Research at the frontier between computer science and physics illustrates the shortcomings of the reductionist approach to science, which explains macroscopic behaviour using microscopic principles.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Anderson, P. W. Science 177, 393–396 (1972).
Hawking, S. W. Is the End in Sight for Theoretical Physics? (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1980).
Gu, M., Weedbrook, C., Perales, A. & Nielsen, M. A. Physica D 238, 835–839 (2009).
Percus, A., Istrate, G. & Moore, C. (eds) Computational Complexity and Statistical Physics (Oxford Univ. Press, 2006).
Wolfram, S. Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 735–738 (1985).
Binder, P.-M. Nature 455, 884–885 (2008).
Benenson, Y., Gil, B., Ben-Dor, U., Adar, R. & Shapiro, E. Nature 429, 423–429 (2004).
Toffoli, T. & Margolus, N. Cellular Automata Machines (MIT Press, 1987).
Cook, M. Complex Systems 15, 1–40 (2004).
Domany, E. & Kinzel, W. Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 311–314 (1984).
Moore, C. Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2354–2357 (1990).
Bennett, C. H. Nature 346, 606–607 (1990).
Siegelmann, H. T. Science 268, 545–548 (1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Binder, PM. The edge of reductionism. Nature 459, 332–333 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/459332a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/459332a