Mosquitoes: just how much biodiversity does humanity need?

Article metrics

If a world without mosquitoes (Nature 466, 432–434; 2010) would be better for humanity and inflict no more than “collateral damage” on ecosystems, then what else might we reasonably eliminate from the face of the planet — deadly snakes, plague locusts?

Never mind that the collateral damage of eradicating mosquitoes might include the loss of a group of pollinators and a primary food source for many species. Perhaps another organism will come along to fill the niche eventually — assuming that organisms are replaceable and interchangeable.

In which case, ecologists have to ask what minimum level of biodiversity is required for functional provision of ecosystem services to sustain humanity.

Author information

Additional information

See Also: Mosquitoes: schemes to render them extinct are impracticable

See Also: Mosquitoes: first evaluate impacts of eradicating them

See Also: Mosquitoes: retain an ex situ population for ecological insurance

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.