The idea that physical phenomena might be described by a more downto-earth theory than quantum physics has met with resistance from many physicists. Indeed, it seems that nature is not as simple as we would like.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Kirchmair, G. et al. Nature 460, 494–497 (2009).
Huang, Y.-F., Li, C.-F., Zhang, Y.-S., Pan, J.-W. & Guo, G.-C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 250401 (2003).
Bartosik, H. et al. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.4576 (2009).
Bell, J. S. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964).
Moehring, D. L. et al. Nature 449, 68–71 (2007).
Rosenfeld, W. et al. Preprint at http://arxiv.org/abs/0906.0703 (2009).
Bechmann-Pasquinucci, H. & Peres, A. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3313–3316 (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blinov, B. Hidden context. Nature 460, 464–465 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/460464a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/460464a
