Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Data management

One scientist's data as another's noise

Reviewer Charles Seife considers my book Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World alongside two popular books on big data in commerce: Steve Lohr's Data-ism and Bruce Schneier's Data and Goliath (see Nature 518, 480–481; 2015). Yet the review does not make clear that mine is aimed at a very different audience.

I wrote the book for scientific researchers, scholars, librarians, publishers, policy-makers and other stakeholders, for whom the subtle uses of data as evidence in research are being swamped in the hype about big data. With case studies exploring how the idea of data varies in and between domains, I show how one researcher's data can be someone else's noise. Therein lies the rub.

Because so much about research data is open to personal interpretation, the information can be difficult to describe, represent and manage — and to share or reuse. The failure to understand these complexities leads to misguided policies for data management and to a lack of investment in both the workforce and the infrastructure for data curation. Ultimately, it can mean that no data survive for research.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Borgman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borgman, C. One scientist's data as another's noise. Nature 520, 157 (2015).

Download citation


Quick links