Main

A survey of hygienists qualifying from the Liverpool School of Dental Hygiene 1977–1988 by D. G. Hillam Br Dent J 2000; 188: 150–153

Comment

As the delivery of dental care focuses more on a team approach, this paper is timely and reports on the career patterns of dental hygienists who have qualified from the Liverpool School of Dental Hygiene over a 20-year period. The point is made in the introduction that the dental hygienist training schools not only have a responsibility to monitor methods of recruitment so that students accepted onto the course complete it, but also when qualified they have the aptitude and motivation to work in their chosen profession for a substantial time afterwards. It is a fact that the vast majority of applications to UK schools of dental hygiene are from females who predominately have a dental nurse background. Few males apply for this course even though direct entry avoiding dental nurse training is possible for those with two A level passes.

The aim of the survey which involved more than 200 hygienists, was to assess if there had been a return to work by dental hygienists after a break caused by family commitments, to assess job opportunities, access to continuing education and the current level of job satisfaction. This is timely because the numbers of dental hygienists qualifying each year falls short of the needs of the country as a whole, so the importance of returners to work is paramount. Reassuringly we see that 89% of dental hygienists qualifying from Liverpool still work as hygienists but of these 74% had a career break for maternity and family reasons, although we do not know the average length of time involved as it was stated as 3 months or more. Fortunately, job satisfaction often expressed as low did appear to be high in this group. This is again reassuring and with additional duties around the corner should be even higher in the future.

Access to continuing professional development (CPD) was variable with nearly half saying that it was good or very good and a third saying it was bad or very bad. This is an area which does need to be addressed, particularly as continuing professional development for hygienists is now a requirement by the GDC.1 In addition, if dental hygienists are being asked to undertake more clinical duties then an investment for CPD from central funds would seem to be appropriate.

One concern highlighted is the tendency for hygienists, once they have had a career break for whatever reason, to rarely go back to work full time. The career break also tends to lead to a loss of confidence if it is protracted, and to overcome this hygienists sensibly try to arrange refresher courses but this can often be difficult. This is frequently due to them being geographically distant from a dental hygiene school who would usually provide the update course.

Finally, it could be that some of the responses to this survey indicate a need to attract more males into the profession particularly as there are currently 4,085 enrolled hygienists of which only 84 are male.2 This is obviously an area for further debate as hygienists (and other PCDs) become more important in the dental team and more involved in the treatment of patients.