Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Darwin 200

Should scientists study race and IQ? NO: Science and society do not benefit

In the first of two opposing commentaries, Steven Rose argues that studies investigating possible links between race, gender and intelligence do no good. In the second, Stephen Ceci and Wendy M. Williams argue that such research is both morally defensible and important for the pursuit of truth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

See Editorial, page 763 , and online at http://www.nature.com/darwin . Discuss this commentary package on Nature Networks .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rose, S. Should scientists study race and IQ? NO: Science and society do not benefit. Nature 457, 786–788 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/457786a

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/457786a

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing