Sir,
The Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer has certainly done a disservice regarding the question of the possible connection between tobacco smoke and breast cancer by publishing their recent paper (Collaborative Group, 2002) and concluding that there is no increase in breast cancer risk from smoking cigarettes. They note under Methods that ‘no attention was given to the reported associations of breast cancer with environmental tobacco smoke’. Again, under limitations of these findings in the Discussion section, they say ‘nor has attention been given to the reported effects of environmental exposure to tobacco, as active smoking only has been considered’. However, they make no estimate as to what effect this limitation might have on their findings, nor do they qualify their conclusion in the abstract. Their finding is erroneous because they compared ever-smokers with all never-smokers. Since most never-smokers have had significant passive smoking exposure, and since the passive risk, based on the better studies, is almost as large as the active risk, they, in effect, were comparing exposed with exposed and found no effect.
An estimate of the magnitude of the passive smoking breast cancer risk and its effect on the active smoking risk can be obtained by studying the data in Morabia et al (1996) and Johnson et al (2000), probably the two best of the 16 or so studies on this issue so far. When these investigators used nonpassively exposed never-smokers as their reference category, Morabia et al (1996) found odds ratios of 2.3 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.5–3.7) for passive smoking and 3.2 (95% CI, 2.1–4.9) by combining odds ratios for three levels of ever active smoking. Johnson et al (2000), with a somewhat less comprehensive questionnaire, reported odds ratios for both pre- and postmenopausal women, which, when combined, are 1.43 (95% CI, 1.01–2.02) for passive smoking and 1.7 (95% CI, 1.2–2.2) for active smoking. Using even the lower estimates of Johnson et al (2000) to correct the Collaborative Group's active smoking relative risk would have resulted in a substantial, statistically significant, positive risk.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer (2002) Alcohol, tobacco and breast cancer – collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 58 515 women with breast cancer and 95 067 women without the disease. Br J Cancer 87: 1234–1245
Johnson KC, Hu J, Mao Y and the Canadian Cancer Registries Epidemiology Research Group (2000) Passive and active smoking and breast cancer risk in Canada, 1994–97. Cancer Causes Control 11: 211–221
Morabia A, Bernstein M, Heritier S, Khatchatrian N (1996) Relation of breast cancer with passive and active exposure to tobacco smoke. Am J Epidemiol 143: 918–928
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Wells, A. Breast cancer and tobacco smoke. Br J Cancer 89, 955 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601182
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601182
This article is cited by
-
The polymorphism of EGFR 142285G > A exerts no risk effect on breast cancer
Tumor Biology (2014)