Your Editorial (Nature 462, 545; 2009) castigates “denialists” for making “endless, time-consuming demands for information under the US and UK Freedom of Information Acts”. But you do not mention the reason — that the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia has systematically tried to avoid revealing data and code.
Science relies upon open analysis of data and methods, and the UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) has a clear data-sharing policy that expects scientists “to cooperate in validating and publishing [data] in their entirety”. The university's leaked e-mails imply a concerted effort to avoid data sharing, which both violates the best practice defined in NERC policy and prevents verification of the results obtained by the unit. Asking for scientific data and code should not lead to anyone being branded as part of the “climate-change-denialist fringe”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Contributions may be submitted to correspondence@nature.com . Please refer to the Guide to Authors at http://go.nature.com/cMCHno . They should be no longer than 300 words. Published contributions are edited. Science publishing issues are regularly featured at http://blogs.nature.com/nautilus , where we welcome comments and debate.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bell, D. Climate e-mails: lack of data sharing is a real concern. Nature 463, 25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/463025b
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/463025b
