Research evaluation

Flanders overrates impact factors


A renewed decree on research funding last year by the government of Flanders in northern Belgium advised that 40% of research evaluation should be based on bibliometric data. This involves a complex calculation that includes the number of publications and citations, and the impact factors for the journals of publication (see; in Dutch). We question the merits of this strategy, given the debatable value of impact factors in gauging research quality (see, for example, B. Alberts Science 340, 787; 2013).

The Flemish Interuniversity Council in fact advised Flemish universities in 2010 to reduce the importance of bibliometric data when weighing up researchers for appointment or promotion. In practice, however, such data have become even more important.

It is time to heed the widely recognized risk of overrating the quantity of scientific publications, which can compromise research quality and integrity.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Stroobants.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stroobants, K., Godecharle, S. & Brouwers, S. Flanders overrates impact factors. Nature 500, 29 (2013).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing