Correspondence | Published:

Macaques

Anti-vivisectionists respond

Nature volume 515, page 343 (20 November 2014) | Download Citation

Following our seven-month undercover investigation, the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (BUAV) strongly disagrees with your claim that the Max Planck Institute in Tübingen, Germany, has done a “good job” on its website in explaining its neuroscience research on macaques (see Nature 513, 459–460; 2014).

Our investigation of the macaques' treatment and conditions was undertaken with SOKO-TS, a German animal-protection organization. The BUAV goes to enormous lengths to check facts and is extremely careful only to publish allegations that it believes are demonstrably true.

After rigorously scrutinizing footage and documentation from this investigation, the leading German television station Stern has called into serious question claims and images posted on the Max Planck Institute's website. For example, the institute makes what in our opinion is the bizarre claim on its website that the animals do not suffer.

Jane Goodall, the renowned primatologist, says she has seldom seen such sickening experiments. They have no place in a civilised society.

Following the Stern broadcast, the institute has identified a need for improvement in terms of staff organization and agreed to introduce overnight care for the animals following surgery and to improve veterinary attention.

We consider that the use of macaques in these experiments is unnecessary: the continued creative and ethical use of imaging techniques on patients and volunteers is, we believe, far more likely to produce improvements in neurological health.

It is not better PR that animal researchers need, as you argue, but a paradigm shift in thinking, a better appreciation of the suffering they cause animals and a commitment to genuine transparency.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. BUAV, London, UK.

    • Michelle Thew

Authors

  1. Search for Michelle Thew in:

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Thew.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/515343d

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing