Editorial | Published:

A lifesaving arrangement

Nature volume 457, page 236 (15 January 2009) | Download Citation

George Bush's AIDS programme needs leadership and support from the Obama administration.

The focus of president-elect Barack Obama's incoming administration is understandably green jobs and a stimulus package to revive the flagging economy. But officials should not neglect one of George W. Bush's few well-received initiatives: the President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief (PEPFAR).

“The same stigma and denial driving the AIDS epidemic around the world can also be found in the United States.”

Unveiled in 2003, PEPFAR is a massive international programme to help those infected with HIV. More than 2 million people have been treated under its auspices, and it is widely hailed for proving that lifesaving AIDS treatments can be administered anywhere in the world — even in very poor countries where health systems were thought to be inadequate for the task (see page 254). But the programme now faces a long list of challenges. The first is to rid itself of scientifically unsound restrictions that prevent it from meeting its full potential. Examples include rules, imposed to satisfy the US religious right, that committed part of its funds to education on sexual abstinence and that made it difficult for organizations receiving PEPFAR funds to work with people at high risk of contracting HIV, such as prostitutes. The abstinence provisions have now been softened, but many restrictions remain, such as ill-advised policies preventing PEPFAR funding recipients from integrating with family-planning groups.

Another challenge is to convince Congress to spend the $48 billion it authorized for the programme's continuation last summer — before the domestic and world economies imploded. Yet another is to expand PEPFAR to reach AIDS sufferers who still desperately need care.

Then there is the challenge of prevention, an area in which health officials acknowledge they have not made much headway, even as consensus grows that this is the key to stopping the epidemic. And perhaps most difficult of all is the challenge of sustaining PEPFAR in the future. AIDS cannot yet be cured, only held at bay. So PEPFAR must make a lifetime commitment to monitor the patients it is now serving, enrol them on antiretroviral treatment once they need it, and help them switch to new therapies as they develop drug resistance. This means that the programme will become much more expensive if it is to maintain its beneficial momentum.

For PEPFAR to navigate these challenges successfully, Obama will need to appoint a programme leader with scientific integrity and global stature. Meanwhile, PEPFAR's success abroad has led some to ask whether it is time for an equivalent programme within the United States, where public-health officials have stumbled badly in their efforts to fight the disease. Last year, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Georgia, revealed it had underestimated the number of new HIV infections by 40%. There are serious barriers to HIV testing, such as inadequate policies to ensure people get tested and pay for the tests, and hundreds of thousands of those infected with the virus don't know they have it. The death in December of Christine Maggiore, an HIV-positive Los Angeles woman who argued that HIV does not cause AIDS, highlighted the fact that the same stigma and denial driving the epidemic around the world can also be found in the United States.

Doctors, activists and scientists have urged the United States to fill the vacant post of AIDS adviser at the White House to revitalize domestic efforts against the disease. They are also calling for a national AIDS policy to govern funding akin to PEPFAR's rules, under which aid recipients must explain how the funding fits their national goals to fight the epidemic. Obama should heed these calls, which would represent a significant step towards restoring the country's status as a leader in global health — both abroad and at home.

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/457236a

Authors

    Comments

    By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

    Newsletter Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing