Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Environmental warming alters food-web structure and ecosystem function

Abstract

We know little about how ecosystems of different complexity will respond to global warming1,2,3,4,5. Microcosms permit experimental control over species composition and rates of environmental change. Here we show using microcosm experiments that extinction risk in warming environments depends on trophic position but remains unaffected by biodiversity. Warmed communities disproportionately lose top predators and herbivores, and become increasingly dominated by autotrophs and bacterivores. Changes in the relative distribution of organisms among trophically defined functional groups lead to differences in ecosystem function beyond those expected from temperature-dependent physiological rates. Diverse communities retain more species than depauperate ones, as predicted by the insurance hypothesis, which suggests that high biodiversity buffers against the effects of environmental variation because tolerant species are more likely to be found6,7. Studies of single trophic levels clearly show that warming can affect the distribution and abundance of species2,4,5, but complex responses generated in entire food webs greatly complicate inferences based on single functional groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Species combinations and trophic structure used to manipulate diversity and composition.
Figure 2: Effects of warming on extinctions.
Figure 3: Biomass of different trophic groups during the sixth week.
Figure 4: Impacts of warming on ecosystem properties.

References

  1. Frost,T. M., Carpenter,S. R., Ives,A. R. & Kratz,T. K. in Linking Species and Ecosystems (eds Jones, C. G. & Lawton, J. H.) 224–239 (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1995).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis,A. J., Jenkinson,L. S., Lawton,J. H., Shorrocks,B. & Wood,S. Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391, 783–786 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sanford,E. Regulation of keystone predation by small changes in ocean temperature. Science 283, 2095–2097 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Harte,J. & Shaw,R. Shifting dominance within a montane vegetation community: results of a climate-warming experiment. Science 267, 876–880 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Parmesan,C. et al. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399, 579–583 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Naeem,S. & Li,S. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability. Nature 390, 507–509 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yachi,S. & Loreau,M. Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: the insurance hypothesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 1463–1468 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ives,A. R. & Gilchrist,G. in Biotic Interactions and Global Change (eds Kareiva, P. M., Kingsolver, J. G. & Huey, R. B.) 120–146 (Sinauer Associates Inc., Sunderland, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Houghton,J. T. et al. Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lawton,J. H. Ecological experiments with model systems. Science 269, 328–331 (1995).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McGrady-Steed,J., Harris,P. M. & Morin,P. J. Biodiversity regulates ecosystem predictability. Nature 390, 162–165 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. May,R. M. Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pimm,S. L. The Balance of Nature? (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Solé,R. V., Manrubia,S. C., Benton,M., Kauffman,S. & Bak,P. Criticality and scaling in evolutionary ecology. Trends. Ecol. Evol. 14, 156–160 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bak,P. How Nature Works (Springer, New York, 1996).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Naeem,S. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Cons. Biol. 12, 39–45 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Oksanen,L., Fretwell,S. D., Arruda,J. & Niemelä,P. Exploitation ecosystems in gradients of primary productivity. Am. Nat. 118, 240–261 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kaunzinger,C. M. K. & Morin,P. J. Productivity controls food-chain properties in microbial communities. Nature 395, 495–497 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Naeem,S. & Li,S. Consumer species richness and autotrophic biomass. Ecology 79, 2603–2615 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hector,A. The effect of diversity on productivity: detecting the role of species complementarity. Oikos 82, 597–599 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Loreau,M. Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. Oikos 82, 600–602 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hooper,D. U. The role of complementarity and competition in ecosystem responses to variation in plant diversity. Ecology 79, 704–719 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tilman,D., Lehman,C. L. & Thomson,K. T. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: theoretical considerations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 94, 1857–1861 (1997).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Schindler,D. E., Carpenter,S. R., Cole,J. J., Kitchell,J. F. & Pace,M. L. Influence of food web structure on carbon exchange between lakes and the atmosphere. Science 277, 248–251 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pounds,J. A., Fogden,M. P. L. & Campbell,J. H. Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398, 611–615 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Del Giorgio,P. A., Cole,J. J., Caraco,N. F. & Peters,R. H. Linking planktonic biomass and metabolism to net gas fluxes in northern temperature lakes. Ecology 80, 1422–1431 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McGrady-Steed,J. & Morin,P. J. Biodiversity, density compensation and the dynamics of populations and functional groups. Ecology (in the pre

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the NSF for supporting this research. Comments from the Morin lab, J. McGrady-Steed, S. Lawler, M. Loreau and S. Naeem improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Owen L. Petchey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Petchey, O., McPhearson, P., Casey, T. et al. Environmental warming alters food-web structure and ecosystem function. Nature 402, 69–72 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/47023

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/47023

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing