furthermore, inhibition of MEK by PD98059 (10 μ M) and U0126 (10 μ M) also decreased cell migration and enhanced the inhibitory effects of forskolin and 8-pCPT (data not shown) in PC-3 cells.
Next, effects on the small GTPase Rap1, a downstream effector of Epac, were analysed. Incubation with the PKA-specific cAMP analogue 6-Bnz (500 μ M) led to a slight decrease in Rap1 activation, whereas only the nonspecific 8-Bromo-cAMP (1 mM) and the Epac-activator 8-pCPT (300 μ M) activated the small GTPase at 5 and 10 min, respectively (Figure 2A).
E-cadherin is highly relevant for cancer invasiveness (Behrens et al, 1993) and has been shown to be regulated by Rap (for review see, Price et al, 2004; Koistra et al, 2007). Thus, we next studied the expression of E-cadherin in PC-3 and DU 145 cells in response to 8-pCPT (300 μ M) by immunoblotting (Figure 2B). However, the Epac activator did not alter E-cadherin expression in the two cell lines.
As cell migration is accompanied by a reorganisation of the actin cytoskeleton, we also studied the cytoskeletal actin organisation by staining F-actin with phalloidin in PC-3 cells. Although in control cells microscopically visible actin stress fibres could be detected, treatment with forskolin (100 μ M) or 8-pCPT (300 μ M) led to cell rounding accompanied by a disassembling of the stress fibres with an irregular pattern and disruption into short fragments (Figure 3A). These effects were confirmed by quantitative analysis of F-actin as measured by flow cytometry (Figure 3B). To elucidate the effect of Epac on Rho GTPases, we performed RhoA activation assays. Lysophosphatidic acid (1 μ M) was used as a positive control. Indeed, we could detect a decrease in RhoA activation after treatment of PC-3 cells with the Epac activator 8-pCPT (300 μ M; Figure 3C).
We confirmed the involvement of Rho-GTPases in the Epac-activated signalling pathways using two Rho kinase inhibitors, Y-27632 and HA-1077, respectively. Inhibition of Rho kinase by Y-27632 (10 μ M) reversed 8-pCPT-induced inhibition of migration in PC-3 and DU 145 cells (Figure 3D). Similar effects were also detectable after inhibition of Rho kinase by HA-1077 (10 μ M; data not shown). In addition, we used TcdB, a protein reported to monoglucosylate members of the Rho protein family. After pre-incubation of PC-3 and DU 145 cells for 24 h with TcdB and following stimulation with 8-pCPT, no inhibitory effects of the Epac activator could be detected (Figure 3E).
Discussion
This study is the first to show the anti-mitogenic and anti-migratory effects of Epac activation in human prostate cancer cells.
Bang et al (1992) suggested that cAMP analogues might be useful in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. However, no discrimination between different possible cAMP effectors has been made thus far, and for a long time PKA has been assumed as the only cAMP target. Importantly, Epac proteins have been shown to act as multifunctional regulators in different cell functions, next to the canonical PKA pathway. Indeed, we were able to detect Epac as well as PKA expression in PC-3 and DU 145 cells. First, we concentrated on ERK-1/2 phosphorylation. We confirmed inhibitory effects of cAMP on the phosphorylation level of ERK-1/2, mitogenesis, and migration (Price et al, 1999; Carey et al, 2007; Hao et al, 2007). Interestingly, we also detected a significant inhibition of the MAPK signalling by the specific Epac activator 8-pCPT. These findings were translated into functional effects, such as an inhibition of mitogenesis and migration.
As neither forskolin nor 8-pCPT induced apoptotic effects in PC-3 cells (annexin V binding, caspase cleavage, PARP processing; data not shown), we hypothesise that the observed inhibition of cell proliferation by these compounds most likely depends on the inhibition of ERK-1/2-mediated mitogenic events.
With regard to the anti-migratory effects of Epac activation in PC-3 and DU 145 cells, our results are in line with recent findings in ES-2 ovarian carcinoma cells (Bastian et al, 2009). The PKA inhibitor H-89 was not able to prevent forskolin-induced inhibition of cell migration strongly pointing to an Epac-dependent signalling pathway. Interestingly, incubation of cells with the inhibitor alone led to different outcomes in PC-3 vs DU 145 cells. A reason for this might be the fact that H-89 is known to inhibit even more target proteins than the well-known PKA (Davies et al, 2000).
Furthermore, Epac-dependent Rap1 activation is shown in this study in PC-3 cells. However, no effect on E-cadherin expression, which is known to be important for cancer cell migration and tumour invasiveness (Behrens et al, 1993), could be detected. This is in line with recent studies also describing an Epac/Rap1-mediated inhibition of epithelial cell migration independent of a modulation of the E-cadherin expression (Lyle et al, 2008).
Importantly, our experiments support the conclusion that inhibition of Rho GTPases, which are crucial for cell migration (Raftopoulou and Hall, 2004) and invasion of PC-3 cells (Hodge et al, 2003), might cause the anti-migratory effects of Epac. Stimulation of Epac by 8-pCPT led to a complete disassembly of the F-actin cytoskeleton. Furthermore, a decrease in RhoA activation was also observed in a pull-down assay. These results are in line with the described effects of cAMP analogues on RhoA activation and do confirm the proposed cross-talk between cAMP and RhoA (Chen et al, 2005).
In summary, this study shows for the first time anti-proliferative and anti-migratory effects of Epac activation in human prostate cancer cells, presumably mechanistically explained by an inhibition of the MAP kinases and RhoA. As these cellular functions are crucial for tumour growth and metastasis, Epac might represent an attractive therapeutic target in the treatment of prostate cancer.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Abate-Shen C, Shen MM (2000) Molecular genetics of prostate cancer. Genes Dev 140: 2410–2434
Bang J, Kim SJ, Danielpour D, Oreilly MA, Kim KY, Myers CE, Trepel JB (1992) Cyclic-AMP induces transforming growth-factor-beta-2 gene-expression and growth arrest in the human androgen-independent prostate carcinoma cell-line Pc-3. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 3556–3560
Bang YJ, Pirnia F, Fang WG, Kang WK, Sartor O, Whitesell L, Ha MJ, Tsokos M, Sheahan MD, Nguyen P, Niklinski WT, Myers CE, Trepel JB (1994) Terminal neuroendocrine differentiation of human prostate carcinoma-cells in response to increased intracellular cyclic-AMP. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 5330–5334
Bastian P, Balcarek A, Altanis C, Strell C, Niggemann B, Zaenker KS, Entschladen F (2009) The inhibitory effect of norepinephrine on the migration of ES-2 ovarian carcinoma cells involves a Rap1-dependent pathway. Cancer Lett 274: 218–224
Behrens J, Vakaet L, Friis R, Winterhager E, Van Roy F, Mareel MM, Birchmeier W (1993) Loss of epithelial differentiation and gain of invasiveness correlates with tyrosine phosphorylation of the E-cadherin/beta-Catenin complex in cells transformed with a temperature-sensitive v-SRC gene. J Cell Biol 20: 757–766
Bos JL (2003) Epac: a new cAMP target and new avenues in cAMP research. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 733–738
Carey AM, Pramanik R, Nicholson LJ, Dew TK, Martin FL, Muir GH, Morris JDH (2007) Ras–MEK–ERK signaling cascade regulates androgen receptor element-inducible gene transcription and DNA synthesis in prostrate cancer cells. Int J Cancer 121: 520–527
Chen YC, Wang Y, Yu H, Wang FW, Xu WR (2005) The cross talk between protein kinase A- and RhoA-mediated signaling in cancer cells. Exp Biol Med 230: 731–741
Davies SP, Reddy H, Calvano M, Cohen P (2000) Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors. Biochem J 351: 95–105
Fang Y, Olah ME (2007) Cyclic AMP-dependent, protein kinase A-independent activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 following denosine receptor stimulation in human umbilical vein endothelial cells: role of exchange protein activated by cAMP 1 (Epac1). J Pharmacol Exp Ther 322: 1189–1200
Gioeli D, Mandell JW, Petroni GR, Frierson HF, Weber MJ (1999) Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase associated with prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res 59: 279–284
Grandoch M, López de Jesús M, Oude Weernink PA, Weber A-A, Jakobs KH, Schmidt M (2009) B cell receptor-induced growth arrest and apoptosis in WEHI-231 immature B lymphoma cells involve cyclic AMP and Epac proteins. Cell Signal 21: 609–621
Hao F, Tan M, Xu X, Han J, Miller DD, Tigyi G, Cui MZ (2007) Lysophosphatidic acid induces prostate cancer PC3 cell migration via activation of LPA(1), p42 and p38 alpha. Biochim Biophys Acta 1771: 883–892
Hermann A, Schrör K, Weber A-A (2002) CD40 ligand (CD40L) does not stimulate proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells. Eur J Cell Biol 81: 213–221
Hodge JC, Bub J, Kaul S, Kajdacsy-Balla A, Lindholm PF (2003) Requirement of RhoA activity for increased nuclear factor kappa B activity and PC-3 human prostate cancer cell invasion. Cancer Res 63: 1359–1364
Holz GG, Chepurny OG, Schwede F (2008) Epac-selective cAMP analogs: new tools with which to evaluate the signal transduction properties of cAMP-regulated guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Cell Signal 20: 10–20
Koistra MR, Dubé N, Bos JL (2007) Rap1: a key regulator in cell–cell junction formation. J Cell Sci 120: 17–22
Lyle KS, Raaijkmakers JH, Bruinsma W, Bos JL, de Rooij J (2008) cAMP-induced Epac-Rap activation inhibits epithelial cell migration by modulating focal adhesion and leading edge dynamics. Cell Signal 20: 1104–1116
Mei FC, Cheng XD (2005) Interplay between exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (Epac) and microtubule cytoskeleton. Mol Biosyst 1: 325–331
Picascia A, Stanzione R, Chieffi P, Kisslinger A, Dikic I, Tramontano D (2002) Proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 regulates proliferation and differentiation of prostate cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 186: 81–87
Price DT, Della Rocca G, Guo CH, Ballo MS, Schwinn DA, Luttrell LM (1999) Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase in human prostate cancer. J Urol 162: 1537–1542
Price LS, Hajdo-Milasinovic A, Zhao J, Zwartkruis FJT, Collard JG, Bos JL (2004) Rap1 regulates E-cadherin-mediated cell–cell-adhesion. J Biol Chem 279: 35127–35132
Raftopoulou M, Hall A (2004) Cell migration: Rho GTPases lead the way. Dev Biol 265: 23–32
Smolenski A, Bachmann C, Reinhard K, Hõnig-Liedl P, Jarchau T, Hoschuetzky H, Walter U (1998) Analysis and regulation of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein serin 239 phosphorylation in vitro and in intact cells using a phosphospecific monoclonal antibody. J Biol Chem 273: 20029–20035
Taylor SS, Buechler JA, Yonemoto W (1990) cAMP-dependent protein-kinase – framework for a diverse family of regulatory enzymes. Annu Rev Biochem 59: 971–1005
Uzgare R, Kaplan PJ, Greenberg NM (2003) Differential expression and/or activation of p38MAPK, Erkl/2, and Jnk during the initiation and progression of prostate cancer. Prostate 55: 128–139
Yokoyama U, Minamisawa S, Quan H, Akaike T, Jin MH, Otsu K, Ulucan C, Wang X, Baljinnyam E, Takaoka M, Sata M, Ishikawa Y (2008) Epac1 is upregulated during neointima formation and promotes vascular smooth muscle cell migration. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 295: H1547–H1555
Acknowledgements
We thank B Langer and S Metze for technical assistance. We also thank H Genth and C von Eichel-Streiber for providing Clostridium difficile toxin B.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on British Journal of Cancer website (http://www.nature.com/bjc).
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Grandoch, M., Rose, A., ter Braak, M. et al. Epac inhibits migration and proliferation of human prostate carcinoma cells. Br J Cancer 101, 2038–2042 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605439
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6605439
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
cAMP guided his way: a life for G protein-mediated signal transduction and molecular pharmacology—tribute to Karl H. Jakobs
Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's Archives of Pharmacology (2019)
-
Insights into exchange factor directly activated by cAMP (EPAC) as potential target for cancer treatment
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (2018)
-
Role of exchange protein directly activated by cAMP (EPAC1) in breast cancer cell migration and apoptosis
Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry (2017)
-
Activation of P2X7 and P2Y11 purinergic receptors inhibits migration and normalizes tumor-derived endothelial cells via cAMP signaling
Scientific Reports (2016)
-
Epac1 interacts with importin β1 and controls neurite outgrowth independently of cAMP and Rap1
Scientific Reports (2016)