In the World View ‘Forensic DNA evidence is not infallible’ (Nature 526, 611; 2015), it may not have been clear that the current investigation in Texas is reportedly focusing on statistics and not the specific problem of secondary contamination in touch-DNA samples.
The online version of the original article can be found at 10.1038/526611a
Related links in Nature Research
Related external links
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Correction: Clarification. Nature 527, 147 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/527147a
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.