Abstract
Temozolomide (TMZ) is an oral alkylating agent with a good safety profile and proven efficacy in the treatment of malignant glioma. Procarbazine (PCB) has been used for treating gliomas for many years and here both agents were combined in the treatment. This phase I study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TMZ alone (course 1) and TMZ in combination with PCB in subsequent courses in chemotherapy-naïve patients with malignant glioma. Patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and low-grade glioma were treated with TMZ 200 mg m−2 on days 1–5 on a 28-day cycle for course 1. Beginning with course 2, cohorts of patients received TMZ at full dose with escalating doses of PCB (50/75/100/125 mg m−2 days 1–5 given 1 h prior to TMZ). A total of 28 patients were enrolled with three patients each at dose level 1 and 2, 16 patients at dose level 3 and six patients at dose level 4 received 182+ cycles of treatment and were included in this analysis. In all, 16 patients had GBM, seven patients had AA, five had grade 1 or 2 glioma and the median age was 47 years. The patients had received prior surgery and radiotherapy. Responses were seen at all dose levels. Overall, there were 10 (36%) responses lasting from 2 to 17+ months. Treatment was generally well tolerated with few grade 3 or 4 toxicities, except at dose level 4, where four patients had grade 3/4 had thrombocytopaenia at this dose and several patients had moderate-to-severe lethargy. TMZ 200 mg m−2 and PCB 100 mg m−2 were well tolerated on a daily 5 × and four weekly cycle in patients with malignant glioma and clearly had antitumour activity.
Main
Prognosis with patients with glioma, and in particular, high-grade (anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)) tumours is poor. Studies have confirmed the beneficial effect of postoperative cranial irradiation, but in most series, survival beyond 2 years is 15% or less (Walker et al, 1978; Stewart, 1989; Fine et al, 1993). The most widely used combination in treating gliomas is procarbazine, CCNU (lomustine), vincristine (PCV). This has a limited effect on survival (Levin et al, 1980; Sandberg-Wollheim et al, 1991). The most active agents identified until recently were the nitrosoureas (BCNU, CCNU, methyl-CCNU and HECNU), and have been reported to induce responses in the range of 35–55%. However, the majority of these responses were of short duration (Rodriguez and Levin, 1987; Georges et al, 1988; Stewart, 1989).
Temozolomide came from a synthetic programme of a number of imidazotetrazine derivatives, which exhibited broad-spectrum antitumour activity against murine models (Stevens et al, 1984). TMZ was selected for further clinical development in view of its good experimental antitumour activity and low toxicity in the pre-clinical screen. In addition, its antitumour activity was also schedule-dependent (Stevens et al, 1987). In the early clinical development of TMZ, administration of a single dose induced myelosupression but did not have any antitumour activity. However, when given on a daily 5 × schedule repeated every 4 weeks, activity against malignant melanomas and gliomas was seen (Newlands et al, 1992). TMZ spontaneously ring opens at physiological pH to produce the active intermediate MTIC, which methylates DNA at a number of sites. The main cytotoxic lesion induced by TMZ is probably at the O6 position of guanine (Tisdale, 1987; Baer et al, 1993; Wedge et al, 1996). This cytotoxic lesion is repaired by the DNA-repair protein O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) that accepts the methyl group onto a cysteine residue and is autoinactivated. TMZ, especially administered in repeat dosing, will deplete tumour cells of AGT (D'Incalci et al, 1991; Mitchell and Dolan, 1993).
PCB has been used as an oral agent for many years in patients with malignant lymphomas (MOPP (mustine, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisolone)) and in PCV-treated malignant gliomas. A number of studies in the 1990s also identified that procarbazine, a DNA-alkylating agent, depletes AGT (Schold et al, 1989; Souliotis et al, 1990; Valvanis et al, 1994; Russell et al, 1995). This study was designed to identify whether there is potentially an increase in the therapeutic index by combining PCB and TMZ in treating patients with malignant gliomas.
Patients and methods
Following ethics committee approval, 28 patients with malignant gliomas were enrolled in this study and their details are shown in Table 1. All had received prior surgery and radiotherapy, and none had received chemotherapy and all had progressive disease. The study design was such that TMZ alone was administered during course 1 to determine whether or not each patient's bone marrow was sensitive to TMZ at full dose. The second and subsequent courses of TMZ were combined with escalating doses of PCB (Table 2). If a patient's bone marrow was sensitive to TMZ at a dose of 200 mg m−2 daily 5 × , this was reduced in the second course to 150 mg m−2 daily 5 × , and then subsequent courses combined with PCB and the reduced dose of TMZ. Patients continued on 4 weekly courses of TMZ at the same dose of PCB until disease progression or evidence of major toxicity.
Responses were assessed clinically and radiologically before and after each course of treatment. Patients with gliomas had to be taking a stable dose of corticosteroid for at least 2 weeks before study entry and the baseline CT or MRI scan. Radiological shrinkage alone was not considered an acceptable measure of response in brain tumours, as there is often difficulty in forming clear margins on a CT or MRI abnormality, which includes additional areas of necrosis, oedema, and vascularity. In some cases, it may be possible to measure a clearcut reduction of 50% by CT or MRI, but in most cases it is only possible to determine a reduction in enhancement and mass effect. An objective response (OR) was defined as one that requires improvement in the Medical Research Council neurological status (Table 3) by one grade as well as a clear-cut reduction in mass effect on CT or MRI assessment with a minimum duration of 4 weeks. There should also be no deterioration in any other neurological symptom or sign and no development of new neurological deficits. Responses had to be documented by two observations at least 4 weeks apart (Brock et al, 1998).
Results
In general, the combination of TMZ and PCB was well tolerated. Dose level 1 (PCB 50 mg m−2 per day given 1 h prior to TMZ) from course 2 onwards was well tolerated without any major side effects, as was dose level 2 (PCB 75 mg m−2 daily × 5). The only significant toxicity at these two dose levels was lymphocytopenia (Table 4). At dose level 3 (PCB 100 mg m−2 at daily × 5), two patients had falls in their white counts and four patients had thrombocytopenia all on TMZ alone. One patient had thrombocytopenia from the combination of TMZ and PCB. At dose level 4, toxicity was seen and four patients had thrombocytopenia and several patients had moderate-to-severe lethargy and malaise. The recommended dose for future studies is dose level 3. The other toxicities that were seen were skin rashes (two patients) and one patient had hepatitis A infection (Table 5).
The responses by tumour grade are shown in Table 6. Responses were seen in all types of glioma, with an overall response rate of 36%. Table 7 shows the response by PCB dose and responses were seen at all dose levels. Table 8 shows the duration of responses to 1 September 2001, the duration of responses lasting from 2 to 17+ months. Figure 1 shows a response in a patient receiving treatment at dose level 3.
Discussion
Using the criteria of response, we have previously published responses in patients with high-grade gliomas (AA and GBM) to TMZ that are well documented and approximately one in four patients achieves an objective response with clearcut neurological improvement and reduction in the area of enhancement on their MRI scan (Brock et al, 1998). A further 25% have disease stabilisation in terms of their MRI scans and some neurological improvement when TMZ is given in the dose of 200 mg m−2 days 1–5 schedule repeated at 4 weekly intervals. In the randomised study of TMZ against PCB, the response rate to PCB was lower, the duration of those responses shorter, and the quality of life poorer. However, PCB clearly had modest activity against high-grade gliomas (Yung et al, 2000).
In this study, the combination of TMZ and PCB was generally well tolerated at doses up to dose level 3. At this dose level, there is little difference in terms of side effects between TMZ alone and the combination with PCB. We had intended to extend this cohort to 30 or 40 patients to identify whether or not the combination was superior to TMZ on its own. However, the supply of PCB was interrupted and the study had to be suspended when a total of 16 patients had been entered at dose level 3. Clearly, these results on a small number of patients are preliminary. The clinical impression is that the combination probably is a bit more active than TMZ on its own, and it may be that some of the patients who would otherwise have been classified as having stable disease would have moved into the responding group, suggesting a greater antitumour activity when the two agents are given together.
Conclusion
TMZ and PCB, when combined at the recommended dose levels, are a reasonably effective and well-tolerated combination in treating patients with relapsed gliomas and tumour activity is seen in low-grade gliomas, AA, and GBM.
Change history
16 November 2011
This paper was modified 12 months after initial publication to switch to Creative Commons licence terms, as noted at publication
References
Baer JC, Freeman AA, Newlands ES, Watson AJ, Rafferty JA, Margison GP (1993) Depletion of O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase correlates with potentiation of temozolomide and CCNU toxicity in human tumour cells. Br J Cancer 67: 1299–1302
Brock CS, Newlands ES, Wedge SR, Bower M, Colquhorn I, Roddie M, Brampton M, Rusti GJ (1998) Phase I trial of temozolomide using an extended continuous oral schedule. Cancer Res 58: 4363–4367
D'Incalci M, Taverna P, Erba E, Filippeschi S, Potenza D, Mariani L, Citti L, Catapano CV (1991) O6-methylguanine and temozolomide can reverse the resistance to chloroethylnitrosoureas of a mouse L1210 leukaemia. Anticancer Res 11: 115–122
Fine HA, Dear KB, Loeffler JS, Black PM, Canellos GP (1993) Meta-analysis of radiation therapy with and without adjuvant chemotherapy for malignant gliomas in adults. Cancer 71: 2585–2587
Georges P, Przedborskis S, Brotchi J, Chatel M, Gedovin D, Hildebrand J (1988) Effect of HECNU in malignant supratentorial gliomas: a phase II study. J Neuro-oncol 211–219
Levin VA, Edwards MS, Seager ML, Schimberg JP, Townsend JJ, Wilson CB (1980) Modified procarbazine, CCNU and vincristine brain tumours. Cancer Treat Rep 64: 237–241
Mitchell RB, Dolan ME (1993) Effect of temozolomide and dacarbazine on O6-alkylguanine DNA alkytransferase activity and sensitivity of human tumour cells and xenografts to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 32: 59–63
Newlands ES, Blackledge GR, Slack JA, Rustin GJ, Smith DB, Stuart NS, Quartermain CP, Hoffman R, Stevens MF, Brampton MH (1992) Phase I trial of temozolomide (CCRG 81045; M&B 39831). Br J Cancer 65: 287
Rodriguez LA, Levin VA . (1987) Does chemotherapy benefit the patient with a central nervous system glioma? Oncology 1: 29–36
Russell SJ, Ye YW, Waber PG, Shuford M, Scold SC Jr, Nisen PD (1995) p53 mutations, O6-alkylguanine DNA alkytransferase activity and sensitivity to procarbazine in human brain tumours. Cancer 75: 1339–1342
Sandberg-Wollheim M et al. (1991) A randomised study of chemotherapy with procarbazine, vincristine and lomustine with and without radiation therapy for astrocytoma grades 3 and/or 4. Cancer 68: 22–29
Schold SC et al. (1989) O6-alkylguanine DNA alkytransferase and sensitivity to procarbazine in human brain tumour xenografts. J Neurosurg 70: 573–577
Souliotis VL et al. (1990) Accumulation of O6-methylguanine in human blood leukocyte DNA during exposure to procarbazine and its relationships with dose and repair. Cancer Res 50: 2764
Stevens MFG et al. (1987) Antitumour activity and pharmacokinetics in mice of 8-carbamoyl-3-(2-chloroethyl) imidazo[5,1,d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazin-4(3 H)-one (CCRG 81045; M&B 39831) a novel drug with potential as an alternative to dacarbazine. Cancer Res 47: 5846
Stevens MFG et al. (1984) Antitumour imidazotetrazines. 1. Synthesis and chemistry of 8-carbamoyl-3-(2-chloroethyl) imidazo[5,1,d]-1,2,3,5-tetrazin-4(3H)-one, a novel broad spectrum antitumour agent. J Med Chem 27: 196
Stewart DJ . (1989) The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of gliomas in adults. Cancer Treat Rev 16: 129–160
Tisdale MJ . (1987) Antitumour imidazotetrazines. XV. Role of guanine O6-alkylation in the mechanism of cytotoxicity of imidazotetrazines. Biochem Pharmacol 36: 457–462
Valvanis C et al. (1994) Differential effects of procarbazine and methylnitrosoureas on the accumulation of O6-methylguanine and the depletion and recovery of O6-alkylguanine DNA alkytransferase in rat tissues. Carcinogenesis 15: 1681–1688
Walker ME et al. (1978) Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas: a co-operative clinical trial. J Neurosurg 49: 333–343
Wedge SR et al. (1996) Potentiation of temozolomide and BCNU cytotoxicity by O6-benzylguanine: a comparative study in vitro. Br J Cancer 73: 482–490
Yung WKA et al. (2000) A Phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer 83: 588–593
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Schering-Plough Research Institute for providing the temozolomide for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Newlands, E., Foster, T. & Zaknoen, S. Phase 1 study of temozolamide (TMZ) combined with procarbazine (PCB) in patients with gliomas. Br J Cancer 89, 248–251 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601043
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601043
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Cilengitide with metronomic temozolomide, procarbazine, and standard radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma and unmethylated MGMT gene promoter in ExCentric, an open-label phase II trial
Journal of Neuro-Oncology (2016)
-
In vivo glioblastoma growth is reduced by apyrase activity in a rat glioma model
BMC Cancer (2006)
-
Systemic Temozolomide Combined with Loco-regional Mitoxantrone in Treating Recurrent Glioblastoma
Journal of Neuro-Oncology (2005)
-
Malignant gliomas
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports (2004)